宁夏立体狗牙(太原消化、呼吸、泌尿生殖、体腔的发生解剖示教模型) (今日更新中)

Wyoming, a state known for cowboys, cattle and its wide-open spaces. But what very few people know is that it's the first state to give women the right to vote.In fact, the state recognized the importance of the female vote back in 1870, 50 years before it was enacted into the U.S. Constitution."We owe this act to men,” says Kim Viner, a docent at the Laramie Plains Museum. “Because obviously men were the only ones who could pass such a law in the territory at the time."According to Viner, the men passed the act to allow women the right to vote and hold office, in hopes it would bring more families to Wyoming and help the territory to become a state."The right decision for all the wrong reasons," Viner says.Wyoming had the first female bailiff, justice of the peace and governor. It also was first state to allow women on a jury. But it was Louisa Ann Swain who changed the course of history."She was just a Quaker woman, 70 years old, when she cast that first vote," Viner says.Swain was simply going into town to get her yeast, when she cast her ballot, making her the first woman in the U.S. to cast a ballot in the general election."She was not the fist-pounding suffragette, saying ‘We need these rights,’ says Mary Mountain, a docent at the museum. “But when the right was afforded, she stepped up."Not only did the suffragette women fight for the rights of women, but they had a few good men backing them."It sounds harsh to say, ‘allowing them,’ but in those days they were,” explains Mountain. “These men were saying, ‘Let’s let women do this."Mountain says women forget their power until they are heard and believes today's political climate resembles so much of what took place nearly 150 years ago."We fall into what is customary,” Mountain says. “Men for our 20th century were guiding the political scene, and we are now saying, ‘Hmm, I don't think that has to continue." 1902

With Universal Mail-In Voting (not Absentee Voting, which is good), 2020 will be the most INACCURATE & FRAUDULENT Election in history. It will be a great embarrassment to the USA. Delay the Election until people can properly, securely and safely vote???— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) July 30, 2020 315

buried under snow a mile away from their car, police say.Detectives say 74-year-old Richard Alexander, and his wife, 79-year-old Elizabeth Alexander, likely died of hypothermia.Neighbors Mike and Diane Haas found the couple Friday. They say they saw two figures as they left their house around 1 p.m.. As they approached, they hoped for the best.“He wondered if they were sleeping, so he got out and yelled at them and they didn’t respond,” Diane Haas said.“I said 'Sir, sir!' And of course they didn’t respond," Mike Haas said. "It came pretty obvious pretty quick, their skin color and other details that they were deceased. So we immediately called 911 and made sure not to touch anything."Detectives with the Yavapai County Sheriff’s Office said the Alexanders lived nearby. Their car got stuck last week in a storm that dumped 10 inches of snow on Ash Fork.“Eventually they decided to leave their vehicle,” Mike Haas said. “They were headed to our house we believe. But 100 yards short."The YCSO says a preliminary finding shows no evidence of foul play.For the Haases, it is emotional to think the couple was suffering so close, while they were celebrating Thanksgiving.“It’s sadness,” Mike Haas said. “You wish you could’ve helped. You could’ve saved a life perhaps. Maybe two lives.”According to the Haases, they found Richard Alexander laying on top of his wife, possibly trying to keep her warm.“It’s terrifying to think that she might’ve been alive under her husband,” Mike Haas said.The Haases say the tragedy is a reminder to always be prepared during extreme weather.“If they hadn’t left their car, I really believe somebody would’ve checked on them. People drove by them but everybody assumed this was somebody who got their car stuck, they called and got rescued. Nobody would’ve ever thought that they were out here struggling,” Diane Haas said.This story was originally published by Zach Crenshaw on 1920

-- arguing that the data is too easily falsified and the indicators used irrelevant to what makes a school worthy. Then again, Forbes publishes their own college ranking list every year, too.Forbes isn't the only one against the rankings. In a 2012 opinion piece for CNN, former George Washington University President Stephen Joel Trachtenberg dismissed the rankings, saying they don't "begin to express the quality, comprehensiveness and special character of the more than 4,000 colleges and universities in the country."The rankings create a national obsession, pushing the false belief that if a student doesn't get into a select school, which is typically accompanied by a high price tag, then "life will never be worth living," Trachtenberg writes. He also discusses the ways in which schools can falsify their data, which Forbes also points out.And they're not wrong.In May, seven years after Trachtenberg wrote his piece, it was revealed that the University of Oklahoma gave "inflated" data on its alumni giving rates for twenty years, in an effort to improve their ranking. Alumni giving, an indicator used by U.S. News to detemine a school's rank, is weighted at 5%.Even before Oklahoma, Claremont McKenna College in California 1238

amid the coronavirus outbreak."This is necessary to slow the spread of COVID-19, and builds on our previous public health recommendations," San Francisco Mayor London Breed said on Twitter when making the announcement.While the Warriors are still planning on hosting tomorrow's home game against the Brooklyn Nets, they plan to do so without fans in attendance, 364

来源：资阳报