濮阳东方男科医院割包皮手术安全放心(濮阳东方医院看男科病收费高不高) (今日更新中)

EVANSVILLE, Ind. — An Indiana teen has died after attempting an internet challenge called the “choking challenge,” according to his parents. Mason Bogard’s mother, Joann Bogard, shared a message on Facebook Sunday saying she wanted the information about his death to come from the family. “We’ve learned that Mason attempted a challenge that he saw on social media and it went horribly wrong,” Joann wrote. “The challenge that Mason tried was the choking challenge. The choking challenge is based on the idea that you choke yourself to the point of almost passing out and then stop. It’s supposed to create a type of high. Unfortunately, it has taken the lives of many young people too early and it will take our precious Mason.”Mason was rushed to the hospital where his mother says he remained on life support until they determined he could not survive. “Over the last several days the amazing staff at the Deaconess Hospital has done everything they can to bring Mason back to us. Unfortunately, we will not have the opportunity to experience so many things with our child because of a stupid challenge on social media,” her post read. On Monday, Mason became an organ donor. Joann posted on Facebook that her son would save six people’s lives. “While we are devastated that we will never experience so many things with Mason again, we are able to find some comfort in the fact that Mason will save the lives of others. He would have wanted it this way," she wrote. "He was an extremely generous young man.”She also issued a plea to parents to pay attention to what their children are doing on social media, so that another family doesn’t have to go through the same pain that they have. “Finally, we want to plead with you from the bottom of our hearts ... please pay attention to what your children look at on social media," the mother wrote. "I know our kids always complain that we're being too overprotective but it's ok, it's our job.” 1956

Close calls between drones and airplanes are on the rise. Researchers now say drones could be more deadly than collisions with birds.Pilot Jake Fredericks was coming in for a landing when he says a drone shot up right in front of him, coming up through the clouds when he was on instrument approach.He estimates it was only 200 feet in front of him."I felt like my life flashed before my eyes, you know if we would have hit that thing, that could have potentially been death for us," he said.Pilot Jeff Munford told us last year about his close call with a drone as he flew over the Georgia-Florida line. Nationwide, reports of drone sightings by pilots has shot up nearly 91 percent since 2015.FAA rules prohibit people from flying drones within five miles of an airport or above 400 feet without permission.The I-Team found Florida pilots reported 288 close calls with drones last year, including two dozen in the Tampa Bay area.Kevin Poorman of the University of Dayton's research institute has been doing bird strike testing for more than two decades.His researchers fired both a replica bird and a two pound drone at a wing."If you look from the exterior, it looks like the bird does more external damage, but the drone had the ability to immediately puncture right through and carry farther to do more damage," Poorman said. "If you go to a 10 pound drone, that's five times the energy."Pilot and Drone instructor Jason Lorenzon believes it's important to teach drone pilots the rules of the sky, especially as the FAA expects the number of drones to approach 3 million by 2022."You can go and pick one of these up off Amazon and it doesn't come with that extensive of a pilot operating handbook, let alone rules of the national airspace system. How do you expect Joe Consumer who just purchased it to know the rules?" he said. 1845

CHICAGO, Ill. – United Airlines plans to cut its flight schedule amid a drop in demand due to the spread of the novel coronavirus, according to multiple reports. 174

Education Secretary Betsy DeVos is facing another lawsuit over the department's loan forgiveness program aimed at helping defrauded students.More than 150,000 applications are pending, and some borrowers have been waiting years to hear whether they'll be granted debt relief. Seven borrowers, all of whom attended for-profit colleges, filed the lawsuit Tuesday."Department officials have not offered a timetable for reviewing these applications. It's becoming very clear that they're not treating them in good faith," said Eileen Connor, legal director at the Project on Predatory Student Lending, which filed the case on behalf of the seven borrowers.The department stopped processing claims under DeVos, who wants to rewrite the Obama-era rule that allows defrauded students to seek loan forgiveness.But a federal judge -- siding with Democratic attorneys general from 18 states and the District of Columbia -- ruled that DeVos' freeze was "arbitrary and capricious" and ordered immediate implementation of the rule in October.Still, the department did not process any more claims through the end of last year, according to the latest data available, and Connor says there's been no indication that it has started to review them again.The Department of Education did not immediately respond to a request for comment.DeVos has called the rule, known as Borrower Defense to Repayment, "bad policy." She's proposed offering partial loan forgiveness for qualifying students instead, based on the income of their peers who attended similar programs at other colleges. The plan would save the government .7 billion over a 10-year period compared with the Obama version, the department said.Department officials have argued that they cannot process claims while another lawsuit is ongoing. The agency was also sued over the proposal to offer partial forgiveness."Until we have clear direction from the court, or a different methodology that we think doesn't run the same challenges -- yes, we are in a holding pattern for students that are probably eligible for partial relief," said Diane Auer Jones, principal deputy under secretary, at an event at the 2165

Chris Matthews, the longtime host of MSNBC's "Hardball," announced his retirement effectively immediately at the start of the program Monday evening. When he said "immediately," he meant it. Matthews gave a brief statement at the beginning of the program, and did not finish the show. MSNBC political director Steve Kornacki, who expressed his surprise by the decision, filled in for the rest of the program. Matthews joined MSNBC in 1999, after "Hardball" was aired on CNBC from 1997 to 1999. Matthews' retirement comes just days after a tweet by GQ's Laura Bassett saying that Matthews had acted inappropriately toward her. "In 2017, I wrote about a cable news host being gross and inappropriate with me. I was afraid to name him at the time," she 762

来源：资阳报