济南前列腺脓肿治疗医院济南前列腺炎中医,济南蛋痛怎么办,济南下面长肉刺图片,济南专科男性医院,济南男人裆部潮湿怎么回事,济南射精无力少,济南龟头敏感神经阻断

A poll released Monday evening by SSRS commissioned by CNN indicates that a majority of Americans might be in support of removing President Donald Trump from office via a Senate trial. The poll, which randomly sampled 1,156 Americans showed that 51% supported Trump's removal compared to 45% who opposed Trump's removal. This was the first time that the SSRS/CNN poll showed more than 50% support in removing Trump from office. In December, polling indicated that 45% supported removing Trump, compared to 47% who opposed it. The composition of Monday's poll was 32% Democratic, 26% Republican and 42% independent or members of another party.Monday's poll gauging support for removal was within the margin of error, which was 3.4%. The poll showed for the second-straight month that Trump's approval rating was 43%, although the survey showed a difference between men and women. Trump's approval rating among men was 50% versus 35% among women. To view the details of the poll, click 996

A women's hospital in California used hidden cameras to secretly record approximately 1,800 patients without their consent, according to a lawsuit.The recordings filmed activity in three labor and delivery rooms at the Women's Center at Sharp Grossmont Hospital in La Mesa, California, over a period of more than 11 months beginning in summer 2012.Captured in the images: partially robed women on operating tables, cesarean sections, and newly delivered babies. At times, according to the lawsuit filed last week, the women's genital areas were visible, as were their faces."It's the most fundamental breach of privacy," said Allison Goddard, a lawyer representing more than 80 women who say they were filmed.Goddard says she's obtained five videos from the hospital and has requested about 100 more."I have seen, for example, a video of a C-section, and it shows the patient being rolled into the operating room. It shows the patient being prepped for surgery. You could see her hospital gown tucked up under her breasts. You could see her bare belly," Goddard said.She says the video goes on to show the birth of the baby and a nurse massaging the woman's uterus to expel any blood clots."It's horrifying to think that, especially in today's day and age of the ubiquity of videos on the internet, if one of those videos were to get in the wrong hands, there's no controlling it. It takes your own medical care outside your own control," Goddard said.The lawsuit states the recordings were stored on desktop computers, some without the need for a password. It further states the hospital "destroyed at least half the recordings but cannot say when or how it deleted those files and cannot confirm that it took the appropriate steps to ensure the files were not otherwise recoverable."The women are suing over the harm they say they suffered, including anguish, horror, humiliation, depression and feelings of powerlessness. They are seeking monetary damages from the hospital.Goddard says the women were notified about what happened to them by a third-party administrator after a nine-month court fight.The hidden camerasWhy would a hospital place hidden cameras in three of its most private areas?According to a legal document prepared by the hospital in a medical board case against a doctor, it was trying to catch a thief.The filing states that in or around May 2012, drugs were disappearing from medical carts in operating rooms, so hospital security installed motion-detecting cameras on the carts that captured images whenever anyone entered the room.Carlisle Lewis, Sharp Healthcare's senior vice president and general counsel, acknowledges in the document that "some of the video clips depict patients in their most vulnerable state, under anesthesia, exposed and undergoing medical procedures."According to the document, on multiple occasions, the cameras captured a doctor removing drugs from the carts, including the powerful anesthetic propofol, and placing the items into a shirt pocket."Although the cameras were intended to record only individuals in front of the anesthesia carts removing drugs, others, including patients and medical personnel in the operating rooms, were at times visible to the cameras and recorded," John Cihomsky, Sharp Healthcare's vice president of public relations and communications, said in a statement.'The hospital is a privacy zone'Health care ethicists criticize the hospital's use of hidden cameras."These are extreme, horrific violations. And it's exactly why the hospital is a privacy zone," said Art Caplan, head of the Division of Medical Ethics at the New York University School of Medicine. "There are a very long list of reasons why taping, recording, videoing for anything other than medical or treatment purposes has to be strictly off-limits, because you're trying to protect people who can't protect themselves."Caplan says drug theft is a huge problem for hospitals and it's often investigated, but the investigations are usually coordinated with law enforcement. Sharp Grossmont Hospital confirmed that they hadn't worked with law enforcement in this case."It may be a noble thing to try and figure out how drugs are being diverted, but set it up with the appropriate legal authorities," Caplan said. "It can't be just an internal quality control activity. If you want to get people not to trust health care, this is a great way to do it."Cihomsky said the surveillance methods were used for only that particular investigation and have not been used again. He said that the case remains ongoing and that the hospital was unable to comment further about the matter."We sincerely regret that our efforts to ensure medication security may have caused distress to those we serve," he said. 4760

A simple cabinet stands on along a road in Rocky River, Ohio — and what’s inside is helping people in the community every single day.The idea for the cabinet came from the youth group at 199

Abortion has now been decriminalized in almost all of Australia after the country's most populous state voted to overturn a 119-year-old law.On Thursday, lawmakers in New South Wales -- which is home to Sydney -- voted to pass a bill that decriminalizes abortion and makes terminations available to people who are less than 22 weeks pregnant.Previously, "unlawful abortion" was listed in the Crimes Act and carried a possible penalty of 10 years in prison for a woman who administered her own abortion. To get a "lawful abortion," a doctor 552

An analysis of the airline industry suggests that major airlines will likely go bankrupt by May, as the industry encounters an abrupt interruption in travel due to coronavirus fears. According to a report by the Centre for Aviation on Monday, airlines are running low on cash reserves as flights are either being canceled, or being flown with few passengers. Stocks for major airlines have taken a huge tumble. United Airlines stock has dropped by 60 percent in the last month. Delta's stock has dropped more than 40%. American Airlines' stock dropped 45% in the last month.Delta announced an approximately 50% cut in capacity for April and May on Monday. Delta expects these cuts to extend into the summer travel period. Even with those cuts, Delta said its expecting load factors to drop into the 20-30% range -- assuming things don't get worse.United Airlines said it estimates March 2020 revenues will be .5 billion below March 2019 figures after having one million fewer passengers the first two weeks of March this year compared to last. United is also dropping 40% of its domestic flights and 75% of its international routes. American Airlines is also dropping 75% of its international flights. American Airlines plans on dropping 20% of its domestic April flights, and 30% in May. Adding insult to injury, the 1332