呼市东大医院治疗肛肠科好不好呼和浩特大便时肛门疼是咋回事,呼和浩特肠道科医院科,呼市治疗痔疮大便拉血贵不贵,呼市治疗便秘好,呼和浩特肛门突然流血了,呼市做痔疮手术哪好些,呼和浩特市肛瘘手术钱

SAN DIEGO (AP) — The Navy dismissed charges Thursday against an officer who had been accused of not reporting war crimes by a Navy SEAL later acquitted of murder in a high-profile case that got the president's attention.The action by the chief of naval operations in the case of Lt. Jacob Portier is the latest blow to military prosecutors and comes a month after a military jury cleared Special Operations Chief Edward Gallagher of murder and attempted murder charges.Adm. John Richardson also ordered an investigation into the performance of the Navy's justice system.Portier faced charges of dereliction of duty, destruction of evidence and holding Gallagher's re-enlistment ceremony next to the corpse of a teen Islamic State militant the decorated SEAL was accused of stabbing to death after treating the boy's wounds.Gallagher was convicted of a single charge of posing for photos with the 17-year-old militant's corpse. He was sentenced to the maximum penalty of four months but will serve no jail time because it is less than his pre-trial confinement.The move by the admiral comes a day after President Donald Trump ordered the secretary of the Navy on Wednesday to strip prosecutors of medals they were awarded for their handling of the case despite the fact Gallagher was acquitted on the most serious charges.A prosecutor who had been removed from the case before trial — and not given a medal — was admonished for taking part in an effort that used software to track emails sent to the defense team that a judge said violated Gallagher's constitutional rights.The email tracking was meant to ferret out the source of leaks to the news media that plagued the case but the Navy said it never found the leak. 1726

SACRAMENTO, Calif. (KGTV) -- With 35 days until the election, it appears California voters are in favor of eight state propositions that impact everything from property taxes to parole to rent control. Still, for most propositions, the support is not enough to feel comfortable. A new ABC-10News-Union-Tribune scientific poll shows eight propositions leading outside the poll's 5.4 percent margin of error. Still, pollster Survey USA says that could change because typically opposition to all ballot measures increase as election day gets closer. Then again, it says 2020 is not a typical election year. Thad Kousser, a political analyst at UC San Diego, said propositions that do not poll over 50 percent have an increased chance in ultimately failing, even if they are up."The more people learn about propositions and their details, the less there is to like about them," he said. "Sometimes a proposition has one part of it that people find attractive and then other details that they don't like, and as a campaign exposes those, as the No campaign makes that case, then support will drop off."The poll also shows Joe Biden defeating President Trump 59 percent to 32 percent in California. Interestingly, however, the poll says voters who plan to vote in person on election day choose Trump over Biden, 55 to 38. Here is the breakdown of the propositions as part of the poll, which surveyed 588 likely voters:Prop 15, which would reassess some commercial properties to raise property taxes for schools and local governments, exempting smaller businesses and farms, is passing 49 to 21, with the remainder undecided.Prop 16, which would eliminate the ban on consideration of race, sex, color, ethnicity or national origin in public education, public employment and public contracting to allow for more diversity, is passing 40 to 26, with the remainder undecided.Prop 17, which restores voting rights to former inmates, is passing 55 to 19, with the remainder undecided.Prop 19, which allows severely disabled homeowners, those over 55, and those who have lost their homes in a wildfire to transfer their property tax basis to any property in the state, and allocates new revenue to fire protection services, is passing 56 to 10, with the remainder undecided. Prop 20, which would reclassify certain crimes and change parole on other crimes, is passing 35 to 22, with the remainder undecided. Prop 21, which allows local governments to establish rent control on some properties over 15 years old, is passing 46 to 27, with the remainder undecided.Prop 22, which aims to keep Uber, Lyft and Doordash drivers as independent contractors with benefits, as opposed to full employees, is passing 45 to 31, with the remainder undecided. Prop 23, which adds requirements for kidney dialysis clinics, is passing 49 to 23, with the remainder undecided. 2854

SAN DIEGO (CNS) - A 27-year-old man is recovering Sunday after being shot in the back in the Mountain View area , police said.A verbal argument between two groups Saturday in the 200 block of Southlook Avenue, which started just before 9 p.m., escalated into a violent encounter, according to Officer Robert Heims of the San Diego Police Department."During the fight someone fired multiple shots into the crowd," he said. "Everyone fled the scene after the shots were fired."An 18-year-old man was detained and later arrested, Heims said.San Diego Police Gang Detectives are currently investigating the case.The victim's injuries don't appear to be life threatening, authorities said.Anyone with information about the shooting is encouraged to call Crime Stoppers at 888-580-8477. 788

SALTON CITY, Calif. (KGTV) - A 3.4-magnitude earthquake shook the Salton Sea region early Sunday.The quake hit just after 5:30 a.m. Sunday a little more than 8.5 miles southwest of Salton City, Calif., with a depth of about 6 miles, according to the United States Geological Survey.According to the website's "Did you feel it?" survey, the shake-up was felt as far away as Julian and El Cajon.RELATED: Is there such a thing as earthquake weather?There have been no reports of injuries or damages from Sunday's earthquake.Several smaller rattles under 1.0-magnitude within the Borrego Springs area were also recorded by the USGS.The Salton Sea area has traditionally been an area that experienced "earthquake swarms," or sequences of several quakes around the same area. 797

SAN DIEGO (AP) — A military judge on Friday refused to dismiss the murder case of a decorated Navy SEAL, but found the prosecution's meddling in defense lawyer emails troubling enough to reduce the maximum penalty he faces.Capt. Aaron Rugh said an effort to track emails sent to lawyers for Special Operations Chief Edward Gallagher violated constitutional rights against illegal searches and the right to counsel by interfering with attorney-client privilege."It hampered the defense's opportunity to prepare for trial as they became necessarily enmeshed in discovery and litigation related to the operation, thereby harming the accused's right to competent counsel," Rugh said.RELATED: Judge refuses to toss war crimes case over misconduct claimsThe action also harmed the public's view of the military justice system and cast doubt on Gallagher's ability to give a fair trial, Rugh said.The ruling was the latest rebuke in one of the Navy's most prominent war crimes cases and came just days after the judge removed the lead prosecutor as the defense sought dismissal of the case for alleged misconduct in what they characterized as "spying."Rugh found the intrusion "placed an intolerable strain on the public's perception of the military justice system."RELATED: New date set for Navy SEAL murder trial"Applying its broad discretion in crafting a remedy to remove the taint of unlawful command influence," Rugh said he would remove the maximum penalty of life imprisonment without parole if Gallagher is convicted of premeditated murder. Gallagher could now face life in prison with a chance of parole.To relieve the "strain of pretrial publicity," Rugh also said he would allow the defense to reject two more potential jurors without cause during jury selection.Gallagher is scheduled to go to trial June 17 on murder and attempted murder charges.RELATED: Military judge releases Navy SEAL accused of murder before his trialNavy spokesman Brian O'Rourke said the Navy vows to give Gallagher a fair trial.On Monday, Rugh removed the lead prosecutor, Cmdr. Christopher Czaplak. He said it was not within his power to determine whether Czaplak engaged in misconduct, but the potential for a probe into his actions could present a conflict and required his removal.It is extremely unusual for a military judge to remove a prosecutor only days before the start of a trial. Gallagher had been facing trial on Monday until Rugh delayed it for another week.RELATED: Judge removes prosecutor from Navy SEAL war crimes caseLast week, Rugh unexpectedly released Gallagher from custody as a remedy for interference by prosecutors in the middle of a hearing on several defense motions.Rugh rejected allegations that prosecutors withheld evidence that could help his defense.The military justice system has won few war crime convictions and been criticized for being ineffective.Republicans in Congress have lobbied for Gallagher, saying he has been mistreated. President Donald Trump intervened to move Gallagher to less restrictive confinement in March and has considered dismissing the charges.RELATED: SEAL's trial delayed as defense seeks info on email snoopingGallagher pleaded not guilty to a murder charge in the death of an injured teenage militant in Iraq in 2017 and to attempted murder in the shooting of two civilians from a sniper's perch.He blames disgruntled platoon mates for fabricating complaints about him because they didn't like his tough leadership.Defense lawyers for Gallagher and his commanding officer, Lt. Jacob Portier, have said most of the court documents leaked to reporters have hurt their clients, so the sources are likely on the government side. But Rugh found no evidence of that.Portier has denied charges of conduct unbecoming an officer after being accused of conducting Gallagher's re-enlistment ceremony next to the militant's corpse.Rugh indicated he was misled about the effort to embed code in emails sent to the defense team and a journalist to track where those messages were sent to find the source of leaks that have plagued the case.He said he didn't have the authority to approve such a tactic and was led to believe Czaplak was working with federal prosecutors so his consent was not necessary.Rugh said he learned Friday that the U.S. attorney's office in San Diego had not approved or coordinated the tracking, defense lawyer Tim Parlatore said.Evidence at hearings last week showed an intelligence specialist from Naval Criminal Investigative Service conducted criminal background checks on three civilian lawyers and a Navy Times journalist who has broken several stories based on documents that are only to be shared among lawyers in the case.Parlatore, who was among the lawyers investigated, accused prosecutors of a "rogue, relentless, and unlawful cyber campaign" that may have violated attorney-client privilege and hurt his client's ability to get a fair trial.Czaplak downplayed the move, saying the code embedded in emails recorded nothing more than what marketers use to find out where and when messages were opened by recipients.The government said the investigation did not find the source of leaks. 5167