梅州尿道炎严重吗(梅州非特异阴道炎的原因) (今日更新中)

Special counsel Robert Mueller said in a rare and remarkable public statement Wednesday his investigation could not clear President Donald Trump and that charging the President was not an option his office could consider.In Mueller's first public comments on the investigation since his was appointed special counsel two years ago, Mueller emphasized that Justice Department guidelines did not allow him to charge a sitting President, and as a result his office did not determine whether the President had committed obstruction of justice."If we had confidence the President clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so," Mueller said. "We did not however make a determination as to whether the President did commit a crime."In what's likely to be his only public statement on the investigation, Mueller's comments highlighted what he wanted to emphasize from 448-page report he issued on the investigation into Russian election interference and possible obstruction of justice.As he announced he was closing the special counsel's office and resigning from the Justice Department, Mueller delivered a road map of how the investigation played out and the possible role that Congress could play in holding Trump accountable."I hope and expect this will be the only time I will speak to you in this manner," he said."It's important the office's written work speaks for itself," Mueller said about his report, which was delivered in March to Attorney General William Barr.The statement was delivered amid political disputes about the findings of Mueller's investigation, particularly regarding whether Trump obstructed justice.The Justice Department 1666

Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts was sworn in Thursday to preside over impeachment trial of President Donald Trump on Thursday, beginning the third impeachment trial in U.S. history.House lawmakers prosecuting the case began Thursday by walking across the Capitol and formally delivering the articles in the Senate chambers.Roberts then swore in all senators, who will act as jurors during the impeachment trial.Rep. Adam Schiff (D-California), one of the impeachment managers appointed by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, then read the articles in their entirety. The articles allege Trump abused his presidential power by pressuring Ukraine to investigate Democratic rival Joe Biden and used military aid to the country as leverage. Trump is also charged with obstructing Congress’ ensuing probe.Watch live video of the swearing-in below.Trump has called the impeachment a "hoax." 897

Public health officials are investigating an E. coli outbreak that has infected at least 17 people in eight states, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 178

State Representative Kelly Townsend says she's troubled by video that shows Chandler, Arizona, police officers with guns drawn, forcing their way into a family's home. The officers were there for a 2-year-old boy who was believed to have an extremely high fever. Townsend, a Republican in District 16, played a big role in getting legislation passed requiring the Arizona Department of Child Safety to get a search warrant to remove children from their home in a non-emergency situation. Townsend says she never thought this would be the result."The doctor chose to use DCS to remove the child and DCS chose to use the police and the police chose to use the SWAT team," said Townsend. "That is not the country that I recognize."Townsend says this all started back in February when the parents took the 2-year-old-boy, who isn't vaccinated, to a naturopathic doctor for a fever of about 105. The doctor instructed the parents to take the infant to the emergency room but after the doctor's visit the child's fever broke, so they never went.After finding that out, the doctor called DCS which then called Chandler police to check on the child. After the father refused to let police into the home to check on the boy, police came back later with a search warrant and forced their way into the home after the family didn't respond."All because of a fever. A fever! It's absolutely ridiculous," said Nicholas Boca, the family's attorney. "That type of kicking your door in, with guns drawn... it should be reserved for violent criminals.""At that point who now owns control over the child?" asked Townsend. "And it seems like we've given that now to the doctor and the parent no longer has the say or they risk the SWAT team taking all of your children and potentially the newborn."Townsend says she can see both sides on this story: a concerned doctor and protective parents, but she's questioning how it was done and the amount of force used."We need to admit that this situation was a mistake," said Townsend. "There are other situations where there is neglect, there is abuse and that's what we need to focus on."DCS said it's not able to comment on the case specifically because of privacy laws.Townsend said the child actually had an upper respiratory infection, not meningitis like the doctor had feared.The Chandler Police Department says DCS obtained a search warrant and asked for their assistance entering the home, but says they used regular officers and not SWAT officers.The parents are fighting to get their kids back. "They have a good family. And this is a waste of state resources," said Boca. 2619

SURPRISE, Ariz. — LaRissa Waln's been waiting for the day she'd get to walk across the stage and receive her high school diploma, but she might not get the chance. The 17-year-old attends Valley Vista High School in Surprise, Arizona, and says she started decorating her cap for the ceremony more than a week ago. But just this week, school administrators said caps had to remain blank. "If I do wear it, I won't be able to walk," Waln said. Her cap though has a special meaning. Waln's father helped create the design, a tribute to their Native American culture. The cap is adorned with intricate beadwork that represents the Wahpeton Sioux tribe. "It means everything to me, to be a part of it in any way possible," she added. "We did pay for the cap and gown out of our own pockets, and we should have the right to decorate it." Administrators said it wasn't a school policy though; it's enforced district-wide. Here's Dysart Unified School District's full statement: “The Dysart Unified School District understands that graduation is an exciting time for students, and our goal is to ensure each student is appropriately recognized for successfully graduating high school. We respect the formality of our graduations and believe that decorated caps take away from the purpose of the ceremony, calling unnecessary attention to individual students. Only school-approved regalia, which is typically academic in nature, are allowed to adorn the gown. We appreciate the desire of students to honor cultural traditions, and there are many ways to do so beyond decorating a graduation cap.”Waln says she and her father have tried meeting with administrators about the issue, even asking for a written copy of the policy, but say neither the school nor the district has provided one. She also found no policies on graduation caps in the school's handbook. "I worked four years for this," Waln said. "I'll always stick with my culture no matter what. If it means I can't walk at graduation, then I guess I won't walk. But I will be there." 2046

来源：资阳报