Ê×Ò³ ÕýÎÄ

APPÏÂÔØ

¼ÃÄÏÉ侫ÉäµÄÌ«¿ìÁËÔõô°ì(¼ÃÄÏǰÁÐÏÙÄÒÖ×) (½ñÈÕ¸üÐÂÖÐ)

¿´µã
2025-05-24 15:58:53
È¥AppÌýÓïÒô²¥±¨
´ò¿ªAPP
¡¡¡¡

¼ÃÄÏÉ侫ÉäµÄÌ«¿ìÁËÔõô°ì-¡¾¼ÃÄϸ½Ò»Ò½Ôº¡¿£¬¼ÃÄϸ½Ò»Ò½Ôº,¼ÃÄÏÈçºÎÖÎÁÆÔ­·¢ÐÔÑÏÖØÔçй,¼ÃÄϵ½ÄÄÀïÒ½ºÃÄпÆ,¼ÃÄÏÈçºÎÈÃÄÐÈ˸ú³Ö¾Ã,¼ÃÄϰü¾¥¸îÂð,¼ÃÄÏÑôðôÄܲ»ÄÜÍêÈ«ÖÎ,¼ÃÄÏÄÐÈËÄǸö²ªÆðÔõô°ì

¡¡¡¡¼ÃÄÏÉ侫ÉäµÄÌ«¿ìÁËÔõô°ì ¡¡¡¡

Volkswagen has been fined another €800 million (6 million) over its diesel emissions scandal, this time because of failings at its Audi subsidiary.Volkswagen said Tuesday it accepted the fine imposed by German prosecutors, waving its right to appeal. It said the penalty would hit earnings this year."As a negative special item, [it will] reduce the group earnings for fiscal year 2018 accordingly," it said in a statement.The penalty by Munich prosecutors is just the latest consequence of the scandal that emerged in 2015 and initially wiped out billions off the company's value.Volkswagen admitted cheating on clean air rules with software that made emissions look less toxic than they actually were.The fine concludes the Munich prosecutors' investigation into the company. However, probes into executives, including Audi's former CEO Rupert Stadler, continue, the prosecutors said.The €800 million fine comprises a €5 million penalty for administrative offenses, the maximum allowed under German law.On top of that, prosecutors ordered Volkswagen to repay €795 million they said the company made from the cheating. The prosecutors said this included profits from the sales of affected vehicles.In this case, the diesel emissions cheating affected nearly 5 million cars sold by the Volkswagen group in Europe and the United States, prosecutors said. Specifically, it concerned V6 and V8 diesel engines manufactured by Audi and installed in Audi, Volkswagen and Porsche brands, and Audi vehicles equipped with EA 189 and EA 288 engine made by Volkswagen.Shares in Volkswagen (VLKAF) and Audi (AUDVF) were trading higher on Tuesday. Volkswagen stock is down 11 percent so far this year. 1699

¡¡¡¡¼ÃÄÏÉ侫ÉäµÄÌ«¿ìÁËÔõô°ì ¡¡¡¡

VISTA (CNS) - A man who fatally beat his cousin in the front yard of an Oceanside home was convicted Thursday of second-degree murder.Joel Cardona, 37, was found guilty for the Aug. 2, 2018, death of Nestor Jurado, 37, following a trial that began last week at the Vista courthouse. A sentencing date has not yet been set, but the second-degree murder conviction means Cardona faces at least 15 years to life in state prison.Cardona was arrested on the morning of Aug. 2 during a tussle with Jurado in front of a home on Arthur Avenue, according to police and prosecutors. Jurado was unconscious by the time officers arrived and arrested Cardona, and medics tried in vain to revive him before pronouncing him dead at the scene.RELATED: Oceanside Police: Man dies after fistfight with relativeThe motive for the fight and subsequent killing was unclear.A Feb. 18 court date was set, during which Cardona's prior convictions will be reviewed, potentially affecting his sentence. 984

¡¡¡¡¼ÃÄÏÉ侫ÉäµÄÌ«¿ìÁËÔõô°ì ¡¡¡¡

WASHINGTON ¡ª The Supreme Court has ruled that the Trump administration can deport some people seeking asylum without allowing them to make their case to a federal judge. The high court¡¯s 7-2 decision applies to people who fail their initial asylum screenings, making them eligible for quick deportation, or expedited removal. ACLU attorney Lee Gelernt argued against the case and said the ruling will put lives in danger."This ruling fails to live up to the Constitution¡¯s bedrock principle that individuals deprived of their liberty have their day in court, and this includes asylum seekers. This decision means that some people facing flawed deportation orders can be forcibly removed with no judicial oversight, putting their lives in grave danger," Gelernt said.The justices ruled in the case of man who said he fled persecution as a member of Sri Lanka¡¯s Tamil minority, but failed to persuade immigration officials that he faced harm if he returned to Sri Lanka. The man was arrested soon after he slipped across the U.S. border from Mexico. 1055

¡¡¡¡

VISTA, Calif. (KGTV) ¡ª San Diego Sheriff's Department is asking for help locating a missing man in the North County.Deonicio Sebastian, 67, was last seen Monday at his home on W. Indian Rock Rd. in Vista. SDSO says Sebastian left his home on foot sometime Monday, taking his wallet but leaving his cellphone.Sebastian's family has not had any contact with him since.He's described as a Hispanic man, about 5-foot 4-inches tall, and weighing about 200 pounds. He has a receding hairline and dark brown complexion. His family also says he cannot read or write.Sebastian walks with a limp and requires medication every six hours for health issues, including diabetes, high blood pressure, and asthma. He also has a pacemaker.SDSO said Sebastian commonly walks, or rides the bus or train to various places to run errands, buy food, and go to medical appointments. He has also been known to walk from his home to Arango Green Growers at 2266 Bautista Ave. to work.Anyone with information on Sebastian's whereabouts or who sees him is asked to call SDSO at 858-565-5200. 1072

¡¡¡¡

WASHINGTON (AP) ¡ª In President Donald Trump's former life as a casino owner, he might have cheered Monday's ruling from the Supreme Court that struck down a federal law that barred every state but Nevada from allowing betting on most sporting events.But the Trump administration opposed the outcome reached by the high court at least in part because it could signal trouble in its legal fight against so-called sanctuary states and cities. Seven of the nine justices ¡ª five conservatives and two liberals ¡ª backed a robust reading of the Constitution's 10th Amendment and a limit on the federal government's power to force the states go along with Washington's wishes.The federal anti-gambling law is unconstitutional because "it unequivocally dictates what a state legislature may and may not do," Justice Samuel Alito wrote in his majority opinion. "It's as if federal officers were installed in state legislative chambers and were armed with the authority to stop legislators from voting on any offending proposals."RELATED: San Diego County Board of Supervisors votes to support sanctuary state lawsuit against CaliforniaThere is a direct link between the court's decision in the sports betting case and the administration's effort to punish local governments that resist Trump's immigration enforcement policies, several legal commentators said."The court ruled definitively that the federal government can't force states to enforce federal law. In the immigration context, this means it can't require state or local officials to cooperate with federal immigration authorities," said Ilya Shapiro, a senior fellow in constitutional studies at the libertarian Cato Institute.Omar Jadwat, director of the ACLU's immigrants' rights project, said the ruling reinforced decisions from the 1990s, including one that struck down part of a federal gun control law that required local police to determine if buyers were fit to own handguns.RELATED: Escondido?City Council votes to support sanctuary policy lawsuit"It reiterates that the real thrust of the 10th Amendment and the principles of law in this area is that the fed government can't tell the states or cities how to legislate," Jadwat said. The amendment says that powers not specifically given to the federal government belong to the states.The gun law decision split the court's conservatives and liberals in 1997, in keeping with conservatives' complaints about the federal government's overreach and the importance of states' rights. But on Monday, Justices Stephen Breyer and Elena Kagan joined their more conservative colleagues.The Justice Department declined to comment on the decision, but it had called on the court to uphold the federal law at issue ¡ª the department's usual practice when federal laws are challenged ¡ª by arguing that there was no constitutional violation.RELATED: San Diego church becomes 'sanctuary congregation' amid immigration debateIn the most recent ruling about sanctuary cities, the federal appeals court in Chicago held last month that the federal government cannot withhold public safety grants from cities that won't go along with Trump's immigration enforcement policies.In lawsuits challenging the administration, cities argue that turning local police authorities into immigration officers erodes trust with minority communities and discourages residents from reporting crime. The administration says sanctuary jurisdictions allow dangerous criminals back on the street.The administration's efforts to crack down on places that don't comply with immigration authorities have taken several forms. Trump issued an executive order aimed at withholding federal money from recalcitrant jurisdictions. The administration also has sued California over three laws aimed at protecting immigrants in the country illegally. 3834

À´Ô´£º×ÊÑô±¨

·ÖÏíÎÄÕµ½
˵˵ÄãµÄ¿´·¨...
A-
A+
ÈÈÃÅÐÂÎÅ

¼ÃÄÏÃëÉäÊÇʲôԭÒò

¼ÃÄÏÒõÄÒË®Ö×Ôõô°ì

¼ÃÄÏÖÎÑôðô²»¾ÙµÄÒ©

¼ÃÄÏÔçйÓа취û

¼ÃÄÏÄÐÐԵĴóÒ½Ôº

¼ÃÄÏÕý³£µÄ°üƤÊÇÔõôÑùµÄ

¼ÃÄÏÖÎÁÆÔçйµÄÒ©Ãû

¼ÃÄÏÏÂÌ峤¸ö¸í´ñ

¼ÃÄÏÃÚÄò¿ÆÉÏÄÄÀï¿´

¼ÃÄÏÄÐÐÔ¼²²¡Ò½ÖÎÒ½Ôº

¼ÃÄÏǰÁÐÏÙ»áÔõôÀ´µÄ

¼ÃÄÏǰÁÐÏÙÔöÉúÔõôÖÎÁÆ

¼ÃÄÏʲôÖÐÒ©ÖÎÑôðôÔçй

¼ÃÄÏС±ãʱÄòµÀ´ÌÍ´Õ¦»ØÊÂ

¼ÃÄÏÖÎÁÆÇ°ÁÐÏÙÒªÏûÈÚÊõ

¼ÃÄÏÄпƼì²éÒ»°ã¶àÉÙÇ®

¼ÃÄϹêÍ·Ë®Ö×

¼ÃÄÏÄò·ÓиÐȾÄÄЩ֢״

¼ÃÄϲªÆð¶ÌÔõô°ì

¼ÃÄÏÒõÄÒ³±ÊªÊÇʲôԭÒò

¼ÃÄÏΪʲôÓÐǰÁÐÏÙÔöÉú

¼ÃÄÏÊÖÒù¶àÁËÉ侫¿ìÁËÔõô°ì

¼ÃÄÏÑôίӲ¶È²»¹»Ôõô°ì

¼ÃÄÏÓ²¶È²»¹»²»²ªÆðÔõô°ì

¼ÃÄϼ¸Ï¾ÍÉäÁË

¼ÃÄÏÉñ¾­Ãô¸Ð¶È¸ßÔõô°ì