和林格尔县肛肠医院好的回民区肛肠医院检查哪家好,新城区一级肛肠医院,呼和浩特哪家治疗痔疮好,呼和浩特痔疮临床症状,呼和浩特治疗痔疮长期便血费用,清水河县肛肠医院检查哪家好,呼和浩特市患有痔疮如何治疗

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) – A man was fatally shot by San Diego Police as officers responded to calls of vandalism in the Mountain View neighborhood early Monday morning.According to police, officers were called to the 300 block of South Pardee Street just before 4:30 a.m. after receiving reports of “a violent disturbance involving a weapon.”Residents at the home were woken up by a man they say ripped a metal curtain rod from the window and began breaking windows and other objects.“Fearing for their safety, they asked another resident to call 911. A neighbor also heard the commotion and called 911 reporting it sounded like someone was being tortured,” police said.When officers arrived, police say they gave the man directions in English and Spanish but received no response. According to police, that’s when the man crawled through a broken window before running towards officers with a metal pole.“Fearing for their safety, one officer fired a bean bag round, one officer fired a Taser, and one officer fired several rounds from his service pistol. The man was struck by at least one round and fell to the ground where he was taken into custody,” police said.Police rendered first aid to the suspect who was taken to the hospital where he later died.The suspect and officers involved haven’t been identified at this time.Anyone with information on the incident is asked to call the San Diego Police Department Homicide Unit at (619) 531-2293 or Crime Stoppers at (888) 580-8477. 1487

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) -- A La Jolla store in an upscale mall is facing scrutiny from customers who told Team 10 they were misled after buying hundreds—even thousands—of dollars worth of skin care products.Team 10 spoke to at least two customers who had similar complaints. When they tried to return unopened products, they said they were sold lies.Christianna Ortiz regrets walking into Gold Elements at the UTC mall on La Jolla Village Drive.“I’m honestly very embarrassed I fell for it,” Ortiz said.Last summer, she said Gold Elements employees encouraged her to purchase products, including a skin care regiment.“He wanted me to buy it for 0. I said yeah, that's not going to work. He said I'll tell you what, I'll throw in a facial and I was like, now that sounds interesting, but I don't want to come here alone. I'll throw in two facials,” Ortiz said the employee told her.When she went to her appointment, she said employees would not give her the facials she paid for.“I said, I want to return the stuff then and he said no return.I said I paid for something that was an outright lie,” Ortiz said.Ortiz said they never told her there was a no refund policy.She disputed the charge with her credit card and could not believe what happened next.“They sent me back the copy of my receipt along with another sheet of paper that listed the refund policy. I had never seen that sheet of paper, didn't exist!” Ortiz said.“You’re hustled,” said Sharon Garrow, another Gold Elements customer.Garrow spent nearly ,500 on products in September. She admits spending more than she should. When she tried to return the products the following morning—less than 24 hours later—she said she was not allowed to.She went to the store Saturday, where she said an employee told her there was nobody who could help her. She went again on Monday. “He [said] there’s no return on [these] products,” Garrow said.It was on her receipt, but like Ortiz, she signed on a computer and said the policy was not visible on the screen. She said nobody told her anything in person and there were no signs in the store that customers could see.A Team 10 investigative photojournalist also visited the store. He also did not see any return policies in the store.On the California Attorney General’s website, it says: “Stores that do not accept returns must clearly display their policy.”The California Civil code states that retail sellers shall display their policy “either on signs posted at each cash register and sales counter, at each public entrance, on tags attached to each item sold under that policy, or on the retail seller’s order form, if any.”Goods that cannot be resold due to “health considerations” are an exception. Both women said they never opened the Gold Elements boxes before trying to return the items.When Team 10 visited the store to get answers, there were no managers available to talk to us. An independent esthetician told Team 10 to contact a Gold Elements promoter. That person did not call back.Less than an hour later, a man who claimed he was the owner called Team 10 and said they always give the best help to customers and have not had problems with refunds. The man would not agree to an in-person interview, saying that he was not in town.He told Team 10 all future communication would be with his lawyer, but would not give his lawyer’s name.It was a different story on the Better Business Bureau website, where the store has an F rating. A 2017 class action lawsuit filed in Northern California against Gold Elements products and affiliated companies.Part of the complaint was that “complimentary facials” were not honored when customers tried to use them.““If I got taken, so many other people are probably getting taken. Somebody has to stop it,” Ortiz said.Team 10 discovered the La Jolla store could also be violating different state code.On Gold Elements’ wall is a price list for facials. The Board of Barbering and Cosmetology, under the California State Department of Consumer Affairs, said a business that charges for facials should have an establishment license.The store has no record of that license.The women have a warning for others.“It’s not like I’m a dummy,” Ortiz said. “Do what I usually do. Check reviews ahead of time.”The Attorney General’s office said if any customers have concerns about a return policy, or lack of one, you can file a complaint with their office. 4419

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) -- A judge ruled Wednesday that a Navy commander will face a third trial on charges he tried to rape a junior officer in her home.John Michael Neuhart II asked the judge to dismiss all charges after a second jury was unable to reach a verdict.The judge dismissed charges of assault with intent to commit rape during burglary, burglary and resisting or delaying a peace officer.RELATED: Mistrial declared for former Navy commander accused of rapeThe judge added that prosecutors can proceed with a third trial in January on charges of attempted forcible rape and assault with intent to commit rape.Neuhart now faces six years behind bars and lifetime sex offender registration if found guilty. Neuhart had previously been facing life in prison.In the two trials combined, 21 out of 24 jurors voted to convict Neuhart. The alleged victim said Neuhart sexually assaulted her after they spent time drinking and hanging out with colleagues in 2016.RELATED: Mistrial declared in trial of former Navy commanderThe woman said Neuhart took off her pants and underwear and was physically violent with her. In cell phone video recorded by the woman, she can be heard telling Neuhart to stop as he tried to get the door open. 1238

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) — A non-profit organization held a first-of-its-kind seminar to teach law enforcement officers, first responders, and legal professionals how to understand and handle incidents involving people with intellectual and developmental disabilities. More than 100 individuals representing a variety of agencies, including the San Diego Police Department, Chula Vista Police Department, and the public defender's office attended the Arc of San Diego's "Pathways to Justice" training at the Handlery Hotel in Mission Valley. In recent years, law enforcement agencies from across the country have been under attack about their handling of cases involving witnesses, victims, and suspects with disabilities. Arc of San Diego hopes to bridge the understanding gap. On April 30, 2015, San Diego Police officer Neal Browder responded to a call about a man reportedly wielding a knife. He rolled into the alley with no lights, sirens, nor was he wearing a body camera. But a nearby surveillance camera caught the entire encounter. Within three seconds of opening his door, Browder fatally shot the man, Fridoon Nehad. It turned out, Nehad was an unarmed, mentally disabled man. Since this incident, the American Civil Liberties Union has questioned the officer's use of lethal force. Would this have happened if San Diego Police officers had the proper training?The Arc of San Diego hopes this never happens again, which is why they invited agencies to join their training seminar."We want to help first responders have a better understanding of what it is to interact with people with intellectual and developmental disabilities," Arc of San Diego CEO and President Anthony Desalis said.San Diego was chosen as one of four cities nationwide to run this three-pilot program. The others are Monmouth County, New Jersey, Loudoun County, Virginia, and Columbia, South Carolina. The program includes this one-day seminar where each department will create its own Disability Response Team. Finally, the departments will hire disabled individuals as intern cadets through the "Growth Through Opportunity" program. "That gives the officers at those stations a chance to interact with someone who has a disability," SDPD Sgt. Jonathan Lowe said. While his primary assignment is recruiting, he is also the Chief's Liaison for the Disabled Community. So how do you deal with a situation like Nehad's? Experts say step one is to be patient. "Don't automatically assume they are somebody who is drunk or somebody who is on drugs," Desalis said. "It may just be that it takes a moment to process what you're saying to them."Giving that person that extra moment could be the difference between life and death."No situation is ever going to be perfect in the field," Sgt. Lowe said. "But at least we can do our best to be proactive about training our officers the right way." 2871

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) -- A mistrial has been declared in the trail of the man accused in the disappearance and murder of his stepson.Tieray Jones was charged with the murder of 2-year-old Jahi Turner. Jahi was last seen at a park near Balboa Park in April of 2002.Jones was facing several charges including 2nd degree murder and involuntary manslaughter. Two jurors found Jones guilty of murder while 10 did not while 10 jurors found Jones guilty of involuntary manslaughter and two did not.RELATED: Stepfather facing trial in Jahi Turner murder?During the trial Friday, the judge asked if jurors would be able to reach a verdict if given more time to deliberate. They responded by saying no. The District Attorney will now decide whether or not to retry Jones. Jones reported the boy missing, telling police Jahi wandered off. Jahi was in Jones’ care while the 2-year-old’s mother was on deployment.A countywide search followed with thousands of people looking for the young boy in the park and Golden Hill neighborhood.People also searched the Miramar Landfill, but Jahi was never found. Jones was arrested in North Carolina and charged in the death in April of 2016.Jones faces 25 years to life in prison.  1232