和田治疗个包皮过长价格(和田包茎切除术需多少) (今日更新中)

A New Jersey woman faces four years in state prison for her role in scamming more than 0,000 from GoFundMe donors, claiming to be collecting money for a homeless man in Philadelphia.Katelyn McClure, 29, pleaded guilty to one count of theft by deception in the second degree Monday in Burlington County, New Jersey.In the viral story from 2017 that made national headlines, New Jersey resident McClure ran out of gas and was stranded on Interstate 95 in Philadelphia. The homeless man, Johnny Bobbitt Jr., supposedly saw her and gave her his last for gas.McClure and her then-boyfriend, Mark D'Amico, posted about the "good deed" on social media, including a picture of her with Bobbitt on a highway ramp. They also started a GoFundMe campaign to raise money for the homeless man, saying they wanted to pay it forward to the good Samaritan and get him off the streets.Bobbitt pleaded guilty at the local level to one count of conspiracy to commit theft by deception last Friday. He faces a five-year special probation period that requires him to enter the state Superior Court drug court program, in which he'll be expected to get a job and adhere to a structured regimen of treatment and recovery services. Any infractions could bring him a five-year prison sentence, according to Joel Bewley, a spokesman for the Burlington County Prosecutor's Office.CNN reached out to Bobbitt's attorney for comment, but has not heard back.Both Bobbitt and McClure agreed to testify against D'Amico, who has yet to enter a plea in Burlington County court on charges of theft by deception and conspiracy to commit theft by deception in the second degree. His case is scheduled to be presented next month to a Burlington County grand jury for a possible indictment.Both McClure and Bobbitt also pleaded guilty to federal charges in early March.D'Amico is not currently facing federal charges. McClure's lawyer said she had tried to stop the GoFundMe page and D'Amico wouldn't let her."We've indicated throughout it's my view that Mr. D'Amico is the real agent provocateur in this matter.Kate's role from the beginning was to help Mr. Bobbitt," said McClure's attorney, Jim Gerrow."Kate has been strong. She's devastated by this and has been, but we look to the sentencings in federal and state courts and hopefully we can find sufficient evidence to convince both judges of her role and the fact that throughout this she started out with benign motive, her hope to help Johnny Bobbitt and not to enrich herself or anyone else," Gerrow said.The couple transferred the funds to their bank account and bought a BMW, expensive handbags and went on trips, including to casinos in Pennsylvania, New Jersey and Nevada, according to court documents.McClure transferred ,000 from her bank account to Bobbitt's in December 2017, federal prosecutors said. He received a total of ,000 in the campaign, according to Burlington County Prosecutor Scott Coffina.GoFundMe has since made refunds to thousands of people who donated thinking they were giving to Bobbitt. Both Bobbitt and McClure must pay back the money in restitution, per their state court plea deals.The story began to fall apart after Bobbitt sued McClure and D'Amico, accusing them of withholding the money raised on his behalf."In reality, McClure never ran out of gas and Bobbitt never spent his last for her," according to a US Attorney's Office press release. "D'Amico and McClure allegedly conspired to create the false story to obtain money from donors."The federal cases have not been settled. McClure could face up to 20 years in prison and a 0,000 fine after pleading guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud. She will be sentenced on June 19.Bobbitt could face up to 10 years in prison and a 0,000 fine on the federal charge after pleading guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit money laundering. He will be sentenced at a later date. 3964

An appeals court said Tuesday that President Donald Trump violated the First Amendment by blocking users on Twitter.The 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a New York judge's ruling and found that Trump "engaged in unconstitutional viewpoint discrimination by utilizing Twitter's 'blocking' function to limit certain users' access to his social media account, which is otherwise open to the public at large, because he disagrees with their speech.""We hold that he engaged in such discrimination," the ruling adds.The judges on the appeals court concluded that "the First Amendment does not permit a public official who utilizes a social media account for all manner of official purposes to exclude persons from an otherwise-open online dialogue because they expressed views with which the official disagrees."The challenge to Trump's unprecedented use of Twitter in office came from seven individuals he blocked, as well as the Knight First Amendment Institute, which argued that the President's personal account is an extension of his office.The Justice Department argued in March that the President wasn't "wielding the power" of the federal government when he blocked certain individuals from his personal Twitter account, @realDonaldTrump, because while the President sends tweets in his official capacity, he blocks users as a personal matter.But the appeals court disagreed with that view."The irony in all of this is that we write at a time in the history of this nation when the conduct of our government and its officials is subject to wide‐open, robust debate," they wrote. "This debate encompasses an extraordinarily broad range of ideas and viewpoints and generates a level of passion and intensity the likes of which have rarely been seen. This debate, as uncomfortable and as unpleasant as it frequently may be, is nonetheless a good thing. In resolving this appeal, we remind the litigants and the public that if the First Amendment means anything, it means that the best response to disfavored speech on matters of public concern is more speech, not less."Tuesday's ruling affirms the position taken last year by a New York federal judge, who ruled that Trump had 2197

A new bill proposed in the North Carolina General Assembly is proposing a 15-point grading scale, changing an F grade from a 59 percent to a 39 percent.Under the proposed scale, these would be the new benchmarks for each letter grade:A - 85-100B - 70-85C - 55-69D - 40-54F - 0-39The bill also prohibits other designations related to performance measures from being added, including "plus" or "minus."The North Carolina school system is currently on a traditional 10-point scale. 490

An air traveler’s service dog is delivering puppies now @FlyTPA We’re a full-service department! pic.twitter.com/4xlPixtcFn— Tampa Fire Rescue (@TampaFireRescue) May 25, 2018 186

A Nicaraguan man who died Friday at an Arizona hospital is the 12th person to die in the custody of US immigration authorities since September.Three dozen people from Central America, including the 52-year-old man, had turned themselves in to Border Patrol agents west of Sasabe, US Customs and Border Protection said in a statement. They were being processed at a Border Patrol facility in Tucson when he fell into medical distress.CBP expressed its condolences to the man's family.Eleven others have died in US custody, including a 30-year-old Honduran man who died in ICE custody last Sunday at a hospital in Humble, Texas, the agency said.Yimi Alexis Balderramos-Torres entered ICE custody on June 6 and less than two weeks later was transferred to the Houston Contract Detention Facility in Houston, Texas.On June 30, he was found unresponsive in his dormitory and attempts to revive him were unsuccessful, ICE said.Other detainees to die in ICE custody since November include a 996

来源：资阳报