喀什男科医师在线咨询喀什哪个药流医院比较好,喀什哪里医院妇科检查好,喀什割一包皮多少钱,喀什治阳痿性功能的价格,喀什勃起很硬很快就软了,喀什妇科人流 价格,喀什人流手术哪家专业医院便宜

SAN DIEGO — Some parents are keeping their children out of school Tuesday to protest the San Diego Unified School District’s sex education curriculum.A group of parents say the district’s Sexual Health Education Program (SHEP) is too graphic and not age-appropriate for their students, and they are urging district officials to eliminate the program.The parents have taken their concerns to the district’s School Board, but they said board members refuse to replace the curriculum.District officials said students can opt out of the course, but parents want the images they consider graphic gone.Ashley Bever, a substitute teacher who is organizing the one-day protest, said she was surprised to see all of the materials student had access to.“I thought a 6th grade teacher did not write this. Where it did come from? Why is it so explicit? Why is it telling kids they have sexual rights apart from their parents?” Bever said.The group is scheduled to hold a rally at the district’s office in University Heights at 4 p.m., just before the School Board’s meeting. 1075

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) — Cold, windy, and rainy conditions have prompted the San Diego Housing Commission to activate inclement weather shelters this New Year’s Eve. The commission activates the Inclement Weather Shelter Program when temperatures drop below 50 degrees, the chance of rain is higher than 40 percent or in the case of sustained high winds. The program is a partnership between the commission, the city of San Diego, Father Joe's and Connections Housing. The commission also funds the program. Father Joe’s Villages tells 10News they can take in an additional 170 people this New Year's Eve, including children.They will convert two dining halls into temporary shelters, filling them with cots. “When you’re out there in the rain and you get wet and then this cold air, you feel a chill in your bones, that’s what those on the streets experience,” said Deacon Jim Vargas, President and CEO of Father Joe’s Villages. Homeless individuals will be given meals as well as dry clothes when they leave. Residents can dial 2-1-1 or visit 211sandiego.org to find out more about the county's Inclement Weather Shelter Program. 1134

SAN DIEGO (CNS) - A drunken driver who went the wrong way and crashed head-on into another car in 4S Ranch, killing the other driver, was convicted Wednesday of gross vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated and DUI causing injury.Jurors deadlocked on a second-degree murder count against Alexandria Bayne, but will return Thursday to resume deliberations in hopes of reaching a consensus. The 37-year-old defendant was charged with murder due to two previous DUI convictions from 2005 and 2008.The panel deliberated two days before returning the vehicular manslaughter and DUI verdicts, and acquitted Bayne of four child endangerment counts involving allegations that she drove drunk earlier in the day while her children were riding in her minivan.RELATED: Fatal 4S Ranch DUI suspect breaks down in tears when husband testifies in hearingOn Thursday, the jury will hear a read-back of closing arguments and receive clarifications on the legal definitions of certain terms such as "intentionally" and "deliberately," which were cited as a source of contention in jury notes submitted to San Diego County Superior Court Judge Robert F. O'Neill.Sarita Shakya, a 38-year-old Scripps Mercy Hospital nurse, was heading home from work the afternoon of Dec. 17, 2016, on Camino Del Norte when her car was struck head-on by the defendant's vehicle.Deputy District Attorney Cally Bright told jurors in her opening statement that Bayne had been drinking alcoholic beverages throughout the day, starting that morning. The defendant and her attorney conceded she'd been drinking but was not drunk when she was behind the wheel. Though she testified that she had eight drinks throughout that day, she told the jury she simply made a mistake when she turned into opposing traffic lanes on Camino Del Norte.RELATED: Tears at preliminary hearing in suspected DUI fatal crashBayne's attorney, Michelle Hunsaker, contended that Bayne made that mistake because she was distracted by family issues, as well as her cell phone.Prosecutors said her blood alcohol content was measured at between .32 and .33% -- the legal limit is .08% -- after the crash.Hunsaker disputed that testing result, saying Bayne's alcohol consumption "just doesn't line up" with the .33% BAC alleged by the prosecution. She also said Bayne had encountered several people throughout the day and did not appear intoxicated.RELATED: Woman killed by suspected drunk driver in 4S Ranch identified"We are not discounting the magnitude of the loss of Ms. Shakya and take full responsibility for that collision. But distraction does not equal murder," Hunsaker said.Shakya's husband, Peter Chen, testified that his wife typically returned home sometime after midnight each night following her shift at the hospital. When she didn't show up, he called her supervisor, who didn't know why Shakya might be late.Hours later, he received the bad news."I couldn't believe what had happened," Chen said, calling it "the worst day of my life." 2990

SAN DIEGO (AP) — A pathologist testified Monday at a Navy SEAL's murder trial that a wounded Islamic State militant in Iraq could have died from a stabbing described by other witnesses.Dr. Frank Sheridan said he couldn't determine a cause of death because there was no body and a lack of other evidence.The testimony at the trial of Special Operations Chief Edward Gallagher, though, countered a statement offered last week by another SEAL who stunned the court when he confessed to the killing.Corey Scott testified Thursday that he killed the victim by plugging his breathing tube after Gallagher unexpectedly stabbed the fighter while treating him for injuries suffered in an air strike outside Mosul in 2017.Scott testified that the militant, described as an adolescent boy, would have survived the stabbing.But Scott said he decided to asphyxiate him because he assumed he would later be tortured and killed by Iraqi forces who captured him and brought him to the Navy medics for treatment.Gallagher, 40, is charged with murder in the killing of the boy and attempted murder for allegedly gunning down civilians from his sniper's post.He has pleaded not guilty and his lawyers blame his former troop mates for fabricating the accusations to get Gallagher ousted from the special forces because they didn't like his tough leadership.Scott and another SEAL said Gallagher had initiated medical treatment for the boy and then stabbed him one to three times in the neck for no apparent reason.Gallagher later texted a photo of the corpse to friends with the following message: "Good story behind this, got him with my hunting knife."His lawyers said the message was an attempt at dark humor.Sheridan based his testimony on witness accounts and video of the wounded war prisoner before the alleged knifing.After the boy was wounded in an air strike — more than an hour before he was brought to the U.S. forces for treatment — he was interviewed by an Iraqi TV news crew. He appeared lucid and did not have significant hemorrhaging, Sheridan said."He's clearly responsive," Sheridan said. "There's no sign he's bleeding from any wound."Witnesses at the scene said Gallagher treated the boy for a leg wound and an apparent collapsed lung. The patient was sedated and given a breathing tube for a wound they believe occurred from the air strike blast.He was breathing normally after the procedure when Gallagher suddenly pulled out his personal knife and stabbed him in or near the neck, witnesses said.Depending on the location of the stab wounds, he could have died from profuse internal or external bleeding, Sheridan said. But he couldn't make that determination."I can't give an opinion on the cause of death," Sheridan said. "There just isn't enough evidence."___Melley reported from Los Angeles. 2807

SAN DIEGO — Tony Ganaway took full advantage of the space in front of him. He had three tents set up in the parking lot of the College Area strip mall where he and his colleagues could deliver haircuts outside."It's on us as owners and entrepreneurs to sit here and find a way everyday," said Ganaway, who owns the Cutt'n Edge barber shop. 'Hearing the word 'no' is something you've got to get used to when you're trying to make it in life."Ganaway says the afternoon was busy as people lined up for his signature service. It was the first day operating under new state rules for haircuts to help stop the spread of the Coronavirus. The rules allowed hair stylists to operate outdoors, or under shaded coverings that allow normal airflow. The rules also restrict the kinds of services that can be conducted outdoors, including eliminating big money makers like coloring services. For some salons, that's a deal breaker and they'd rather just stay closed."It's business suicide for our industry," said Corinne Lam, who decided not to reopen Salotto Salon in Rancho Bernardo. "It's unsanitary, the elements are uncontrollable, people will be sweating under cutting capes, and it is just unfathomable."In a statement, the California Department of Consumer affairs stood by the new rules."The situation is fluid and the environment is constantly changing, but for now, personal care facilities that are on the statewide monitoring list must follow the Governor's directive not to operate services indoors," spokeswoman Cheri Gyuro said. Lam said regular haircuts make up just 15 percent of her business, and she spent ,000 making the inside of her salon safer. Meanwhile, she's exhausted all of the Paycheck Protection Program funds that helped her through the first shutdown, 1782