梅州慢性附件炎要怎样治疗梅州子宫内膜炎怎么治,梅州女子盆腔炎的初期症状,梅州在线人流专家咨询,梅州割双眼皮的多钱,梅州排卵期白带带血,梅州哪家医院做打胎,梅州白带异常的治疗去哪家医院蕞好

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) — Just days after San Diego County ordered a shutdown of indoor dining and San Diego Mayor Kevin Faulconer signed an executive order that makes it easier for restaurants to move seating outdoors, many restaurants are already opening up business outside.Johan Engman is the owner of Rise and Shine Hospitality, which has 18 restaurant locations under the umbrella. Ten of those are Breakfast Republic. He said about half of the 18 locations have expanded to include either sidewalk, parking lot, or shared courtyard space for tables.“Let’s not waste our time complaining or feeling sorry for ourselves. Let’s figure out what do we need to do to give us the best odds to survive this and let’s just do it,” said Engman.For the Pacific Beach Breakfast Republic location, he said there were about 170 seats prior to coronavirus. Once there were social distancing limits, he could seat about 80. With the new ban on indoor seating, that left only about 30 seats on his patio, so the addition of parking lot space will bump seating back up to about 80 people. He said financially, they’re taking a hit, but he made the decision to stay open to help his employees.“Not only seeing how financially detrimental that is, but the morale. So you lay off all your managers then you hire them back. Imagine them literally a couple weeks later you send that message again,” he said.Similarly, La Puerta is seeing the roller coaster of numbers. Owner Merritte Powell said the Gaslamp restaurant is also expanding onto the sidewalk. He said customers will notice a difference, but hopes something is better than nothing.“You’re sitting next to a building, next to a doorway, you’re also going to be a couple feet from a parked car,” he said, referring to the new setup.He said he’s hoping to add plants and lights eventually to make it more aesthetically pleasing and could see a permanent future for sidewalk dining like this if it is successful. He said this could be beneficial in areas like the Gaslamp that lack a lively presence that the outdoor dining will likely bring.Both business owners said the Department of Alcohol Beverage Control has been working quickly and efficiently to help get them the liquor permits they need for the parking lot. They also both are hoping the city votes to allow parklets next week, which they say will further expand seating and appeal. 2386

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) — Like Saturday, several cities around the county saw temperatures hit record highs as temperatures baked the county over the holiday weekend.Sweltering heat continued across the county on Sunday, prompting residents to flee for the coast only to be met by more high temps.According to the National Weather Service, several cities saw daily record highs for Sept. 6, with Escondido hitting an all-time high of 115 degrees:San Diego: 100° (old record: 97° in 2011)Oceanside: 85° (old record: 83° in 2004)Vista: 107° (old record: 102° in 2004)Chula Vista: 102° (old record: 97° in 2011)Escondido: 115° (old record: 104° in 1955) — an all-time recordRamona: 112° (old record: 102° in 1983)Palomar Mountain: 98° (old record: 94° in 1955)Campo: 110° (old record: 104° in 1955)Borrego: 117° (old record: 115° in 1989)Saturday, Alpine and El Cajon set all-time highs at 113 and 114 degrees, respectively.Monday, a slight heat reprieve with come to parts of the county. Monday's highs are forecasted for the coast at 80-91°, for the inland areas at 93-99°, in the mountains at 91-103°, and for the deserts at 113-119°. 1135

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) - In the wake of the coronavirus budget crisis, cuts are being proposed to child welfare services.The proposed cuts come just weeks after Gov. Gavin Newsom announced new investments totaling million to protect younger Californians at heightened risk for abuse and mistreatment due to COVID-19.The April announcement directed funding to support families struggling to stay together, additional social worker outreach, family resources centers, and age extension for foster youth, among other things.According to the County of San Diego, "The funds approved by Governor Newsom will be used in part, as earmarked, benefiting Child Welfare families receiving emergency response and family maintenance services. The County of San Diego Health and Human Services Agency, Child Welfare Services is partnering with the state as it seeks to provide 0 monthly payments to families with children who are at risk of entering foster care. In addition, funds were allocated to help youth who have exited out of the Child Welfare System. The funds will allow foster youth who turn 21 to extend their stay in foster care to prevent potential homelessness during the COVID-19 pandemic. San Diego is receiving 0,000 in Transitional Housing Program funds from SB80 which will be used to reduce youth homelessness through the expansion of transitional housing so that we can support youth exiting foster care even after the funds provided for COVID response are no longer available. Funds are also allocated for youth to get access to cell phones and laptops through the iFoster program to continue to participate in educational activities and stay connected with their families during COVID-19. iFoster and San Diego County Child Welfare Services have been working together since 2013 to provide resources to children, youth and caregivers. CWS began working with iFoster to provide cell phones to foster youth in 2019 and will continue this partnership. "But that money will only last so long. The governor's May budget revise contains cuts to children's programs.The budget states: "Child Welfare Services include family support and maltreatment prevention services, child protective services, foster care services, and permanency programs. California's child welfare system provides a continuum of services for children who are either at risk of or have suffered, abuse, neglect, or exploitation. Program success is measured in terms of improving the safety, permanence, and well-being of children and families. The May Revision includes 6.1 million General Fund on 2020-21 for these programs, a decrease of .5 million General Fund since the Governor's Budget. When federal, state, 1991 Realignment, and 2011 Realignment funds are included, total funding for children's programs is over .7 billion in 2020-21."The proposal eliminates Foster Family Agency social worker rate increases, eliminates the Family Urgent Response System, and eliminates the Public Health Nurse Early Intervention Program in Los Angeles County."This is a time where we need to see, not cuts, but increased investment in the kinds of supports that help families meet basic needs and avoid some of the financial stresses and then receive the kinds of services and support for dealing with any issues that may trigger some abuse," said Jessica Heldman with the Children's Advocacy Institute at the University of San Diego.Heldman said they're concerned about funding to help prevent abuse and neglect, funding to foster care services, and making sure there's money to support young adults who are transitioning out of the system and have no support beyond the system.She said transitional youth leave the system at 18 or 21 and don't have a parent or legal guardian who can help with financial support or emotional support. Something as simple as a place to stay."They are high risk of some pretty poor outcomes, and it's going to take a real investment to make sure that we put them in the best position possible when they are going to be struggling," Heldman said.Heldman explained many of the youth aging out of Foster Care are losing their jobs. She cited a recent survey of about 600 transition-age foster youth across the country. It showed 65 percent of the respondents had lost their job, one in five said they are concerned about not having enough money to eat, and more than half of them had not received stimulus checks."I think people are unaware of this population of young adults and older teens who really need the support and need to be a priority or else they are going to become the parents of the next generation who are struggling economically, and the cost to that in our society is going to be far greater than the investment now to make sure that they stay on their feet," she said.Experts say a budget proposal from the Legislature released last week restores many of the cuts proposed by the governor.According to the floor report of the 2020-21 budget, “The Legislature Rejects the Governor's May Revision proposal to eliminate the Foster Family Agency social worker rate increases in 2020-21, Rejects the Governor's May Revision proposal to eliminate the Family Urgent Response System and Rejects the Governor's May Revision proposal to eliminate the Public Health Nurse Early Intervention Program in Los Angeles County among other things.”The overview of the floor report states, "The Speaker of the Assembly, the President Pro Tempore of the Senate, and the Assembly and Senate Budget Committee Chairs announced a legislative agreement on the 2020-21 state budget on June 3, 2020. This sets the stage for legislative negotiations on the budget with the Governor and his administration. The Legislature will meet the June 15 deadline to pass a balanced budget bill.""It is the responsibility of the state to ensure that children who depend on child welfare and foster care youth programs can do so confidently and without fear of abandonment, especially during these uncertain times. I have been a longtime advocate for youth, and I strongly believe that the state funding provided to these programs cannot be compromised. As budget negotiations continue, I urge the Governor's office not to balance the budget on the backs of children who need our help," Assemblymember Brian Maienschein told 10News.County of San Diego Health and Human Services representatives said the agency is monitoring the budget process, what is submitted and what the governor will sign. 6490

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) - It is an effort to remove guns from dangerous people and an aggressive strategy by the City Attorney's office to implement a law that has been in place since 2016. Since the beginning of the year, the City Attorney’s office obtained 25 gun restraining orders, affecting teenagers to senior citizens.  “I think we have opened people's eyes to the availability of a tool that works,” said City Attorney Mara Elliott. “I think we all recognize that there are some people that should not have a gun or access to a gun.” It's a push to use a law Elliott said is underutilized. Now, she's training law enforcement to use it more.  These civil restraining orders prohibit someone from having a gun or ammunition. Law enforcement or close family members can request it if they're afraid someone will hurt themselves or others. A temporary order is issued until a hearing for a permanent one takes place. “It's not the city attorney or the police department making the determination... ultimately it's somebody that's got no horse in the race... a judge,” Elliott said.  This law came after a 2014 murder spree near Santa Barbara. Elliot Rodger stabbed three young men to death, then shot and killed three others. His family reported mental health concerns before the shooting.  “In the past, we had to wait for a tragedy. We don't have to wait anymore,” Mara Elliott said.  The City Attorney's office represents law enforcement in court.  Those with these restraining orders range in age from 19 to 81. All were men, except one. About a quarter involved were either current or former military. A City Attorney spokesperson said these numbers do not include minors that were connected to school shooting threats.  Team 10 spoke to one man who received a restraining order against him. He agreed to talk to 10News if he was not identified. According to the man, a fight with his wife was the catalyst for the restraining order. He claimed that he did not threaten his wife. “No, we never had a violent thing. Just words,” the man said.  It was a different story in the court petition. It said his wife was afraid and that the 81-year-old threatened “to shoot her” and the neighbor. His son, according to documents, was worried his parents were losing their sanity. It also showed he was arrested several years ago for domestic violence, but the charges were dropped. Still, he called the restraining order against him unfair. “I think every case is different. It depends on people you’re dealing with,” he said, calling himself a safe gun owner.  That man’s guns are at the San Diego Police Department. Under this law, guns are surrendered to law enforcement. An individual could also store them or sell them to a licensed firearms dealer. A permanent restraining order lasts a year. It expires unless someone seeks an extension. “We’ve done a lot to try and calm the nerves of those concerned about their Second Amendment rights,” Elliott said.  “Conceptually, the idea of taking firearms from criminals or people that are mentally unfit is something we stand behind,” said Michael Schwartz with the San Diego County Gun Owners PAC.  However, he still had concerns after meeting with the City Attorney. “If they've already broken the law, then we can take firearms from criminals or people that are mentally unfit. If they haven't broken the law, then why are we taking firearms from them?” Schwartz asked. He is also concerned about the potential for abuse of this law. The City Attorney's office said orders are issued when it’s not clear when or if a person will be charged or someone hasn't been convicted yet and the public needs protection. “I'm hoping that it makes people feel safer and it saves lives and I'm convinced we've done that,” Elliott said.  Elliott said it is still too early to determine any kind of trend of those served with a restraining order. There is a proposal right now to expand this law, allowing co-workers and school employees to request these types of restraining orders. That is heading to the Senate.     4173

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) - Jo Anne Bilodeau finds peace inside the grounds of her serene San Carlos apartment complex, filled with greenery, benches, a clubhouse and a pool.Even her rent is less than ,100 a month. "It kind of feels like a sanctuary," she says. But Bilodeau's days in San Diego could be numbered, all because of a specialty shot she takes every 12 weeks. RELATED: Making It in San Diego: Prescription medication costs impacting San Diego families"It's just scary," Bilodeau says. "It makes you feel like you're in limbo all the time because you don't know the exact cost of the drug until you get a bill."Bilodeau suffers from Rheumatoid Arthritis, an autoimmune disease that causes the body to mistakenly attack the joints. She's about to turn 71 and on medical leave from her job, meaning her company health benefits are expiring. That leaves her with just Medicare, and what she believes will be a ,300 co-insurance payment on the drug."I have my days," she says. "I have meltdowns where I just cry because I'm worried and scared."Bilodeau isn't the only one with that anxiety.A new study by AARP says the price for specialty prescription drugs, ones that are generally infused or injected, rose 7 percent in 2017. That's more than three times the rate of inflation. The average annual cost for these drugs is nearly ,000. RELATED: Making It in San Diego: How to save money on your prescriptions"The prices for those medications has risen dramatically," said Leslie Ritter, a senior director at the National Multiple Sclerosis society, a condition that also requires specialty drugs.Ritter says patients on the medications have skipped doses and racked up credit card debt. "Medications only work if you're adhering to them, and you're taking them as prescribed," she says. Federal and State governments are now moving legislation to help lower prices and increase transparency. In the meantime, Leigh Purvis, of the AARP Public Policy Institute, said the best thing to do is for patients to talk to their health care providers to see if there is a less expensive generic alternative to treat the same condition.Drug manufacturers themselves also offer patient assistance programs to those who are eligible. However, they are only available to privately and commercially insured patients, not those on Medicare. 2338