昆明哪个医院堕胎好(昆明比较好的流产医院医院) (今日更新中)

A federal judge in Mississippi expressed deep skepticism on Tuesday about a state law that bans abortion as early as six weeks of pregnancy, sending a signal that attempts across the country to pass near total bans on abortion might not easily withstand judicial scrutiny.During a hearing, US District Judge Carlton Reeves expressed anger at times, especially over the fact that the law has no exception for rape or incest. He pointed out that six months ago he struck down a 15-week ban and the legislature responded with an even more restrictive law, suggesting the new law "smacks of defiance" to the court."You said, 'We can't do 15 weeks so by God we will do six weeks,'" Reeves said at one point. He then rhetorically asked if the state legislature would call a special session and then pass a four-week or two-week ban.Supporters of abortion rights say the law collides with Supreme Court precedent, violating a woman's right to seek an abortion prior to viability.The hearing comes as emboldened Republican-led states across the country are attempting to push through restrictive laws with the hope of overturning or cutting back on the landmark 1973 opinion, Roe v. Wade. Similar six-week bans have been introduced in 15 states although none are currently in effect.Last fall, Reeves struck down the Mississippi law that banned abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy, holding that the state was "wrong on the law" and that its Legislature's "professed interest" in women's health amounted to "pure gaslighting."Tuesday, the judge also read out loud part of the Supreme Court's 1992 ruling in Casey v. Planned Parenthood, the decision which upheld the core holding of Roe v. Wade.Reeves asked if the Supreme Court had ever sustained a "previability" ban and he noted that sometimes a woman does not even know she is pregnant as early as six weeks.At the end of arguments, just before he said he would take the case under advisement, Reeves pressed the state on the fact that the law had no exception for rape or incest."So a child who is raped at 10 or 11 -- who has not revealed to her parents that the rape has occurred... the child must bring this fetus to term under the statute?" he asked.In court papers, Hillary Schneller of the Center for Reproductive Rights, representing the Jackson Women's Health Organization, said that at six weeks "no embryo is capable of surviving for a sustained period outside the womb, with or without medical intervention." She pointed out that women who are breastfeeding or who use hormonal contraceptives may not realize they have missed a period."The Supreme Court has reaffirmed many times over nearly 50 years, and as recently as 2016, that a woman has the right to decide whether to continue her pregnancy at any point before viability," said Schneller.The law is slated to go into effect on July 1. State officials, including Thomas E. Dobbs of the Mississippi State Health Office, say it was passed to further the state's interest in regulating the medical profession in order to "promote respect for life."They acknowledge Supreme Court precedent on viability but argue that once a fetal heartbeat is detected, the "chances of the fetus surviving to full term are 95%-98%."The law is meant to "prohibit procedures that destroy the life of a whole, separate, unique living human being," the officials say in court papers. It does not amount to a total ban on abortion in part because sometimes a fetal heartbeat is not detectable until as late as 12 weeks, particularly if an abdominal ultrasound is performed, they argue.Because the bill allows for exceptions, it can't be compared to previous opinions, Mississippi argues. Since 1992, the 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals "has not decided a case involving a law which prohibited some but not all abortions, and has not considered a law that restricts abortions based on the existence of a fetal heartbeat or beyond a specific gestational age," the state says."Instead of banning abortion, S.B. 2116 regulates the time period during which abortions may be performed," the filing adds. "As such, it is akin to laws regulating the time, place, or manner of speech, which have been upheld as constitutional.Asked by Reeves about the fact that the Supreme Court has yet to down a previability law, a state lawyer responded in court by saying the '"fact that it hasn't happened yet" doesn't mean that it would not.Reeves displayed a keen understanding of the current composition of the court and even made clear that he had been paying attention last week when the conservative majority struck down some 40-year-old precedent in a case unrelated to abortion. He wondered out loud if that decision, and other recent ones where the conservatives struck precedent in the area of voting rights, campaign finance and labor unions should impact his thinking. 4861

A Macomb County, Michigan, mom is furious.She says her special needs son was silenced and shamed by adults at a school Christmas concert in Clinton Township.Her anger and disappointment has been echoed by many on social media. The L’Anse Creuse Middle School concert was earlier this week and 14-year-old Dominic Schroeder was super excited. He plays the saxophone and has been practicing the performance in band class and at home too.Dominic is cognitively impaired. Because of his special needs, he often practices with a plastic digital saxophone with ear-buds. The device can help the instructors measure his progression. On concert day Dominic was ready to perform using his own shiny saxophone. But according to his family, Dominic was told by an administrator that he could not play his instrument with the band. He was instructed to use the plastic saxophone - with earphones.Dominic was upset and his loved ones were too. We’re told he and his family did not agree to this. They also say, with this device, Dominic’s the only one who can hear his music. It is silent to the rest of the world.The family believes this is discrimination and exclusion. And they want answers.L’Anse Creuse Public Schools issued the following statement about this story: 1270

A complaint has been filed against Las Vegas legend Wayne Newton after his pet monkey reportedly "viciously attacked" a girl on his property.A complaint was filed by Jocelyne Urena, who is the mother of Genevieve Urena.The younger Urena was a guest at Newton's house, Casa de Shenandoah, on Oct. 17, 2017.During the visit, she was attacked and bitten by the monkey, she said.The complaint says that Newton knew about the monkey's viciousness and propensity to attack and did not take care to protect his guest. According to the complaint, the girl did nothing to provoke the attack.Urena is seeking more than ,000 in damages. The complaint was filed in Clark County District Court. The connection between Urena and Newton is unknown.Casa de Shenandoah opened to the public as a tourist attraction in September 2015. It was closed as an attraction in March 2018. At the time, an attorney for the singer said that Newton and his wife wanted the property to become their private residence once again.The Newtons have been the target of many complaints from neighbors over the years, primarily because of the animals that live or lived on the property. This article was originally published by 1205

A Chicago Midway International Airport passenger might have exposed people to measles there and at a Chicago-area hospital in the past week, Illinois health officials said, as physicians across the globe contend with 229

A growing number of states are issuing stay-at-home orders to help slow the spread of COVID-19, the illness caused by the new coronavirus that has already killed thousands of people worldwide. These orders are not necessarily full lockdowns, but they do require residents to stay home except for essential activities, such as grocery shopping, going to the pharmacy, receiving medical care, walking your dog, etc. If you work in an essential industry, like healthcare, food service or law enforcement, you will also be able to travel to your place of employment. Many of these orders also prohibit things like visiting other people’s homes (except to provide care or supplies) and gatherings of more than 10 people.The following states have issued stay-at-home orders:ArizonaOn Match 30, Arizona Gov. Doug Ducey issued a declaration entitled "Stay Home, Stay Healthy, Stay Connected." The order urges Arizonans to limit their time away from home except for "essential activities and functions." It also ordered the closure of businesses deemed "non-essential." The order goes into effect on March 31 at 5 p.m.For more info on the order, 1149

来源：资阳报