喀什20天可以查出来怀孕吗喀什包皮手术前后图片,喀什上环后多久可以取环,喀什割包皮得住院多久,喀什无痛割包皮多钱,喀什40多岁的女人月经不调怎么办,喀什治阴道炎要花多少钱,喀什哪家妇科治疗的比较好

SACRAMENTO, Calif. (KGTV) -- Governor Gavin Newsom's new proposal would make California the first state to establish its own generic drug label in hopes of lowering the cost of medications, CalMatters reports. The proposal is part of the state budget expected to be sent to the legislature on Friday. Newsom released a summary of the proposal Thursday, although the exact cost of the plan is unclear. “It’s time to take the power out of the hands of greedy pharmaceutical companies,” the Governor said in Tweet Thursday. According to a Kaiser Family Foundation report, roughly six in 1 Americans report taking at lease on prescription medication. RELATED: Gov. Gavin Newsom: 'Know your rights' over threat of ICE raidsMeanwhile, 79 percent of Americans say the cost of prescription drugs is unreasonable.While those in favor of the idea are supportive, some are skeptical. “If California enters the market itself, it will face the same market dynamics that have led to generic prescription drug price deflation in the past three years, as well as certain cases of patent abuse that have led to longer monopolies by select brand-name drugs,” the Association of Accessible Medicines said in a statement sent to 10News. Read the full statement below: 1256

Said it last week about GA. This is SYSTEMIC RACISM and OPPRESSION. So angry man. ?????? #BlackLivesMatter ??? #MoreThanaVote ???? https://t.co/o9440Ugyzv— LeBron James (@KingJames) June 20, 2020 205

SAN DIEGO (CNS) - A 24-year-old La Jolla man who was wearing a Jesus costume when he sucker-punched a San Diego police officer at a Gaslamp District Halloween street festival was sentenced Thursday to 270 days in jail, which will be served on weekends.Eric Van Vleet, who was arrested in Idaho's Cassia County four days after the Nov. 1, 2019, attack, pleaded guilty last year to a felony count of battery on a peace officer resulting in injury.San Diego County Superior Court Judge Melinda J. Lasater ordered that Van Vleet serve his time in county jail on 35 consecutive three-day weekends, totaling 105 days, with the rest of the time earned through custody credits. Lasater, who also imposed five years of probation, ordered that the jail term be re-evaluated and potentially modified after 15 weekends.RELATED: Man in Jesus Halloween costume accused of punching San Diego police officerDeputy District Attorney Will Hopkins said San Diego Police Officer Ben Hall and his partner, Kristen Robinson, witnessed a fight break out among several people outside the Atomic bar about 1 a.m.Hall pepper-sprayed the combatants, including one man, who punched his girlfriend after being blinded by the mace.When Robinson went to detain the man, with Hall assisting, Hopkins said Van Vleet -- who was dressed as Jesus Christ with devil horns -- yelled, "(Expletive) the police" and punched the lawman in the side of the head.He then walked away from the ruckus, disappearing into a crowd and getting into a ridesharing vehicle, and eventually left the state. According to the prosecution, surveillance footage and bar tabs helped investigators identify Van Vleet as the suspect.Hall was taken to a hospital for treatment of a roughly inch-long laceration and other trauma. The officer missed a week of work with post- concussion symptoms, according to Hopkins.Hall and Robinson called the incident "an ambush" at Van Vleet's sentencing hearing, and said it left them with doubts regarding what they could or should have done differently to safeguard themselves that night."I don't hold any grudges against you, but I believe in accountability," Hall told Van Vleet at the hearing. The officer said he hoped Van Vleet's sentence "shows that we're protected by the same laws we enforce."Van Vleet tearfully apologized to Hall, Robinson and a handful of other San Diego police officers in attendance."I don't want you guys to feel fear for doing what is your chosen calling, to protect the people," he said. "I'm more than willing to be accountable for my actions." 2563

SAN DIEGO (AP) — The American Civil Liberties Union on Wednesday released documents detailing widespread allegations of misconduct by U.S. border authorities toward children, including kicking one in the ribs, denying medical attention to a pregnant teen who complained of pain and threatening others with sexual abuse.Its report is based on more than 30,000 pages of government documents in response to Freedom of Information Act requests and a subsequent lawsuit. The allegations date from 2009 to 2014 and, according to its authors, number in the hundreds.Customs and Border Protection strongly denied the claims, as it has rejected similar accusations of widespread excessive use of force in recent years. The documents compiled by the Homeland Security Department's Office of Civil Litigation and Civil Rights for the ACLU are partially redacted, making it more difficult to assess the allegations and findings.TEAM 10 INVESTIGATES: Increase in arrests of immigrants smuggled into San Diego by seaHomeland Security's internal watchdog agency has reviewed the claims and found them unsubstantiated, said Customs and Border Protection spokesman Dan Hetlage. In 2014, the department's inspector general investigated 16 cases of alleged child neglect and abuse — out of 116 that advocacy groups had compiled — and reported that federal prosecutors declined to file charges because there was no evidence of crimes."The false accusations made by the ACLU against the previous administration are unfounded and baseless," said Hetlage.Mitra Ebadolahi, an attorney for the ACLU's border litigation project, said the quantity of the allegations as well as their consistency — spanning several years and several states and coming from children with differing backgrounds — indicates some level of truth.RELATED: Customs and Border Protection details reasons for San Diego border wall testing"These records document a pattern of intimidation, harassment, physical abuse, refusal of medical services, and improper deportation between 2009 and 2014. These records also reveal the absence of meaningful internal or external agency oversight and accountability," says the report, which was co-authored by the University of Chicago Law School's International Human Rights Clinic.The ACLU began publishing the government documents online Wednesday and plans to post material, including audio recordings. Among the cases described in the initial release of documents: 2466

SAN DIEGO (CNS) - A collective of conservation organizations filed lawsuits Thursday against San Diego County and its board of supervisors for approving a controversial housing development in the Otay Ranch community, with the groups claiming that the development endangers wildlife and the development's future residents. The project known as Adara was approved last month with a 3-2 vote and involves construction of more than 1,000 homes and a commercial village core, along with an elementary school, fire station, sheriff's office, trails, electric vehicle charging stations, solar panels and more than 700 acres of open space and parks. Environmental groups contend that its location, between the city of Chula Vista and rural community Jamul, is home to several endangered and protected plant and animal species and is at exceptional risk for wildfires. Plaintiffs include the Center for Biological Diversity, Preserve Wild Santee, the California Chaparral Institute, Endangered Habitats League, California Native Plant Society and the Sierra Club. ``Building houses in this fire-prone place will put people at risk, and it'll wreak havoc on golden eagles and other wildlife,'' said Peter Broderick, an attorney with the Center for Biological Diversity. ``By approving this sprawl project, officials have put both homeowners and wildlife in danger. They've dealt a big setback to sustainable development in San Diego County.'' In their complaint, the plaintiffs referenced county data identifying ``22 special-status plants and 28 special-status wildlife species'' on the project site. They also allege that the area is especially prone to wildfires, which was noted by Supervisor Dianne Jacob in her dissenting vote on the project. The complaint states the area ``has burned at least 17 times in the last 100 years'' and is ``at serious risk for fast-moving, wind-driven fires.'' The site's steep terrain would make suppressing fires difficult, and homeowners would only have one evacuation route available, according to the plaintiffs. Peter Andersen, chair of the Sierra Club's San Diego Chapter, called the project ``a fire trap that endangers all East County residents, contributes to severe traffic jams and destroys multiple species' habitat,'' while Richard Halsey of the California Chaparral Institute said ``History has shown that during a wind-driven wildfire, developments like this one in a known fire corridor can and have been destroyed by embers flying a mile or more ahead of the flame front. The claim that a development like this is fire safe ignores everything we have learned during the destructive 2017 and 2018 firestorms.'' 2662