梅州做打胎前需要什么准备梅州眼睫毛倒长手术多少钱,梅州真菌尿道炎怎么回事,梅州打胎打胎 价格,梅州抽脂瘦腰部,梅州怀孕做打胎时间,梅州泪沟自体脂肪填充,梅州治疗慢性阴道炎的方法

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) - Shipping companies expect another record setting holiday season, which gives would be thieves ample chances to steal packages off of porches.This year, FedEx expects to ship 400 million packages during the holiday season. UPS says they'll deliver 750 million. The U.S. Postal Service estimates 850 million packages and 15 billion pieces of mail altogether, and Amazon says in 2016 they sent more than a billion items world wide through Prime.But this year, more companies have ways for you to protect your deliveries.Ring doorbells are becoming popular. They have motion-sensing cameras that connect to your smartphone, alerting users to see anyone that comes to the door. Their Facebook page is full of videos where owners scared off would-be thieves with an alarm or by shouting through a connected microphone.The company is also encouraging people to download their app. Even if you don't have a Ring Doorbell, the app will send you alerts any time suspicious activity is reported in your neighborhood.Also new this holiday season is the Amazon Key, an option introduced this fall. For about 0, you can buy a starter kit that includes a camera and a special door lock. Delivery drivers would be able to put packages inside your home.Amazon also has lockers all around San Diego that packages can be sent to. You get a code to open them to pick up your package.Meanwhile, the US Postal Service says people who are worried about theft can ship packages using the "Hold for Pickup" option. Packages are kept at the post office to be picked up. You can also require a signature for delivery, or re-route a package to a different address while it's being delivered. They have more tips on how to protect holiday gifts here. 1776

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) -- San Diego State will continue to call SDCCU in Mission Valley its home, but it will cost them. San Diego city Council approved A two-year lease extension at the stadium for .1 million.Under the agreement, the city will also get the full amount of concession and parking revenue which generates approximately 0,000.The Aztecs current lease agreement expires at the end of 2018. The university was previously paying a dollar per ticket. Head football coach Rocky Long was among the dozens of supporters in Council Chambers saying the decision to extend the lease is more than just football.RELATED: San Diego City Council to consider SDCCU Stadium lease extension for AztecsThe only Council member that voted against the extension was Scott Sherman. Sherman questioned if it was the best deal for the city and for taxpayers.He wanted to go back to the drawing board to come up with a more lucrative deal for the city. “Taxpayers have told us time and again they do not want to subsidize sports. We asked SDSU to come to the table with a better plan, and they came back with the exact same deal. What they are paying does not even pay for the utility bill for the year.”The stadium Operates at a .6 million deficit 1251

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) -- Several major streets around San Diego are closed to cars to make way for more bicycles Sunday. The San Diego Bike Coalition hopes the event, called CicloSDias, will encourage people to ride their bikes instead of using their vehicles. Streets like Adams Avenue in Normal Heights and El Cajon Boulevard in City Heights will be closed. The event starts at 10 a.m. and lasts until 5 p.m. The event will also host a free concert with food and activities on El Cajon Boulevard between Fairmont and 44th Street. Click here for more information on the event. 581

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) - Sharp Grossmont Hospital secretly video recorded 1,800 patients using hidden cameras at the women's health center in El Cajon, according to a lawsuit filed late Friday afternoon.The recordings took place between July 17, 2012 and June 30, 2013 inside three Labor and Delivery operating rooms at the facility located at 5555 Grossmont Center Dr. in El Cajon, the plaintiffs claim.Among the video recordings captured by hidden cameras: Caesarean births, hysterectomies, sterilizations, dilatation and curettage to resolve miscarriages, and other procedures, according to court documents.Women were also recorded undressing, the lawsuit says.According to court documents, the hospital claims the recordings were part of an investigation "into whether an employee was stealing the anesthesia drug propofol from drug carts in the operating rooms."The suit states that the motion-activated cameras were installed on drug carts in each of the three operating rooms at the women's health center, but the cameras continued to record after motion stopped. READ: Phony doctor suspect charged for Sharp Grossmont hospital visitsBecause of the angle and placement of the devices, the suit says "patients' faces were recorded, and the patients were identifiable."“At times, Defendants’ patients had their most sensitive genital areas visible,” the lawsuit states. Multiple users, including non-medical personnel and strangers, had access to the recordings on desktop computers, the lawsuit claims, and that Sharp “did not log or track who accessed the recordings, why, or when."“There are images contained within the multitude of images of women undergoing operations of a very personal, private nature, unconscious and in states of exposure depending on the operation being performed,” the lawsuit cites an unnamed Sharp executive as saying.“Plaintiffs suffered harm including, but not limited to, suffering, anguish, fright, horror, nervousness, grief, anxiety, worry, shock, humiliation, embarrassment, shame, mortification, hurt feelings, disappointment, depression and feelings of powerlessness,” the lawsuit claims.Plaintiffs believe Sharp destroyed “at least half” of the recordings but cannot confirm the files are not otherwise recoverable. Computers used for storage were replaced or refreshed, but Sharp did not ensure proper deletion of recordings, according to the lawsuit.READ: La Mesa police investigate man's suspicious death at Sharp Grossmont HospitalSharp HealthCare and Sharp Grossmont Hospital are named in the lawsuit, along with the possibility of more defendants in the future once their names and capacities are known.10News reached out to officials at Sharp HealthCare and they confirmed that between July 2012 and June 2013, "Sharp Grossmont Hospital installed and operated one hidden camera on the anesthesia cart located in each of three operating rooms in the Women’s Center.""The purpose of the three cameras was to ensure patient safety by determining the cause of drugs missing from the carts," Sharp HealthCare officials told 10News."A initial lawsuit alleging privacy violations and other claims stemming from the video recording was filed against Sharp HealthCare and Sharp Grossmont Hospital in 2016. The case remains active and Sharp is not in a position to comment further about the matter," Sharp HealthCare officials told 10News."Sharp HealthCare and Sharp Grossmont Hospital continue to take extensive measures to protect the privacy of its patients," Sharp HealthCare officials said.The complaint for damages includes a demand for jury trial on charges of invasion of privacy, negligence, unlawful recording of confidential information, negligent infliction of emotional distress, and breach of fiduciary privacy.STATEMENT FROM SHARP GROSSMONT HOSPITAL 3809

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) - South Bay Pentecostal Church has been involved in a legal battle since May regarding worshiping indoors, and officials think Friday could be the light at the end of the tunnel.Senior Pastor Arthur Hodges believes during a motions hearing Friday morning the church will be granted permission to reopen indoors.His hope comes from the latest rulings by several judges.On Dec. 3, the Supreme Court ruled places of worship in New York could reopen, saying restrictions meant to curb the pandemic violated the First Amendment of the Constitution.After that ruling, the high court issued an unsigned order to California judges to reconsider Gov. Gavin Newsom's restrictions.On Wednesday, a judge ruled restaurants could reopen indoors in San Diego."That absolutely makes us hopeful, and I've told restaurateurs, business owners, whatever, we're fighting for you, too. Now we have a bigger gun than they do. We've got the Constitution, OK; they don't have that. but they're finding ways to get around it with the right to assemble," Hodges said.Hodges said back in May their initial lawsuit was voted down 5-4 by the Supreme Court.Hodges believes under a high court that shifted majority when Judge Amy Coney Barrett replaced the late Ruth Bader Ginsburg, they will prevail."If religious liberties are lost, you can mark it down your personal liberties are going to be lost," Hodges said, arguing this lawsuit is to protect more than places of worship.Hodges said if they win this legal battle it will pave the way for the rest of the country. 1563