濮阳东方医院评价好不好(濮阳东方评价高) (今日更新中)

Waiting in line is a necessary fate of travel, especially when dealing with security at the airport. It's the reason Trusted Traveler Programs like TSA Precheck and Clear are gaining more traction. "Cut lines. You know, time. Time is money, time is precious, and we need that," Clear customer Shavit Rootman says.The benefit is a faster security process, which also leads to a larger number of what the airline industry calls "trusted travelers".“What we're doing is providing a high level of security and certainty that the person that we're presenting is actually the person that they say they are," Clear Executive Vice President Howard Kass says.But the convenience only comes if you're willing to give up some private information. A form of identification, a photo and a fingerprint are necessary to become a part of the system. No need to be worried, though. Programs say your information isn't sold or shared, and it's well protected. When it comes down to it, the power is in your hands, whether you opt in or not."I don't really worry about the information side of it," says Craig Weller, a customer of both TSA Prechec and Clear. "I think most of that stuff is going to be tracked no matter what you do, so it's not that big of a deal to me, and I have nothing to hide." So, what are these programs? International travelers are often familiar with Global Entry, Nexus and Sentri. Those fall under the control of Customs and Border Protection. But the most popular programs here in the U.S. are TSA Precheck and Clear. TSA Precheck is run by the federal government, and Clear is a private company that coordinates with airports across the country.When taking a closer look at the details, TSA Precheck will cost you for five years. That breaks down to per year. Clear is 9 per year. But before considering cost, it is important to know what each program offers. With TSA Precheck, you won't have to go through the traditional security process."They are allowed to leave their shoes on at the checkpoint, and their belts. They're allowed to leave their lightweight jackets on, they can leave their electronics in their carry-on bag. They don't have to take out their laptops," Lisa Farbstein says. Farbstein is a spokesperson for the Transportation Security Administration.Clear, on the other hand, is a way to skip all lines, including the one at TSA Precheck."I got Clear because at this point there are so many people using TSA Precheck that sometimes the wait is just as long there," Weller said.When it comes to availability, TSA Precheck is in more than 200 airports nationwide, and Clear is in 30. That may not sound like a lot, but travelers say it really depends where you're going."Clear… it's growing so it's in a lot of places, but it's still not in a lot of the places i travel to, so it would only help me here," TSA Precheck customer Mike Lutz says."Most of the major airports now have it. They've been growing I think quickly enough that most of the time it's available," Weller says.How you join each program is also something to consider. For TSA Precheck, you need to make an appointment for an interview, but with Clear, you can do everything online."For Clear it's really easy. It's basically just online," Weller says. "You enter maybe a passport number or a social or something like that and it's almost instantaneous. With TSA Precheck there's an interview, you have to go to a border patrol place, and it's more of a process."Aside from their differences, both TSA Precheck and Clear say the programs are designed to complement each other."I don't want to get to the airport two hours in advance just in case the line's terrible, and if I have Clear and TSA Precheck, I can always cut that window down to about half an hour in advance and still make my flight," Weller says.Each of these programs has its perks. Clear will get you to the front of the security checkpoint faster, and TSA Precheck will get you through that checkpoint without the hassle of taking off your shoes. However, as more people sign up for precheck, those lines get longer as well, so if you're a frequent flyer and you believe "time is money," it may be worth it to sign up for both. 4215

WHITFIELD COUNTY, Ga. – A Georgia driver made it out alive after he rear-ended a log truck, and his car was impaled by logs from the front windshield to the back window.Fortunately, the driver suffered only minor injuries, Whitfield County Fire Chief Edward O'Brien told CNN 286

Uranium ore stored at the Grand Canyon National Park museum may have exposed visitors and workers to elevated levels of radiation, according to the park's safety, health and wellness manager.Elston Stephenson told CNN that he began asking officials from the National Park Service and Department of the Interior last summer to warn workers and tourists they had possibly been exposed to unsafe levels of radiation. After his requests were ignored, he said he sent an email to all park staff at the Grand Canyon on February 4."If you were in the Museum Collections Building (bldg 2C) between the year 2000 and June 18, 2018, you were 'exposed' to uranium by OSHA's definition," said the email, which Stephenson provided to CNN."Please understand, this doesn't mean that you're somehow contaminated, or that you are going to have health issues. It merely means essentially that there was uranium on the site and you were in its presence. ... And by law we are supposed to tell you."The National Park Service is investigating what happened and working with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration and the Arizona Department of Health Services, according to the Department of the Interior, which oversees the park service."Uranium naturally occurs in the rocks of Grand Canyon National Park. A recent survey of the Grand Canyon National Park's museum collection facility found radiation levels at 'background' levels -- the amount always present in the environment -- and below levels of concern for public health and safety. There is no current risk to the public or Park employees," the department said in a statement provided to CNN. The National Park Service also said there is "no current risk" to the public or park employees."The museum collection facility is open and employee work routines have continued as normal," Emily Davis, spokeswoman for the Grand Canyon National Park, said in a statement. "The NPS takes public and employee safety and the response to allegations seriously. We will share additional information about this matter as the investigation continues."Stephenson told CNN that in early June he found out about three 5-gallon buckets of uranium ore that had been stored next to a taxidermy exhibit at the park's museum for nearly two decades. He said he immediately contacted a park service radiation specialist to report the danger.According to a report from a park service radiation safety officer who responded to Stephenson's request on June 14, 2018, testing results were positive for radioactivity above background levels near the buckets, but elsewhere the radiation levels were not elevated.Still, according to the report, the park service decided to remove the buckets on June 18 and dispose of the contents in the nearby Lost Orphan uranium mine, where the ore had come from.Stephenson told CNN that park service workers were inadequately prepared to handle the radioactive material, moving the buckets wearing gardening gloves purchased at a general store, and using mop handles to lift the buckets into pickups for transport.Stephenson said that after trying and failing for months to get National Park Service officials to inform employees and the public about the possible uranium exposure, he filed a complaint with OSHA in November.The next day, Stephenson said, OSHA sent inspectors in protective suits to check the museum and found that park service workers brought the buckets back to the park facility after dumping the uranium ore."OSHA has an open investigation on the issue that was initiated on November 28," OSHA spokesman Leo Kay said in statement to CNN, declining to comment further on an active investigation.Staff for US Rep. Tom O'Halleran, D-Arizona, met with Stephenson in December, according to Cody Uhing, the congressman's communications director."We flagged this to the Natural Resources Committee, which is responsible for oversight for that area. They and we have requested the Department of the Interior's Office of the Inspector General to look into it and provide us with a report," Uhing said.The Department of the Interior's Office of the Inspector General confirmed Tuesday that it had received a letter from O'Halleran and that it would review it.Anna Erickson, associate professor of nuclear and radiological engineering at Georgia Tech, said the uranium exposure at the museum is unlikely to have been hazardous to visitors."Uranium ore contains natural (unenriched) uranium which emits relatively low amounts of radiation," Erickson said. "Given the extremely low reading (zero above background) 5 feet away from the bucket, I'm skeptical there could be any health hazards associated with visiting the exhibit."Stephenson told CNN that tours of schoolchildren often walked by the buckets at the museum, but his larger concern was for park employees and high school interns working near the uranium every day."A safe workplace really is a human right," he said. 4984

When Michael Jackson superfan Myriam Walter first saw the HBO "Leaving Neverland" documentary, in which two key witnesses gave a graphic account of sexual abuse at the hands of the star, she said she cried and wanted to vomit.Referring to Jackson's alleged pedophilia, the 62-year-old former French nurse said, "I know that it is not possible," despite having never met the star. "It was rotten. It was to make a buzz. It was to make money."Now she is among three groups of fans who are suing the two victims of Jackson's alleged abuse, Wade Robson and James Safechuck, in a French court, hoping to challenge a perceived smear of their idol, who died in 2009.Robson and Safechuck, now aged 41 and 37 respectively, alleged in the four-hour documentary that they endured years of sexual abuse by Jackson when they were minors in the late 1980s and early '90s.While neither are resident in France, they are being sued in that country where it is illegal to make criminal accusations against the deceased.US-based lawyers representing Robson and Safechuck said the pair had no comment to make on the case. Officials at the court in the northern city of Orleans, where the case was heard earlier this month, confirmed that the pair were not present and had no legal representation.Robson and Safechuck are being sued for a symbolic sum of one euro (.13) each, for "damaging the memory of the dead," the case claims."It is not about money, it is an affair of the heart," said Emmanuel Ludot, the lawyer representing the fans.Walter, president of one of the groups, MJ Community, which has 600 members, attended the first court hearing. Referring to Jackson, she said: "He had a great heart. It is not right to make these claims against someone who isn't even alive to defend themselves."The other groups, On The Line and MJ Street, accuse the documentary of revisionism and point to errors in the timeline of abuse provided by Safechuck.Brice Najar, president of On the Line and author of multiple books on Jackson, explained: "I wouldn't defend someone whatever the evidence, but he has already been acquitted and there have already been inquiries. I am in my 40s. I have kids."The tribunal said a decision would be delivered on October 4.'Their pain is sincere'The accusations in the documentary were not the first made against Jackson. In 1993, a 13-year-old boy accused the King of Pop of sexually molesting him over a five-month period. The case was settled when Jackson paid close to million.In 2013, Jackson was acquitted of abusing another child, also 13, who had cancer at the time of the alleged offense.Among the evidence presented by Ludot in court were written testimonies from tens of group members: several fans were diagnosed with depression and mental problems following the release of the documentary."I believe their pain is sincere," said Ludot, who in 2014 won a symbolic euro from Jackson's doctor, Conrad Murray, who was ruled to have caused fans distress for his part in the star's death.While the lawyer did not disclose his fee for the case, Walter confided that it was "expensive."Many of the French fans had booked tickets to Jackson's mammoth 50-show run, scheduled to take place in London's O2 arena in 2009-10. The concerts were canceled following the singer's death. Although tickets were around 800 euros, most of the fans did not ask for refund. "They held onto the tickets, like relics," explained Ludot. "For them, he is like Christ."Walter set up MJ Community, with the help of her first daughter, following Jackson's death. While pregnant with her daughter, she listened extensively to his music. "Jennifer [the daughter] has known Michael all her life," she said.That same year, MJ community helped organize a gathering of close to 4,000 fans in Paris to celebrate the life of the star. In 2010, the organization gained the legal status of a religion -- the first fan group in France ever to do so according to the group's lawyer and local media reports."I would do anything for him [Jackson]", said Walter, adding: "I would defend him until the end."Ludot said the legal battle has the full support of the Jackson family, who have previously called the film a "public lynching." The family also described Jackson's accusers as "admitted liars," in reference to sworn statements made by both Safechuck and Robson while Jackson was alive that he did not molest them.Ludot says he has been approached by Jackson fan groups from Switzerland, Sweden, Italy and elsewhere, to clear the pop legend's name via the French legal system.In a statement, John Branca, co-executor of Jackson's estate, wrote: "We remain hopeful that a victory in France will soon fuel a movement in the United States to finally explore changes in the law to afford defamation protection for the deceased."HBO, which made the documentary, shares a parent company (AT&T) with CNN. 4903

WASHINGTON – President Trump's 2020 campaign announced Monday that it will no longer credential Bloomberg News reporters for its events after the outlet said it would not conduct investigations into the Democratic presidential candidates, but would continue to probe the Trump administration."The decision by Bloomberg News to formalize preferential reporting policies is troubling and wrong," Brad Parscale, Trump's 2020 campaign manager, said in a statement.Bloomberg News 487

来源：资阳报