昆明6周打胎多少钱(昆明看妇科较好的医院) (今日更新中)

OROVILLE, Calif. (AP) — Northern California authorities have arrested a woman they say scammed ,100 from a 75-year-old who lost a home in a wildfire last year that killed 85.The Butte County Sheriff's Office announced Tuesday the arrest of 29-year-old Brenda Rose Asbury for elder abuse, embezzlement and grand theft.Detectives say Asbury stole from an insurance settlement that the victim received after losing a home in the 2018 Camp Fire.A warrant for her arrest was issued in September.Asbury turned herself in to Butte County authorities on Monday after driving three days from Tulsa, Oklahoma, and on the advice of her attorney, Michael Erpino of Chico.Sheriff's office spokeswoman Megan McMann said Asbury is in jail on ,100 bail.She is scheduled to be arraigned Thursday. 793

On the night before emergency workers had to evacuate people from a Florida nursing home where eight died, residents suffered in the sweltering heat as staff used fans to cool them, and one woman sat naked in a bed in a hallway, a video obtained by CNN shows.The 34-second recording shows a couple in a room at The Rehabilitation Center at Hollywood Hills in Hollywood, with a fan sitting on a nightstand, blowing air across the room and a window cracked open slightly.According to the family member who shot the video, those two nursing home residents received medical treatment and are recovering. 607

On the left: Nancy Pelosi today shaming Americans, saying "you must wear your mask."On the right: Nancy Pelosi yesterday violating covid rules for salons and not wearing a mask. https://t.co/vUfa9fsCsT pic.twitter.com/aUveM3Fn9m— Trump War Room - Text TRUMP to 88022 (@TrumpWarRoom) September 1, 2020 308

OCEANSIDE (KGTV) -- A North County mother said Oceanside Police used excessive force on her son in a civil lawsuit that has been ongoing for nearly two years.Josette Pyper said her son, Timothy, has been battling mental health issues and addiction. She believes his injuries by police should not have happened.“It was horrible,” Pyper said, sharing her story publicly for the first time. “I couldn’t even watch the whole video. It’s hard. Very very hard.”Pyper is referring to the incident that happened on Nov. 22, 2018.According to the lawsuit filed against Oceanside police and the City of Oceanside, a report of tire slashing was called in by Timothy’s father. His father had a restraining order against him, yet often invited him to visit, according to court documents.The lawsuit states his father called police and also mentioned “that there were potentially two guns in the home.”Police came to investigate the possible restraining order violation and vandalism. Court documents said that police began making public announcements for him to come out of the home, but he did not.Several officers and police K-9 entered the home. They found him in a locked bedroom, which the lawsuit stated was Timothy’s room. An officer picked the lock and opened the door, ordering him to come out with his hands up.“Tim complied with the officers’ command and began walking towards the door. As he did so, the officers changed their command and told him to ‘crawl out,’” the lawsuit said. The family’s lawyers aid the command was confusing, as Timothy began to slowly walk towards the officers to surrender.Police body camera video shows Timothy slowly start to exit his bedroom with one armed raised and the other near his ribcage. “He was wearing only boxers and clearly did not possess any weapons. It looked as though he had been sleeping,” the lawsuit stated.With a shield, an officer pushed Timothy back into his bedroom. Video showed him on the ground after being shoved back into the room with his hands up and feet on the floor. The family’s lawyer said reports from officers that Timothy tried to “violently” strike police were false.The body camera video showed police pulling Timothy up to arrest him, then getting bit by the police K-9.“He’s in full surrender mode and it’s captured on video and they yank him up, they pull him up by his arm,” said the family’s attorney Christina Denning. “He trips over some clothes and then it’s just a brutal multi-tactical attack on him at every different angle as he’s screaming… for his life.”According to the lawsuit, one officer admitted to punching Timothy “with a closed fist in [his] right ribcage… and then applied a choke hold during the arrest.” Another officer admitted “he shot Tim with a .40 mm sponge impact munition,” or rubber bullet.“It’s not right… there was a point in that video where he actually was asking [for his] dad,” Pyper said. “They were still on top of him. Is that a threat?”Josette’s son has a criminal history. His most recent cases included public intoxication and possession of drug paraphernalia. She said Timothy is schizophrenic, dealing with addiction. She does not believe the officers were equipped to handle someone who has mental health issues.Oceanside City Attorney John Mullen defended officers. In a statement to Team 10, he said officers waited more than an hour before entering the bedroom and at least 44 orders were made demanding he exit the room. “As plaintiff approached the officers with one hand obscured, the officers deployed less than lethal tactics, including the use of a canine. The officers were concerned [Timothy] was trying to access a weapon,” Mullen wrote to Team 10.He said the restraining order was issued due to elder abuse against the father and that Timothy “violated this order and barricaded himself in the father’s house.”“OPD was called to this same address one month earlier for a similar violation of the restraining order and plaintiff was combative and injured two officers during that arrest,” Mullen said.Team 10 asked if officers knew of Timothy's mental health history and asked if the Psychiatric Emergency Response Team was called to the home. Mullen said “the City has no information concerning his mental state at the time of the incident or now.”Mullen said he does not believe PERT was called to the home "because this was an active crime scene with unsecured guns in the house."The family’s lawyers disputed that, saying officers were aware of his mental health from meetings they’ve had with opposing counsel.Pyper wants to her get her son help and firmly believes the incident with Oceanside Police could have been handled differently.“They need to be accountable for what happened," she said.A trial date is scheduled for late 2021. 4779

Opponents of President Donald Trump called “foul” on Tuesday, claiming that several moments during the Republican Convention violated the Hatch Act.The Hatch Act was designed to minimize the political activity of government employees.The Hatch Act was first passed in 1939, and has been updated and expanded several times since. Most recently, the Hatch Act was updated in 2012 under then President Barack Obama.Who is governed by the Hatch ActThe Hatch Act covers all federal workers except for the president and vice president. Government employees are generally classified under two umbrellas: Less restricted and more restricted.More restricted employees, such as employees in the Secret Service, CIA, FBI, and Federal Election Commission, are held to a stricter standard. For most White House employees, they fall under the “less restricted” category, but even then, the act places limits.Uniformed members of the military also fall under the “Hatch Act” in the “less restricted” category.What the Hatch Act allowsIt allows government officials to attend political events, rallies and fundraisers outside of their official duties. It also allows government employees to run for non-partisan office. And it allows government employees to express opinions on political issues and candidates while in a non-official role.What the Hatch Act prohibitsFor those under the “less restricted” category, federal employees cannot use their official authority or influence to interfere with or affect the result of an election or engage in political while the employee is on duty, in any federal room or building, while wearing a uniform or official insignia, or using any federally owned or leased vehicle.For those in the “more restrictive” category, employees are barred from taking an active part in partisan political campaigns.3 instances during RNC that raised questionsOn Tuesday, there were three moments that brought up questions on possible Hatch Act violations.- Citizenship ceremonyOn Tuesday, Secretary of Homeland Security Chad Wolf officially swore in five new US citizens inside the White House. In this case, Wolf used his official capacity as acting Homeland Security secretary to swear in the new citizens.Also, moments before the swearing in, two fully-dressed Marines were seen in a video prepared by the RNC opening the door for Trump as he entered the room. Members of the military are also governed by the Hatch Act.- Secretary of state’s visitSecretary of State Mike Pompeo was on an official visit in Israel when he recorded his speech for the RNC. Sources told CNN that his speech was cleared by multiple lawyers, and that the RNC paid for his portion of the speech. - First lady Melania Trump’s speechFirst lady Melania Trump spoke from the White House Rose Garden on Tuesday. While presidents and their families have traditionally shied away from using the White House for re-election events, the Trumps have begun to embrace the complex, especially with in-person events being trimmed down due to the coronavirus pandemic. While the first lady is not a federal employee, and is not subject to the Hatch Act, using the White House would require staff to prepare the facility to be used for political purposes.Penalties for violating the Hatch ActViolating the Hatch Act could involve termination from your position and a civil fine. Last year, the Office of Special Counsel recommended that White House adviser Kellyanne Conway be terminated after she allegedly violated the Hatch Act on multiple occasions during television interviews and social media posts. Several other White House officials, including former UN ambassador Nikki Haley, have been warned by the Office of Special Counsel for political activities they have performed while on duty. Haley got dinged for retweeting a Trump tweet endorsing a congressional candidate.Several high ranking Obama administration officials, including Secretaries Julian Castro and Kathleen Sebelius, had also violated that Hatch Act. Like in Haley’s case, the officials were simply warned by the Office of Special Counsel. 4098

来源：资阳报