济南男人早泄治疗的方法(济南生殖器 医院) (今日更新中)

SAN DIEGO (CNS) - A judge Monday denied a request by four San Diego County businesses seeking to resume indoor operations following the county's recent slide into the purple tier of the state's coronavirus reopening plan.San Diego Superior Court Judge Kenneth J. Medel heard arguments Friday on the lawsuit, which was filed earlier this month on behalf of Cowboy Star Restaurant and Butcher Shop, Home & Away Encinitas, Fit Athletic Club and Bear Republic, shortly before indoor operations were suspended for nonessential businesses in the county due to rising COVID-19 case numbers.The businesses sought a temporary restraining order halting the prohibition on indoor operations, contending that San Diego County's increased case numbers are not a result of exposures at restaurants, gyms and other types of businesses impacted by the closures.While Medel and the state conceded pandemic restrictions have created negative economic impacts for businesses, both stated the public health concerns outweighed those harms.In his ruling, Medel wrote, "In the court's mind, the impact on public health of dismantling a portion of the state's COVID-19 response designed to reduce community spread outweighs the economic harm to plaintiffs at least pending further examination of these issues in any upcoming hearing on preliminary injunction."A status conference was scheduled for Dec. 2 for discussion regarding a preliminary injunction hearing.Wilson Elser, the law firm representing the businesses, declined comment on the ruling, stating through a spokesperson that it does not comment on active lawsuits.The lawsuit cited figures indicating restaurants/bars, retail businesses, places of worship, schools and gyms make up a small percentage of infections and confirmed community outbreaks.During Friday afternoon's hearing, attorney Bruno Katz, representing the businesses, referenced an adjudication request submitted to the state by San Diego County Public Health Officer Dr. Wilma Wooten, which sought to have San Diego County remain in the red tier. The request was rejected."Penalizing the impacted sectors for case inc

SAN ANTONIO, Texas – The moment Ryan Houston-Dial stepped on The University of Texas at San Antonio campus, he felt at home.“This is where I want to be,” said Houston-Dial of the feeling he got when he visited the school.The university offered everything he wanted, but somehow, several semesters later, the psychology major was left feeling empty.His classes were the first place he felt alone.“Typically, I was the only African American male, so sometimes I feared tokenism, that I would have to be the speaker for a certain demographic,” he said.The feelings of worry and stress only grew with the racial unrest this year, and the pandemic.“My mental health was pretty low. When you have to be able to try to process a lot of these things that are going on in America, and still have to go to work or go to school and act like that did not happen, I feel like you lose a part of yourself.”But Ryan couldn’t accept that loss. He reached out to The Steve Fund: a nonprofit providing mental health resources specifically for students of color.He joined an advisory board there to help develop solutions for colleges to support students of color better, especially through the pandemic.Psychologists there also opened up conversations that helped him understand the emotional weight he was carrying inside himself.“Racial trauma is real, and college students are likely entering into college already with racial trauma in their systems,” said David Rivera with The Steve Fund. Rivera is also an Associate Professor at the Queens College of New York. “Racial trauma is inherited from our ancestors who had to endure very traumatic events, so we carry that with us.”We spoke with several psychologists to explore the conversation of healing racial trauma and where it comes from. We spoke with Dr. Theopia Jackson of the Association of Black Psychologists and the Chair for the Clinical Psychology degree program at Saybrook University and Winley K., a clinical psychologist who specializes in mental health care for young people of color.Below, Jackson discusses the roots of institutional racism in the U.S."We glorify our forefathers in the efficacy, that they were trying to move forward. But we have to critically think, they were limited by what they knew at that time. At that time, we might presume, that there's this assumption they were not aware of their cognitive dissonance, thinking one way and behaving another. We can't say everyone has unalienable rights while you're still taking people's lands, owning people, and even the ways in which we have thought about and treated women in general and children in general, when they were owned by their husbands, so that's the cognitive dissonance. So we have to critically look at that and see how do we recognize where there are still roots of this in our ways of being?" said Jackson.Winley K. said students come in for counseling often with racial trauma, and many don’t fully realize it.“People often come in and say, ‘I just don’t feel good, I don’t have motivation for stuff, but I’m not sure why I feel like this,’ but then they’ll tell me that two days ago, someone called them the N word or in the classroom they're the only person of color and they feel like they're under a microscope and whenever something race related is brought up, people look to them for the answer, but they’re still saying I don’t know why I feel bad I don’t know why it's hard for me to do things I don’t understand, so a lot of the work is helping them draw connections between those pieces."Houston-Dial realized he’d been living with that trauma for years.“I believe around 12 or 13 years old, it started with the Trayvon Martin case, and I remember sitting in my living room, and I just started crying. It hit a certain point to where I almost didn't even know why I was crying. And as I became older, I began to more realize I was crying because when I saw Trayvon Martin, I saw a reflection of myself that, being an innocent Black boy very well in his neighborhood minding his own business could very well lose his life,” said Houston-Dial.This pain can be lessened with time and support. But without that, racial trauma can have real consequences on a person’s health.“There is a wellness impact to experiencing microaggressions, and when they go unchecked, they can create anxiety, they can create depression symptoms such as sadness, such as fatigue,” said Rivera.These microaggressions can take many forms. It can be a subtle racist comment or a derogatory look.Below, Jackson discusses how consistent microaggressions can impact a person's healthAll are damaging. That’s why researchers say it’s more important than ever to get young people mental health resources, because 50% of life long mental illness start showing up by the time a person turns 14, and 75% of chronic mental illness will likely emerge by age 24.“The more that we can equip the young person in terms of helping them to understand the various dynamics they’re likely to endure in their life, such as microaggressions and racial trauma, the better off this young person will be in the end,” said David Rivera."There are those unseen or unrecognizable or small instances that can happen, and that is when we talk about microaggressions and people say, 'you speak really well' to a person of color, which is sort of a backhanded compliment." said Jackson. "The speaker may really have the intentions of giving a compliment, and the receiver may think it really was one, but within their spirit of some space, is what people may call the unconscious if you will, or the unknown parts of ourselves, these types of comments for the receiver can generate this idea of, 'wait a minute, why do I need to be complimented that I speak so well?' That has something to do with not being expected to speak so well particularly when our mainstream messages will in fact suggest that certain people from certain groups aren't supposed to speak very well," said Jackson. "We have science that suggests that exposure to consistent microaggressions can lead to physical challenges such as health care issues around diabetes and obesity and other things like that."Psychologists say improving the situation will not only start on the individual level by giving young people better tools to help improve their mental health, but it will also take conversations about dismantling the institutional racism that exists all around us, including here on college campuses.“The impact of institutionalized racism is pretty deep,” said Rivera. “Their systems, their procedures, their structures were created for a very few at the expense of many.”But, both Rivera and Houston-Dial believe this system can be rebuilt.“I believe right now, it's going to take empathy,” said Houston-Dial.More than that, it will take deep, honest conversations between all groups to come together, not grow further apart.“It’s gonna take those who are unaffected to be just as enraged as those who are affected on a daily basis, and from there we can start to have more honest conversations about what race is,” said Houston-Dial.With those conversations, this college student is hopeful change will come.But, Houston-Dial is already creating change working with The Steve Fund, and his on-campus publication The Paisano.He and a group of students, including Chevaughn Wellington, a medical student at Quinnipiac University, developed a report with ways to support youth of color, especially during the pandemic.The Steve Fund is also now reaching out to high school students to provide mental health resources and a safe place to open up about emotional racial trauma.On his own campus specifically, Houston-Dial and other students petitioned for more counselors to be available to students on campus, and the petition was successful. The university now has more options and mental health resources available for students.These successes have been a beacon of hope to Houston-Dial in spite of the obstacles this year placed in front of him.“I have a voice as an African American male in a society that very well may try to oppress me and put me down, but I can still be the icon to another African American male saying, ‘Hey it is okay to want to cry, it is okay to want to talk about certain things that are bothering you and that: we can do this together,’” said Houston-Dial.Because together, their plea for a better tomorrow cannot and will not be ignored.“We just want to be seen as your equal. That's all we want,” said Houston-Dial.Words that exist in a complicated reality, but a reality this student and his peers will not stop fighting for. 8634

SALT LAKE CITY, Utah - Misinformation comes in many forms, but some can be harder to spot than others.Whether it's sharing a video clip or picture that doesn't tell the whole story, re-posting an article from a non-credible source, or commenting on a social media thread without reading the original post, chances are, most of us have been guilty of doing this at some point.Now, social media companies and the FBI are taking steps to prevent the spread of misinformation like this, especially when it comes to subjects like elections and COVID-19."We established a relationship with social media companies and other technology companies and maintain an open channel and ongoing dialogue with them to share threat information," said Casey Harrington, a supervisory special agent at the FBI's Salt Lake City Division.Here are a few tools that social media sites are making available to help you identify and prevent the spread of misinformation.Twitter is testing a prompt that comes up when you try to retweet an article that you haven't opened before.It will ask you if you would like to open it first.So far, they say they've found that people open articles 40 percent more often after seeing the prompt, and some people have chosen not to share it after opening the article."Make sure you’re getting your news from trustworthy sources, know the origin of your information, and seek out multiple sources so you’re making an informed judgment," said Harrington.Facebook is also doing its part by:Limiting the number of times you can forward a messageTelling you how old an article isSharing where the information is coming fromProviding links to trusted sources when information reviewed by fact-checkers is is found to be falseInstagram, which is now owned by Facebook, will also flag false information and provide an explanation as to why it's not accurate."They ultimately make the decision on the content and the users on their site," Harrington said. "I think the social media companies have recognized, based on past election cycles, what our adversaries and what cybercriminals are able to do, and have taken steps to try to counter that."The difficult thing about false information is it's hard to prosecute criminally."Fake news by itself is not illegal. The FBI cannot initiate an investigation based solely on speech protected by the first amendment. If a foreign adversary or if someone tied in with a foreign intelligence service is the one creating and pushing that information, that is something that we would take action on," said Harrington.So what can you do to prevent the spread of misinformation?Ask yourself these questions before posting or sharing something on social media:Has the story been reported somewhere else?Is it from a reliable source?Has the video or photo been taken out of context?If you're not sure, then there's a chance it's fake and it could do more harm than good if you share it.If you come across something that you think is false information, you can report it to the social media platform you found it on, which stops it from spreading further.This story was first reported by Jordan Hogan at KSTU in Salt Lake City, Utah. 3178

SACRAMENTO, Calif. (KGTV) -- California organizations and prominent businesses leaders are rallying support to repeal part of Proposition 13, a landmark vote that limited property taxes statewide.The portion organizations have taken aim at would leave property tax protections in place for homes and residential properties, but would substantially increase taxes on commercial property, creating a so-called “split roll,” according to the Sacramento Bee.A group that supports the initiative to change Prop 13, Schools and Communities First, has gathered 860,000 in an effort to get the measure on the November 2020 ballot.RELATED: San Diego ranked third for hidden costs of owning a homeThe state’s Legislative Analyst, Mac Taylor, concluded that the changes most years would result in an additional revenue of to billion.Proposition 13 was passed by California voters in June of 1978 and limits property tax. Prior to the passage of Prop 13, each local government throughout the state could set its property tax annually.This meant the average rate throughout California was nearly three percent. Under the proposition, a property’s overall tax rate statewide is limited to one percent.RELATED: Gas tax repeal qualifies for November ballotTaxes on property are already one of California’s largest sources of government revenue, raising billion in the 2014 to 2015 budget year, according to the Legislative Analyst’s Office.The chart below paints a picture of what happened to tax revenue following the passage of Prop 13 as well as revenue in recent years. One of the reform’s biggest proponents, The San Francisco Foundation, says the revenue could be used for schools, health clinics, infrastructure and other community services.“This is a watershed moment for California,” said Fred Blackwell, CEO of The San Francisco Foundation. “Closing these tax loopholes will restore over billion every year in desperately needed resources for our schools, clinics, and other critical services. It is an investment in a brighter future—expanding access to opportunity and bringing greater racial and economic inclusion to the Bay Area and across the state.”RELATED: San Diego tax increase proposal moves forwardGroups like the California Chamber of Commerce, however, oppose the plan split roll plan. The chamber says higher commercial taxes would be passed on to consumers. The CalChamber board added that, if changes to Prop 13 pass, they fear local governments would move toward approving commercial retail development instead of badly-needed housing developments.  2624

SAN BERNARDINO, Calif. (AP) — A jury on Monday recommended the death penalty for a Southern California man convicted of killing a family of four with a sledgehammer and burying their bodies in shallow desert graves.Jurors in San Bernardino made the recommendation for Charles "Chase" Merritt, 62, in a case that puzzled investigators for years after a couple and their two young sons vanished from their home in 2010. Their bodies were found three years later.Merritt supported his head on his fists and closed his eyes as the verdicts were read. He also spoke briefly to his attorney.He was convicted this month of the murders of his former business associate Joseph McStay, McStay's wife Summer, and their 4- and 3-year-old sons, Gianni and Joseph Jr.Merritt had pleaded not guilty and his lawyers didn't offer witnesses during the penalty phase of his trial, insisting he is innocent.San Bernardino County Superior Court Judge Michael A. Smith set a Sept. 27 hearing to formally sentence Merritt. He thanked the jurors after the verdicts were read, saying he knew the decision was "extremely difficult."Authorities said they believed Merritt killed the family as McStay was cutting him out of his business making and selling custom water fountains. When the family disappeared, there were no signs of forced entry at their San Diego County home and their car was found parked at a strip mall near the Mexico border.For years, no one could figure out what happened to them. In 2013, their bodies were found in shallow graves in the desert after an off-road motorcyclist discovered skeletal remains in the area. Authorities also unearthed a rusty sledgehammer that they said was used to kill the family.Merritt was arrested the following year. Authorities said they traced his cellphone to the area of the desert graves in the days after the family disappeared and to a call seeking to close McStay's online bookkeeping account. Merritt also had referred to McStay in the past tense during an interview with investigators.Authorities concede the case against Merritt largely focused on circumstantial evidence and that questions remain about what happened at the McStay home.During the trial's penalty phase, prosecutor Britt Imes asked jurors to consider any possible motive for the killing of two young boys, whether they could have been witnesses to the murder of their parents or simply victims of callous killings."There is no motive that can be ascribed to the killer of a 4-year-old and a 3-year-old that passes muster," he said.Merritt's attorneys didn't call any witnesses during the penalty phase, instead appealing to any lingering doubts jurors may have had about killings they say their client didn't commit."From the very beginning, this case screamed doubt," defense attorney Raj Maline told jurors. "This case is filled with unanswered questions."California has not executed anyone since 2006. Voters approved a ballot measure to speed up executions in 2016, but Gov. Gavin Newsom this year placed a moratorium on executions while he's in office. 3072

来源：资阳报