昆明妇科检查要多少钱-【昆明台俪妇产医院】,昆明台俪妇产医院,昆明打胎时间怎么算,昆明吃药流产没有流干净怎么办,昆明做流产花费用,昆明做流产在那个医院好,昆明检查怀孕是在哪里,昆明打胎多少钱啊一般来说
昆明妇科检查要多少钱昆明台俪妇科医院去怎么走,昆明药流要多少天可以做,无痛人流昆明好的医院,昆明做流产少费用,昆明药流多少费用,昆明那些妇科医院,昆明到哪家医院做人流正规
(KGTV) — A National City woman is heartbroken after she was forced to leave her beloved fish at Denver International Airport. It was supposed to be a happy homecoming for Lanice Powless and her best friend."I've taken him everywhere with me," she said.But Wednesday, the University of Colorado sophomore left Denver without "Cassie," her pink, male beta fish."This lady was just not having it," Powless said. "So the supervisor comes and she said 'Unfortunately, you cannot bring fish onto Southwest Airlines,'" Powless said.Her freshman year in Colorado, Powless admitted she was lonely and wanted a pet. She considered getting a dog or cat. But her mother convinced her that a fish would be a better fit. She got Cassie at the local Petco, but did not realize she would end up falling in love with him. "I put my finger in there, he come up and nibble my finger. He was a cool fish," she said. "I even got him a heater, because it gets so cold in Colorado."According to the TSA website, live fish are allowed on board as a carry on. Powless said she never had any problems bringing Cassie along on her usual Southwest flight. But according to the airline, only small cats and dogs that fit in an under-seat carrier are allowed."I have traveled with it. I had it in my container too. Maybe they just didn't make a big deal out of it at the time?" Powless said.But this time, she said she was utterly humiliated. When she asked Southwest staff if she could leave Cassie on their counter so a friend can come a pick him up in half an hour, they denied her. So she frantically started to look around the airport for a new owner. She eventually found a traveler on another airline that allows fish on board, to care for Cassie on her behalf. But airport staff separated them, so Powless never got her name. "They were not allowing us to converse at all because they were thinking we were going to do some secret exchange throughout the airport," Powless said. "Even after I was no longer in possession of the fish, they still continued to have security around us, and follow us through the airport and escorted onto our plane, as if we brought something bad onto the airport," she added.Powless said airport staff made her feel like a criminal. Now spending winter break back in National City, she is the one who feels like a fish out of water, lost without her little sidekick swimming by her side. "Everyone's laughing at me. Yes, it's a fish. I know. But dang, it was my pet. And just because it wasn't a cat or dog, it wasn't as important?" Powless said.10News reached out to Southwest Airlines. A spokeswoman said airport staff are trained and in this case, followed protocol. She said counter staff offered a later flight so Powless could make arrangements for her fish, but said she did not take the offer. The Southwest spokeswoman did extend apoligies on behalf of the airlines for making Powless feel uncomfortable. 2930
(KGTV) -- Democrat Scott Peters has won reelection in the 52 Congressional District, beating his opponent Republican Jim DeBello, the Associated Press reports. Peters was elected to the seat in 2020 after beating Congressman Brian Billbray.Peters served on the Committee on Energy and Commerce from 2019 through 2020 and has also served on the Committee on Armed Forces.DeBello is a tech entrepreneur who says he’s focused on homelessness and the Tijuana water sewage problems.During the March Primary, Peters bested Jim DeBello 49 percent to 32 percent. 562
(KGTV) — As of Jan. 1, 2020, Californians won't have to pay sales tax on diapers or menstrual products for two years.The temporary ban is thanks to Senate Bull 92, which was signed into law by Gov. Gavin Newsom last June as part of his state budget.The bill, authored by Assemblywomen Loran Gonzalez of San Diego and Cristina Garcia of Bell Gardens, bans sales and use tax on diapers for infants, toddlers, and children, and also on menstrual hygiene products like tampons, menstrual cups and sponges, and sanitary napkins.RELATED: New California laws to know starting on Jan. 1, 2020SB92 will expire on Jan. 1, 2022.“I’m so proud of the work we have done here in California to really tackle diaper need,” Assemblywoman Gonzalez said in June. “By passing a budget that expands our statewide diaper bank program and by repealing the sales tax on diapers, which we hope to eventually make permanent, we are setting an example for the rest of the nation of how to make a real impact in the lives of working parents.”Anyone who believes they've been wrongfully taxed since Jan. 1 can request a refund by bringing their receipt to the retailer and a copy of the notice from the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration — found here. Anyone with questions can also reach out to the state DTFA at 1-800-400-7115. 1324
(CNN) - President Donald Trump made his first visit to a war zone on Wednesday, receiving an enthusiastic reception from many US troops there -- some of whom may have run afoul of military rules.Video footage and the written report of Trump's visit with service members in Iraq showed the President signing "Make America Great Again" hats and an embroidered patch that read "Trump 2020."A US military official told CNN the MAGA hats that Trump signed at the Ramstein Air Base event in Germany were personal and brought there by military personnel in hopes of getting an autograph. The official contended that it was not a campaign event and that the hats were used as support for Trump, not as a statement of political support.Although the event was not an official Trump re-election campaign event, the President did declare his candidacy for re-election in 2020 soon after his inauguration.White House press secretary Sarah Sanders told CNN the hats were personal items brought by the troops in Iraq and Germany. Sanders said the White House did not distribute them.Department of Defense guidelines say that "active duty personnel may not engage in partisan political activities and all military personnel should avoid the inference that their political activities imply or appear to imply DoD sponsorship, approval, or endorsement of a political candidate, campaign, or cause."The questions arose because the hats, emblazoned with the President's signature political slogan, appeared to be brand new and because there are rules against military personnel participating in political activities while in uniform.No policy violations have been brought to the military's attention at this time, said Capt. Christopher Bowyer-Meeder, a spokesperson for the US Air Force, Europe. He added there is no rule against Airmen bringing personal items to be signed by the president.The Defense Department guidelines have the same intent as mirror the Hatch Act restrictions on political activities for civilian federal officials. In the Trump Era, officials have deemed hashtags and hats potential rule violations. Earlier this year specific guidance notified federal employees that bringing MAGA hats to work or using the terms "#resist" or "resistance" in reference to President Trump could violate the Hatch Act.Retired Rear Adm. John Kirby, a former Obama administration spokesperson and a CNN analyst, said on CNN's "The Situation Room" on Wednesday that service members having Trump sign the items was inappropriate."It is in fact a campaign slogan, that is a campaign item, and it is completely inappropriate for the troops to do this," Kirby said.Kirby assigned some blame to Trump himself for political activity around the military: "Every time he's around military audiences, he tends to politicize it, and he brings in complaints and grievances from outside the realm of military policy." 2897
(KGTV) - Are Chinese soldiers really placing a needle or pin in their uniform collar with the point facing the neck?Yes.This came to light from a recent picture posted on Twitter by "Discover and Know," which explained it's done to help soldiers keep their posture.However, not all soldiers are forced to do this.A 2009 New York Times article said this is a corrective measure only imposed on soldiers who have trouble maintaining the proper posture. 458