济南和早泄治疗(济南治疗无菌性前列腺病) (今日更新中)

....monsters, the United States stands ready, willing & able to get involved and do the job quickly and effectively. The great new President of Mexico has made this a big issue, but the cartels have become so large and powerful that you sometimes need an army to defeat an army!— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 5, 2019 347

"Full House" actress Lori Loughlin surrendered Wednesday morning to federal authorities in Los Angeles, FBI spokeswoman Laura Eimiller said, as fallout from the college admissions scandal continues to spread.Loughlin and her husband, fashion designer Mossimo Giannulli, are accused of paying 0,000 in bribes to designate their two daughters as recruits to the University of Southern California crew team, even though they did not participate in crew, according to court documents released Tuesday.The actress will be booked and is expected to make an initial appearance Wednesday afternoon in federal court in Los Angeles. Giannulli appeared Tuesday in federal court and was released on million bail; his next court appearance is March 29 in Boston.Loughlin's surrender comes a day after the nationwide scandal exposed what federal prosecutors describe as a corrupt exchange of wealth, fame and influence for student admissions to the nation's most elite universities.Fifty people -- from Hollywood stars and top industry CEOs to college coaches and standardized test administrators -- stand accused of participating in a scheme to cheat on admissions tests and admit to students to leading institutions as athletes regardless of their abilities, prosecutors revealed Tuesday in a federal indictment. The scandal is being called the largest college admissions scam ever prosecuted.As the alleged culprits, including actresses Felicity Huffman, Loughlin and Giannulli, position their defenses, the fallout continues for players across this wide-ranging case, which spans six states and raises seminal questions about how level the post-secondary playing field really is.Still hanging in the balance is the fate of the privileged scholars, at least some of whom may not have known about their parents' alleged acts. It was no accident that none were immediately charged, US Attorney Andrew Lelling of Massachusetts said Tuesday."The prime movers of this fraud" were the parents and other defendants, Lelling said, though he noted some students may face charges down the road.Meantime, officials at universities including Yale, Stanford and Georgetown must now examine criminal claims made against key staffers, some of whom already have part ways.Perhaps most critically, they'll also have to answer for whether qualified students were denied entry into their programs in lieu of the children of the rich and famous."For every student admitted through fraud," Lelling said, "an honest, genuinely talented student was rejected."Parents spent up to .5 million, the FBI saysThe sums that authorities say the accused parents paid in bribes would, for many, finance a college education many times over.Some spent between 0,000 and .5 million to guarantee admissions for their children, FBI Special Agent Joseph Bonavolonta said.The relatives of one applicant paid .2 million to have the applicant falsely described as the co-captain of a well-known California soccer team, although the applicant did not play competitive soccer, prosecutors said.By comparison, the average annual cost of tuition and fees at a private, four-year college is ,478, the US Department of Education's National Center for Education Statistics' most recent report shows."This case is about the widening corruption of elite college admissions through the steady application of wealth combined with fraud," Lelling said. "There can be no separate college admission system for the wealthy, and I'll add that there will not be a separate criminal justice system either."The ringleader got million, US attorney saysMuch of the indictment revolves around William Rick Singer, the founder of a for-profit college counseling and preparation business known as The Key."OK, so, who we are ... what we do is we help the wealthiest families in the US get their kids into school," Singer told one parent, according to prosecutors.There were dual avenues for carrying out the scheme, Lelling explained."There were essentially two kinds of fraud that Singer was selling," Lelling said of the accusations, which run from 2011 to 2019. "One was to cheat on the SAT or ACT, and the other was to use his connections with Division I coaches and use bribes to get these parents' kids into school with fake athletic credentials."For example, Singer and his co-conspirators used photo-editing technology to superimpose the face of a patron's student onto stock photos of athletes, prosecutors said.Singer was paid roughly million by parents to help their children get in to schools, the US attorney said.Singer pleaded guilty on Tuesday to racketeering conspiracy, money laundering conspiracy, conspiracy to defraud the United States and obstruction of justice, prosecutors said.Actresses allegedly were taped discussing the plotBest known for her role on TV's "Desperate Housewives," Huffman is accused of paying ,000 to Singer's fake charity, the Key Worldwide Foundation, to facilitate cheating for her daughter on the SATs, the complaint says.Her daughter received a 1420 on her test, which was 400 points higher than a PSAT taken a year earlier without the same administrator, the complaint states.Huffman also discussed the scheme in a recorded phone call with a cooperating witness, the complaint says.Huffman has been charged with felony conspiracy to commit mail fraud and honest services mail fraud, according to federal court documents filed Monday in Massachusetts. She was arrested without incident at her California home, the FBI said.She appeared Tuesday in federal court in Los Angeles, where a judge set her bond at 0,000 and federal agents took her passport. Her next court appearance was set for March 29 in Boston.Loughlin, who played Aunt Becky on "Full House," faces the same felony charge. Her husband, Giannulli, was also charged with conspiracy to commit mail fraud and honest services mail fraud.The couple gave bribe money to Singer's fake charity, and in a recorded phone call, Singer clarified that the money was actually intended for getting their daughters into USC crew, according to the complaint.CNN has contacted Iconix Brand Group, which owns Giannulli's namesake fashion company, Mossimo. CNN also is seeking comment from the actresses' representatives.Implicated coaches sidelined at Yale and GeorgetownCoaches from Yale, Stanford, Wake Forest and Georgetown universities and USC, among others, are implicated in the case."The Department of Justice believes that Yale has been the victim of a crime perpetrated by a former coach who no longer works at the university," Yale's president said in a statement. "The corrupt behavior alleged by the Department of Justice is an affront to our university's deeply held values of inclusion and fairness."The Georgetown coach who was arrested "has not coached our tennis team since December 2017, when he was placed on leave after the Office of Undergraduate Admissions identified irregularities in his recruitment practices and the University initiated an internal investigation," a university spokeswoman said in a statement.USC is reviewing the school's application process, officials said. 7162

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Within the World Wide Web, lies a whole world of information. “We worried about hackers,” said University of Maryland professor Jennifer Golbeck, “but we didn't worry about essentially ‘surveillance capitalism’ – companies that make money by collecting data about us and selling it to other people.” Those companies are known as “data brokers.” They operate with little oversight, but collect thousands of pieces of data about you every day. What could it include? If you have a store loyalty card – they know what you buy. If you have an app – they can track your location and what websites you visit. Credit reports, real estate transactions, job applications: all can be compiled by data brokers to paint a picture of who you are. They don’t have to tell you about it and it’s all perfectly legal. Prof. Golbeck specializes in data privacy at University of Maryland’s College of Information Studies and has looked at the way data brokers operate. “For data brokers, in particular, people have tried [to find out what they know] and most of the time they won't share it because that's their product. The thing that has a value is all that data. So, they don't want to give it away,” she said. “It's their data. It's about you. And that, I think, is really the fundamental problem with how we think about data in the U.S. It is my data. It's information about me. But I don't have a right to it. I don't own it here.” That is not the case in Europe, where the European Union enacted the “General Data Protection and Regulation” law in 2018. It regulates the processing of personal information and data and allows consumers to request a copy of the data collected about them – similar to the way people in the U.S. can get a copy of their credit report. Privacy experts say that’s what makes the need for federal oversight of data brokers so critical. “Ultimately, this is not a ‘David versus Goliath’ situation. It is not something that consumers can solve on their own,” said Alan Butler, senior counsel for the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) in Washington, D.C. This month, Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-New York) introduced the “Data Protection Act of 2020.” Among other things, it would create a federal “Data Protection Agency” that would protect consumers and monitor where their data goes and how it’s used. “I think what we've seen over the past 10 years is an increase really an epidemic of data breach in this country. And that's really the result of the amassing of so much personal information in given places,” Butler said. “Really, we need laws that limit and control the collection of personal information rather than our current situation.” California recently enacted a stronger data privacy law within that state: the California Consumer Privacy Act, which allows people to learn what data is being collected about them and allows them to opt out of having their data sold. Experts believe that law could end up having a cascading effect and spread to other states, but a federal law would be the only way to guarantee those protections to all Americans. In the meantime, experts say in order to protect yourself, install a tracker blocker on your phone and browsers and set all your online settings to private. 3274

"Glee" was on a regularly scheduled hiatus in 2013 when one of its young stars, Cory Monteith, died of an accidental overdose.The cast and crew began production on the show's fifth season just weeks later, first filming two previously written episodes as planned and then a special episode that was a moving tribute to the 31-year-old actor, who played Finn Hudson.At the time, showrunner Ryan Murphy, then a veteran of series like "Nip/Tuck" and "Popular," 470

A group of 50 attorneys general from 48 states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico unveiled a major antitrust investigation of Google Monday, sharply escalating the regulatory scrutiny facing the tech giant.The probe will focus on whether Google has harmed competition and consumers, looking at least initially into the company's conduct in its search, advertising and other businesses, though it may expand from there.Speaking to reporters in front of the US Supreme Court Monday, a group of 13 attorneys general struck a bipartisan tone. Karl Racine, attorney general of the District of Columbia, said it was an "unusual setting" for a group that typically disagrees on issues ranging from gun control to reproductive rights."But we are acting as one today," he said.Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton said the investigation will begin by looking at Google's advertising and search dominance but hinted that the scope of the probe could widen significantly."The facts will lead where the facts will lead," he said.To kick off the probe, the states on Monday sent Google a compulsory request for information known as a civil investigative demand (CID). Officials declined to say what was contained in the request, but South Dakota Attorney General Jason Ravnsborg told CNN Business the document is dozens of pages long with many questions.The attorneys general of California and Alabama are the only two from all 50 states not yet participating.Asked why California has not joined the states pursuing the investigation, a spokesperson for California Attorney General Xavier Becerra said the state is committed to fighting anti-competitive behavior."But to protect the integrity of our work, we can't comment — to confirm or deny any pending or potential investigation," the spokesperson said.A spokesperson for the Alabama attorney general didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.The investigation significantly raises the risks of regulation for Google, which so far has faced antitrust scrutiny from federal lawmakers and the Justice Department. On Friday, Google disclosed in an investor filing that it had received a CID from DOJ.The multi-state probe is the second such look into Big Tech to be announced within a week; on Friday, eight states and the District of Columbia said they have begun an antitrust investigation into Facebook. 2370

来源：资阳报