沈阳高级创伤四肢模块甘肃胶脱支架制作模型,丹东姜式人体层次解剖模型,鸡西女性内外生殖器解剖模型,安徽男性盆部横断断层解剖模型,西宁毛发模型,重庆60CM 男性针灸模型解剖（中文、英代）,沈阳4周的人体胚胎模型

BEIJING, June 1 (Xinhua) -- China has promising growth prospects and should not be blamed for world imbalances, says Danny Quah, a renowned British economist."Emergency financing that was placed in the Chinese economy to counter the downturn from the 2008 global financial crisis was the right thing...The imbalances is a global problem, not a China problem," said Quah, a professor at the London School of Economics and Political Science.China did the right thing in infusing its economy with fiscal stimulus, Quah said in a recent interview with Xinhua.He also declined to describe the ballooning real estate prices as a bubble, pointing out "the strong fundamentals" of China's economy.He said the expansion of China's housing construction will be proved useful eventually, given the fact that "China is still engaging in the task of moving hundreds of millions of people from rural areas to urban China to continue to power its manufacturing and industrial progress.""So I would not describe it as a collapse of real estate bubble, we can look forward to a rationalization of housing and real estate prices," Quah said. "The improvement and expansion of housing stock will play an important role in continuing to move the Chinese economy forward.""I think Chinese fundamentals will continue to be strong. And a little bit of high inflation, as long as it doesn't break out into some kind of runaway high inflation, is probably no bad thing," he said. "We will get it under control again as the Chinese government did previously."On allegations that China deliberately keeps its currency RMB weak to obtain unfair advantages in trade with countries like the United States, Quah said people who draw such a false conclusion are misguided."The United States is running a trade deficit not just against China. It is running a trade deficit against almost 100 other countries," he said. "China is not unique in how it is exporting more to the United States than it's importing."The U.S. government was beginning to run a large trade deficit long before China's trade surpluses started grow, he added."If you take the ratio of China's bilateral trade surplus against the U.S. as a fraction of the U.S.' overall bilateral trade deficit against all of the countries, it has remained constant over the last 15, 20 years," Quah said.

LOS ANGELES, April 2 (Xinhua) -- Some U.S. experts on China suggested that the United States and China have different perceptions towards each other, but cooperation on critical global issues is essential and will necessarily involve sacrifices at home.Clayton Dube, Associate Director of U.S. China Institute at the University of Southern California, told Xinhua in a recent interview that domestic political concerns drive leaders in both countries, and neither side wants to be perceived by their fellow citizens as not standing up for core interests of their own countries.However, he said, what is vital is for leaders on both sides to convince their fellow citizens that cooperation on critical global issues is essential. Although it will involve sacrifices at home, ultimately those sacrifices will be rewarded to progress in addressing climate change, furthering economic growth and constraining the proliferation of nuclear weapons."Strong leaders know that they must sometimes yield on important measures in order to attain even more crucial aims. That must happen now and it must happen on both sides," stressed Dube."Leaders must always be sensitive to domestic pressures, but they also have a responsibility to look forward and to take action that will yield a better tomorrow, even if there are political costs today," said Dube.Stanley Rosen, Director of the East Asian Studies Center at the University of Southern California, told Xinhua that the political system, the role of media, ideology, political culture and political history between the two countries are very different, therefore it is easy for the two countries to misunderstand each other.However, in Rosen's opinion, both sides do not want the situation to get out of control."It is a two level game," he said, explaining that the U.S. leaders will deal with China, and Chinese leaders will deal with the U.S., then the U.S. leaders will deal with the U.S. and Chinese leaders will deal with China.He said the Obama Administration will have to worry about the U. S. Congress, and public opinion. His leadership has been weakened by the health care debate and he is worried about the mid-term election."There is much pressure on him to be tough on China," said Rosen.On the Chinese side, Rosen said Chinese leaders also face great pressure to be tough on the U.S. from the military, the National People's Congress, etc. "It is a nature of politics," Rosen said.From the U.S. side, Rosen said the message is Obama tries to be flexible in foreign affairs, but the flexibility has been perceived as weak towards China."His flexibility is not awarded, so he has to show his toughness towards China. The American and Chinese perceptions are different," said Rosen.For example, he said, the U.S. is tough on the currency issue and has put pressure on the Chinese side to reevaluate its currency. However, even in the U.S. there is a debate on whether the evaluation of RMB will help U.S. exports or to which degree the change of value of the Chinese currency will help increase jobs in the U.S..Rosen said the U.S. tends to be governed by elections. In his opinion, before the November election, the U.S. is unlikely to make concessions on issues on currency and others.He said what the U.S. can do is very limited right now, but he does not expect that the U.S. will take major actions to further deteriorate the U.S.-China relations. In his opinion, the Obama Administration and Democrats need to show their toughness towards China to woo voters before the mid-term election.He said most U.S. Congressional members are politicians but not statesmen. What they care about is to get re-elected every two years. Therefore, whether a small business will be closed and several dozens of employees will lose their jobs in their district is certainly a big concern for them, while whether what they have done will impact U.S.-China relations is not what they are caring about.Ben Tang, Director of Asian Studies at the Claremont Institute, told Xinhua that nationalism in both countries is on the increase and China has felt the pressure. However, he said the importance for the U.S. and China to cooperate should be carefully taken into consideration while making big decisions.Tang said that there is a trend of trade protectionism in the U. S. and some Americans attempt to let the world share the burden of its economic recession, that will set a very bad example in the world.But in Tang's opinion, the increasing trade protectionism and voices to be tough on China in the U.S. are partly fueled by the mid-term election to be held in November this year. He said such a situation won't last long. It will gradually die down after the election.

BEIJING, May 31 (Xinhua) -- The People's Bank of China (PBOC), China's central bank, issued a circular Monday requiring banks to curb lending to energy-intensive industries, a move echoing government energy-saving and pollution-reduction measures.Banks must strictly review loan applications from companies in energy-consuming industries, the circular said, adding that only bank headquarters can extend loans to finance capacity expansion projects in energy-guzzling sectors.It also banned new credit to any projects not complying with government energy-saving policies.According to the circular, banks should conduct an overall review of loans to energy-intensive industries and report the results to the central bank by the end of June.The State Council, China's Cabinet, urged in early May all government departments make efforts to cut emissions and conserve energy to meet the country's target set in the 11th Five-Year Plan (2006-2010), according to which China will cut its per unit GDP energy consumption by 20 percent compared with 2005 levels by the end of 2010.

BEIJING, May 24 (Xinhua) -- China's top political advisor Jia Qinglin has called for more efforts from political advisors for the development and stability in Xinjiang and Tibet."The Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC) ... has a significant responsibility to promote leapfrog development and lasting stability for Xinjiang and Tibet," Jia said Monday at a meeting of the 11th National Committee of the CPPCC, the country's top political advisory body.Jia Qinglin, member of the Standing Committee of the Political Bureau of the Communist Party of China (CPC) Central Committee and chairman of the National Committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC), presides over the 27th meeting of chairpersons of the 11th CPPCC National Committee in Beijing, China, May 24, 2010.Jia, chairman of the CPPCC National Committee, called on the political advisors to study the strategic plans for Xinjiang and Tibet, which were outlined last week, and work to boost the two regions' development and stability.Also at the meeting, Jia asked the political advisors to provide more proposals as the country is making its 12th five-year (2011-2015) plan.

BEIJING, May 7 (Xinhua) -- China's policy of actively attracting foreign investment will not change, said vice minister of commerce Ma Xiuhong Friday.The Ministry of Commerce will keep working to maintain a good investment environment for foreign companies, said Ma during a discussion with multinational firms."The ministry will strengthen its communication with multinational corporations and foreign enterprises," she said.China could provide new opportunities for foreign investors as the country is in a process of modernization, urbanization and transformation of its economic development pattern, said Ma.She hoped that while achieving their own development goals, foreign enterprises could play a larger role in China's pursuit of scientific innovation, industrial upgrading, and more balanced regional economic development.Representatives from 64 multinational corporations and four foreign chambers of commerce participated in the discussion. They were joined by officials from a number of Chinese government departments, including the Ministry of Finance and Ministry of Industry and Information.Foreign direct investment to China increased 7.7 percent year on year to 23.44 billion U.S. dollars in the first quarter.