济南龟头不是很敏感济南治性功能障碍的医院哪家好,济南啪啪啪时间很短,济南睾丸皮上有疙瘩特别痒,济南早泄到哪里治疗,济南男人想射精怎么办,济南男生射精快怎样治疗,济南治疗男科疾病

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) - Southcrest neighbors banned together to file a lawsuit against the City of San Diego, claiming a city park was not designed to properly drain and therefore floods the neighborhood each time it rains.Last December was the breaking point for neighbors near Southcrest Trails Park, at S. 37th Street and a dirt road behind houses situated on Beta Street. They say feet of water flooded into their homes."This actually becomes a sinkhole, this area," said Greg Montoya, who is leading the charge with his hefty binder full of decades of documentation of the problem. Montoya has pictures of his white pickup truck sunken rims-deep into his yard due to saturation.The lawsuit describes it as "a 66-acre, 1.2-mile corridor in the Southcrest neighborhood of San Diego to construct Highway 252, which would connect Interstate 805 and lnterstates 5 and 15."The project never materialized, Montoya says, because St. Jude, thinking of the school, put up a fight."So then the City of San Diego put dirt berms in to keep people from driving back here, to keep people from throwing trash back here, because it became a dump," Montoya said. The park took shape in 2003, according to the lawsuit.Montoya and other neighbors say there was not enough drainage put in, sending water running down the five-foot berm every time it rains.A storm in December 2018 left many stranded, including Ricky Vasquez, who was trying to pick up his one-year-old son."Other cars were stuck in the middle of the street because the water was so high," said Vasquez.Neighbor Pastor Nicolas Martinez said his home flooded, ultimately costing ,000.Montoya was fed up."San Diego's America's Finest City for some but not for all because I've got documentation for over 30 years for asking for help for this situation that they've created and I'm just ignored," said Montoya.He went to attorney Evan Walker, who said his team found one of the two storm drains at the park "is not connected to any sort of system despite the city's own plans to connect them to the system."Montoya hopes the lawsuit causes the city to step up.10News reached out to the City of San Diego who said they could not comment on ongoing litigation. 2211

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) -- San Diego State University says 400 students have confirmed and probable cases of coronavirus.The university said Tuesday that, since August 24, 396 students have tested positive for COVID-19. Four other students have probable cases of the virus.The update comes one day after the school extended its stay-at-home order for on-campus residents through September 14. The order was originally set to expire Tuesday.RELATED:San Diego State coronavirus cases continue to rise during 'stay-at-home' orderSDSU reports 120 more COVID-19 cases since fall startSan Diego State moves all classes online for 4 weeks as student cases riseSDSU students told to stay at home over Labor Day Weekend as coronavirus cases increase"Some students who have tested positive have fully recovered and are no longer symptomatic. Also, SDSU has no reports of any hospitalizations as a result of any positive cases. However, the COVID-19 risk remains within our community, and researchers are still trying to understand potential rebound illness for those who have tested positive but have since recovered," the school previously said.Students are advised to call 2-1-1 or their medical providers and stay home if they feel ill. They can also contact Student Health Services at 619-594-4325 (Monday through Friday) or the Nurse Call Line at 858-225-3105 (after hours and during weekends and holidays). Testing is available by appointment only and can be scheduled online here. 1478

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) - San Diego Police searched Tuesday for the man who may have groped several women in the South Bay.The most recent encounter happened Sunday at 7:30 p.m. as the woman was walking on Iris Ave. and Oro Vista Rd. in Nestor, police said.A man walking the opposite direction grabbed the woman’s breast, then ran away.The woman wasn’t hurt and told police the man didn’t appear to have a weapon.Police said the man was Hispanic, in his early 20’s, 5’6” tall with a heavy build. He was wearing a gray hooded sweatshirt with the hood up, black athletic shorts, and black shoes.The man may be responsible for two similar attacks in the same area, said officers.The first incident happened October 30 at 7:30 pm. and the second was January 17 at 9:30 p.m., both on Oro Vista Rd. near the I-5 and 905 interchange.Anyone with information is asked to call the San Diego Police Department at 619-531-2000. 916

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) — Several business sectors will be cleared to reopen indoor activities with modifications next week in San Diego County under the state's new guidance, according to local health officials.Under California's new blueprint for reopening amid the coronavirus pandemic, starting Monday, Aug. 31, San Diego County can reopen indoor operations at the following businesses with modifications:Restaurants for dine-in, places of worship, museums, and movie theaters at a maximum of 25% capacity or 100 people, whichever is less;Gyms, yoga studios, and fitness centers at a maximum of 10% capacity;Hair salons, barbershops, nail salons, and body waxing studios;Libraries and bookstores at a maximum of 50% capacity;Shopping malls at a maximum of 50% capacity, with closed common areas, and reduced food court capacity;Aquariums and zoos at a maximum of 25% capacityBusinesses that have been reopened under their safe reopening plans may have to be modified to meet the state's new percentages on capacity, according to Gary Johnston, the county's Chief Resiliency Officer on Reopening."The safe reopening plans, you need to modify those and express on those plans how you're going to adhere to the requirements that came out with the state," Johnston said.California's new rules for reopening are based on a four-tier, color-coded system that counties will move through based on their number of cases (case rate) and the percentage of positive tests. The system replaces the state's monitoring list.Based on the state’s new tool, San Diego County is in the red "Substantial" tier. The red tier covers counties with a case rate of four to seven daily new cases per 100,000 people and 5% to 8% positive tests. The county's case rate was 5.8 and its positive rate was 3.8% as of Friday, according to county public health officer Dr. Wilma Wooten.More detailed information by county and business type can be found at https://covid19.ca.gov/safer-economy.The reopening of K-12 schools is not impacted by the new system, Wooten said.Under the new guidance, some businesses may see more restrictive limits on indoor activities. California's guidance for grocery and retail stores requires indoor operations to be limited to 50% capacity with modifications."There are some outbreaks that we see in retail. So by decreasing the capacity this will help with increased risk and increased exposure," Wooten said. "We are following what's on the website ... as it relates to what's being recommended for tier two."Bars, breweries, and distilleries that do not serve food are still not cleared to reopen for indoor operations, according to the state. Theme parks are also not permitted to reopen.Wooten cautioned that the success of reopening any indoor operations this time around depends on compliance with the guidance and locals being safe."This time what we hope will happen, but it relies on people's behavior, is that as we are opening up 25% or 50% of capacity, not full 100%," Wooten said. "As we see issues people should also be clear that we will shut down entities if they are not following the guidelines and if there are particularly outbreaks occurring as a result of not following those non-pharmaceutical strategies."In order for San Diego County to move up a tier, it must stay in tier two for at least three weeks. Then to move up, it must meet the next tier's criteria for two consecutive weeks. If the county's metrics worsen for two consecutive weeks, it will be moved to a more restrictive tier.In a statement, Supervisor Nathan Fletcher, who serves on the county's COVID-19 taskforce, said he fears the reopenings are too much at the same time: 3669

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) - Sharp Grossmont Hospital secretly video recorded 1,800 patients using hidden cameras at the women's health center in El Cajon, according to a lawsuit filed late Friday afternoon.The recordings took place between July 17, 2012 and June 30, 2013 inside three Labor and Delivery operating rooms at the facility located at 5555 Grossmont Center Dr. in El Cajon, the plaintiffs claim.Among the video recordings captured by hidden cameras: Caesarean births, hysterectomies, sterilizations, dilatation and curettage to resolve miscarriages, and other procedures, according to court documents.Women were also recorded undressing, the lawsuit says.According to court documents, the hospital claims the recordings were part of an investigation "into whether an employee was stealing the anesthesia drug propofol from drug carts in the operating rooms."The suit states that the motion-activated cameras were installed on drug carts in each of the three operating rooms at the women's health center, but the cameras continued to record after motion stopped. READ: Phony doctor suspect charged for Sharp Grossmont hospital visitsBecause of the angle and placement of the devices, the suit says "patients' faces were recorded, and the patients were identifiable."“At times, Defendants’ patients had their most sensitive genital areas visible,” the lawsuit states. Multiple users, including non-medical personnel and strangers, had access to the recordings on desktop computers, the lawsuit claims, and that Sharp “did not log or track who accessed the recordings, why, or when."“There are images contained within the multitude of images of women undergoing operations of a very personal, private nature, unconscious and in states of exposure depending on the operation being performed,” the lawsuit cites an unnamed Sharp executive as saying.“Plaintiffs suffered harm including, but not limited to, suffering, anguish, fright, horror, nervousness, grief, anxiety, worry, shock, humiliation, embarrassment, shame, mortification, hurt feelings, disappointment, depression and feelings of powerlessness,” the lawsuit claims.Plaintiffs believe Sharp destroyed “at least half” of the recordings but cannot confirm the files are not otherwise recoverable. Computers used for storage were replaced or refreshed, but Sharp did not ensure proper deletion of recordings, according to the lawsuit.READ: La Mesa police investigate man's suspicious death at Sharp Grossmont HospitalSharp HealthCare and Sharp Grossmont Hospital are named in the lawsuit, along with the possibility of more defendants in the future once their names and capacities are known.10News reached out to officials at Sharp HealthCare and they confirmed that between July 2012 and June 2013, "Sharp Grossmont Hospital installed and operated one hidden camera on the anesthesia cart located in each of three operating rooms in the Women’s Center.""The purpose of the three cameras was to ensure patient safety by determining the cause of drugs missing from the carts," Sharp HealthCare officials told 10News."A initial lawsuit alleging privacy violations and other claims stemming from the video recording was filed against Sharp HealthCare and Sharp Grossmont Hospital in 2016. The case remains active and Sharp is not in a position to comment further about the matter," Sharp HealthCare officials told 10News."Sharp HealthCare and Sharp Grossmont Hospital continue to take extensive measures to protect the privacy of its patients," Sharp HealthCare officials said.The complaint for damages includes a demand for jury trial on charges of invasion of privacy, negligence, unlawful recording of confidential information, negligent infliction of emotional distress, and breach of fiduciary privacy.STATEMENT FROM SHARP GROSSMONT HOSPITAL 3809