梅州20周无痛人流费用梅州做打胎手术大概要花多少钱,梅州假体再造乳房,梅州宫颈炎会出现什么症状,梅州处女膜破裂如何修复,梅州做人流所需费用是多少,梅州治女性疾病的医院哪里好,梅州细菌阴道炎的病因

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) - The Class of 2019 is graduating to a significantly tougher rental market than graduates from ten years ago. Rent hikes and slow income growth are making it more difficult for new grads to afford rental homes, according to a HotPads report. A typical college graduate in the U.S. spends 45.3 percent of his or her income on the median rent of ,740, up from 40.5 percent for the Class of 2009. The rent burden has grown by 22 percent as early-career median incomes have dropped 14.5 percent, HotPads analysts say. In San Diego, the median rent is more than the entire income for new graduates with degrees including biology and business management, at ,000 per year, and nearly the entire income for those with degrees in psychology, at roughly ,000 per year, HotPads reports. The top-earning degrees nationwide were primarily in engineering fields, with mining and mineral engineers earning a median ,854 after college. “As rent prices and student debts rise, affordability concerns for recent college graduates have garnered attention on the national stage,” said Joshua Clark, economist at HotPads. “Graduating from college still typically pays off in the long run, but slower wage growth for college graduates and rising costs have dampened the immediate financial benefits associated with a four-year degree. As renters consider their career interests and their short-term costs of living, where and how they live post-graduation can have more of an impact on their finances now than ever before." Although an education is a major financial investment, it pays off in San Diego’s tight rental market. Renters without a four-year degree would spend 129.7 percent of the median income on rent. Want to know how much you can afford? See the rent ratio chart here. 1801

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) — The City of San Diego could make the unorthodox move of refusing to reveal a directory of its 11,000-plus employees.A new memo from City Attorney Mara Elliott's office says officials fear doing so could increase the risk of cyber attack. "You have indicated that releasing all City employee email addresses at once could create a potential threat to the City's cybersecurity because it would make it substantially easier for bad actors to launch phishing attacks against the City, which could interrupt critical City operations," says the Sept. 20 memo. The Union-Tribune recently made a California Public Records Act request for names, work email addresses and phone numbers of all city employees, which is disclosable under the act. Cyber security experts say public agencies have been facing a barrage of hacking attempts because they control critical civic operations. Last year, hackers shut down some operations at the Port of San Diego, and the city of Atlanta has spent millions to recover a system after a ,000 ransomware attack. Ted Harrington, an executive partner at Independent Security Evaluators, said hackers often try to get victims to open attachments in emails, known as phishing. "It's an attack method where when the victim either clicks a link or downloads an attachment, that automatically installs some sort of malware or directors that particular victim to a malicious website, and then all kinds of bad things can happen from there," he said. The City Attorney's memo existing case law suggests there are circumstances where not disclosing the list of workers outweighs the public interest in disclosing them, but leaves it up to the city on a final determination. Jeff Light, the editor and publisher of the Union-Tribune, said in a statement that he understands the cyber security concern, but that it shouldn't keep the information from being disclosed. "Public information law in California says that 'access to information concerning the conduct of the people’s business is a fundamental and necessary right of every person in this state,'" Light said. "I don’t see how that principle squares with this theory that the government should not reveal the phone extension or email of a city employee."The City Attorney memo notes that while the city may not release a full directory, residents do have access to contact information for city officials they may need to contact. It says the decision should be made based on credible facts and information. 2511

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) - The former Navy sailor accused of killing four people by driving his truck off the Coronado Bridge and onto a crowd attended a motions hearing Friday.Richard Sepolio faces four counts of gross vehicular manslaughter and DUI. His defense team argued to throw out the DUI charge, as well as crucial evidence, including initial conversations between Sepolio and his arresting officers. The judge concluded that both issues would be allowed in the upcoming trial.The nephew of two of the victims wants answers. Jacob Contreras has flown from Chicago to San Diego a dozen times to follow the case in court.RELATED: Parents of driver in Coronado Bridge crash defend son"I'm here a lot. I'm trying to move here,” Contreras said. "My family hasn't celebrated Thanksgiving in two years. Life is just not the same. It's never going to be the same."Contreras is the nephew of Annamarie and Cruz Contreras of Chandler, Arizona, two of four people killed on October 15, 2016. Like the two other victims, Francine Jimenez and Andre Banks of Hacienda Heights, the couple was attending a fundraising event at Chicano Park when Sepolio’s truck suddenly plunged into a crowd, killing them.Sepolio's high-profile attorney Paul Pfingst argued Friday that his client was not read his Miranda rights while being transported to the hospital for his injuries and therefore, the conversations between Sepolio and responding officers should be inadmissible during trial.RELATED: Facebook Live video captures aftermath of bridge crashCHP Officer Juan Carlos Jimenez read from his notes about the initial conversation."I asked if he felt the effects of the alcohol,” Jimenez said. “He said ‘Yep.’”Officer Jimenez also recalled the moments when he gave Sepolio a Breathalyzer test. He believed Sepolio was attempting to fake the test by only pretending to breathe small amounts of air into the device. The test results showed Sepolio's blood alcohol level was 0.08 to 0.09%. RELATED: Social media: Truck flies off Coronado Bridge, lands on crowdThe defense also argued that responding officers never noted Sepolio had “slurred” speech, implying that he may not have been drunk when the accident occurred. Officer Jimenez remembered that Sepolio’s speech was indeed slurred and that he was complaining of back pain. But he admitted that instead of writing he had “slurred” speech, he noted that his speech was “slow.”Jacob Contreras said he was not buying the defense’s argument. "The slurred speech and slow speech, if you're intoxicated, you tend to do both,” Contreras said. “So my point of view is the defendant was intoxicated.”RELATED: Navy man charged with DUI in crash that killed fourNearly two years since the crash, Sepolio has recovered from his injuries. But two families are still left without answers, still seeking justice. 2876

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) -- The man who was convicted of driving drunk when he hit a Lyft car, killing the driver, was sentenced in court Thursday.Steven Quintero was sentenced to 16 years in prison following an emotional day in court in which three young women in the car at the time of the crash and the victim’s sister all gave statements. “The worst part of my story is that I remember every detail of the crash," said Kelly Hoffman with a shaky voice. "I am haunted by the memory of the violent, powerful impact and the sound of the bending metal and shattering glass," she added.A jury convicted Quintero of DUI causing injury, hit-and-run and driving on a suspended license in the crash that killed Henry Reyes along State Route 94 just east of downtown San Diego.RELATED: Driver who hit and killed Lyft driver in 2016 faces retrialThe crash happened on October 1, 2016. Reyes pulled over on the side of the road when one of the passengers inside the Lyft, Sarah Smith, got sick.When Reyes pulled over, he got out to help Smith out of the car and get her water. While walking around the front of the car to get back in, the Lyft was struck from behind, killing Reyes.Smith, Hoffman and Jessica Techel all suffered major injuries in the crash. “When I see photos of the car I am reminded that I’m lucky to be alive, have all my limbs and my mental capacity," Techel told the court.Reyes' sister brought photos of her brother to court. In one of them, he was with his 2-year-old son. Evette Rous testified how important her brother was to her and her family.  He gave her away at her wedding, and was always around with a sarcastic comment for his sister. She said her life is forever changed. “When Steven Quintero made the decision to drink and drive, he not only killed my brother, he killed a part of each of us who lived Henry. He killed dreams, and memories yet to be made," she said.Rous said her mother didn't come to court because she felt there was no justice for Henry Reyes.  The victims all testified they were disappointed when two different juries failed to convict Quintero of murder.  In exchange for not trying Quintero a third time, he agreed to go to prison for 16 years, without the possibility of probation.  Quintero also agreed not to appeal his case.Quintero did not address or even look at his victims as they spoke.  His attorney told them he apologizes for his actions and is filled with remourse.Rous called the apology an insult.The 2016 crash wasn’t the first time Quintero was found to be driving under the influence. In 2015, he was also convicted of DUI. 2673

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) - The local ACLU is now firing back at ICE officials after news broke Tuesday of a new measure in place of blocking certain calls from detainees’ being housed at the Otay Mesa Detention Center.“For the government to interfere with the people's ability to make those calls and advocates abilities to receive those calls is deeply troubling,” said ACLU senior staff attorney Mitra Ebadolahi. She’s now sent a letter to both ICE and ICE’s contractor, CoreCivic, demanding answers and writing in part, "…legally, these blockages may violate the constitution."On Tuesday, Alex Mensing with Pueblo Sin Fronteras said his number was blocked along with numbers to another immigrants rights' activist group, Otay Mesa Detention Resistance. Mensing told ABC 10 News, “Last time I checked, in the United States we're not supposed to censor people's ability to denounce abuses, to denounce medical negligence, to denounce physical assault by guards…by private prison guards or ICE officers against the people.”The Otay Mesa Detention Center has come under fire for allegations of poor health conditions and abuses inside as hundreds of people being housed there were testing positive for COVID-19.“Without more information, it does appear that his kind of blockage is either retaliatory or at least viewpoint discriminatory,” added Ebadolahi.The ACLU is demanding that ICE remove the blockage and offer a response by next Tuesday.CoreCivic referred ABC10 News to ICE which sent a statement Wednesday reiterating part of a statement from Tuesday which reported that it temporarily blocked detainee calls to a specific San Diego area phone number after calls resulted in disruptive behavior from detainees. The full statement from Wednesday is below.“U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has temporarily blocked detainee calls at Otay Mesa Detention Center (OMDC) to a specific San Diego area phone number after detainee calls to this number resulted in detainees exhibiting highly disruptive behavior, threatening the health and security of other detainees and employees at the facility.""ICE fully respects the rights of those in our custody to peacefully express their opinion without interference. This action was taken out of concern for the safety of those in our custody. ICE takes very seriously the safety and well-being of those in our care and will take all necessary steps in order to ensure the continued safety of both detainees and staff. San Diego ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) management will continue to monitor the situation. Temporary blocked phone calls may be restored when deemed safe to do so.""All ICE facilities provide detainees with reasonable and equitable access to telephones. Detainees are further allowed to make free calls to an ICE-approved list of free legal service providers for the purpose of obtaining initial legal representation.""ICE remains fully committed to ensuring that those in our custody reside in a safe, secure environment, and that our staff and facility adhere strictly to the National Detention Standards (NDS) [ice.gov]. These standards protect communities, staff, contractors, volunteers, and detainees from harm by ensuring facility security is maintained and that situations that could pose a risk of harm are mitigated. OMDC maintains and routinely evaluates comprehensive security and safety guidelines to ensure facility security and control.” 3442