阜阳皮肤发炎治疗好的医院阜阳皮肤科医院几点关,阜阳哪家荨麻疹医院好点,阜阳三蓬塔治疗皮肤病的医院,阜阳市好的湿疹医院,阜阳皮肤病治疗办法,安徽阜阳市治疗皮肤病专科医院,阜阳荨麻疹的治疗好医院

U.S. officials sought to determine Sunday whether extremist groups had infiltrated police brutality protests across the country and deliberately tipped largely peaceful demonstrations toward violence — and if foreign adversaries were behind a burgeoning disinformation campaign on social media.As demonstrations spread from Minneapolis to the White House, New York City and overseas, federal law enforcement officials insisted far-left groups were stoking violence. Meanwhile, experts who track extremist groups also reported seeing evidence of the far-right at work.Investigators were also tracking online interference and looking into whether foreign agents were behind the effort. Officials have seen a surge of social media accounts with fewer than 200 followers created in the last month, a textbook sign of a disinformation effort.The accounts have posted graphic images of the protests, material on police brutality and material on the coronavirus pandemic that appeared designed to inflame tensions across the political divide, according to three administration officials. The officials spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss investigations.The investigations are an attempt to identify the network of forces behind some of the most widespread 1268

When Michael Jackson superfan Myriam Walter first saw the HBO "Leaving Neverland" documentary, in which two key witnesses gave a graphic account of sexual abuse at the hands of the star, she said she cried and wanted to vomit.Referring to Jackson's alleged pedophilia, the 62-year-old former French nurse said, "I know that it is not possible," despite having never met the star. "It was rotten. It was to make a buzz. It was to make money."Now she is among three groups of fans who are suing the two victims of Jackson's alleged abuse, Wade Robson and James Safechuck, in a French court, hoping to challenge a perceived smear of their idol, who died in 2009.Robson and Safechuck, now aged 41 and 37 respectively, alleged in the four-hour documentary that they endured years of sexual abuse by Jackson when they were minors in the late 1980s and early '90s.While neither are resident in France, they are being sued in that country where it is illegal to make criminal accusations against the deceased.US-based lawyers representing Robson and Safechuck said the pair had no comment to make on the case. Officials at the court in the northern city of Orleans, where the case was heard earlier this month, confirmed that the pair were not present and had no legal representation.Robson and Safechuck are being sued for a symbolic sum of one euro (.13) each, for "damaging the memory of the dead," the case claims."It is not about money, it is an affair of the heart," said Emmanuel Ludot, the lawyer representing the fans.Walter, president of one of the groups, MJ Community, which has 600 members, attended the first court hearing. Referring to Jackson, she said: "He had a great heart. It is not right to make these claims against someone who isn't even alive to defend themselves."The other groups, On The Line and MJ Street, accuse the documentary of revisionism and point to errors in the timeline of abuse provided by Safechuck.Brice Najar, president of On the Line and author of multiple books on Jackson, explained: "I wouldn't defend someone whatever the evidence, but he has already been acquitted and there have already been inquiries. I am in my 40s. I have kids."The tribunal said a decision would be delivered on October 4.'Their pain is sincere'The accusations in the documentary were not the first made against Jackson. In 1993, a 13-year-old boy accused the King of Pop of sexually molesting him over a five-month period. The case was settled when Jackson paid close to million.In 2013, Jackson was acquitted of abusing another child, also 13, who had cancer at the time of the alleged offense.Among the evidence presented by Ludot in court were written testimonies from tens of group members: several fans were diagnosed with depression and mental problems following the release of the documentary."I believe their pain is sincere," said Ludot, who in 2014 won a symbolic euro from Jackson's doctor, Conrad Murray, who was ruled to have caused fans distress for his part in the star's death.While the lawyer did not disclose his fee for the case, Walter confided that it was "expensive."Many of the French fans had booked tickets to Jackson's mammoth 50-show run, scheduled to take place in London's O2 arena in 2009-10. The concerts were canceled following the singer's death. Although tickets were around 800 euros, most of the fans did not ask for refund. "They held onto the tickets, like relics," explained Ludot. "For them, he is like Christ."Walter set up MJ Community, with the help of her first daughter, following Jackson's death. While pregnant with her daughter, she listened extensively to his music. "Jennifer [the daughter] has known Michael all her life," she said.That same year, MJ community helped organize a gathering of close to 4,000 fans in Paris to celebrate the life of the star. In 2010, the organization gained the legal status of a religion -- the first fan group in France ever to do so according to the group's lawyer and local media reports."I would do anything for him [Jackson]", said Walter, adding: "I would defend him until the end."Ludot said the legal battle has the full support of the Jackson family, who have previously called the film a "public lynching." The family also described Jackson's accusers as "admitted liars," in reference to sworn statements made by both Safechuck and Robson while Jackson was alive that he did not molest them.Ludot says he has been approached by Jackson fan groups from Switzerland, Sweden, Italy and elsewhere, to clear the pop legend's name via the French legal system.In a statement, John Branca, co-executor of Jackson's estate, wrote: "We remain hopeful that a victory in France will soon fuel a movement in the United States to finally explore changes in the law to afford defamation protection for the deceased."HBO, which made the documentary, shares a parent company (AT&T) with CNN. 4903

Two men armed with an AK-style rifle are on the run after opening fire in the courtyard of an apartment complex in Washington DC, leaving one dead and five injured, police said.Metropolitan Police are investigating the multiple shooting that happened on the 1300 block of Columbia Road about 10 p.m. Thursday.Investigators believe the shooting was a drive-by conducted by two male suspects in a light-colored Nissan sedan and armed with an AK-style rifle, authorities said.When police arrived, they found six victims -- five men and one woman -- suffering from gunshot wounds, said Stuart Emerman, a district commander. One of the victims was dead at the scene and the other five were transported to local hospitals with conditions varying from critical to noncritical.The suspects were last seen near the scene of the shooting, police said. 853

When an Oregon medical student was asked to donate sperm in 1989, he was promised that only five offspring would be born -- all on the other side of the country -- according to a lawsuit alleging a clinic violated the agreement by allowing the birth of at least 17 babies, among other alleged violations.Now a doctor, Bryce Cleary claims in his .25 million lawsuit that Oregon Health & Science University didn't adhere to a stipulation that his sperm could only be used by women living on the East Coast. The result, the lawsuit says: Most, if not all, of the 17 were born in Oregon, and some of the children went to the same schools, church or social functions as their half-siblings without knowing they were related.Cleary is claiming he is the victim of fraud and has suffered emotional distress since learning about the births."I wanted to help people struggling with infertility, and I had faith that OHSU would act in a responsible manner and honor their promises," Cleary said at the press conference. "Recently I became painfully aware that these promises were a lie.""OHSU treats any allegation of misconduct with the gravity it deserves," Tamara Hargens-Bradley, a spokeswoman for OHSU, said in a statement, adding that the university can't comment on the case because of patient confidentiality obligations.Cleary, who has three sons and an adopted daughter he is raising with his wife, found out about the other children when two of them contacted him in March 2018. Looking for their biological father, they used Ancestry.com and "specific and substantive information" from the fertility clinic itself to identify him and other siblings.Cleary then sent off his own DNA to Ancestry.com, and that led to the discovery that he had at least 17 offspring born through his sperm donations, the lawsuit says.'I knew something was wrong'"When the matches came back, I knew something was wrong," Cleary said."There were four instant matches and the odds of that happening was not reasonable.""It feels like OHSU really didn't take into consideration the fact that they were creating humans," Allysen Allee, 25, who was conceived with Cleary's donated sperm, said at the press conference. "They were reckless with this and it feels like it was just numbers and money to them."Cleary donated sperm at OHSU after the hospital's fertility clinic encouraged him and his male classmates to participate in a research program by donating their sperm, according to the lawsuit. Cleary alleges he was assured by the university that the sperm would be used either for research or fertility treatments, or both.Because the facility didn't keep records of where the sperm was sent and used at places outside of the state and region, "it is impossible to discover just how many of children born of Plaintiff's donations reside in Oregon, the United States, and/or the world," the lawsuit claims. 2905

When you’re at the drug store picking up an over-the-counter medication, you might notice the price of infant or children’s drugs are more expensive than the adult version.A search online showed that an adult version of Tylenol costs .99 a bottle at Target. The children’s version of the medicine costs .99 for four ounces at the same retailer. But a bottle of infant Tylenol that is two ounces is .79 a bottle. Why is there a large price difference?"When you start to add additional items to a package product, you start to see price differences," said Lisa Gill with Consumer Reports. Added products, like syringes and plastic measuring cups that help dispense the medicine, can add to the cost."That acetaminophen that is in the Tylenol product and store brand product is literally the exact same drug," Gill said.Johnson & Johnson, who makes Tylenol, did not respond to questions on how it determines pricing. But the company isn’t the only name brand that has wide price differences.If you are a brand loyalist, it can be hard breaking away, but Gill said it’s worth it."Believe it or not, the best deal is typically not Tylenol — it's going to be a generic,” Gill said. “The generic version, the store brand, the Walmart, the Target, the CVS, the Walgreens store brand — the store brand is almost always half the price."Although the generic brand for the adult version isn’t quite half of the price of Tylenol, it is still a discount at .49 a bottle. 1480