濮阳市东方医院比较好-【濮阳东方医院】,濮阳东方医院,濮阳东方医院男科看早泄技术好,濮阳东方医院妇科预约挂号,濮阳东方男科评价非常好,濮阳东方医院看男科病口碑好收费低,濮阳东方医院做人流非常好,濮阳东方医院看早泄技术很靠谱

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) -- An Australian national and his Long Beach business partner are accused of siphoning more than million from the State of California in a years-long charter school scheme. According to the San Diego District Attorney, the pair sought out small school districts with limited experience in oversight and proposed they start online charter schools to earn more public funds. Sean McManus, 46, and Jason Schrock, 44, the CEO and president of A3 Education, along with nine other people named in the case have been indicted in San Diego County. Criminal counts include conspiracy, misappropriation of public funds, paying for student information and conflict of interest.A year-long investigation uncovered a massive scheme in which McManus and Schrock told subordinates and co-defendants to open a total of 19 charter schools in both San Diego County and statewide, according to the DA. The charter schools are listed below: Valiant Academy San DiegoValiant Academy Los AngelesValiant Academy Santa BarbaraCA STEAM San BernardinoCA STEAM SonomaCA STEAM Sonoma IICA STEAM Santa BarbaraUplift California MontereyUplift California NorthUplift California SouthUplift California Santa BarbaraCalifornia Academy of Sports ScienceCalifornia Academy of Sports Science FresnoCalifornia Vanguard FresnoUniversity PrepUniversity Prep FresnoUniversity Prep San BernardinoCalifornia Prep Sutter K-7California Prep Sutter 8-12 “These defendants engaged in a devious, systematic public corruption scheme on the backs of students, their parents and the public that over time diverted millions of taxpayer dollars into their own pockets,” District Attorney Summer Stephan said. “Our team of investigators and prosecutors uncovered widespread misappropriation of public funds that extends across the state.”Co-defendants in the case who worked under McManus and Schrock at the charter schools reportedly failed to disclose their relationship with the men when starting the schools, claiming to be the schools’ leaders. McManus is charged with 64 counts and is facing more than 40 years in prison if convicted. Schrock is charged with 62 counts and also faces more than 40 years in prison, Stephan said. On top of creating the charter schools, both McManus and Schrock are accused of running another scam that paid athletic organizations for student information. The pair reportedly paid pre-existing youth programs as little as per student for enrollment documentation and would then enroll the students into a charter school during the summer, collecting roughly ,000 per student from the state. McManus and Schrock are then accused of transferring more than million in public charter school funds into companies the pair own or control. Instead of spending the money on education, once the money was in private bank accounts, both men are accused of using the funds for themselves and their families. According to authorities, McManus and Schrock used the money to invest in startup companies, real estate, and wired money directly to themselves or family members. Most of the money obtained from the state ended up in the pockets of McManus and Schrock, the District Attorney's office said. San Diego's District Attorney held a news conference Wednesday morning. Watch the conference in the player below: 3326
SAN DIEGO (KGTV) — Among the propositions that will be on the November ballot in California, Proposition 17 will ask voters to decide whether or not to allow individuals on parole to vote.Voters will vote "yes" or "no" on the proposition, which is an amendment to the state's constitution introduced by Sacramento Assemblymember Kevin McCarty, according to BallotPedia.In California, those who are "mentally incompetent or imprisoned or on parole for the conviction of a felony" for a state or federal sentence are not allowed to vote.The passage of Proposition 17 would instead direct the state to only disqualify those who are currently serving a sentence for the conviction of a felony and allow those on parole for a felony conviction to vote."Parole is not an extension of punishment. It's a reintegration time for someone to come back in their community," says Shay Franco-Clausen, the Yes on Prop 17 Campaign Manager. "What better way to make them feel that they have a stake in the community is there than giving the right to them."Those who support Prop 17 argue, "when a person completes their prison sentence, they should be encouraged to reenter society and have a stake in their community. Restoring their voting rights does that. Civic engagement is connected to lower rates of recidivism. When people feel that they are valued members of their community, they are less likely to return to prison," according to the official support statement.19 other states, plus Washington DC currently allow ex-felons to vote while they're on parole. And the Yes on Prop 17 campaign points to a 2011 study by the Florida Parole Commission that showed parolees who are given the right to vote are less likely to commit another crime."If you're invested in your community and you feel like you are stakeholders, you're part of it. You don't want to do harm," say Franco-Clausen.Opponents to the Proposition declined interview requests by ABC 10News, pointing to their published literature instead.In it, they say, "Parole is an adjustment period when violent felons prove their desire to adjust to behaving properly in a free society. Their every move is monitored and supervised by a trained state officer. If the state does not trust them to choose where to live or travel, with whom to associate and what jobs to do, it MUST NOT trust them with decisions that will impact the lives and finances of all other members of society..."Proposition 17 will allow criminals convicted of murder, rape, sexual assault against children, kidnapping, assault, gang gun crimes, and human trafficking to vote before completing their sentence including parole."Proposition 17 started as ACA 6, and passed the State Assembly and Senate with 70% approval. It now needs a simple majority to become law. 2794

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) -- A San Diego school was briefly locked down after shots were fired near the school Monday afternoon. According to San Diego Police, officers responded to the 5100 block of Ewing Street near San Diego State University after 1 p.m. to investigate reports of shots fired. Due to the investigation, the nearby Language Academy was briefly placed on lockdown. Witnesses say they heard five or six shots being fired. Police also found a small amount blood in the area, but no victim was located. 517
SAN DIEGO (KGTV) - Active-duty troops are deployed at or around the San Ysidro Port of Entry in southern San Diego County, the Department of Defense said Friday, marking the start of a military response to the U.S.-Mexico border amid immigration concerns.More than 7,000 American service members have been deployed due to word of a migrant caravan moving up from South America, according to the Associated Press. The troops may eventually number 15,000, President Trump said Wednesday.As of Friday, one week after the Pentagon acknowledged that Defense Secretary Jim Mattis had approved a Department of Homeland Security request for military support at the border, the troop deployment was still unfolding, with about 3,500 at staging bases in the Southwest. Of those, about 2,250 active duty troops are at staging bases in Texas, about 1,100 Marines are at Camp Pendleton in California and fewer than 200 are in Arizona. RELATED: Interactive map: Migrant caravan journeys to U.S.-Mexico borderThe mix of forces includes military police, an assault helicopter battalion, various communications, medical and headquarters units, combat engineers, planners and public affairs units.Most of the troops are being used to facilitate the movement of border patrol agents, house them, feed them and provide some of their protection.The Pentagon is adamant that active-duty troops will not do law enforcement, which they are forbidden from doing under the Posse Comitatus Act in the Constitution. Troops can't arrest people at the border. Their main job will be to support the Border Patrol.RELATED: Pentagon rejects border troop request from DHSThis means the military will transport border patrol agents to and along the border, help them erect additional vehicle barriers and fencing along the border, assist them with communications and provide some security for border agent camps. The military also will provide the border patrol agents with medical care, pre-packaged meals, and temporary housing.Many of the troops will be armed. Military police at the border will carry weapons, although they will have non-lethal options for dealing with unexpected conflict. Pentagon officials say they are planning for a worst-case scenario of violence that could force soldiers to rely on their training to make split-second decisions to defend themselves or civilians. MPs might, for example, be dispatched to provide armed security for military engineers placing barricades at locations where there are no border patrol agents to provide protection.PHOTOS: Troops deployed to U.S.-Mexico border / Migrant caravan travels across MexicoOne day after Trump suggested soldiers on the southwest border may open fire if migrants throw rocks at them, he insisted Friday that he meant that rock-throwers would be arrested. "I didn't say 'shoot,'" he told reporters at the White House. Either way, his scenario of violence captures in a nutshell the risk of using active duty troops for domestic security: Their mission does not include confronting migrants, but some may be unable to avoid it.The commander in charge of the military operation, Air Force Gen. Terrence O'Shaughnessy, head of U.S. Northern Command, said earlier this week that handling migrants will be primarily the job of the Customs and Border Protection agency. But he acknowledged "there could be incidental interaction" between migrants and soldiers. In light of that possibility, the soldiers "are going to be fully trained in how to do that," he said.Lt. Col. Jamie Davis, a Pentagon spokesman, said the military will not disclose details of its rules on the use of force.RELATED: Troops at the border are limited in what they can doIn Texas, troops installed coils of razor wire on a bridge and riverbank near Brownsville. The same type of wire was visible in video released by the Pentagon showing staging in California’s San Joaquin Valley.Some residents of Texas’ Rio Grande Valley expressed concerns to the Associated Press about a large military presence in the area.Emmanuel Torres, 19, said the area feels "a lot like family," and he worries the military presence will fuel outsiders' perceptions of a dysfunctional border.RELATED: Timeline: Migrant caravan headed to border"People that don't live here are just going to create a bigger negative image," Torres said.When the caravan arrives, the migrants may legally seek asylum.Father Neil Wilkinson, known as ‘Father Pepe’, is part of the San Diego Rapid Response Network, which is gearing up to help the potential influx of migrants.“All kinds of groups are getting together to put things together. If people cross, we want to receive them; people are hungry, they may need clothing. It’s just humanitarian assistance,” said Father Wilkinson.The Associated Press contributed to this report. 4828
SAN DIEGO (KGTV) - Adam Shacknai testified Monday in the wrongful death civil lawsuit filed by the family of Rebecca Zahau, whose body was found hanging at the Spreckels Mansion in Coronado.The San Diego County Medical Examiner’s office ruled Zahau’s death was a suicide. Zahau’s family believes she was murdered at the home on 1043 Ocean Blvd.Adam Shacknai, the brother of Zahau’s boyfriend Jonah, told investigators he removed Zahau’s body from the balcony about 6:45 a.m. the morning of July 13, 2011.In testimony, Shacknai said he called 911.Investigators found her body on the ground, her hands and feet bound with red rope. The same red rope was discovered hanging over the balcony.Shacknai had been staying in the mansion's guest house at the time of Zahau's death.RELATED: Interactive timeline of Rebecca Zahau?case / Lead investigator testifies in wrongful death lawsuit / Coronado death investigation photosShacknai testified Monday he liked Zahau, and she liked him.Zahau was found dead just days after the young son of her boyfriend suffered serious brain injuries after a fall at the home while he was in Zahau’s care.6-year-old Max Shacknai died from his injuries. Authorities later ruled his death accidental. 1242
来源:资阳报