济南阴囊上有黑点像血泡不疼不痒济南男人的包皮过长怎么办,济南医院泌尿科专家,济南男性勃起是怎样,济南治疗前列腺炎早泄,济南包皮手术一般几天,济南包茎太厚,济南什么情况割包皮

(KGTV) -- Billions of dollars could be at stake with Proposition 15.If passed, it would tax some commercial properties based on current market value instead of when it was bought. It could potentially bring in anywhere between .5 to .5 billion in new funding to local schools and governments, according to the Legislative Analyst’s Office.Brandon Foster is a small business owner in Oceanside. Even though he rents the space where his two gift shops are located, he is against Prop. 15.“We already have been told by our landlords, if that passes, they will be passing on that cost to us,” Foster said. “The landlords, a lot of them, have vacancies and things like that where they are struggling themselves. I understand why they need to pass that cost onto us.”The ad for No on Prop. 15 highlights a small business owner who said he had to close twice during the pandemic. The ad said Proposition 15 would raise “property taxes and rents on small business and they admit homeowners are next.”The change in property tax assessment would apply only to commercial or industrial properties valued at more than million. It would tax those properties at current market value rather than when it was bought.Residential and agricultural properties are not affected under Prop. 15.“They are very emotional, as ads are supposed to be,” said Lynn Reaser, chief economist at Pt. Loma Nazarene University.The ad has major funding from the California Business Roundtable, California Business Properties Association, and the California Taxpayers Association.“You would see a big effect especially on these older companies, not necessarily the big companies, but all companies that bought their properties some years ago,” Reaser said. “They could face more problems in terms of survival.”The ad lacks detail about time frame for Proposition 15, not making clear that it would take effect in 2022.While the ad said homeowners are next in line for property tax increases, Reaser said “no one knows” if that is actually true.“All the businesses, they’re all going to have to pass on the money, the expense, to somebody,” Foster said. 2131

(KGTV) - Did a man really try to board a plane naked because he said clothes made him less aerodynamic?Yes.Last weekend, the man stripped while waiting in line to get on a Ural Airlines flight in Russia.He was detained before getting onto the aircraft and taken to a medical facility for evaluation. 307

(KGTV) — At least 50,000 people were ordered to evacuate as multiple fires burned north of Los Angeles Thursday amid dangerously dry and windy conditions.The Tick Fire started about 2 p.m. in the Canyon Country area of Santa Clarita and spread east to Agua Dulce. Cal Fire reported about 8:30 p.m. the fire had spread to 3,950 acres. Several structures were lost. As of 6:20 p.m., firefighters had slowed the fire's progress.Mandatory Tick Fire evacuations are in effect for all residents north of 14 freeway, east of Whites/Plum Canyon, south of Vasquez Canyon, west of Agua Dolce. Also, south of 14 freeway, east of Sand Canyon, north of Placerita Canyon, and west of Robinson Ranch Golf Course.WATCH LIVE:Evacuees were told to find shelter at College of the Canyons, 26455 Rockwell Canyon Road, Santa Clarita.Shortly after the Tick Fire started, a brush fire erupted in Castaic.Flames moved uphill from The Old Road and burned homes.RELATED: Interactive Map: Fires scorch Southern CaliforniaThe California Highway Patrol shut down northbound I-5 at Halsey Canyon and advised drivers to use the westbound SR 126 to the 101 Freeway as an alternate.About 4:00 p.m., a brush fire broke out in LA's Sepulveda Basin at Woodley Ave, northwest of the 405/101 junction. The fire burned 30 acres and was 20% contained by 6:20 p.m.There was no immediate threat to structures from the Basin Fire, Los Angeles Fire Department officials said. Homeless people living in the area were evacuated south. Residents of Sherman Oaks and Encino were warned to gather belongings should they need to evacuate.The causes of the three significant fires were not immediately determined.10News is monitoring breaking developments.VIDEO: @LACoFireAirOps Firehawk helicopters fighting wildfire on three fronts. Working to protect lives and property earlier in Santa Clarita, CA. #TickFire @LACoFDPIO (media ok to use with credit) pic.twitter.com/XZEOlS3ZxL— LACoFireAirOps (@LACoFireAirOps) October 25, 2019 If these are your dogs, don’t worry. @SCVSHERIFF deputies were able to rescue them off of the Old Road. They are now in the care of animal control. pic.twitter.com/OBWaD1Z7uB— LA County Sheriffs (@LASDHQ) October 25, 2019 2212

(KGTV) - A truck driver narrowly missed a boy stepping off his school bus in Norway.Video from another truck’s dash cam shows the boy running straight into the path of the oncoming vehicle.The truck driver slammed on the brakes and missed the boy by centimeters.The dash cam owner said he flashed his lights to help alert the truck driver. 347

(KGTV) — A Northern California judge has ruled against Gov. Gavin Newsom, saying he overstepped his authority when requiring all California registered voters receive a mail-in ballot for the 2020 election.Sutter County Judge Sarah Heckman said Friday that Gov. Newsom did not have the authority to amend or change the state's law through an executive order, which mandated all registered voters get a mail-in ballot and allowed counties to reduce the number of polling locations if in-person voting is offered ahead of Nov. 3, according to court documents.The ruling doesn't affect the results of the 2020 election.Newsom's executive order was made as part of the California Emergency Services Act, or CESA. The act gives the governor special powers during a public emergency.The ruling stemmed from a lawsuit by Assembly members James Gallagher (R-Yuba City) and Kevin Kiley (R-Rocklin), who claimed Newsom didn't have the authority to make the order. California's legislature later passed a similar law to the order.Kiley posted the judge's ruling online, in which the judge wrote, "Executive Order N-67-20 issued by the Governor on June 3, 2020 is void as an unconstitutional exercise of legislative power and shall be of no further force or effect. The California Emergency Services Act (CA Government Code §8550 et seq.) does not authorize or empower the Governor of the State of California to amend statutory law or make new statutory law, which is exclusively legislative function not delegated to the Governor under the CESA."The judge's ruling also put an injunction in place against Newsom, prohibiting him from changing any laws under CESA, according to the documents. 1687