阜阳医院治毛囊炎(专治阜阳荨麻疹医院) (今日更新中)

I'm pretty sure Keegan Michael was mocking Trump with the umbrella. #Oscars pic.twitter.com/JMhQon1b6s— Michelle Verkest (@Flip_flop_mom) February 25, 2019 167

JACKSON, Miss. — A federal appeals court is keeping a block on a Mississippi law that would ban most abortions as early as six weeks — when many women may not even know they are pregnant. A panel of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals made the decision Thursday. The appeals judges agreed with a district court judge who blocked the six-week ban from taking effect in 2019. The only abortion clinic in Mississippi sued the state soon after the law was signed by then-Gov. Phil Bryant. In December, the same appeals court kept a block on a separate Mississippi law to ban most abortions at 15 weeks.The decision comes as states with conservative-majority legislature race to place limits on abortions in the hopes that the Supreme Court with a newly-conservative majority will uphold the new laws.According to 823

It’s the foundation of American democracy: voting.Depending on where you are in the U.S., though, your election experience could look very different from that in your neighboring state or even just your neighbor.“It really does depend on where you are in the country,” said Marian Schneider, who heads up Verified Voting, a non-profit, non-partisan group that advocates for better election security.In particular, the group takes a closer look at when it comes to the use of computers in elections.“We use computers in every aspect of election administration in this country,” Schneider said. “We have also historically underfunded our elections and not put the money into them that we need in order to run a computerized operation.”So, what might voters encounter on election day? There are a few possibilities.- A paper ballot, where a voter uses a pen or paper to mark their choices and that paper is then scanned and counted by a computer.- A computerized device, where a voter presses a touchscreen to mark an electronic ballot, which then prints out a paper version that is scanned and counted.- And there are paperless electronic machines, which have a completely computerized ballot, with no paper trail.It is the last one, Schneider said, which raises big concerns because they are the most vulnerable to hacking. “First of all, they make it difficult to discover if something has gone wrong,” she said. “And then, even if you are able to discover it, you can't recover from it.”It can’t be recovered because there is no paper trail to serve as a backup. It’s a type of ballot currently used in all elections held in Louisiana, as well as some jurisdictions in nearly a dozen other states: Delaware, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Mississippi, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Texas and Tennessee. Some of those are now in the process of phasing out the paperless devices, but upgrading election security is costly.“What you just saw most recently is bipartisan agreement to fund elections at the state level, so Congress just agreed to provide 5 million, in addition to 5 million they allocated in 2018,” said Liz Howard, with the Brennan Center for Justice. “So, we’re getting close to billion from the federal government to improve election security across the country."While states continue grapple with the cost of replacing vulnerable and aging voting machines, Schneider said voters still need to do their part.“There's only one surefire way to make sure your vote is not counted,” she said, “and that's if you don't show up at the polls.” 2590

KOKOMO — A central Indiana woman has a word of warning for other women after finding something strange on a feminine product she just recently purchased."It's really gross," Kimberly Fisher said after opening the package of her Tampax Pearl tampon and noticing the string was discolored."I thought that was odd so I go to look at the tip of it and I noticed that it was also a weird and dingy color and so I pushed it out of the applicator and it had nothing but black mold all over it," Fisher said.Fisher said she bought the new box of tampons in Kokomo, Indiana, last week — two days before making the discovery. Fisher said she immediately became concerned wondering if other tampons she already used looked the same way."The fear of what could happen, the fear of did my last one have that and I did not know," she said.Fisher said she hopes by sharing her story it will serve as a warning for other women and girls to check their tampons before using them."We need to spread awareness because this is something you never thought about," Fisher said. "I never thought the horror story of finding mold on a tampon."Fisher shared her experience on Facebook in a post that has now gone viral with more than 32,000 shares.Procter & Gamble, the manufacturer of Tampax, said they have completed a thorough manufacturing investigation and can assure consumers no issues were identified at that site or through the transportation process to the retailer. Here is the full response from Cheri McMaster, associate director of communications, global feminine care for Procter & Gamble: 1599

INDIANAPOLIS, Ind. -- The NCAA opened the door for college athletes to get paid from use of their name, image and likeness in a major shift in the rules governing collegiate sports.While some view this as a step in the right direction, others think this could lead to more problems.What this means is that college athletes will now be able to make money from sales of jerseys, commercials and signing endorsements.NCAA board members have asked each division to create new rules no later than January 2021.The rule will affect 1,1000 member schools encompassing nearly 500,000 athletes.This decision came one month after California passed a law allowing players to profit off their name which takes place in California in 2023.“As a national governing body, the NCAA is uniquely positioned to modify its rules to ensure fairness and a level playing field for student-athletes,” the association president Mark Emmert said in a statement. “The board’s action creates a path to enhance opportunities for student-athletes while ensuring they compete against students and not professionals.”This decision is currently being debated whether it’s a step in the right direction.Brian Gearity, a professor of sports coaching at the University of Denver, is an advocate for college athletes getting paid.“The idea that now we’re able to let athletes be compensated for their own images like we would anyone else is a good thing,” Gearity said. “Is it opening the floodgates to something else or power shifting – absolutely.” Before this new ruling, athletes did not see any profit for any type of memorabilia sold with their names on it.New York has a similar bill to California; however, it is proposing athletes could see 15 percent of the profits.“There’s going to be bumps in the road and there’s fear and anxiety and still people holding onto their power,” Gearity said. “But the point is to not get distracted. The ultimate goals are this is going to be a fairer and more equitable thing.”Cody McDavis, a former Division I basketball player for the University of Northern Colorado disagrees.McDavis said that he believes the NCAA did the right thing by making this a national ruling after California passed its law.“What you have if only one state has this is a huge recruiting advantage,” McDavis said. “But I still don’t think this is a fair and equitable ruling. What happens when we have student athletes receiving more than their teammates for the same amount of work on the team? What happens when we have women that are not being paid at all but are as equally deserving as their men counterparts?” McDavis said other sports like swimming, soccer and track could be left behind in the profits. “We’re talking about men’s basketball and football here,” McDavis said. “We’re talking about the best athletes in those sports. The truth is, there are options for those athletes. And it’s called the NFL or the NBA.”Joe Goldhammer, a professor of sports law and labor law, said this isn’t the final solution.He believes this could push athletes to a similar direction that was shot down at Northwestern University which is to create a union.“The Devil is in the details,” Goldhammer said. “The specifics of that are going to be very hard to work out and very complicated. The problem with this whole system is that it lacks equality and lacks fairness for the players. And you’re going to create another level of unfairness if we’re not careful. College athletes have been exploited over the years. The best thing for them is to stand up for themselves sand say what’s best for them and form a labor union.” 3615

来源：资阳报