济南前列腺功能济南治疗射精延时方法,济南如何可以治阳痿,济南前列腺炎肥大治疗,济南治疗非淋感染,济南怎么是包皮长,济南尿道有感染吃什么好,济南包皮怎么叫过长

Congressional Democrats have issued subpoenas to the Trump Organization and other Trump businesses tied to a lawsuit accusing President Donald Trump of profiting from foreign governments in violation of the Constitution, but the Justice Department is now asking an appeals court to step in and block the move.Democrats sent more than three-dozen subpoenas, demanding a response by July 29, seeking to collect evidence about the President's financial records, after a federal judge ruled last month that Democrats could proceed with the legal discovery process in their lawsuit.But the Justice Department, defending Trump in his presidential capacity, has requested that an appeals court Monday overrule the lower court's decision and prevent the subpoenas from going forward. If the Democratic members of Congress collected evidence in the emoluments lawsuit, DOJ wrote, Trump "is likely to suffer irreparable injury" because of "intrusive discovery into his personal finances based on the public office he holds."The escalating court fight represents a new front in Democrats' quest to obtain the President's financial records, a battle that's now playing out across multiple congressional committees and judicial jurisdictions.The new subpoenas come from the Constitutional Accountability Center, which is representing a group of House and Senate Democrats led by Sen. Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut and House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler of New York, who are alleging Trump is violating the emoluments clause of the Constitution.The judge overseeing the suit, Emmet Sullivan of the US District Court in Washington, gave the Democrats permission to subpoena the documents and take depositions beginning June 28.The Justice Department asked in its filing Monday for the DC Circuit Court of Appeals to hear their case before Sullivan finishes resolving it at the trial level. The department says Sullivan was wrong in his interpretation of congressional power and the constitutional clause that prohibits officials from receiving benefits from foreign powers.Sullivan previously told the Justice Department that it could not yet appeal his decisions that allowed the case to move forward into evidence-collection."If the district court's clearly erroneous orders are allowed to stand, this improper suit will proceed and the Members will commence discovery aimed at probing the President's personal financial affairs because he holds federal office," the Justice Department wrote to the DC Circuit on Monday.It's an extraordinary step for the Justice Department to go around a lower court's decision before a case is resolved. However, it's not unheard of. The Justice Department used the same maneuver in another case about emoluments, before the federal court in Maryland. The Fourth Circuit, which looks at appeals from Maryland, has not yet decided that case.The DC Circuit hasn't yet decided what it will do.The Democratic subpoenas seek the President's companies' tax returns and other financial information about Trump's business assets. They also request information about three Trump towers in New York, the Trump International Hotel in Washington, DC, a San Francisco building, and the President's Palm Beach club Mar-a-Lago.Blumenthal said the subpoenas were intended to provide "information about foreign government payments accepted by six Trump properties, as well as trademarks granted to Trump businesses by foreign governments.""Unsurprisingly, the Trump Administration is still seeking to delay, delay, delay, but we are confident that the D.C. Circuit will recognize the well-reasoned logic of the District Court, and allow discovery to proceed," Blumenthal said in a statement.Democrats seek Trump finances through multiple channelsThe emoluments lawsuit has plodded along in the federal court since 2017, but the judge's decision on subpoenas gives Democrats a potential new avenue to obtain the President's financial records. While it's the earliest case where Democrats took the President to court, they now are also fighting Trump and his administration in additional court cases to obtain his tax returns and financial records from the Trump Organization's banks and accounting firms.The various cases may take several months -- if not much longer -- to be resolved. Democrats say they're seeking the financial information to conduct oversight of the Trump administration, but if they do obtain the records they're seeking, the documents could also provide them additional evidence beyond what was uncovered by special counsel Robert Mueller should they decide to pursue an impeachment inquiry into the President.Trump has repeatedly accused Democrats of "presidential harassment" in their efforts both to obtain his financial records and haul in his closest aides to testify. In this case, the Justice Department has argued in court that the Constitution's emoluments provision doesn't apply to Trump's business situation, and that any evidence collection for the legal challenge would be too distracting for the President. In other court cases, Trump's private legal team has argued that 5133

CINCINNATI — Without the knowledge of Hamilton County's sheriff, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents have been 136

CINCINNATI, Ohio — Comprehensive multi-platform reporting and collaboration with news outlets are trends among winners of the 2018 Scripps Howard Awards. "Their work embodies the meaning of journalism that brings important truths to light, holds the powerful accountable and changes our world," said a release from the Scripps Howard Foundation. Winners of its 66th awards competed in 15 categories. The Scripps Howard Foundation will present more than 0,000 in prize money to the winning organizations and journalists at its annual awards show on April 18 in Cincinnati. Here are the winners for this year:Breaking News: South Florida Sun Sentinel (Deerfield Beach) for “Parkland: A Breaking News Story that Demanded a Long-Term Commitment” – Coverage of the shooting at Marjorie Stoneman Douglas High School.Judges’ comments: “Breaking news coverage is not often an area where demonstrable impact can be shown, but the Sun Sentinel’s dogged real-time pursuit of every angle of the breaking story and underlying contributors to this tragedy has had a lasting impact on Parkland, on journalism and on the national conversation about guns in America.” Finalists: The Kansas City (Missouri) Star – “Tragedy on Table Rock Lake”; Pittsburgh Post-Gazette – “Tree of Life Shooting” Broadcast – Local Coverage: KNTV (San Jose, California) for “Transgender Kids: A Changing Student Body” – A story exploring the issue of transgender reassignment decisions. Judges’ comments: “The winner in this category, in part, wins for taking on a subject that, 20 years from now we will likely look back on and wonder why it was a subject at all. We were most impressed at the mature, non-sensational way this story treated the subject.” Finalists: KARE (Minneapolis) – “A Pattern of Denial”; KUSA (Denver) – “Lien on Me” Broadcast – National, International Coverage: MSNBC for “Putin’s Covert War” – An investigation into the main players in the 2016 election meddling story. Judges’ comments: “MSNBC reporter Richard Engle goes inside one of the most important and hard-to-crack stories of our time – the spread of Russian influence on international affairs and on U.S. politics. He shows, through audio recordings, for example, how American troops confront Russian-hired mercenaries in Syria, and he tracks down a former KGB spy turned double agent now living in London to learn more about how Russia put out ‘hit contracts’ on opponents.” Finalists: Frontline PBS and ProPublica – “Documenting Hate”; Vice News – “After the Fall” Business/Financial Reporting: International Consortium of Investigative Journalists, NBC News Investigative Unit, Associated Press and more than 50 media partners for “Implant Files” – An investigation into the medical devices and implants industry and its related injuries and deaths. Judges’ comments: “Excellently planned, researched, documented, reported and written with key findings highlighted throughout. The compelling personal stories of patients give life to the numbers.”Finalists: Bloomberg – “Sign Here to Lose Everything”; Reveal from the Center for Investigative Reporting, PRX, Associated Press and PBS NewsHour – “Kept Out” Community Journalism: Knoxville (Tennessee) News Sentinel for “The Devastation of TVA’s Coal Ash Spill” – Coverage of the workers who were sickened cleaning up the country’s worst coal ash spill. Judges’ comments: “Reporter Jamie Satterfield delivers excellent watchdog work that truly holds the powerful accountable. Her investigation is deeply reported and swarms all the important angles. The series of stories were well sourced and contained videos with on-the-record accounts that hit viewers between the eyes. Satterfield’s extraordinary efforts result in change-inducing and life-saving journalism.” Finalists: The Marshall Project and Tennessean (Nashville) – “Tennessee’s ‘Safekeepers’”; The Post and Courier (Charleston, South Carolina) – “Minimally Adequate” Environmental Reporting: National Geographic for “Planet or Plastic?” – Reporting on the alarming volume of plastic in our world. Judges’ comments: “National Geographic’s ‘Planet or Plastic?’ has catapulted the conversation onto a global platform by creating awareness and catalyzing action. Journalism like this shines a light on policy flaws and irresponsible manufacturing and empowers citizens and communities to be proactive about protecting our environment and the people and animals it supports.” Finalists: Center for Public Integrity, The Texas Tribune (Austin), Newsy and Associated Press – “Blowout: Inside America’s Energy Gamble”; Charleston (West Virginia) Gazette-Mail and ProPublica – “The New Power Brokers: West Virginia’s Natural Gas Industry” Distinguished Service to the First Amendment: The Dallas Morning News for “Pain and Profit” – An investigation into the failures in Texas’ privatized Medicaid system. Judges’ comments: "The impact of the investigation is impressive. Sick people are getting the services they are entitled to; the state has spent million on 100 new regulators; the legislature is considering a package of bills expected to lead to a crackdown on companies that deny medically needed services…none of this could have been accomplished without the use of public records requests and resourceful use of duplicate records held by other states when their requests were denied.” Finalists: Atlanta Journal-Constitution and WSB-TV (Atlanta) – “How Atlanta Trampled the Public’s Right to Know”; The Denver Post – “Shrouded Justice” Human Interest Storytelling: The New York Times and ProPublica for “Blood Will Tell” – An investigation of a forensic technique used in the criminal justice system, despite concerns about its reliability. Judges’ comments: “Extraordinary storytelling with careful selection and organization of a massive amount of material. The story somehow manages to present a troubling indictment of blood spatter analysis and its misuse in our courts — and at the same time, to tell the deeply human tragedy of this husband and wife and all those decades the man spent in prison.” Finalists: The New York Times – “Lost in the Storm”; Univision – “America First: The Legacy of an Immigration Raid” Innovation: BBC for “Anatomy of a Killing” – A project that used forensic analysis of viral video footage to prove the occurrence of a series of executions in Cameroon, Africa.Judges’ comments: “This is a story where the innovation was integral to the journalism instead of just enhancing the story. This investigation done from laptops in London taps readily available digital tools to show the potential power of investigative journalism when traditional skills are paired up with modern digital resources. The genesis of this project – a video that went viral – is one that can serve as a replicable model for other newsrooms.” Finalists: The New York Times – “Visual Forensics”; South Florida Sun Sentinel – “Parkland” Investigative Reporting: Reuters for “Myanmar Burning” – Reporting on the expulsion of Rohingya Muslims in Myanmar. Judges’ comments: “Brave, intrepid collection of reporting. Reporters Wa Lone and Kyaw Soe Oo gathered comprehensive evidence from survivors, witnesses and families of the victims to tell the story of atrocities that may otherwise not have been brought to light. The reporters remain imprisoned in Myanmar, but the work they began resonated throughout the world.” Finalists: Star Tribune (Minneapolis) – “Denied Justice”; The Wall Street Journal – “Trump’s Hush Money” Multimedia Journalism: Frontline PBS and The GroundTruth Project for “The Last Generation: An Interactive Film on the Marshall Islands” – A collaborative reporting project on climate change and its effect on the population of the Marshall Islands.Judges’ comments: “Frontline and GroundTruth introduce viewers to this issue through the lens of a generation of children on the Marshall Islands, their lives likely be displaced by rising waters. Using a smartly presented mix of documentary video, explainer text and illustrated graphics to present the science, ‘The Last Generation’ gives a space for these kids to articulate what climate change means for their futures. And as viewers navigate through the story, they might also glimpse their own potential fate." Finalists: The Oregonian/OregonLive.com (Portland) – “Ghosts of Highway 20”; South Florida Sun Sentinel – “Unprepared and Overwhelmed” Opinion: Palestine (Texas) Herald-Press for “What Are They Hiding?” – Commentary that questioned two issues affecting the Palestine community: an athletic commission’s treatment of a football player and the state of Texas’ rush to execute condemned prisoners. Judges’ comments: “In their clarity and detail, the editorials would be worthy of the best efforts of the largest metro newspapers in America. The fact that they were all published by a small Texas paper with less than a 10,000 circulation is an example of journalism that speaks truth to power when doing so could invite truly unpleasant consequences.”Finalists: Bloomberg – Tim O’Brien columns for Bloomberg Opinion; Capital Gazette (Annapolis, Maryland) – “Capital Gazette Shooting and Aftermath” Radio/Podcast: Michigan Radio for “Believed” – A podcast that tells the stories of survivors of abuse by former Olympic gymnastics doctor Larry Nassar. Judges’ comments: “The lifelong costs and consequences of childhood sexual abuse were made vividly, urgently clear in the superb Michigan Radio series ‘Believed.’ Using interrogation tapes, archival audio and in-depth interviews with the victims and their families, the Michigan Radio reporters skillfully led listeners through a staggering loss of innocence.” Finalists: WBEZ-FM (Chicago) and Chicago Tribune – “16 Shots”; WNYC Studios – “Aftereffect” Topic of the Year: Midterm Elections: Vice News for “She’s Running” – A four-part web series on female candidates running for office in the 2018 midterm elections. Judges’ comments: “What Vice News did so impressively in its series “She’s Running” was document just how hard it is to be a young female candidate running for the first time on her own terms – and winning. Each episode was filled with candid moments that revealed what it takes to run for office. We were impressed by Vice’s choice to do this in a non-narrated way, giving the viewer front-row seats to the unfolding drama of this race."Finalists: CBS News: “60 Minutes” – “As Texas Goes”; The Washington Post – “Midterm Election” Visual Journalism: Marcus Yam of the Los Angeles Times for his newspaper photojournalism portfolio. Judges’ comments: “Each submission demonstrated his mastery of key photographic elements such as light, composition and an intimacy that builds a visual narrative that draws the reader in and connects you to the subjects so that one feels their plight and our shared humanity. In this, he fulfilled one of journalism’s highest principles, giving voice to the voiceless.” Finalists: David Goldman photography portfolio for the Associated Press; BBC – “Trail of the Deadly Drug Trade” Journalism Education AwardsThe Scripps Howard Foundation, in partnership with the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, also announced the winners of its two journalism education awards:Teacher of the Year: Jinx Broussard – Manship School of Mass Communication, Louisiana State University (Baton Rouge) Finalists: Kathleen Culver – School of Journalism and Mass Communication, University of Wisconsin-Madison; Meenakshi Gigi Durham – School of Journalism and Mass Communication, University of Iowa (Iowa City)Administrator of the Year: Dean Diane McFarlin – College of Journalism and Communications, University of Florida (Gainesville) Finalist: Director Judy Oskam – School of Journalism and Mass Communication, Texas State University (San Marcos) 11825

Dwayne 'The Rock' Johnson took to social media to issue a plea for leadership as protests continue across the country.The actor 140

Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders said Monday he was open to backing a major proposed reform to the makeup of the Supreme Court.The Vermont independent, following the lead of some progressive legal scholars, floated a plan that would effectively end lifetime, uninterrupted appointments for Supreme Court justices."What may make sense is, if not term limits, then rotating judges to the appeals court as well," Sanders said at the We the People Summit in Washington. "Letting them get out of the Supreme Court and bringing in new blood."Sanders stopped short of backing calls to add justices to the court, a strategy gaining steam with a new generation of left-wing activists, who are putting pressure on the Democratic candidates to address their concerns over the current conservative influence on the court with more ambitious plans."My worry is that the next time the Republicans are in power they will do the same thing," Sanders said of the court-packing option. "So I think that is not the ultimate solution."Progressive legal scholars and activist groups have paid increasing mind to the courts in the aftermath of 2016, when Senate Republicans blocked former President Barack Obama's Supreme Court pick, Merrick Garland, denying him even a public hearing ahead of the election. Since then, President Donald Trump has appointed two justices, both confirmed nearly along party lines after the GOP did away with the filibuster for Supreme Court nominees."It's not just about expansion, it's about depoliticizing the Supreme Court," Sen. Elizabeth Warren told 1597