濮阳东方医院治疗早泄评价比较好-【濮阳东方医院】,濮阳东方医院,濮阳东方评价很好,濮阳东方医院男科收费标准,濮阳东方医院做人流可靠,濮阳东方医院技术先进,濮阳东方看男科口碑非常高,濮阳东方医院男科治疗阳痿价格收费透明
濮阳东方医院治疗早泄评价比较好濮阳市东方医院价格低,濮阳东方医院割包皮手术安全吗,濮阳东方医院妇科专家怎么样,濮阳东方男科医院收费透明,濮阳东方妇科值得信赖,濮阳东方医院男科治疗早泄评价非常好,濮阳东方医院妇科做人流手术口碑怎么样
Attorneys general in 20 states and the District of Columbia filed a lawsuit Thursday challenging a federal regulation that could allow blueprints for making guns on 3D printers to be posted on the internet. New York Attorney General Tish James, who helped lead the coalition of state attorneys general, argued that posting the blueprints would allow anyone to go online and use the downloadable files to create unregistered and untraceable assault-style weapons that could be difficult to detect. The lawsuit, joined by California, Washington and 17 other states, was filed in U.S. District Court in Seattle. It is likely to reignite a fierce debate over the use of 3D-printed firearms and is the latest in a series of attempts by state law enforcement officials to block the Trump administration from easing the accessibility of the blueprints. Proponents have argued there is a constitutional right to publish the material, but critics counter that making the blueprints readily accessible online could lead to an increase in gun violence and put weapons in the hands of criminals who are legally prohibited from owning them. Washington state’s attorney general Bob Ferguson said a previous multi-state lawsuit led a federal judge last year to strike down the administration’s earlier attempt to allow the files to be distributed.“Why is the Trump administration working so hard to allow domestic abusers, felons and terrorists access to untraceable, undetectable 3D-printed guns?” Ferguson said in a statement.For years, law enforcement officials have been trying to draw attention to the dangers posed by the so-called ghost guns, which contain no registration numbers that could be used to trace them. A federal judge in November blocked an earlier attempt by the Trump administration to allow the files to be released online, arguing that the government had violated the law on procedural grounds. But the administration published formal rules on Thursday that transfer the regulation of 3D-printed guns from the State Department to the Commerce Department, which could open the door to making the blueprints available online.The state attorneys general argue the government is breaking the law and say such deregulation will “make it far easier for individuals ineligible to possess firearms under state or federal law to obtain a deadly weapon without undergoing a background check,” according to the lawsuit. They also argue that the Commerce Department lacks the power to properly regulate 3D-printed guns. “Ghost Guns endanger every single one of us,” James said in a statement. “While the president and his Administration know these homemade weapons pose an imminent threat, he continues to cater to the gun lobby — risking the lives of millions of Americans.” In 2015, Cody Wilson and his company Defense Distributed sued the federal government after it told him to remove online blueprints of a 3D-printed gun. The State Department reached a settlement with the company in 2018 and removed the 3D gun-making plans from a list of weapons or technical data that are not allowed to be exported. But a coalition of state attorneys general filed a lawsuit to stop the maneuver, arguing that undetectable plastic guns pose a national security risk. The Justice Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the lawsuit filed Thursday. In addition to Washington, California and New York, the states suing are: Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, North Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont and Virginia as well as the District of Columbia.“We successfully challenged the Trump administration’s first reckless attempt, and we will continue to fight against this latest attack on the safety of our communities,″ California Attorney General Xavier Becerra said in a statement.___Grygiel reported from Seattle. 3942
Be honest. How often do you read the fine print when signing important documents? It turns out some people read the fine print, and in one case, it earned a woman ,000. SquareMouth, an insurance company that provides travel coverage, launched a contest last month that stated that the first person to contact the company would win a ,000 prize. The catch was that the contest's announcement was buried within the fine print of an insurance contract. Donelan Andrews of Georgia read about the contest on Page 7 of her insurance contract. It only took 23 hours after the contest began for SquareMouth to find a winner. According to the company, it had sold 73 policies with contest information before Andrews contacted them. Andrews said in a press release that she, as a home economics and family consumer science teacher, emphasizes reading the fine print to her students. “I used to put a question like that midway through an exam, saying ‘If you’re reading this, skip the next question.’ That caught my eye and intrigued me to keep reading," she said. SquareMouth launched the contest as a way to highlight the importance of reading the details of a contract. "Over the past 16 years, we’ve learned that many travelers buy travel insurance and just assume they’re covered if anything goes wrong, without actually reading the details of their policy," the company said in a release. "However, this often leads to claims for losses that are not covered. This lack of understanding is one of the biggest reasons travel insurance claims are denied."SquareMouth also made a ,000 contribution to Reading Is Fundamental, as well as ,000 to the two schools where Andrews teaches. Andrews is going to use the winnings to go on another trip, this time to Scotland with her husband for their wedding anniversary. 1827
An employee in the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives headquarters building Thursday opened a package that contained a liquid substance and the employee said she felt sick right after opening it, according to law enforcement officials.It is not clear what the substance is, one of the officials told CNN. The mail is screened off site so it is unclear if this package was delivered some other way or if it made it through screening, said one official.The headquarters in Washington, DC, was evacuated after the suspicious package was discovered.A HAZMAT crew responded to the scene and left the building shortly before 4:40 p.m. Thursday, according to April Langwell, the head of ATF Public Affairs.Langwell said that the field test of the substance is "clear" and they are sending the substance that was found in an envelope opened by an employee to a lab for further analysis. She said the package was "not the usual suspicious package."Langwell told CNN that it appears that only one person was affected by the package, which was opened at about 2:30 p.m. Thursday.There were still first responders in the building as of 5 p.m. Thursday, but people were being allowed back into the building.Police, firefighters and paramedics from Washington, DC, responded to the scene. 1303
Attorneys for Nicholas Sandmann, the Covington teenager who became the center of a social media controversy in January, are suing the Washington Post, accusing it of defamation and a "reckless disregard of the facts and truth."L. Lin Wood filed a federal suit Tuesday demanding the publication pay 0 million — 330
Authorities say at least four people have died after severe storms swept across parts of the U.S. South. Three people were killed in Louisiana, including an elderly couple found near their trailer home Saturday by firefighters.In Texas, one person died when a car flipped into a creek. Tornadoes have destroyed homes in Arkansas and Missouri and also caused damage in Oklahoma. The storms also unleashed downpours that caused widespread flash flooding. Weather forecasters issued tornado warnings for parts of Mississippi. 534