阜阳哪个治疗痘痘好阜阳哪家医院皮肤科较好,软尤阜阳哪个医院可以治,阜阳那个扁平尤医院好,阜阳看座疮去哪家医院好,在阜阳看皮肤去哪家医院好,阜阳医院激光治疗痤疮,安徽阜阳有名的中医皮肤科专家

Sharonda Wilson was looking forward to getting her diploma at her graduation from Ferris State University in Big Rapids, Michigan.There was just one problem: Her son, Stephan, was graduating on the same day at Central Michigan University in Mount Pleasant, Michigan.Wilson was all set to forgo her own. But her son's school -- and hers -- had a different idea.The predicamentIn the days leading up to the graduation, Wilson posted her predicament on Facebook.Among those who saw it was a student who works in the president's office at Central Michigan.On Saturday morning -- graduation day -- the student told Central Michigan's president, Bob Davies, about the situation.The planThe president then contacted his counterpart at Ferris State University, President David Eisler. Davies wanted to see if his school could confer Wilson's degree."It was a very fast turnaround," Ari Harris, the spokesman for Central Michigan, told CNN.The ceremony 955

STATEN ISLAND — A Staten Island City Councilmember is leading the push for the borough to secede.Joe Borelli (R), who represents the 51st District and lives on Staten Island, will be introducing two proposals to form a committee and to begin a study to look at secession.Staten Islanders have long felt like they are the “forgotten borough.”Of the 51 member city council, Staten Island only has three, Borelli one of the three. Residents said they have mixed feelings about the matter.“It’s been a staple of the five boroughs,” said Tariq Harmon, a 27-year-resident of Staten Island “It has to be five boroughs other than that it wouldn’t be New York City, you losing everything.”“It’s kind of tough, we’re always fending for our own I feel like we’re always the last borough to get support,” said Annette Lyudin.Lyudin and her husband, Alex, are raising a family on the Island, where they’ve lived for the past four years, after moving from Brooklyn.“It’s quiet, safe, great schools, great restaurants, it’s a relaxing place to live,” said Alex Lyudin.Of course as any New Yorker knows, this is not the first time there has been talk of secession. The last time it gained traction was 30 years ago in 1989.In a 1990 referendum, more than 80 percent of Staten Islanders voted to begin the secession process.Then on Election Day in November 1993, 65% of Staten Islanders voted by ballot in favor of becoming an independent city.But a vote never made it to the state level, many blaming then New York State Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver for refusing to put it to a vote at the state level.As it did back then, questions now arise such as Will the borough survive financially on its own? Will taxes go up to pay for resources?Even..,will the Staten Island ferry no longer be free?While Staten Island may often seem like a land of its own - afterall it’s the only borough that overwhelmingly voted for President Trump - only time will tell if we have our own version of Brexit. 1987

Sen. Jeff Merkley announced Tuesday that he is not running for President, telling supporters in a video that he will remain in the Senate after mulling a presidential bid for months.In a video that in many ways mimicked a presidential announcement, Merkley laid out his life story, described issues that he believes need to be tackled and outlined what could have been a rationale for a 2020 run. But the Oregon Democrat says in the video that he believes Democrats need leadership in the Oval Office and the Senate and that he believes he could be most effective in the legislative body."Over the last year, I've weighed whether I can contribute more to the battle by running for president or by running for reelection to the Senate," Merkley said. "Today, I am announcing that I am not running for president."Merkley did not endorse a candidate currently in the race and added, "I believe that there are Democrats now in the presidential race who are speaking to the importance of tackling the big challenges we face. But what I'm also sure of is that right now the Senate is not prepared to be a full partner in this fight."Instead of running for president, Merkley will now spend the next two years running for reelection in Oregon, a race that all nonpartisan handicappers rate as a seat safely in Democratic hands.Merkley, a Democrat representing Oregon since 2009, was the only US senator to endorse Bernie Sanders in the 2016 election over his rival, Hillary Clinton. Despite that support, Merkley said if Sanders was losing to Clinton after the primary season, he should end his presidential campaign and concede to Clinton.Merkley, a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, has been a major critical voice of the Trump administration in the Senate, particularly its handling of immigration issues. In June, the senator made headlines when he was denied entry to a Texas immigration center for unaccompanied minors when he showed up and asked for a tour. He accused the administration of being part of a "cruel" effort against unauthorized immigrant children.In January he asked the FBI to open a perjury investigation into Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen. The call came a day after he released a draft memo that shows the Trump administration was drafting a policy as early as December 2017 to separate families apprehended at the US southern border. The administration has repeatedly denied there was a policy to separate families, and Merkley said Nielsen made the same claim when she testified before Congress.Late last year, Merkley told ABC that his family had given him a "thumbs-up" to run for President, and that he would make a decision within the first three months of 2019. 2729

Striking a blow to abortion rights activists, the US Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit has given Ohio the green light to cut funding to groups like Planned Parenthood.The federal court's ruling Tuesday upheld an Ohio law that barred state funding for health care providers that offer abortions, overturning a decision that deemed the law unconstitutional."Private organizations do not have a constitutional right to obtain governmental funding to support their activities," Judge Jeffrey Sutton wrote for the majority in the 11-6 opinion. "The state also may choose not to subsidize constitutionally protected activities. Just as it has no obligation to provide a platform for an individual's free speech ... it has no obligation to pay for a woman's abortion."Planned Parenthood, which operates 26 health centers between its Greater Ohio and Southwest Ohio Region affiliates, stands to lose .5 million in annual funding from the state health department, according to media reports.Planned Parenthood says that funding has been used for non-abortion-related programs, including other forms of health care and educational services."I recently visited our Ohio health centers where I saw for myself the public health necessity of our Planned Parenthood programs that reduce maternal and infant mortality, cut STI and HIV rates, and provide breast and cervical cancer screenings," Dr. Leana Wen, president and CEO of Planned Parenthood Federation of America, said in a statement Tuesday. "Today's court ruling will roll back the gains to public health -- harming women's health, children's health, and the health of families across Ohio."Planned Parenthood served more than 80,000 Ohio patients in 2017, according to Sarah Inskeep, a spokeswoman for Planned Parenthood of Greater Ohio. Outreach and educational programs helped more than 45,000 people. More than 170,000 sexually transmitted infection tests were administered, as were more than 18,000 HIV tests, she said in a statement.The law, which was signed in 2016 by former Gov. John Kasich before being blocked, slashes funding that provides STD and HIV testing, cancer screenings, domestic violence education and a program to reduce infant mortality, Inskeep said."This is an incredible loss for our community. The law reduces access to sex education programs that teach young people about healthy relationships, and how to prevent STIs and unplanned pregnancies," added Kersha Deibel, president and CEO of Planned Parenthood of the Southwest Ohio Region. "This law would have an outsized impact on groups who have historically faced systemic barriers in accessing quality health care, including people with low incomes and communities of color. Blocking access to education programs for Ohio's most underserved is unethical and downright dangerous."One side's victoryThe law was unanimously ruled unconstitutional last year by a three-judge panel for the 6th Circuit. Gov. Mike DeWine, then the state attorney general, asked for a full court hearing -- which rendered Tuesday's decision.Current Attorney General Dave Yost's office did not respond to a request for comment.As for DeWine, he is "pleased by today's decision as he has long believed that the people of Ohio, through its state legislature, have the right to decide what it funds and what it doesn't fund," spokesman Daniel Tierney wrote in an email.DeWine is not alone."Ohio Right to Life is absolutely thrilled that Planned Parenthood will not get any more of our state tax dollars," said Michael Gonidakis, president of Ohio Right to Life, in a statement. "Thanks to this very encouraging decision, Ohioans of conscience won't have to worry about whether their tax dollars are going towards abortions."The president of the national anti-abortion group Susan B. Anthony List, Marjorie Dannenfelser, called the decision a "major victory" and cheered the fact that money once used to "prop up the abortion industry" could now be "redirected to life-affirming care providers."And Catherine Glenn Foster, president and CEO of Americans United for Life, said she hoped the decision would be a sign of more changes to come."AUL applauds the court's strong denunciation of Planned Parenthood's 'Big Lie' that it represents the best interests of women when it advocates for ... unlimited abortion on demand," she said in a statement. "We look forward to a similar conclusion by the federal courts affirming this Administration's decision to keep Title X funds out of the hands of abortionists like Planned Parenthood."Another side's lossOn the other side of the abortion fight, advocates hope the ruling will function as a rallying cry."Today we are one step closer to becoming a forced birth nation," #VoteProChoice co-founder Heidi Sieck said in a written statement. "While the extreme, anti-choice conservative minority elected President Trump and took over the Supreme Court, our prochoice nation can still fight back if we vote prochoice up and down the ballot. ... This ruling must serve as an alarm bell."The timing of the decision spoke volumes, said Iris Harvey, president and CEO of Planned Parenthood Advocates of Ohio."It's no coincidence that this ruling came down on the same day the [Ohio] House heard testimony for a bill that would use taxpayer dollars to implement a costly, anti-abortion miseducation campaign in schools and the likely Senate committee vote for the dangerous six-week abortion ban -- a bill that Governor DeWine has promised to sign," she said in a statement. "It's clear that this is a concerted effort to block Ohioans' from accessing to the full range of reproductive health care, including safe and legal abortion."Planned Parenthood says it doesn't know when the ruling will go into effect; that depends on when the Ohio Department of Health issues notifications of funding changes to its grantees. In the meantime, though, the organization is weighing its options, including further litigation. 5964

SAN ANTONIO, TX — Four people have been taken to the hospital after a shooting at a San Antonio mall, according to the San Antonio Fire Department.Officers were called out to South Park Mall, located at 2310 SW Military Drive, around 9:16 p.m. Wednesday.Two people were taken to the hospital in serious condition, while the other two suffered non-life threatening injuries, according to 399