济南尿道里感染症状济南早泄哪里好,济南尿道感染得治疗方法,济南为什么射精很少,济南怎样治时间短,济南医院包茎手术,济南阴虱能长多大,济南不持久怎么调理

BOCA RATON, Fla. -- Police responded to multiple reports of shots fired at Town Center Mall in Boca Raton on Sunday, but later determined that no shots had been fired.“The tips seem to center around a loud noise that occurred," Boca Raton Police Chief Dan Alexander said.According to Alexander, one person who was originally reported to have suffered a gunshot wound was hurt when he hit his head on a door while fleeing the scene.“I hear a boom! And I thought that boom was like a balloon or someone falling or something, but as I look back … I see a bunch of kids yelling and crying and screaming, 'run, run, run, a shooter!'" eyewitness Stephanie Silva said.Detectives were able to recover both blood and hair on that door.Alexander said no weapon, casings or rounds of ammunition were found at the scene.“We have not identified any suspect, no gunshots or gunfire," Alexander said. “Right now we’re currently combing with assistance of ATF, they have dogs that can determine that, so that will be a focus of our investigation.”According to Alexander, the tips they received centered around a loud noise that occurred.“The important thing to remember is that something happened in that mall today to cause people to get concerned, a lot of people," he said.At this time detectives do not know what made the loud noise that caused the panic. Their investigation is ongoing and they are still reviewing surveillance video from inside the mall. 1456

As reports circulated Wednesday about the alleged "Momo Challenge" that encourages children to harm themselves, YouTube issued a response saying no videos of the sort had been published recently on its platform."We want to clear something up regarding the Momo Challenge: We’ve seen no recent evidence of videos promoting the Momo Challenge on YouTube. Videos encouraging harmful and dangerous challenges are against our policies," YouTube said in a tweet. "If you see videos including harmful or dangerous challenges on YouTube, we encourage you to flag them to us immediately. These challenges are clearly against our Community Guidelines."Facebook, which owns WhatsApp — a platform reportedly targeted by the challenge — also issued a response."We care about the safety of our community and want to provide assistance for people in distress. As outlined in our Community Standards, we don't allow the promotion of self-injury or suicide and will remove it when reported to us," the statement read. "We also provide people who have expressed suicidal thoughts, and people who want to reach out to a friend who may be struggling, with a number of support options and resources. These global tools and resources were developed with the help of over 70 mental health partners around the world and we’re continuously improving them to build a safer and more supportive community on Facebook." 1402

Banner Health experts are warning the public against using "inappropriate medications" after an Arizona man died and his wife was hospitalized after taking chemicals they believed could help protect against coronavirus.On Sunday, the man and his wife, both in their 60s, took chloroquine phosphate, an additive commonly used to clean fish tanks, and within 30 minutes experienced effects that required admittance to a nearby Banner Health facility. The man died and his wife remains under critical care, according to a hospital spokesperson.The woman, who was able to throw up the chemicals, is likely going to survive, said the spokesperson.The woman reportedly told hospital staffers that she and her husband ingested the product after reading a "fake" article online and saw symptoms shortly after taking it. “Given the uncertainty around COVID-19, we understand that people are trying to find new ways to prevent or treat this virus, but self-medicating is not the way to do so,” said Dr. Daniel Brooks, Banner Poison and Drug Information Center medical director. “The last thing that we want right now is to inundate our emergency departments with patients who believe they found a vague and risky solution that could potentially jeopardize their health.” 1272

Attorney General William Barr said Tuesday he expects to release a redacted version of special counsel Robert Mueller's nearly report "within a week," but he does not plan to provide Congress with an unredacted version of the report, setting the stage for a showdown with congressional Democrats.Barr told a House subcommittee Tuesday that the redactions process was going "very well," and he would explain the rationale for the redactions that are made from Mueller's nearly 400-page report. But he said he would not accede to Democrats' demands that he provide the full, unredacted report to Congress, arguing that he cannot legally release grand jury material and that he did not plan to ask a court to release it."I don't intend at this stage to send the full, unredacted report to the committee," Barr said.Barr's comments Tuesday come ahead of a brewing clash between Congress and the Trump administration over the Mueller report, as Democrats are indeed prepared to go to court in an effort to obtain the unredacted Mueller report and the special counsel's underlying evidence. Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee have already authorized a subpoena for the full Mueller report and the underlying evidence, which House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler said Tuesday he is waiting to see what Barr releases before moving forward on the subpoena."The question is what we receive -- do we receive a full copy of the Mueller Report and the documentation underneath it?" Nadler said. "Do we receive most of it with a little redaction or do they completely expurgate it? We'll have to take a look at it."Asked Tuesday about the grand jury material, Barr told a House Appropriations subcommittee: "The chairman of the Judiciary Committee is free to go to court."Four types of information would be redacted from the report he submits, Barr said, including grand jury material, classified information, material tied to ongoing investigation, and information that could harm "peripheral third parties."Barr defends four-page summaryDemocrats pressed Barr on his decision to release a four-page summary of Mueller's conclusions, particularly in light of reports that some on Mueller's team have told others they were unsatisfied with how Barr characterized the investigation.Barr said that Mueller was given the opportunity to review the summary Barr released last month detailing the Mueller's conclusions, and the special counsel declined to do so. He said he suspected that members of Mueller's team wanted more from him, but he explained that he wasn't trying to summarize the full report with his four-page letter, which stated Mueller's investigation did not establish a criminal conspiracy between Trump's team and Russia, and that Mueller reached no conclusion on the question of obstruction of justice."I suspect that they probably wanted more put out," Barr said. "In my view, I was not interested in putting out summaries or trying to summarize, because I think any summary, regardless of who prepares it, not only runs the risk of being under-inclusive or over-inclusive, but also, would trigger a lot of discussion and analysis that really should await everything coming out at once."Barr said the White House did not review his letter, but he declined to answer questions about whether the White House has been briefed on the report."I've already laid out the process that is going forward to release these reports hopefully within a week. And I'm not going to say anything more about it until the report is out and everyone has a chance to look at it," Barr said.Barr's answers did not appear to satisfy Democrats, who repeatedly urged Barr to release the full report and fully explain any redactions that Barr decided to make."I think it would strike a serious blow to our system, and yes, to our democracy, if that report is not fully seen," said New York Rep. Jose Serrano, the chairman of the Commerce, Science and Justice Subcommittee holding Tuesday's hearing. "We're not here today to be in a confrontational situation with you. We want to help you do the job, and you need to help us do ours."House Appropriations Chairwoman Nita Lowey told Barr that his handling of Mueller's report was "unacceptable" and the summary he released "raises more questions than it answers.""I look forward to reviewing the Mueller report myself, and I know my constituents do as well," Lowey said. "I understand that portions of it must be redacted as a matter of law, but my hope is that you will stop there and bring transparency to this process as soon as possible."Republican lawmakers, on the other hand, have not so far asked questions about Mueller and are focusing on budget issues in the hearing. GOP Rep. Robert Aderholt of Alabama, the top Republican on the subcommittee, did not mention Mueller in his opening statement.Barr is scheduled to return to Capitol Hill on May 1 and May 2 for hearings before the Senate and House Judiciary Committees specifically to answer questions about the Mueller investigation.Barr told Congress earlier this month he expected to release a redacted version of Mueller's nearly 400-page report by "mid-April, if not sooner." 5184

As many as 20 correctional officers who work at the federal detention center where Jeffrey Epstein died by suicide received grand jury subpoenas last week relating to an investigation into his death, according to a source with knowledge of the situation.Investigators are trying to recreate the events that happened on the night Epstein died nearly two weeks ago at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York, the source said.For example, investigators want to talk to the lieutenants who were in charge that night to get details on rounds that were not made, the source said. Epstein was supposed to be checked on regularly.More subpoenas could be in the works as the investigation widens, the source added.CNN has reached out to the Department of Justice for comment. 787