济南如何控制龟头的敏感度(济南治前列腺要花多少钱) (今日更新中)

WASHINGTON – A federal appeals court has largely upheld the Federal Communications Commission's controversial repeal of its net neutrality rules for internet providers, finding the agency didn't overreach when it decided in 2018 to deregulate companies such as Comcast and Verizon.The decision marks a victory for the Republican-led commission in light of opposition by consumer groups, tech companies and local government officials who had sued the agency in a years-long battle over the future of the open internet.But there is an important caveat: The court struck down a key aspect of the agency's order that could lead to further battles at the state level.Tuesday's opinion by the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit is a win for the broadband industry, which had argued the regulations created uncertainty for internet providers and were too restrictive. But the decision also handed a partial victory to net neutrality advocates in that it provides a path for states to create their own net neutrality rules.Both sides were quick to declare victory.In a statement Tuesday, FCC Chairman Ajit Pai said the decision is a win "for consumers, broadband deployment, and the free and open Internet." He added: "A free and open Internet is what we have today and what we'll continue to have moving forward."Democratic FCC commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel, a net neutrality advocate, cheered the court's decision as it "vacates the FCC's unlawful effort to block states and localities from protecting an open internet for their citizens."For years, consumer groups have pushed for tough net neutrality rules. Advocates say providers should not be allowed to slow down websites, block access to apps or give faster service to preferred partners, which could distort the market for online services. Under those principles, Verizon, for example, would not be allowed to speed up loading times for, say, Yahoo, which it owns. Similarly, Spectrum could not downgrade Netflix as a way to deter cord-cutting.In light of the decision, Mozilla, maker of the Firefox browser and one of the lead plaintiffs in the case, said the fight to preserve the principle of net neutrality "is far from over."Consumer groups succeeded in 2015 when the FCC decided to regulate internet providers much like legacy telephone companies. The agency imposed clear rules banning the blocking, throttling or accelerating of Web content by internet providers and reserved the right to investigate business practices that risked violating the spirit of net neutrality.Opponents charged that the rules were a gross overreach by the government. Industry groups argued the constant danger of FCC investigations created business uncertainty and the rules opened the door to direct federal regulation of broadband prices.When President Trump took the White House, Republicans gained control of the FCC. Among the first acts Pai took as the new chairman was a plan to unwind the rules. Pai argued that the net neutrality regulations were heavy-handed and discouraged internet providers from upgrading their networks. In 2017, the FCC voted to repeal major parts of the rules, including the bans on blocking and slowing of websites.Internet providers say they are not interested in blocking or slowing down websites anyway.USTelecom, an association representing broadband providers, said the litigation showed how "Congress must end this regulatory rinse and repeat cycle by passing a strong national framework that applies to all companies."But internet providers have lobbied for the freedom to strike deals with websites to provide premium service, possibly in exchange for extra fees.Some policymakers have argued that practice, known as "paid prioritization," could benefit advanced applications like self-driving cars and telemedicine. Critics worry it could become an unbearable cost for some websites and tech companies — giving wealthy, established firms the power to dominate while marginalizing smaller businesses that can't afford to pay.Those arguments figured prominently in the legal battle over net neutrality. A coalition of critics led by Mozilla sued the FCC in hopes of blocking Pai's deregulation.The case was decided with the panel's three judges concluding the FCC acted lawfully when it decided to undo the Obama-era rules and regulate internet providers more lightly.But the opinion also struck down efforts by the FCC to prevent state governments from enacting their own net neutrality laws and regulations. The court on Tuesday rejected that approach, saying it amounted to an attempt to "categorically abolish all fifty States' ... authority to regulate intrastate communications." The FCC could still seek to preempt states on a case-by-case basis, setting the stage for multiple legal tussles.Andy Schwartzman, a lecturer in law at Georgetown University, said the decision "provides a roadmap to rules that can protect the promise of a vibrant internet that serves people, not the big cable and telcom companies." 5018

WESTERVILLE, Ohio - Former Vice President Joe Biden said on Tuesday at the Democratic presidential debate that he and his son Hunter did not commit any wrongdoing by advocating for the dismissal of a Ukrainian prosecutor while his son was employed by a Ukrainian company under investigation. "My son did nothing wrong," Biden said. "I did nothing wrong. I carried out the policy of the United States government in rooting out corruption in Ukraine. And that's what we should be focusing on."The issue did not get much airplay on Tuesday from other candidates. The only candidate who was asked about Biden's conduct was Sen. Bernie Sanders, who opted not to attack Biden. In 2016, Sanders also did not go after opponent Hillary Clinton for her handling of government emails on a personal server. But it appeared at least one other candidate wanted to expound on Biden's conduct as moderators moved on. One of the candidates who tried to interject could be heard saying, "It is wrong to move on."Candidates agree on impeachmentThe opening question at Tuesday’s debate was on why President Donald Trump should be removed from office instead of waiting for voters to decide next November. All 12 Democrats on stage have come out in support of impeachment of Trump.Several candidates, including Sanders and Biden, said that Trump is the “most corrupt president in history.”Among those on stage, there were six current members of Congress. Among them are five U.S. senators who could be asked to consider convicting Trump and removing the president from office. “The president has not been putting America ahead of his own interests,” Minnesota U.S. Senator Amy Klobuchar said. The candidates agreed that Trump’s phone call to Ukraine’s president was an impeachable offense. While the candidates agreed that Trump crossed a red line, some of the candidates cautioned fellow Democrats. "If the House votes to impeach, the Senate does not vote to remove Donald Trump, he walks out and he feels exonerated, further deepening the divides in this country that we cannot afford," said Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard, who said Democrats should accept that Trump won the 2016 election. Warren refuses to say 'Medicare For All' would increase taxesMassachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren, a supporter of "Medicare For All," was pressed on whether taxes would go up under her plan. Warren refused to say that middle class taxes would go up, instead saying that costs would go down. "I have made clear what my principles are here. Costs will go up for the wealthy and big corporations,” Warren said.South Bend Mayor Pete Buttigieg said it was a simple yes or no question that Warren refuses to answer. "That didn't get a yes or no answer,” Buttigieg said. “This is why people here in the Midwest are so frustrated with Washington in general and Capitol Hill in particular.”Sanders, also a supporter of "Medicare For All," said that it is fair to say taxes would go up with the plan. "As somebody who wrote the damn bill, let's be clear: Under the Medicare For All bill I wrote, premiums are gone, co-payments are gone, deductibles are gone. All out of expenses are gone," Sanders said.Sanders said that a "Medicare For All" plan would cost trillion over 10 years. Overall, Americans spend .5 trillion in healthcare per year, the Congressional Budget Office says. But the CBO could not put an estimate on exactly how much the average person would spend with a Medicare-for-All system. A CBO report says a number of factors, such as whether state governments will pay into the system and whether citizens can opt out of public insurance all options, would affect costs.The CBO states that the federal government has lower administrative costs than private insurance. The cost to administer all of Medicare was 6 percent, compared to 12 percent for private insurers in 2017, the CBO says.The CBO added that administrative costs could decrease even further as a Medicare-for-All system would have fewer eligibility exclusions.Protests line streets near the debateHundreds of protesters supporting Trump and other Democratic candidates lined the streets of Westerville as debate attendees walked by. At times, police officers used bicycles to push protesters back onto the sidewalk. Most of the protesters remained several city blocks away as the debate was held at a private university. 4377

WASHINGTON — Hundreds of people converged on the White House on Saturday for a second straight day to protest the death of George Floyd in Minneapolis and President Donald Trump’s response. 203

Vittorio Caruso, the most recent American to die in the Dominican Republic, died from respiratory and heart failure after a long history of related-health problems, the country's Attorney General's office said, citing a preliminary autopsy report.Caruso had suffered from hypertension, heart disease and pulmonary disease for a long time, the office said.Caruso is the 10th known American to die in the Dominican Republic in the last year. Local and US authorities maintain that the deaths are not related.The US hasn't issued a travel warning specific to the deaths in the Dominican Republic, and a US official said Friday there hasn't been an unusual uptick in reported deaths there.Caruso, from New York, had been living in the Boca Chica community near Santo Domingo for several years, prosecutors said. His partner, Yomaira Ramirez de Jesus, told prosecutors that Caruso began to cough and feel shortness of breath on June 11. He went to the doctor, was treated and released.Almost a week later, Ramirez de Jesus says Caruso called her, complaining of respiratory distress and chest pain. She found him receiving medical attention at home, say prosecutors.Caruso was then transferred to a Santo Domingo hospital, where he suffered from cardiorespiratory arrest and died.Caruso had been battling hypertension for nine years, and had a long history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), the attorney general's office said.New and previous heart attacks were detected by the autopsy, the office said. Caruso was a smoker and drank alcohol, per the autopsy results.The body exhibited no signs of internal or external trauma, according to prosecutors.The FBI has a team in the Dominican Republic assisting with the toxicology tests of three of the 10 known American deaths.Some of those deaths could be related to alcohol. The Hard Rock Hotel and Casino in Punta Cana, where two of the deaths occurred, said Sunday it would remove liquor dispensers from guest room minibars. 1997

WASHINGTON, D.C. – President Donald Trump will donate his quarterly salary to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. White House Press Secretary Stephanie Grisham made the announcement Tuesday, saying that the 0,000 donation is being made to support the efforts to confront, contain and combat COVID-19, the disease brought on by the new coronavirus. President 387

来源：资阳报