濮阳东方妇科非常的专业濮阳东方妇科医院咨询专家在线,濮阳东方医院治早泄口碑比较好,濮阳东方妇科医院做人流很好,濮阳东方男科医院评价好收费低,濮阳东方医院看病好,濮阳东方医院治阳痿口碑非常好,濮阳东方看男科技术好

The Democratic Party and CNN announced that the next Democratic Party debate, which will likely feature Joe Biden and Bernie Sanders, will be without an audience. CNN also announced that the media filing room and spin room, an area for journalists to gather interviews for reports, will also be closed. "CNN's top priority is the safety of our employees and community members," the network said in a statement. "This extends to guests planning to attend or cover our debate on March 15. At the request of the campaigns and out of an abundance of caution, we have made the decision to eliminate the debate live audience, the press filing center and spin room in Phoenix."Sunday's debate will be the first one-on-one debate between Biden and Sanders. Earlier on Tuesday, both campaigns canceled planned rallies that were slated to be held in Cleveland. The Cleveland area had three confirmed cases of COVID-19 on Monday."DNC has been in regular communication with local health officials and the Mayor's office, which advised that we could proceed as planned," DNC Communications Director Xochitl Hinojosa said in a statement. "Nevertheless, our number one priority has and will continue to be the safety of our staff, campaigns, Arizonans and all those involved in the debate. We will continue to remain in daily contact with all stakeholders through Sunday." 1369

The device looks similar to a taser, but acts more like a lasso with more and more police officers are adding it to their belt.“It will, much like a boomerang, wrap around the individuals extremities and prevent the individual from moving,” Los Angeles Police Department Chief Michel Moore said.LAPD is the most recent, and largest, police department to test the product. And their officers have to go through four hours of training to use it.“How could we provide the best tools and best options so officers would not have to resort to force, particularly deadly force,” Moore explained.Dozens of police departments around the U.S. are testing or have purchased the remote restraint device, including Sacramento, California, Fort Worth, Texas, and Minneapolis, Minnesota to name a few.“This tool is meant to be used early on in an encounter without causing pain to an individual,” Wrap Technologies Chief Operating Officer Mike Rothans said. He is a retired assistant sheriff with two children who work in law enforcement. The device works by releasing a cord that wraps around a person 20 to 25 feet away. On the end, there are metal anchors. The cord comes out of the device at 513 feet a second. At 10 feet, it drops to 270 feet a second.The devices costs ,000 a piece and are per use.“All you feel is maybe a metal slap from the anchors around each end of the cord. But it doesn’t really cause any pain,” Rothans said.Not everyone is convinced.What happens when someone’s in shorts or they’re in a skirt? What if they accidentally get someone’s neck?,” Cat Brooks, Co-founder of the Anti-Police Terror Project, explained. APTP is a coalition that works toward ending police terror.“We need to be transforming the way law enforcement engages with our community, not what weapons they have to be able to do so,” Brooks said.Rothans explained that one scenario the BolaWrap can be used in, is in the case of confronting someone dealing with a mental health problem.“Basically the issue with the mentally ill or dealing with people in crisis, isn’t unique to one particular area in the U.S.. It’s the same issue we see in small towns in Minnesota, or big cities like New York or Los Angeles,” he said. “Police officers have really become the de facto social services”People with severe mental illness are involved in at least one in four fatal police shootings, according to a study done by the Treatment Advocacy Center.“There’s really no reason to send a badge and a gun into that situation when you can send a mental health professional,” Brooks said.For officers, Rothans says this is a safer option that buys the responder some time.“This restricts their mobility and slows that individual down to allow officers to put a plan into place,” he explained.“There’s no perfect scenario or perfect formula,” Moore said during his press conference announcing the use of the device. 2899

The New Mexico State Police released video on Thursday of a wild wrong-way police chase from earlier in the month of a wrong-way driver that caused a semi to jackknife. 181

The COVID-19 outbreak has resulted in massive layoffs around the country. Millions of Americans have filed for unemployment benefits. If you are someone who needs to file for unemployment, there are a few things you need to know before signing up.Vicki Salemi, a career expert for Monster Jobs, says full-time and part-time workers can apply for unemployment benefits, which can provide monetary relief when you have been terminated from a job.And in some states, gig workers like Uber and Lyft drivers, can also file for unemployment benefits. “State rules and state eligibility differ,” Salemi explained. “Your best point of reference for your own state is to go to 680

The FBI, in a change of policy, is committing to inform state officials if local election systems have been breached, federal officials said Thursday.In the past, the FBI would alert local governments about attacks on their electoral systems without automatically sharing that information with the state. That meant state officials, left in the dark, might be in a position of certifying the accuracy of election results without realizing there had been problems in individual counties. Alerting local governments about breaches, but not the states, was in keeping with FBI policy of protecting the privacy and identities of the actual hacking victim.Now, though, the FBI will notify both counties victimized by breaches as well as the state’s chief election official — in most cases, the secretary of state. Under the new policy, that notification is to be done in person. The state will be notified either simultaneously or around the same time, officials said Thursday.The change is intended to bolster federal-state cooperation, which has often been difficult on electoral issues, and is one of several government efforts to rethink how information about cyber threats is shared and with whom. It may also ease concerns of local officials who in the past have complained about the lack of information they’ve received from the federal government, though cooperation has improved ahead of the 2020 election with concerns that Russia or another nation could try to tamper with the vote. The policy change was shared with state officials on Thursday and made public later in the day. Senior officials from the FBI and Justice Department described the outlines of it to The Associated Press ahead of the formal release on condition of anonymity.State elections officials praised the change, saying the notifications are essential to securing elections in their states. The secretaries of state in Ohio, Colorado and West Virginia issued a joint statement calling it a “good step forward in protecting” elections.California Secretary of State Alex Padilla told The Associated Press that state election officials play an important role in supporting local election officials. “It’s imperative that we work together not just in the proper administration of elections but in the proper security of elections,” Padilla said. “It’s us at the state level that can connect dots if things are happening in multiple jurisdictions in our state.”Federal officials say their goal is to sound the alarm louder and at higher levels of government than in past years, ensuring that information about efforts to interfere in the election reaches the state officials who need it the most and who have the best resources to deal with it. That is especially important since federal officials believe Russian agents in 2016 searched for vulnerabilities within election systems in all 50 states.Though the policy change means that a broader audience of government officials will learn of any intrusion, it does not guarantee that the American public will as well. FBI officials say they will continue to protect the privacy of individual hacking victims, including governmental offices or local elections systems, by not sharing their identities with the public. It will remain up to electoral officials to disclose if they’ve been hacked, or if they are working with the FBI. That stance has been a source of contention between federal law enforcement and state and local officials. The public still does not know, for instance, which two Florida counties were breached by Russian agents in 2016 and members of the congressional delegation said they were barred by federal officials from sharing that information following a briefing they attended.Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis said last May that he was frustrated when he saw a reference to the Florida hacking in special counsel Robert Mueller’s report on Russan interference in the 2016 election. DeSantis said he signed an agreement with the FBI not to disclose the names of the two counties where hackers gained access to the voting database and that his predecessor as governor did not have access to the information.Rep. Stephanie Murphy, a Florida Democrat, has co-sponsored bipartisan legislation that would compel reporting among federal, state and local officials and to voters potentially affected by a breach. On Thursday, she called the FBI’s announcement welcome but not enough and said she would continue to push for federal officials to release more information when foreign powers interfere with the election.“Our citizens will then be in a position to check their voter registration data to confirm it wasn’t tampered with and to hold accountable state and local officials who fail to protect election infrastructure,” Murphy said in a statement. Another sponsor of the bill, Republican Rep. Michael Waltz, praised the new policy but said he would “continue to press for voters to be eventually included.” The FBI policy does not cover more routine cyber activity, such as scanning for network vulnerabilities. But it would extend to sophisticated spear-phishing campaigns, aimed at tricking employees into giving up their log-in credentials, and other acts that officials see as particularly alarming and think must be communicated both to the county and the state.The policy comes two months after the Office of the Director of National Intelligence released a broad framework for how and in what circumstances to notify the public about foreign election interference, laying out general considerations for the government to take into account.When it comes to notifying states, one FBI official told the AP there was confusion in the past about who was receiving information and in what circumstances — issues the new policy is meant to address. The official said the policy is meant to ensure that one party does not hear it from the other before hearing it from the federal government.____Associated Press writer Christina A. Cassidy in Atlanta contributed to this report.Follow Eric Tucker on Twitter at 6064