济南下面硬一会就软了(济南可以治疗龟头敏感) (今日更新中)

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) - Supporters of Poway Unified School District kicked off a campaign Tuesday night in support of Measure P on the March ballot, which would provide 8 million meant to be spent on facilities across the distict's 39 schools. This is the first time PUSD has asked voters to approve a bond since the infamous "billion dollar bond", which many critics call a debacle which taxpayers will be on the hook for for decades.“We have leaky roofs," Superintendent Marian Kim Phelps told 10News during an interview Tuesday. "We have rusty pipes. We have tile that’s falling apart. We have high schools that have sewage spilling up into the room.” Phelps says a recent study commissioned by the district reported that 63% of the school campuses will be rated in "poor condition" by 2023. She also says a bond is the best option because the state of California does not provide money for facilities.RELATED: Poway Unified brings students together in pilot program with new approach to special education“What most people don’t understand and realize is we don’t receive any funding from the state. And so we also are one of the lowest funded school districts in the county, so we do a lot with a lot less.” Phelps says she understands why taxpayers may be hesitant to fund another bond measure. The last time the district approached voters, the bond was passed by 2011. It was later revealed that because of the way the bond was financed, the 5 million loan would accrue 7 million in interest, meaning taxpayers are on the hook for nearly billion. The bill for that will begin to be paid in 2023 and continue for 40 years.Phelps points out that the entire leadership that approved "the billion dollar bond" has been replaced and that the new team has worked hard to repair Poway Unified's finances in recent years. RELATED: Poway Unified School District implements multi-million dollar plan to improve campus securityShe says the district is being transparent about how this measure will be funded and spent. She also points out that the plan has been endorsed by the San Diego Taxpayers Association.Despite those reassurances, many residents within the district, which is the county's third largest and encompasses the city of Poway and large portions of Inland Northern San Diego, have expressed concern, saying they will not vote for Measure P. The district says polling conducted to gauge community support showed voters marginally in favor of the measure. 2480

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) — The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation said up to 8,000 inmates statewide could be released early in order to stop the spread of coronavirus within prisons, and the San Diego District Attorney Summer Stephan is now working to alert victims and families as people are released.“Those are people that cause a public safety risk and a real concern for us,” said Stephan.One known inmate being released in the next week is David Herbert, an Oceanside man who was convicted of torturing and killing dogs. He was sentenced to nine years in 2019 but has served a fraction of that. Now, Michelle Plaketta, whose dog was killed by Herbert, is worried about the safety of her family.RELATED: Oceanside man who tortured neighbors' dogs may be released early due to COVID-19“The system is basically failing us as victims to allow him to be released on such a short time,” Plaketta said.Stephan said at the end of July, about 300 inmates from San Diego County who had committed lower-level crimes were released early and returned back to society. In that group was Martin Alvarez, the man suspected of stabbing another man to death in a Pacific Beach bathroom in August. He had recently been released early as part of this COVID-19 prevention program and now faces the new murder charges.RELATED: Man fatally stabbed in Pacific Beach bathroom, San Diego police sayShe said her office was not alerted when the first group of people was released, so they worked with the CDCR to create a line of communication. Now, the DA’s office will get five days notice before inmates are released, giving them time to reach out to victims and survivors with an emergency team that was created for this purpose.“What do you need from us? Do you need us to help you with a restraining order? Do you need us to help you relocate?” Stephan said, referring to questions they ask victims and survivors.The San Diego District Attorney’s office has so far received notice that another 221 inmates could be released early, but this time it’s for different types of crimes, putting Stephan on alert.“They are serving life in prison for a murder or something like and now that timeline that the victim counted on through a justice system is shortened,” said Stephen.The CDCR’s website outlines the eligibility requirements for early release.People can be released if they have less than 180 days left on their sentence, are not currently serving for domestic violence or a violent crime, have no current or prior sentences that require them to register as a sex offender and finally do not have an assessment score that indicates a high risk for violence.People can be released if they have 365 days or less on their sentence, are not currently serving for domestic violence or a violent crime, have no current or prior sentences that require them to register as a sex offender and finally do not have an assessment score that indicates a high risk for violence.People who are deemed “high risk” for COVID-19 can be released early. People have to be high risk, can't be serving life without parole or condemned, have an assessment indicating low risk for violence and cannot be high-risk sex offenders.Stephan said their first priority is giving assistance to victims and survivors, but she also wants the public to be aware of these releases.“People who commit violent crimes, they could pick another victim when they’re out,” she said.The family of Cara Knott, the woman killed by a CHP officer in 1986, put out a plea to not release her killer, Craig Peyer. The DA confirmed as of Aug. 28, Peyer is not on the list of inmates eligible for early release.RELATED: Cara Knott's family fears her killer could be released 3730

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) — The City of San Diego could go to court to invalidate a landmark pension reform measure that voters overwhelmingly supported in 2012.The City Council is expected to meet in closed session the week June 10 to decide whether to ask a judge to throw out Measure B. The measure switched most new hires from pensions to 401(k) style retirement plans. More than 65 percent of San Diego voters supported Measure B in 2012. The problem, however, is that the measure got to the ballot via a citizens initiative, but then-Mayor Jerry Sanders campaigned on its behalf. Labor unions challenged the initiative in court, contending the mayor's involvement meant the city needed to meet and confer with them. The state Supreme Court agreed, and an appellate court ordered the city to make its employees whole, plus pay them 7 percent interest. The courts, however, did not invalidate Measure B, instead directing the city to work out a compromise with the unions. On Thursday, City Councilman Scott Sherman and former Councilman Carl DeMaio held a news conference pushing the city to protect Measure B."Right now we are being asked to go against what our bosses told us, and I don't think we should do that," Sherman said, adding that the city spends 0 million a year now meeting its minimum pension obligations. DeMaio said he would work with a coalition to go to court to protect Measure B. "I'm talking about putting the City of San Diego back on the brink of bankruptcy, let alone telling voters that they don't have a say on where their tax dollars go," he said. Early estimates indicate the amount needed to make employees whole ranges from negligible to million.Michael Zucchet, who heads the Municipal Employees Association, said the only rational way to move forward is to invalidate Measure B."It is time for the City and its citizens to move forward by ending the Prop B debacle with the least amount of additional litigation and expense, and at the same time help address the City’s severe recruitment and retention challenges brought about because San Diego is the only City in California with no defined benefit pension nor Social Security benefits for newly hired employees," Zucchet said in a statement.Mayor Kevin Faulconer said in a statement he would oppose any effort to get rid of Measure B. "Voters demanded pension reform and we should respect that, plain and simple," Faulconer said. The mayor cannot vote, however, in the decision facing the City Council. 2500

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) -- The National Weather Service warned of minor coastal flooding ahead of a King Tide set to hit the San Diego County coastline Monday and Tuesday.The event forced the agency to issue a beach hazards statement from Sunday night through Tuesday evening.Surf will begin to build late Sunday, peaking Monday and Tuesday. By Tuesday night, the surf is expected to diminish, the agency said.High tides Monday will be 6.9 feet at 8 a.m. High tide on Tuesday will be 6.8 feet at 8:40 a.m.The agency warned that the King Tides will create water run-up into some beach parking lots and other low-lying areas.Beaches most prone to flooding include Sunset, Seal, Newport, Oceanside, Cardiff, La Jolla Shores and Imperial Beach.Elevated surf will also create strong rip currents and dangerous swimming conditions, the National Weather Service says. 861

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) — The family of 19-year-old Dylan Hernandez, the San Diego State University (SDSU) freshman who died after falling off a bunk bed last November, say they are concerned about the investigation conducted by Campus Police and the University. The family believes the University Police Department is not pursuing certain angles, including a possible cover-up.Last November, Dylan Hernandez died after attending a Phi Gamma Delta fraternity party. In police reports obtained by the San Diego Union-Tribune, the freshman made it back to his dorm room around midnight. On the morning of Nov. 7, 2019, he fell off the top bunk bed and hit his head. An autopsy concluded that Hernandez had fractured his skull, suffering from a brain bleed that ultimately led to his accidental death. Reports also state that his blood-alcohol level was about 0.23, nearly three times the legal limit. RELATED: San Diego State suspends 14 fraternities after student is hospitalizedIn a newly released statement to 10News, the Florida native's family said they are disturbed at how poorly Campus Police and San Diego State are handling the investigation. "The Hernandez family is concerned because witnesses they provided to SDSU and UPD still have not been questioned," George Kindley, Hernandez family lawyer, said. The same University Police reports state that UPD never interviewed anybody from the Phi Gamma Delta fraternity. They also never sought out search warrants for Snapchat videos or phone records, despite knowing that some fraternity brothers instructed others to delete possibly incriminating videos and messages. According to the report, one of those messages read, "Remember, silence is golden."This was a shocking revelation to the family. In a statement to 10News, the Hernandez family said, they hope:RELATED: Cause determined after San Diego State University student dies"SDSU and UPD will quickly live up to their promises and complete the investigation without further delay. The Hernandez family wants SDSU and UPD to take action now to prevent future tragedies like this one from occurring." (George Kindley, Hernandez family lawyer)Sunday, UPD responded to a 10News inquiry regarding the Hernandez family. They said:"The preliminary, incomplete police report was provided to a representative of the Hernandez family in an effort to be as supportive and transparent with the family as possible during a difficult time for them as they are mourning the tragic loss of their loved one. Details of the incomplete report, released late last year, was not meant to be shared with the public as it compromises our ongoing investigation and can hinder witnesses from sharing information. "The Hernandez family also told 10News they are questioning the SDSU's bunk bed safety enforcement. They said:RELATED: SDSU launches two task forces in wake of student's death"SDSU needs to provide all students in school issued bunk beds with a safety rail that actually meets minimum safety standards, not a pseudo safety rail that SDSU knows failed and caused other students injuries in the past." (George Kindley, Hernandez family lawyer)In response, SDSU said in the last five years, they have only had two known incidents regarding bunk beds. However, they did not reveal specifics. They said: "All lofted beds and bunk beds located within SDSU residence halls are produced by national manufacturers and meet California State Fire Marshal requirements. Colleges and universities are not required to follow U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission guidelines defining requirements for childrens' beds." (Cory Marshall, San Diego State University)The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission guidelines state the height from the railing from the top of the mattress must be no lower than five inches. College dorms, jails and military barracks are not held to the same standards. 3885

来源：资阳报