石家庄多种心电图电脑模拟人榆林针刺训练手臂模型,七台河高48CM 人体针灸模型（女性）,陕西神经元突触及神经纤维结构模型,辽宁4阶段病变腰椎模型,合肥脑解剖模型（6部件）,广州顶骨模型,银川穿戴式四肢止血训练套件

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) - Sharp Grossmont Hospital secretly video recorded 1,800 patients using hidden cameras at the women's health center in El Cajon, according to a lawsuit filed late Friday afternoon.The recordings took place between July 17, 2012 and June 30, 2013 inside three Labor and Delivery operating rooms at the facility located at 5555 Grossmont Center Dr. in El Cajon, the plaintiffs claim.Among the video recordings captured by hidden cameras: Caesarean births, hysterectomies, sterilizations, dilatation and curettage to resolve miscarriages, and other procedures, according to court documents.Women were also recorded undressing, the lawsuit says.According to court documents, the hospital claims the recordings were part of an investigation "into whether an employee was stealing the anesthesia drug propofol from drug carts in the operating rooms."The suit states that the motion-activated cameras were installed on drug carts in each of the three operating rooms at the women's health center, but the cameras continued to record after motion stopped. READ: Phony doctor suspect charged for Sharp Grossmont hospital visitsBecause of the angle and placement of the devices, the suit says "patients' faces were recorded, and the patients were identifiable."“At times, Defendants’ patients had their most sensitive genital areas visible,” the lawsuit states. Multiple users, including non-medical personnel and strangers, had access to the recordings on desktop computers, the lawsuit claims, and that Sharp “did not log or track who accessed the recordings, why, or when."“There are images contained within the multitude of images of women undergoing operations of a very personal, private nature, unconscious and in states of exposure depending on the operation being performed,” the lawsuit cites an unnamed Sharp executive as saying.“Plaintiffs suffered harm including, but not limited to, suffering, anguish, fright, horror, nervousness, grief, anxiety, worry, shock, humiliation, embarrassment, shame, mortification, hurt feelings, disappointment, depression and feelings of powerlessness,” the lawsuit claims.Plaintiffs believe Sharp destroyed “at least half” of the recordings but cannot confirm the files are not otherwise recoverable. Computers used for storage were replaced or refreshed, but Sharp did not ensure proper deletion of recordings, according to the lawsuit.READ: La Mesa police investigate man's suspicious death at Sharp Grossmont HospitalSharp HealthCare and Sharp Grossmont Hospital are named in the lawsuit, along with the possibility of more defendants in the future once their names and capacities are known.10News reached out to officials at Sharp HealthCare and they confirmed that between July 2012 and June 2013, "Sharp Grossmont Hospital installed and operated one hidden camera on the anesthesia cart located in each of three operating rooms in the Women’s Center.""The purpose of the three cameras was to ensure patient safety by determining the cause of drugs missing from the carts," Sharp HealthCare officials told 10News."A initial lawsuit alleging privacy violations and other claims stemming from the video recording was filed against Sharp HealthCare and Sharp Grossmont Hospital in 2016. The case remains active and Sharp is not in a position to comment further about the matter," Sharp HealthCare officials told 10News."Sharp HealthCare and Sharp Grossmont Hospital continue to take extensive measures to protect the privacy of its patients," Sharp HealthCare officials said.The complaint for damages includes a demand for jury trial on charges of invasion of privacy, negligence, unlawful recording of confidential information, negligent infliction of emotional distress, and breach of fiduciary privacy.STATEMENT FROM SHARP GROSSMONT HOSPITAL 3809

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) -- Since they got the call for help a week ago, San Diego Border Dreamers has been working around the clock to set up an emergency medical clinic in Tijuana.Board Director Milad Torabi says he's getting word migrants have conditions including fevers, rashes, blisters and bad sunburns. On a Go Fund Me, they're raising money for basic medical, first aid, and sanitary supplies.The advocacy group is partnering with two UC San Diego organizations which specialize in this area: Flying Samaritans and the International Health Collective.They're accepting monetary donations as well as medical supplies.San Diego Border Dreamers is also seeking doctors, nurses, medical students, acupuncturists, physical therapists and medical translators willing to volunteer their time. 799

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) - San Diego-based Qualcomm won a million decision Friday against Apple in a patent infringement case involving iPhones. A jury in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California found the iPhone 7, 7 Plus, 8, 8 Plus, and X infringed Qualcomm’s patents. One of the patents enables "flashless booting”, eliminating the need for separate flash memory. It also allows a smartphone to connect to the internet quickly after being powered on, according to Qualcomm officials. The other two patents allow smartphone apps to access internet data quickly, and enable high performance and graphics while increasing battery life, Qualcomm said in a news release. Qualcomm was awarded million in damages from July 6, 2017, the date the lawsuit was filed, through the end of the trial. "Today's unanimous jury verdict is the latest victory in our worldwide patent litigation directed at holding Apple accountable for using our valuable technologies without paying for them," said Don Rosenberg, executive vice president and general counsel for Qualcomm. "The technologies invented by Qualcomm and others are what made it possible for Apple to enter the market and become so successful so quickly. The three patents found to be infringed in this case represent just a small fraction of Qualcomm's valuable portfolio of tens of thousands of patents. We are gratified that courts all over the world are rejecting Apple's strategy of refusing to pay for the use of our IP." Courts in Germany and China also ruled in favor of Qualcomm in similar legal disputes in the past six months. 1614

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) -- San Diego’s first rainbow crosswalk opened in Hillcrest Saturday afternoon. According to organizers, the crosswalk is the first in California that also features a transgender flag. The crosswalk is located at the corner of Normal Street and University Avenue. RELATED: Hillcrest to get San Diego's first LGBTQ+ rainbow crosswalkCouncilmember Chris Ward and other local leaders were there for the unveiling. His office released a statement saying, in part: “I am proud that my office has made this symbol of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (LGBTQ) pride a reality.” 596

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) — Since the start of the pandemic, there have been more than 240 community outbreaks in San Diego County. But despite calls from the public, county leaders continue to keep the exact locations secret.After public records requests from news outlets, the county released a list this week showing all the confirmed outbreaks until Sept. 1.The list reveals one outbreak at a San Diego business led to 175 infections. Another outbreak at a Chula Vista adult day care was linked to three deaths. But the addresses and business names are redacted.Many ABC 10News viewers have said they would like detailed information about the location of outbreaks to better inform decisions on where they visit.The county has resisted those calls, citing several reasons.The first reason has to do with contact tracing. County leaders say tracers often encounter people who are reluctant to provide information out of concern it will harm their business or organization.They say it’s useful tracers are able to assure people the business names will be kept confidential.“Contact tracing only works when those that are being interviewed are completely honest and forthcoming with relevant information,” the county wrote in a letter attached to the public records request.“Releasing the names of these locations and the addresses will have a chilling effect on the open communication necessary to ensure the Public Health Officer is able to effectively combat active outbreaks,” the county added.Los Angeles County does it differently. Health officials there post the names and addresses of all outbreak locations at workplaces, food, and retail stores.An outbreak is defined as three or more cases among members of different households who visited the same location within a 14-day period.San Diego County Public Health Officer Dr. Wilma Wooten said LA’s approach is unique.“LA does not have the capacity to do the contact tracing investigations the way that we do them,” she said in a press conference last month. “If you call any other health department in Southern California, no other health department does what LA does.”At times, San Diego County has identified the locations of outbreaks, including announcing in late July an outbreak at a fitness facility called The Gym in Pacific Beach.At the time, The Gym was defying public health orders, but has since gotten permission to reopen.San Diego County has also revealed locations of outbreaks from other diseases.In 2017, the county identified a Pacific Beach restaurant where there was a Hepatitis A outbreak. It regularly names schools with cases of tuberculosis.“We would release or have a press release related to an outbreak if there was additional information that the public would need to take actions,” Dr. Wooten said.County officials say they only reveal locations when they need help identifying people who may be exposed.In many cases, by the time an outbreak is confirmed, the county says the active threat is over.That’s because on average, the list reveals it takes 25 days to confirm the presence of three or more cases.“In most instances, the outbreak location information is reported and added to this list well after the outbreak has already taken place, so releasing the names now would do little to protect the public, especially when the business is cooperating with the Public Health Officer, exposed individuals have been notified, and measures have been taken to mitigate the risk of an additional outbreak,” the county said in its letter explaining the redactions in the public records request.Then there’s a privacy argument. County leaders say that in some cases revealing locations would make it easy to determine the people who had fallen ill.Finally, Dr. Wooten said she doesn’t want the public to get the impression that the virus is only contained in locations where outbreaks have occurred.When there's an outbreak of another disease, cases tend to be very localized. COVID-19 is different, she said.“The virus is widespread. People should not get false complacency,” said Dr. Wooten. 4079