伊宁怀孕9多天不想要孩子怎么办-【伊宁宏康医院】,hokayini ,伊宁哪些医院治疗勃起障碍,宏康妇科医院流产多少钱,伊宁无痛微管人流手术价格,伊宁切包皮切除的费用,伊宁怀孕35多天不要孩子怎么办,伊宁市妇幼妇科医院无痛取环费用
伊宁怀孕9多天不想要孩子怎么办做人流伊宁哪家医院做好,伊宁激光包皮术需要多少钱,伊宁怀孕一个多月不想要了,伊宁男性割包皮是有哪些好处,伊宁女人堕胎费用,伊宁关于前列腺治疗,伊宁泌尿科排行
(KGTV) - KGTV and Team10 have launched the Transparency Project to allow the public to view case files from San Diego County over the past 10 years where officer involved shootings and law enforcement misconduct cases were investigated. For many of these cases, the officers were cleared of wrongdoing. Others resulted in officers being reprimanded, fired or even charged criminally --- but all of these cases resulted in community reactions. Transparency Project Database: Search officer-involved shootings, law enforcement misconduct casesThese case files were released after Senate Bill 1421 went into effect on January 1, 2019. It requires California law enforcement agencies to make internal reports for officer-involved shootings and major uses of force, officer dishonesty and confirmed cases of sexual assault available to the public. You can view the cases that have been released by the police agencies here. The project includes a searchable database, where you can find cases by the name of the officer involved, the name of the victim/suspect, the department and much more. Click here to access the database and begin searching. The 10News database contains files released by the following law enforcement agencies in San Diego County:Carlsbad Police DepartmentChula Vista Police DepartmentCoronado Police DepartmentEl Cajon Police DepartmentEscondido Police DepartmentNational City Police DepartmentLa Mesa Police DepartmentOceanside Police DepartmentSan Diego Harbor Police DepartmentSan Diego Police DepartmentSan Diego County Sheriff’s OfficeSan Diego Unified School District Police DepartmentThis project is focusing on documents related to incidents that have occurred between 2009 and 2019. There may be some documents related to earlier cases included based on their content and those parties involved. We will be continuing to upload documents to this database as they are released. All of the information in this database has been gathered from the police reports or investigation files made public by the law enforcement organization. The information has been summarized and entered based on the following:The race or sex of the individual involved was entered as it was reported by the police agency.Some reports did not include information about the race or sex of the law enforcement officer, so this information will appear as “unknown” in the database.The officers involved listed in the database as being involved in the incidents are those listed on the released reports.When classifying “use of force,” we selected all forms of force used as reported in the report or investigative file.The summary of the incident was written by KGTV journalists who reviewed all documents in the case. Not all details are included in the summary.Some of the materials released (including photos, videos, audio files and the reports themselves) can be graphic in nature. We have added notes to files that contain content that may be disturbing or graphic in nature. Please proceed with caution when viewing these materials.If you have any questions about how this database was put together please contact Lynn Walsh at https://www.10news.com/news/transparency-project/transparency-project-questionnaire.Our reporting on these cases and the investigatory process is more complete with your feedback. We encourage you to fill out this form about the Transparency Project if you see any common threads between cases, have more information about a particular case or have questions about how the law enforcement agencies investigate these cases.This project has been supported by the Solutions Journalism Network, a nonprofit organization dedicated to rigorous and compelling reporting about responses to social problems. To learn more about their work and approach to storytelling, click here [solutionsu.solutionsjournalism.org]. 3852
(KGTV) - A Southern California police department's Facebook post is igniting the online debate over panhandling.Ventura Police posted a video on their Facebook page Wednesday discouraging locals not to give to panhandlers and to give to charities instead."Want to help those in need in our community? Please say no to panhandling and yes to charities," Ventura Police's post read. "Giving money to panhandlers often feeds addictions and does not help someone get long-term help."RELATED: How a single mother's request for 40 cents could lead to a repeal of Ohio city's panhandling lawThe video features a silent officer holding various signs reading things like "want to help?" and then "please don't give to panhandlers."Comments on the viral video have ranged from supportive to not, some claiming that charities are not enough to solve the issue. Others say the video reinforces negative stereotypes of homeless individuals.The police department said people should instead give to groups that provide meals, medical attention, and avenues that are long-term solutions to homelessness.RELATED: Children spotted alongside man panhandling on La Jolla street cornerThe City of Ventura's website also advocates against panhandling, saying it "may make us feel good for a moment, but cash spent on feeding addictions shortens the life of homeless individuals and supports their ability to live on the street rather than get permanent help." 1465
(KGTV) - Has there been a major disease outbreak every election year since 2004?No.The meme making such a claim has several inaccuracies.Coronavirus is also called Covid-19 because it was first detected in the non-election year of 2019.In addition, Sars was identified in 2003, not 2004.Zika was 2015, not 2016.The Swine Flu was declared a pandemic in 2009, not 2010. 375
(KGTV) — As fair season gets underway, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention warns attendees to practice safe hygiene at petting zoos and around animals.Animals in exhibits can can incredibly educational and fun, but can also put visitors at risk of various germs that can make people sick, including E. Coli and salmonella. From 2010-2015, the CDC said about 100 outbreaks were reported linked to animals in public settings like fairs, zoos, and farms.If interacting with animals — such as feeding, holding, or petting — or touching exhibit areas, guests should wash their hands afterward. Even if visitors don't interact with any animals, germs can still be spread from surfaces around exhibits.Running water and soap are best to use, but if not available, the CDC recommends using an alcohol-based sanitizer with at least 60% alcohol. If gloves are worn, the CDC still recommends washing hands afterward.Especially at fairgrounds, food can find its way into animal exhibit areas. The CDC warns that visitors should not eat or drink around animals or their living areas. Food shouldn't be shared with animals and visitors should not eat or drink any raw, or unpateurized products.For parents, always supervise children around animals. Children 5 years old and younger should not have any contact with reptiles, amphibians, or live poultry because those animals are more likely to make them sick, according to the CDC.Parents should also leave strollers, toys, pacifiers, and cups outside animal exhibit areas. The CDC also says parents should make sure their children do not put their thumbs, fingers, or objects in their mouths when around animal areas. 1673
(KGTV) -- Gov. Gavin Newsom Monday announced California's plan for how COVID-19 vaccines will be distributed once they receive emergency Food and Drug Administration approval. The state is waiting on three companies that say their trials have shown promising results: Pfizer, Moderna and AstraZeneca.On Monday, Newsom explained that health care workers will be the first in line to get vaccinated, along with people in nursing or assisted living facilities and first responders.The governor said there are three separate committees currently looking at the data presented by the drugmakers, confirming that the vaccines are safe, saying so far they have not had any issues. During Monday's press conference, Newsom said that the state is not handling distribution, instead the drugmaker will distribute directly to the medical facilities or use an independent distributor to transport the vaccines. AstraZeneca reported Monday that its vaccine is up to 90% effective. Last week, Moderna and Pfiszer both applied for emergency FDA authorization after reporting that their trials showed their vaccines to be 95% and 90% effective, respectively. Newsom also discussed how the vaccines will be transported. Pfizer's vaccine requires being stored in extremely freezing temperatures, likely requiring things like dry ice. Moderna's must also be frozen, but can be done in a traditional freezer. The distribution will happen in phases, and Newsom said further phases of distribution will still take time, with mass distribution still months away. 1547