南昌治疗敏感多疑医生南昌治幻视那个医院,南昌看焦虑症症到哪个医院好,南昌第十二医院收费贵吗靠谱么,南昌第十二医院精神科医院专家好不好,南昌哪里治双相情感障碍好呢,南昌医院哪个治双向情感障碍好,南昌专业治疗敏感多疑哪家医院好

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) - The Food and Drug Administration has recalled several types of tattoo ink after determining they were contaminated with bacteria. One of them is the popular black ink made by Dynamic Color. The FDA found that two of their lots tested positive for microorganisms. The recall includes all bottles of Scalpaink SC, Scalpaink PA, and Scalpaink AL basic black tattoo inks manufactured by Scalp Aesthetics. One lot of Color Art’s red Solid Ink-Diablo was also included. Tattoo shops across the country were contacted through their local health departments about the recall. One of the largest tattoo parlors in San Diego, SD Tattoo, says they got the email Wednesday morning and immediately searched through their inks.They did have the Dynamic black ink, but tattoo artist Nicki Ninteman said, "We checked all the lot numbers and all of ours are clean, so we’re good."She said they didn't have either of the other two brands in the shop.According to the FDA, people who have been tattooed with contaminated ink can experience rashes or lesions of red papules. If untreated, contaminated ink can also cause permanent scarring. For more information one the FDA recall, visit their website. 1209

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) -- Technical problems at the state level impacted the California Department of Public Health's ability to accurately report COVID-19 cases."We are committed to the medium- and long-term to address these foundational data issues so that we can approve our importance and our customer service," California Gov. Gavin Newsom said on Monday.According to the state, the data system they use failed, and that led to inaccurate case numbers and case positivity rates. That failure prevented counties from having some of the data they need to monitor and respond to the virus in local communities, such as contact tracing.The state says that about two weeks ago, a server outage created a delay in lab records coming into the reporting system. At the same time, they realized they weren't getting data from one of the largest commercial reporting labs for about five days."Just thanking all Californians for their patience as we continue to make sure we're sharing this accurate COVID-19 data," said Secretary of California Health and Human Services Dr. Mark Ghaly. "We know how critical it is for planning at the local level for all Californians to feel confident about the trends and where we're heading."Counties across the state felt the impact of the data inaccuracies. Local leaders use numbers and science to guide decision-making.But are counties having any issues with the numbers at the local level?In Kern County, public health officials were asked at the end of July if they're 100% sure no one is getting double-counted for positive COVID-19 tests."That answer would be no…we do get cases that we hear that their addresses are mismatched, they've been counted in another county, they were tested and are in another county, and we are still waiting for that information to flow through so I'm not comfortable saying that we're 100% sure that we aren't duplicating any cases," Kern County Public Health Department Lead Epidemiologist Kim Hernandez said.Public health said less than 18.4 cases were reported inaccurately.Kern County Chief Administrative Officer Ryan Alsop told 23ABC News, "The data and duplication that you are asking about is not a reason we are on the state’s monitoring list."With questions about accuracy at the state level and those raised in Kern County, reporter Adam Racusin asked officials in San Diego and San Luis Obispo counties how confident they are in the daily numbers they report to the public."I'm quite confident our numbers are accurate," said San Diego County Public Health Officer Dr. Wilma Wooten. "We have web CMR, and our tests are not all phoned through CalREDIE system. Our test results are reported directly to the county. The only issue which you already know about is the glitch with Quest."A spokesperson for San Luis Obispo County said they are confident in the number of positive cases reported.A spokesperson for the county said, "When it comes to duplicates, they regularly run data queries on positive case results to search for duplicates. On occasion duplicates have been detected and counts adjusted appropriately."The spokesperson also noted, "With regard to the total number of tests (positive and negative), some individuals may receive multiple tests over time. We do not classify those as duplicates but rather they are counted as distinct testing events. That is to say, if one is tested five times, that will show with five distinct test results. All that said, some locations/labs are not reporting ALL their test results (both negative and positive) through our reporting system. Some are only reporting positive tests. So, there may be some under-reporting of negative tests. Consequently, we are confident that the number of positive case reports is correct, although the number of negative results (and by extension) the number of total tests run, may be somewhat under reported."The California Department of Public Health did not respond to multiple requests for comment about data accuracy and duplicate counting. 4011

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) — The county Medical Examiner has identified the second teenager killed after a car lost control on a Mission Valley freeway and crashed before bursting into flames last weekend.David Chavez, 15, was killed by blunt force trauma, thermal cause, and smoke inhalation according to the ME in the tragic crash on Jan. 18.Police say a car was speeding at about 3 a.m. on the westbound Interstate 8 ramp to southbound State Route 163 when the driver lost control and hit a guardrail, sending the car down an embankment where it a tree and caught fire.RELATED:Community helping family of teen killed in Mission Valley crashAt least 2 dead in fiery freeway crash in Mission ValleyAnother 15-year-old, identified as Gustavo Beltran, was also killed in the crash.The driver, a 17-year-old, was arrested by CHP on suspicion of DUI. Two other teens in the car are also battling significant injuries. None of their identities have been released by authorities. 972

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) -- Sunday, The Department of Environmental Health lifted a water contact closer along Imperial Beach. The department said recent water quality testing confirms that Tijuana River flows are no longer impacting the beaches. RELATED: Sewage-contaminated runoff in Tijuana River prompts Imperial Beach water closureThe area was closed to water contact recently due to sewage-contaminated flows from the Tijuana River entering the U.S. The department said Sunday that the ocean shoreline from the International Border to the south end of Seacoast drive will remain closed until water sampling confirms the areas are safe for water contact.RELATED COVERAGE: 701

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) -- The Carlsbad Police Department released body camera footage Saturday night in response to public concerns over officer misconduct during an incident involving a 27-year-old black man.The June 11 incident gained attention after cell phone video surfaced showing officers using a Taser on the man and pressing his head into the pavement in an attempt to subdue him."A video is circulating showing a police use of force incident from Thursday night. Open lines of communication between the Police Department and the community are more important now than ever," Carlsbad police said in a statement."As with all uses of force, we fully investigate incidents to ensure the officers’ conduct is consistent with the Police Department’s policies," police said.The cell phone video doesn't show the start of the incident. The witness video begins with the man on the ground surrounded by paramedics and two officers lying on top of him.The newly released six-minute body cam video starts from the moment two officers respond to the scene. According to the department's timeline of the incident, officers and paramedics responded to a call at 8:48 p.m. about a man found face down on a sidewalk at Ponto Road and Carlsbad Boulevard."Two officers arrived and found the firefighters evaluating the man, who was now standing," police said.Bodycam footage shows the man talking with paramedics, and the group appears to disperse. With the officers approaching, the paramedics step away from the man. The man tells the paramedics, "I'm not complaining about anything else."The man appears to hear something from the group of paramedics and screams out, "are you mocking me?"A paramedic tells the man, "No, I'm not mocking you at all."One officer says, "Hey, they're just here to help you, man."The man stands face to face with the paramedic telling him, "the way he said it is different from how you said it. Because I understand how the f--- you say it. But what do you mean when you say it?"According to the police timeline, "The man walked quickly toward the medics while continuing to yell profanities. Officers, fearing for the safety of the medics, interceded."The report says, "Officers reached out to the man and told him to stop."A struggle ensues and the body cameras are knocked to the ground leaving only an audio recording of the incident for about two minutes. The officers pick up the cameras and resume video recording the scene about two minutes later.The department juxtaposed three camera angles of the confrontation with the man -- two from officer body cameras, and one that was recorded by an unidentified "resident." The witness video fills in a section of lost body cam footage.Carlsbad police said the investigation is still ongoing and are asking the public who may have witnessed the incident to contact the department at their non-emergency line at 760-931-2197.The man in the video, Marcel Cox-Harshaw, 27, of San Diego, was cited and released for resisting arrest. Police also charged him with being drunk in public. Police said drugs and or alcohol played a role in the incident.10News has reached out to Cox-Harshaw for comment.CARLSBAD POLICE DEPARTMENT TIMELINE OF EVENTS:A video is circulating showing a police use of force incident from Thursday night. Open lines of communication between the Police Department and the community are more important now than ever. That’s why we are providing a detailed chronology of this incident.As with all uses of force, we fully investigate incidents to ensure the officers’ conduct is consistent with the Police Department’s policies.At 8:48 p.m. A caller reported a man face down on a sidewalk at Ponto Road and Carlsbad Boulevard.At 8:55 p.m. Carlsbad Fire Department personnel arrived at the location and began their evaluation of the man.At 8:59 p.m. Two officers arrived and found the firefighters evaluating the man, who was now standing.While medics evaluated the man’s condition, the man became visually agitated and started yelling at the medics.At 8:59 p.m. The man walked quickly toward the medics while continuing to yell profanities.Officers, fearing for the safety of the medics, interceded.Officers reached out to the man and told him to stop.The man continued to yell as officers tried to handcuff the man to take him into custody.The man yelled, struggled, turned and pulled from the officers and would not comply with their instructions.At 9:02 p.m. Officers then used a taser to attempt to subdue the man.At 9:03 p.m. The officers then restrained the man by holding his body and head to the ground while placing him in handcuffs. He was not injured, but he continued to shout angrily. Officers asked him to calm down, but he refused to comply and continued shouting.At 9:03 p.m. Officers considered the man detained.A mesh bag called a spit mask was placed on the man’s head to protect the officers and paramedics from coming into contact with droplets coming from the man’s nose and mouth This bag is porous and does not restrict breathing.At this time, paramedics were able to place the man on a gurney, where he continued to yell and struggle.At 9:07 p.m. Paramedics transported the man to a local hospital where he was sedated, assessed and released.The man, 27-year-old Marcel Cox-Harshaw of San Diego, was cited and released for resisting arrest. An additional charge of drunk in public has been presented to the District Attorney's Office. The initial investigation indicates that drugs and or alcohol played a role in the incident.The investigation is still ongoing. We are asking any community members who may have witnessed the incident to call the non-emergency police number at 760-931-2197 to share their accounts.Here are some of the department’s policy that pertain to the incidentOfficers shall use only that amount of force that reasonably appears necessary given the facts and totality of the circumstances known to or perceived by the officer at the time of the event to accomplish a legitimate law enforcement purpose.When determining whether to apply force and evaluating whether an officer has used reasonable force, a number of factors should be taken into consideration, as time and circumstances permit. These factors include but are not limited to:o The apparent immediacy and severity of the threat to officers or others – Mr. Harshaw charged unarmed fire personnel while yelling profanities.o The individual’s apparent ability to understand and comply with officer commands – Mr. Harshaw would not comply with officer commands.o The conduct of the individual being confronted, as reasonably perceived by the officer. Mr. Harshaw was yelling and behaving aggressively toward fire personnel.o Proximity of weapons or dangerous improvised devices. – Officers had no way of knowing what was in Mr. Harshaw’s backpack or baggy pants.o The effects of drugs or alcohol. Mr. Harshaw appeared to be under the influence of drugs and or alcohol.o Whether the person appears to be resisting, attempting to evade arrest by flight, or is attacking the officer. Mr. Harshaw was at no time compliant.The TASER device may be used in any of the following circumstances, when the circumstances perceived by the officer at the time indicate that such application is reasonably necessary to control a person:o The subject is violent or is physically resisting. Mr. Harshaw was physically resistant and behaved aggressively toward fire personnel.o The subject has demonstrated, by words or action, an intention to be violent or to physically resist, and reasonably appears to present the potential to harm officers, him/herself or others. – Mr. Harshaw charged fire personnel, while yelling profanities and he was not compliant with officer commands.Supervisory notification shall be made as soon as practicable following the application of force. A supervisor was immediately called to the scene and an investigation was opened. The investigation includedo Obtaining the basic facts.o Collect evidence at the sceneo Ensure that all needing medical treatment are treated. Mr. Harshaw was transported to the hospital and released. An officer also received minor injuries.o The scene was canvased for additional witnesses.o Complete a Supervisor’s Compliant Summary Report and forward it to the Professional Standards Unit.o Prepare Supervisor’s Use of Force Report 8374