长沙精子形成模型(安徽19寸多媒体人体针灸穴位交互数字平台) (今日更新中)

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) - Coronavirus vaccine trials are underway, but it's unlikely you'll be able to get one before next year.ABC 10News spoke with Dr. Anthony Fauci, the Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, about the next steps in the battle against the Coronavirus.Team 10 investigative reporter Adam Racusin asked Dr. Fauci when a safe and effective vaccine will be available."Well, Adam, we're hoping that's going to be as we get toward the end of this calendar year late fall early winter," he said. "In the United States, two candidates have already started a phase three trial. They started last week on July 27."Fauci said in the next few months, other companies will be getting into a phase three trial."We hope, and I think we can be cautiously optimistic about this, that we will have a safe and effective vaccine by the end of the year, beginning of 2021," he said. "There's never a guarantee Adam, and that's why you do the trials, and the phase three trials are about 30,000 people."Dr. Fauci explained that the government has invested hundreds of millions of dollars - if not billions on vaccine production even before they know if it will work. So, if it is valid, in early 2021, there could be tens of millions of doses ready to go.As for who'd get it first, Fauci said they have committees that advise the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. They're also adding an extra layer of individuals from the National Academy of Medicine to complement that decision."The prioritization is usually for those who would benefit the most and need it the most such as health care providers, those who are vulnerable, the elderly, those with underlying conditions including minority individuals who we know disproportionately suffer much more both in infection rate and in serious consequences," Fauci said.But even if the vaccine is approved, the speed at which it'll be done makes some people cautious and even uncomfortable. Others have indicated they are against any vaccine."We're having what's called community engagement and community involvement," Fauci said. "This has been very successful when we had interventions during the earlier years of HIV/AIDS when there was some skepticism in the community about safety and efficacy in drugs. So we're going to get community leaders to help us get out there and be very transparent in outreaching to the various communities, including minority communities, that may have some skepticism to getting vaccinated."The vaccine is months away at a minimum, yet positive cases are still rising in some communities.Dr. Fauci said what's concerning to him is the capability of the virus to be efficient in how it spreads from person to person."We've got to take it seriously," he warned.Team 10 investigator Adam Racusin asked Fauci, while the country is waiting for a vaccine, does he believe school-aged kids should be physically in school.“Well, I think they should be what we call an overriding default position,” Fauci said. “That it is better, and we should try to the best of our ability to get the children back to school because of the deleterious effects to the children when they’re not in school and the ripple effects to parents of having to stop work to take care of them. However, and I underline the ‘however,’ this should not be sacrificing the health, the welfare or the safety of the children as well as the teachers.”He continued, “So we live in a big country, and you’ve got to realize that there are some areas locally where the infection is so low that you can get the kids back to school, no problem. You’ve got to be realizing and flexible that there are some areas of the country where the infection activity is so high that locally the individual people responsible may have to make the decision either to not get the kids back to school or to do it in a way that safeguards the children’s health by hybrid between online and in-person, physical separation, indoor-outdoor, morning afternoon. There are a lot of ways to do that. We have to be flexible. It’s not one size fits all with getting the children back to school.”To learn more about the clinical trials or to volunteer: https://www.coronaviruspreventionnetwork.org/ 4244

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) -- At the Sycuan Visitors Center in El Cajon, you'll find pieces of history on display. Tools, clothing, baskets, even instruments, all tracing their origin to the Kumeyaay people."We were very important in shaping this landscape, so we developed the landscape and the landscape developed us," said Ethan Banegas, who teaches Kumeyaay history and is Kumeyaay himself.The Kumeyaay people live on 12 reservations in southern California and six in Mexico. Their history is rooted deeply in the San Diego area."We have old village sites all over. Old Town, where the first mission was, was an old village called Kasoy, " Banegas explained. According to Banegas, at one point, the Kumeyaay people lived from the desert to the mountains to the ocean and numbered between 30 and 50 thousand.RELATED: Native American tribes join to celebrate life and heritage at San Diego powwowBy the late 1800s, historians estimate the Kumeyaay population had dwindled to as low as 1000. Even as numbers started to rebound, the language and music continued to fade. Banegas says at one point traditional singers had all but disappeared. However, there was a resurgence in the 1960s that continues today."We have a whole generation learning these songs that were basically gone."As for the language, there are only about a dozen speakers left in the U.S. and a few dozen more in Mexico. But there's an effort underway to teach young people and keep it alive. Banegas says a turning point for many tribes was gaming, which provided an economic solution to the severe poverty many people experienced on the reservations. Today Banegas and others are using education to keep their culture alive and hope that during this Native American heritage month, San Diegans take time to remember the people who've called this land home for thousands of years. 1849

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) -- Chula Vista city officials have placed the controversial statue of explorer Christopher Columbus in storage "out of public safety concerns."City spokeswoman Anne Steinberger said the bronze statue was removed early Friday morning from its platform at Discovery Park in the Rancho Del Rey neighborhood.The Columbus statue has been at the park on 700 Buena Vista Way for nearly three decades, but it has been a frequent target of vandals. Last Columbus Day, the statue was doused with red paint.The city had been hearing arguments for and against the removal of the statue with many people -- including local Native American tribes -- calling the sculpture a symbol of hate, theft of land, and genocide. The debate became heated Feb. 26 when representatives from both sides faced off in a Chula Vista Human Relations Commission meeting. The fiery session prompted Chula Vista police to respond.At the meeting, Chula Vista City Councilman John McCann, with members of the Knights of Columbus standing by his side, called for the statue to be left alone.VIDEO: San Diego man verbally attacked during woman's racist rantThe following night, the committee voted unanimously in favor of a proposal that includes the removal of the statue. The approved a resolution has been postponed due to the coronavirus pandemic."Due to restrictions related to coronavirus, there has not been an opportunity to hold a public forum for community dialogue," said Steinberger. "It is expected that the item will be brought forward for further public input and consideration."It's unclear how long the statue will remain in storage or if the city has decided it will remain there permanently. In a statement regarding its removal, City Councilman Steve Padilla said, "Many have asked for its removal, and given all that is happening nationwide regarding America’s legacy of racism, the City decided to put it in storage.""I look forward to an important community conversation about the final fate of the statue, as well as further actions the City can take to ensure that ALL Chula Vistans feel safe and welcome in our community," said Padilla.The city's decision to stow the statue comes amid national-turned-global Black Lives Matter protests against racism and police brutality stemming from the in-custody death of a black man, George Floyd, who died after a Minneapolis police officer knelt on his neck as he begged for air.READ: 8 Books To Teach Kids About Racism And Social JusticeIn response to call for racial justice, various cities and institutions have taken steps to eradicate symbols honoring controversial figures including public statues of Confederate soldiers. This last week, Nascar and the U.S. Marine Corps announced a ban on public displays of the Confederate battle flag.Demand for action has even extended to Disney. A petition posted on Change.org asks that company remove all references to its 1946 film "Song of the South" from the water ride Splash Mountain. 2994

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) - Another San Diego driver has come forward, after she got hit with a late fee despite paying her parking ticket early.In early November 2019, Pamela Moes parked on Thomas Avenue in Pacific Beach and went for a walk on the beach. She was parked in a street sweeping zone."A truck blocked the 'No Parking' sign when I parked, but it's no excuse. I knew the rules," said Moes.Moes likes have things taken care of quickly, so she went home and mailed out a check for .50 that afternoon.RELATED: North Park driver hit with late fees after paying parking fine earlyA few weeks later, she got a notice from the city: they hadn't received her payment and she would soon be delinquent. She stopped payment on her first check, drove to the Parking Administration office downtown, and paid for the fine in person."I thought everything was taken care of. Now I really don't have to worry about anything," said Moes.She was wrong. In late December 2019, she got another notice from the city. The ticket was paid, but she had been hit with a late fee of . "I was angry and frustrated because I paid for it in person!" said Moes.Turns out when the processing center in Inglewood couldn't deposit the check she stopped payment on, a late fee was assessed, even though she was already paid in full."How is this happening? They have to be talking to one another. There has to be some communication," said Moes.Moes is hardly alone. Last week 10News reported on a North Park driver named Stacy, who paid her fine early — a week after Moes paid hers — and also got hit with the same late fee. The city at that time blamed delays on processing with new equipment and "connectivity issues" at the Inglewood facility.Moes has since made a final payment for the late fee so she could be done with it.10News reached out to a city spokesperson about Moes' case, along with a list of questions about the overall issues and the number of people impacted. A spokesperson says they've begun looking into it and will release a response.The city released the following statements in the previous story: "Check payments are processed by a third party vendor located in Inglewood, Calif. The average processing time in calendar year 2019 was six days for payments mailed to the vendor. Recently, the vendor encountered delays due to the installation of new remittance processing equipment. The new equipment had connectivity issues which created a backlog of payments.Customers who reached out to the Office of the City Treasurer during the backlog were advised not to stop payment on their checks, the postmark date was considered the legal payment date. When the payments were processed, the postmark date would automatically roll back any late fees if assessed. The Office of the City Treasurer generally advises customers to use the online option as the payments are posted in real-time ..." 2897

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) - Another woman has come forward with accusations of sexual misconduct against a former San Diego County Sheriff's deputy. Jane Doe, as she's named in a federal lawsuit, claims Richard Fischer sexually assaulted her in September of 2017. The woman claims she was driving home from her shift as a cocktail waitress, lost control of her vehicle, and crashed into two parked cars. Scared she'd been drinking and driving, she left the scene and called a male friend to drive her to her home in Escondido. According to the lawsuit, as she and the man approached her home, they saw Escondido police cars parked outside. Officers detained her, and she admitted that she'd crashed her car and had been drinking and driving. Police handcuffed the woman and told her she had to wait for San Diego County Sheriff's personnel to arrive. The lawsuit says the responding deputy was Richard Fischer. According to the lawsuit, "Defendant Fischer asked Jane Doe if she had been drinking. She admitted that she had. As he drove Jane Doe back to the accident scene, he asked Jane Doe if either of the two males in the car with her were her boyfriend. Jane Doe answered that they were not. Defendant Fischer then responded, "Good, because you could do much better than them" or words to that effect." The lawsuit says once at the accident scene, deputies questioned Doe about the crash. It says after about 20 minutes at the scene, Fischer asked her if she wanted a ride home. The lawsuit says, "Jane Doe was confused when Defendant Fischer offered her a ride home because she told the officers she had been drinking and driving, she crashed into two parked cars, fled the scene of the accident, did not have a valid driver's license, her friend that picked her up got arrested, and there was an outstanding warrant for her arrest. Jane Doe assumed she was going to jail." The woman says she accepted Fischer's offer for a ride home and got into the patrol car with her hands cuffed behind her back.As they drove to her home, Fischer asked her how old she was, according to the lawsuit. "Deputy Fischer asked if she had gotten a birthday kiss. Jane Doe responded, "What?" Then Deputy Fischer asked Jane Doe if she wanted a birthday kiss. Jane Doe did not respond. Jane Doe became more confused. Jane Doe thought to herself, "What the he** is going on?," the lawsuit stated. The lawsuit says once they got to her house, Fischer opened the rear door where she was sitting. It says, "He then said, "Here comes your favorite part," or words to that effect. He leaned across her to unbuckle her seatbelt. Deputy Fischer then started rubbing Jane Doe's legs as she sat handcuffed in the back of Deputy Fischer's patrol car. Jane Doe was wearing very short denim shorts. Therefore, Deputy Fischer was able to rub the skin of Jane Doe's upper thighs on both legs. As Deputy Fischer rubbed Jane Doe's thighs, he looked at her and said, "Your legs are really soft" or words to that effect. Jane Doe was still handcuffed and could not stop Deputy Fischer's advances." The lawsuit claims once out of the vehicle Fischer stood behind her and started "rubbing her butt". It says, "As the handcuffs were still on, Deputy Fischer then reached between Jane Doe's legs and rubbed her genital area." The woman then went into the house. The lawsuit claims by the time Fischer met the woman, he had "sexually assaulted approximately 19 other women while on duty as a San Diego sheriff deputy." The lawsuit challenges the County of San Diego's complaint process saying it allows very serious complaints to go unanswered, "because a proper system of complaint reporting would have resulted in an Internal Affairs investigation into the complaints, arguably as early as May 4, 2016. Deputy Fischer would have either been terminated then, or placed on administrative leave, as he is currently on, which would have saved Jane Doe and other situationally vulnerable women from his abuse of power as a San Diego sheriff deputy." Fischer is currently facing numerous criminal charges, including sexual battery, false imprisonment, forced oral copulation, and assault by a public officer. He has denied the allegations, telling 10News in September of 2018, "I just want to go on the record and say I vigorously deny these allegations. They are false, and I really look forward to my day in court to fight for myself." According to court records, Fischer's criminal trial is set for September. Attorneys for Fischer did not respond to a request for comment on this federal complaint. 4559

来源：资阳报