山西经食道心脏超声检查（TEE、TTE）模拟系统青海高级电脑心肺复苏训练模拟人（无线版）,黑龙江人体体表、人体骨骼与内脏关系模型,内江高级套管针训练模型,乌鲁木齐六倍大下颌磨牙剖,北京足关节剖面模型,天津枕骨脊柱和脊神经解剖模型,淮安高级婴儿头部双侧静脉注射穿刺训练模型

SAN DIEGO (CNS) - A 48-year-old man riding a motorized bike may not survive the major injuries he sustained when he crashed into a vehicle Friday evening in the Grantville area of San Diego, authorities said.The victim was riding a motorized GT bike in the 6500 block of Mission Gorge Road about 7:55 p.m. when he attempted to cross from the west side of the street to the east side and crashed at a nearly 90-degree angle into the passenger side of a gray 2014 Subaru traveling northbound in the No. 2 lane, causing the bike to overturn, according to Officer Robert Heims of the San Diego Police Department.The victim was taken to a hospital with major blunt force trauma and his survival was in question, Heims said.Alcohol was not a factor in the crash, he said.The SDPD Traffic Division investigated the accident. 825

SAN DIEGO (AP) - A military judge has released a Navy SEAL from custody in advance of his murder trial in the death of an Islamic State prisoner. Capt. Aaron Rugh said Thursday that he was freeing Special Operations Chief Edward Gallagher as a remedy for interference by prosecutors. Defense lawyers accuse the prosecutors of misconduct for an effort to track defense lawyers' emails that they say violated attorney-client privilege. RELATED: Attorneys fight to free Navy SEAL in MCAS Miramar brig before trialRugh said Thursday he knew Navy investigators were trying to find the source of leaked court documents, but did not know of or approve any email tracking. Defense lawyers say the move amounted to prosecutorial misconduct and they want charges against Gallagher dismissed or prosecutors removed from the case. A military prosecutor downplayed the tracking effort, saying it did nothing more than record information on where and when emails were opened by recipients. RELATED: Rep. Duncan Hunter rallies support for accused Navy SEAL on Capitol HillDefense lawyer Tim Parlatore withdrew his motion to have the judge removed from the case after learning Rugh was kept in the dark about what prosecutors did. Gallagher will be freed as his lawyers continue to argue that the case be dismissed. He is scheduled to face trial June 10. There were gasps in the courtroom as Rugh made the announcement. Gallagher's wife put her head in her hands and burst into tears. 1476

SAN DIEGO — The city of San Diego never waived permit repair fees for sidewalks, despite a January announcement from the mayor's office saying it would do so throughout 2020.A homeowner pays the fees, which total to just over ,000, when he or she elects to repair the sidewalk in front of their home. A spokeswoman for the mayor says, however, that the city had to delay the fee waiver program once the coronavirus outbreak hit. The city instead was forced to cut upwards of million from the general fund budget. "The City continues to prioritize sidewalk repair amid the uncertainty and budgetary impacts that COVID 19 has brought," city spokesman Anthony Santacroce said in a statement. "While COVID-related holds slowed repair down for a few months, we estimate another 10,000 locations will be repaired with concrete slicing this (fiscal year 2021) and we are off to a great start."The news release announcing the fee waiver, however, is still on the city's website.Marie St. George, a Mission Hills resident, saw that announcement and contacted the city. She wanted to spend upwards of ,500 to repair the crumbling sidewalk in front of her home. That sidewalk, laid down in 1922, is likely one of upwards of 81,000 backlogged locations the city has marked for repair."I actually am afraid now," St. George said. "People could trip. It's become sort of a hazard."The city has a program to split the construction cost with residents, as both the city and homeowners can be liable for the condition of the sidewalk. St. George, however, was willing to pay all of the cost because she wanted it done faster. However, when she called to get the permits, the city representative said she couldn't waive the fees. "I thought based on the mayor's announcement that it would be waived, so it was pretty shocking," she said. Councilman Mark Kersey, who heads the Active Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, which was moving the fee waiver program forward, said in a statement that he hopes this will be prioritized as money comes available. “Repairs on sidewalks are even more important in the pandemic since so many people depend on them every day," he said. "Programs like the fee waiver can keep residents moving safely and save valuable City dollars by preventing trip-and-fall lawsuits."The city says it also repaired or replaced more than 7,500 sidewalk locations last fiscal year. The mayor's spokeswoman says the hope is to get the fee waiver program to the full council by the end of the year. 2522

SAN DIEGO (CNS) - A drunken driver who crashed into a Lyft vehicle at high speed on state Route 163 in Balboa Park -- killing one passenger and injuring the other two occupants -- pleaded guilty Wednesday to gross vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated and DUI causing injury. Alondra Selena Marquez, 22, of San Diego, faces up to 13 years and four months in prison, with sentencing slated for Sept. 24 at the downtown San Diego courthouse. Prosecutors say Marquez had a .25 percent blood alcohol content -- more than three times the legal limit -- at the time of the March 23 crash that killed San Francisco resident Giao Pham. RELATED: 1 dead, 3 injured in crash along SR-163Pham, 40, was in San Diego to attend a wedding when the vehicle he was riding in was struck from behind by Marquez's car about 2:30 a.m. on SR 163 near Laurel Street. Deputy District Attorney Cally Bright said Marquez was traveling somewhere between 101 and 108 miles per hour at the time. The other passenger -- Pham's friend, Andy Lynn -- was hospitalized with a traumatic brain injury, which still affects him to this day, the prosecutor said. The Lyft driver suffered minor injuries in the crash, but has had to seek counseling due to the emotional after-effects of the crash, according to Bright. 1289

SACRAMENTO, Calif. (KGTV) — California will require people to wear face coverings in most indoor settings and outdoors when physical distancing isn't possible.Gov. Gavin Newsom had previously allowed counties to set their own requirements for facial coverings to slow the spread of the coronavirus. San Diego, Los Angeles, and San Francisco already have face-covering mandates in effect. "Simply put, we are seeing too many people with faces uncovered – putting at risk the real progress we have made in fighting the disease," Newsom said. "California’s strategy to restart the economy and get people back to work will only be successful if people act safely and follow health recommendations. That means wearing a face covering, washing your hands, and practicing physical distancing."RELATED: New UCSD study: Wearing masks significantly curbs spread of COVID-19California's cloth face covering mandate includes situations like:While outdoors in public spaces when maintaining a physical distance of six feet from persons who are not members of the same household or residence is not feasible.Inside of, or in line to enter, any indoor public space;Obtaining services from the healthcare sector in settings including, but not limited to, a hospital, pharmacy, medical clinic, laboratory, physician or dental office, veterinary clinic, or blood bank;Waiting for or riding on public transportation or paratransit or while in a taxi, private car service, or ride-sharing vehicle;Engaged in work, whether at the workplace or performing work off-site, when:Interacting in-person with any member of the public;Working in any space visited by members of the public, regardless of whether anyone from the public is present at the time;Working in any space where food is prepared or packaged for sale or distribution to others;Working in or walking through common areas, such as hallways, stairways, elevators, and parking facilities;In any room or enclosed area where other people (except for members of the person’s own household or residence) are present when unable to physically distance.Driving or operating any public transportation or paratransit vehicle, taxi, or private car service or ride-sharing vehicle when passengers are present. When no passengers are present, face coverings are strongly recommended.RELATED: San Diego County exceeds community outbreak limit, forcing pause on reopeningsThe state's order exempts:Children under 2 years old; Individuals with medical, mental health or developmental disability that prevents wearing a face covering;Persons who are hearing impaired, or communicating with a person who is hearing impaired, where the ability to see the mouth is essential for communication;Persons for whom wearing a face covering would create a risk to the person related to their work, as determined by local, state, or federal regulators or workplace safety guidelines.Persons who are obtaining a service involving the nose or face for which temporary removal of the face covering is necessary to perform the service;Persons who are seated at a restaurant or other establishment that offers food or beverage service, while they are eating or drinking, provided that they are able to maintain a distance of at least six feet away from persons who are not members of the same household or residence;Persons who are engaged in outdoor work or recreation such as swimming, walking, hiking, bicycling, or running, when alone or with household members, and when they are able to maintain a distance of at least six feet from others;Persons who are incarcerated. Prisons and jails, as part of their mitigation plans, will have specific guidance on the wearing of face coverings of masks for both inmates and staff.As of Wednesday, California reported 157,015 coronavirus cases and more than 5,200 deaths from the virus.RELATED: Some San Diegans push for end of San Diego County face mask requirement 3926