临沧阴道不规则出血是什么情况(临沧阴道有霉菌严不严重) (今日更新中)

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) -- The Carlsbad Police Department released body camera footage Saturday night in response to public concerns over officer misconduct during an incident involving a 27-year-old black man.The June 11 incident gained attention after cell phone video surfaced showing officers using a Taser on the man and pressing his head into the pavement in an attempt to subdue him."A video is circulating showing a police use of force incident from Thursday night. Open lines of communication between the Police Department and the community are more important now than ever," Carlsbad police said in a statement."As with all uses of force, we fully investigate incidents to ensure the officers’ conduct is consistent with the Police Department’s policies," police said.The cell phone video doesn't show the start of the incident. The witness video begins with the man on the ground surrounded by paramedics and two officers lying on top of him.The newly released six-minute body cam video starts from the moment two officers respond to the scene. According to the department's timeline of the incident, officers and paramedics responded to a call at 8:48 p.m. about a man found face down on a sidewalk at Ponto Road and Carlsbad Boulevard."Two officers arrived and found the firefighters evaluating the man, who was now standing," police said.Bodycam footage shows the man talking with paramedics, and the group appears to disperse. With the officers approaching, the paramedics step away from the man. The man tells the paramedics, "I'm not complaining about anything else."The man appears to hear something from the group of paramedics and screams out, "are you mocking me?"A paramedic tells the man, "No, I'm not mocking you at all."One officer says, "Hey, they're just here to help you, man."The man stands face to face with the paramedic telling him, "the way he said it is different from how you said it. Because I understand how the f--- you say it. But what do you mean when you say it?"According to the police timeline, "The man walked quickly toward the medics while continuing to yell profanities. Officers, fearing for the safety of the medics, interceded."The report says, "Officers reached out to the man and told him to stop."A struggle ensues and the body cameras are knocked to the ground leaving only an audio recording of the incident for about two minutes. The officers pick up the cameras and resume video recording the scene about two minutes later.The department juxtaposed three camera angles of the confrontation with the man -- two from officer body cameras, and one that was recorded by an unidentified "resident." The witness video fills in a section of lost body cam footage.Carlsbad police said the investigation is still ongoing and are asking the public who may have witnessed the incident to contact the department at their non-emergency line at 760-931-2197.The man in the video, Marcel Cox-Harshaw, 27, of San Diego, was cited and released for resisting arrest. Police also charged him with being drunk in public. Police said drugs and or alcohol played a role in the incident.10News has reached out to Cox-Harshaw for comment.CARLSBAD POLICE DEPARTMENT TIMELINE OF EVENTS:A video is circulating showing a police use of force incident from Thursday night. Open lines of communication between the Police Department and the community are more important now than ever. That’s why we are providing a detailed chronology of this incident.As with all uses of force, we fully investigate incidents to ensure the officers’ conduct is consistent with the Police Department’s policies.At 8:48 p.m. A caller reported a man face down on a sidewalk at Ponto Road and Carlsbad Boulevard.At 8:55 p.m. Carlsbad Fire Department personnel arrived at the location and began their evaluation of the man.At 8:59 p.m. Two officers arrived and found the firefighters evaluating the man, who was now standing.While medics evaluated the man’s condition, the man became visually agitated and started yelling at the medics.At 8:59 p.m. The man walked quickly toward the medics while continuing to yell profanities.Officers, fearing for the safety of the medics, interceded.Officers reached out to the man and told him to stop.The man continued to yell as officers tried to handcuff the man to take him into custody.The man yelled, struggled, turned and pulled from the officers and would not comply with their instructions.At 9:02 p.m. Officers then used a taser to attempt to subdue the man.At 9:03 p.m. The officers then restrained the man by holding his body and head to the ground while placing him in handcuffs. He was not injured, but he continued to shout angrily. Officers asked him to calm down, but he refused to comply and continued shouting.At 9:03 p.m. Officers considered the man detained.A mesh bag called a spit mask was placed on the man’s head to protect the officers and paramedics from coming into contact with droplets coming from the man’s nose and mouth This bag is porous and does not restrict breathing.At this time, paramedics were able to place the man on a gurney, where he continued to yell and struggle.At 9:07 p.m. Paramedics transported the man to a local hospital where he was sedated, assessed and released.The man, 27-year-old Marcel Cox-Harshaw of San Diego, was cited and released for resisting arrest. An additional charge of drunk in public has been presented to the District Attorney's Office. The initial investigation indicates that drugs and or alcohol played a role in the incident.The investigation is still ongoing. We are asking any community members who may have witnessed the incident to call the non-emergency police number at 760-931-2197 to share their accounts.Here are some of the department’s policy that pertain to the incidentOfficers shall use only that amount of force that reasonably appears necessary given the facts and totality of the circumstances known to or perceived by the officer at the time of the event to accomplish a legitimate law enforcement purpose.When determining whether to apply force and evaluating whether an officer has used reasonable force, a number of factors should be taken into consideration, as time and circumstances permit. These factors include but are not limited to:o The apparent immediacy and severity of the threat to officers or others – Mr. Harshaw charged unarmed fire personnel while yelling profanities.o The individual’s apparent ability to understand and comply with officer commands – Mr. Harshaw would not comply with officer commands.o The conduct of the individual being confronted, as reasonably perceived by the officer. Mr. Harshaw was yelling and behaving aggressively toward fire personnel.o Proximity of weapons or dangerous improvised devices. – Officers had no way of knowing what was in Mr. Harshaw’s backpack or baggy pants.o The effects of drugs or alcohol. Mr. Harshaw appeared to be under the influence of drugs and or alcohol.o Whether the person appears to be resisting, attempting to evade arrest by flight, or is attacking the officer. Mr. Harshaw was at no time compliant.The TASER device may be used in any of the following circumstances, when the circumstances perceived by the officer at the time indicate that such application is reasonably necessary to control a person:o The subject is violent or is physically resisting. Mr. Harshaw was physically resistant and behaved aggressively toward fire personnel.o The subject has demonstrated, by words or action, an intention to be violent or to physically resist, and reasonably appears to present the potential to harm officers, him/herself or others. – Mr. Harshaw charged fire personnel, while yelling profanities and he was not compliant with officer commands.Supervisory notification shall be made as soon as practicable following the application of force. A supervisor was immediately called to the scene and an investigation was opened. The investigation includedo Obtaining the basic facts.o Collect evidence at the sceneo Ensure that all needing medical treatment are treated. Mr. Harshaw was transported to the hospital and released. An officer also received minor injuries.o The scene was canvased for additional witnesses.o Complete a Supervisor’s Compliant Summary Report and forward it to the Professional Standards Unit.o Prepare Supervisor’s Use of Force Report 8374

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) - The Drug Enforcement Agency launched a summer project drilling down on factors leading to violent crime across the nation. It is called Project Safeguard.Special Agent in Charge of the San Diego district, John Callery, said, "over 75% of those [violent] crimes are driven to get money to buy drugs."He said drugs and crime go hand in hand. "When a person devolves into a drug addict unfortunately they become very desperate right? And a desperate person will do desperate things to get money and buy drugs."Callery said his team geared up to knock out 15 cases with violent criminals. The arrests happened from August to October."We took a three month, for lack of a better word, a surge. Let’s get violent actors off the street. Let’s arrest them, DEA, and let’s charge them federally." Callery said they arrested 34 criminals.He added they have a lot of evidence to go through as well, "we’ve seized 71 firearms and... seized 160 kilograms of heroin and 160 kilograms of fentanyl."He hopes the arrests lead to hundreds more and reveal kingpins in the Mexican Drug Cartels."We’re a border town and we have a huge responsibility here to try and stop drugs from entering the United States because 75% of all drugs enter right here in our area and go to the rest of the United States." Callery said he is incredibly proud of his teamHe said five agents were infected with the novel coronavirus since March and have recovered. He said they haven't stopped working through the pandemic.Callery said his next big task is National Prescription Drug Take Back Day on October 24th. On takebackday.dea.gov you can find a collection site near you to drop unwanted, old medications so they don't get into the hands of children or others. 1753

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) — The latest ABC News national polling average shows former Vice President Joe Biden leading President Donald Trump by 8 points.But a lot of people are wondering, can we trust the polls after what happened in 2016?The last time Donald Trump was on the ballot in 2016, the polls had him trailing former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton by an average of 3.2 percentage points, and we know what happened.However, pollsters weren’t off by as much as you might think.“At the national level, the polling was, remarkably, given all things, precise,” said Jay Leve, CEO of the polling firm SurveyUSA.Trump lost the popular vote by 2.1 points instead of 3.2, the most accurate these national polls had been in 80 years, according to an analysis by the American Association for Public Opinion Research.Where the polls did miss badly was at the state level, particularly in Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin, three states that were critical in the Electoral College.Leve said there were several reasons for the polling problems at the state level.“Polling is a very expensive undertaking and so it is not possible for the handful of media organizations with pockets deep enough to afford a public opinion poll to be able to poll in every critical battleground state,” he said.Another reason? “Some of it has to do with what’s called ‘weighting,’” he added.To understand weighting, you have to know the two R’s of a good poll: it needs to be representative and random.Random samples are critical to the accuracy of polling, and you can look to your kitchen for an example why. Picture adding salt to a soup. If you mix it right, you can check the taste with any one spoonful -- you don’t have to eat the entire pot. That’s because each spoonful is a truly random sample.If you don’t mix the salt in, you could easily wind up sampling a part of the soup without any salt.When you’re trying to sample the American public with a political poll, either over the phone or most of the time now online, it’s more challenging to get a perfectly random spoonful.“The challenge is to find the individuals in the right numbers and secure their cooperation. Those two things don’t automatically work in sync,” Leve said. “People don’t want to be disturbed. They want privacy and a pollster by definition is an interruption.”It turns out, certain people tend to resist taking polls, while others are more willing. Research shows people with college degrees are more likely to respond to surveys than high school grads.That means surveys run the risk of not being representative of the voter population at large, and Leve said that kind of imbalance played a big role in 2016.To make a sample representative, pollsters gather up as many responses as they can, then adjust them with a process called weighting -- basically boosting or shrinking responses from people with certain demographics to match census data and the expected turnout.“The weighting criteria that was in issue in 2016 was whether you had enough non-college educated white voters in your sample,” Leve said. “If you did, you got the Trump forecast correct.”State polls that didn’t weight by education level missed badly, because to an extent far greater than in previous elections, voters with a college education broke for Clinton while voters with a high school education backed Trump.There’s some evidence that pollsters have learned from their 2016 mistakes. Polling in the 2018 midterms was very accurate -- a full point better than the average over the last 20 years.So can we trust the polls this time around?Leve says yes, as long as you remember that polls are just a snapshot in time and Donald Trump is difficult to predict.“Don’t be surprised if something happens in the final four, five, six days of the election, right before November 3rd, that’s so unforeseeable that neither you nor I nor anyone watching us could have imagined. And if so, that’s going to throw all the polls off,” he said. 3979

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) — The Guinness Book of World Records' largest-ever bounce house will visit 27 U.S. cities this year, including two weekend stints in San Diego.The Big Bounce America tour will bring "The World's Largest Bounce House" to San Diego for two weekends Oct. 18-20 and 25-27. The massive inflatable castle stands 32-feet tall and covers 10,000-square-feet of space.Guests can hop into several different "zones " within the puffy castle walls, including an obstacle course, ball pit, basketball hoops, a giant slide, and more. There's also a VIP section that includes a DJ booth, dance floor, and VIP dome with nightclub lights and sounds.RELATED: Mission Beach Plunge pool reopening after years of vacancyGrahame Ferguson, co-founder of The Big Bounce America, told 10News in 2017 that the bounce house took 18 months to create.Tickets range from to and welcome family and adult-only sessions. San Diegans can sign up for alerts now for when tickets are available. 990

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) - The hospital patient who brutally beat a San Diego nurse faced a judge on Friday for his sentencing. 10News was in the courtroom, where the nurse described how she fought for her life while 41 year-old Geoffrey Brizzolara attacked her.“I stood in his doorway and I said, ‘How may I help you, sir?’ His response was to lift a 25-pound chair over his head and throw it at me,” nursing supervisor Mary Prehoden told the courtroom. “Mr. Brizzolara beat me with his fists. He kicked me and then scratched me and he pulled a handful of hair straight out of my head,” she went on to say.The attack happened last summer at Scripps Mercy Hospital in Hillcrest. He was a patient at the hospital and apparently has a history of mental health issues. He did not know Nurse Preholden.“His actions were deliberate and vicious. I was defenseless,” she told the courtroom.She was joined by other nurses who say that patient violence against nurses is a constant concern across the country. Nurse Trish Mcauliffe told us, “The resources have to be increased- mental health resources.” Mcauliffe described how she was once attacked by a different patient at another hospital. “I ended up with a split lip [and] loose teeth and then he stood in the doorway, laughing.”Friday, Brizzolara was sentenced to one year behind bars, with an option for early-release to a mental health treatment facility.“Every single one of us who chooses to do this for a living is under threat every day in every hospital in this country,” added Prehoden. 1542

来源：资阳报