和田看男科哪家和田阴茎勃起软,和田勃起障碍好治,和田女性检查,和田治疗宫颈糜烂好,和田包皮环切价格贵吗,和田激光包皮环切多少钱,和田女朋友怀孕了不想要

SAN DIEGO (CNS) - Federal agents with the Drug Enforcement Administration's San Diego Field Division made scores of arrests and seized thousands of pounds of methamphetamine during a recently concluded six-month crackdown on Mexican cartels that distribute the drug in the United States, the federal agency reported Thursday.Personnel with the local DEA unit, whose jurisdiction comprises San Diego and Imperial counties, conducted 29 investigations, captured 81 suspects, and impounded 4,462 pounds of methamphetamine and 9,000 in drug proceeds during the enforcement effort, dubbed Operation Crystal Shield."Although (the region has) been locked down since March due to COVID, DEA has been working hard to stop ruthless cartels from bringing methamphetamine into our communities," said John Callery, special agent in charge of the agency's San Diego-area division.Nationwide, agents completed more than 750 investigations, resulting in nearly 1,840 arrests and the seizure of more than 28,560 pounds of methamphetamine, .3 million in drug proceeds, and 284 firearms during the operation."In the months leading up to the launch of Operation Crystal Shield, communities across the United States experienced a surge of methamphetamine," DEA Acting Administrator Timothy Shea said. "The COVID pandemic locked down many communities and impacted legitimate businesses, but the drug trade continued."The crackdown was launched on Feb. 20, after investigators identified major methamphetamine trafficking hubs in Atlanta, Dallas, El Paso, Houston, Los Angeles, New Orleans, Phoenix, San Diego and St. Louis. Together, the nine cities accounted for more than 75 percent of methamphetamine seized by the DEA in 2019."We will continue to be relentless in our pursuit of criminals who continually attempt to poison our schools, communities and environment with methamphetamine and its residual carnage," Callery said. 1921

SAN DIEGO (CNS) - Former Navy SEAL Edward Gallagher, who was acquitted of murder and attempted murder charges last year stemming from allegations that he fatally stabbed a wounded teenage ISIS fighter and shot Iraqi civilians, is suing the Secretary of the Navy and a New York Times reporter, alleging the reporter defamed Gallagher with the help of Navy officials illegally leaking him documents.The suit accuses the Navy of leaking "about 500 pages of confidential documents from the Navy's criminal investigation" on Gallagher to reporter David Philipps, who extensively covered the allegations against Gallagher prior to and after his trial at Navy Base San Diego last year.The suit also names as a defendant Navy Secretary Kenneth J. Braithwaite, who was sworn in to his post Friday, the same day Gallagher's lawsuit was filed in San Diego federal court.Representatives of the Navy and New York Times could not immediately be reached for comment.Gallagher was acquitted in July of several serious charges related to the alleged slaying of a teenage boy, as well as allegations of firing indiscriminately on civilians from a sniper's nest, which could have had him facing life in prison. However, he was only convicted of posing with the teen's body in a photograph, resulting in a demotion in rank. President Donald Trump, who publicly supported Gallagher throughout the allegations, restored Gallagher's rank in November.According to the lawsuit, "corrupt Navy officials" conspired to defame Gallagher by leaking information to Philipps, who published several articles that Gallagher's attorneys allege presented false information to discredit the former SEAL.The complaint further alleges that Philipps wholly fabricated some allegations against Gallagher, including that Gallagher routinely fired on civilian neighborhoods and tried to run over a Navy Police officer in 2014.The suit alleges information leaked to Philipps included "witness interview summaries and seized text messages" from the criminal investigation and "a complete list of other SEALs that Chief Gallagher had deployed with on prior occasions" so that Philipps could contact them for his stories.Navy officials hoped "negative publicity would help to pressure Chief Gallagher into taking a plea, as well as to influence any potential jury pool," the complaint alleges."Navy officials presented David Philipps with a golden egg," the lawsuit alleges. "They would illegally provide him with certain protected documents, in clear violation of the Privacy Act and court orders, so that Philipps could write a damning portrayal of Chief Gallagher, with reckless disregard for the truth."The suit, which seeks unspecified damages, alleges Gallagher has suffered "significant mental and emotional anguish" through the Navy's "violations of the Privacy Act and unlawful disclosure of Chief Gallagher's private information to David Philipps."The lawsuit is not the first time Gallagher's attorneys have accused Navy officials of misconduct.Gallagher's defense team previously alleged Navy prosecutors used tracking software to spy on the email accounts of the defense and a Navy Times reporter covering the trial.The trial judge, Capt. Aaron Rugh, removed prosecutor Cmdr. Chris Czaplak from the case just before the trial was set to begin, ruling the prosecution sent emails to the defense and the Navy Times reporter that were embedded with code that would track the recipients' email activity.The findings led Rugh to order that Gallagher be released from custody due to violations of his Fourth and Sixth Amendment rights and that his maximum possible sentence of life without parole be reduced to life with the possibility of parole. 3715

SAN DIEGO (CNS) - Lab-confirmed flu cases rose nearly 70 percent in San Diego County last week as flu season continues to ramp up, the San Diego County Health and Human Services Agency announced Wednesday.Doctors around the county reported 489 confirmed flu cases during the week of Dec. 8-14, an increase of 198 over the previous week's total of 291 flu cases. According to the HHSA, doctors have confirmed 1,709 flu cases since the flu season began July 1, nearly double the 932 confirmed at this time last year.No flu-related deaths were reported last week, but this flu season's seven deaths still outpace the six confirmed deaths at this time last flu season. The county measures flu seasons from July 1 to June 30 the following year concurrent with the fiscal year.RELATED: San Diego woman, 86, is latest flu death"This is the time of the season when we start to see influenza activity increase significantly," said Dr. Wilma Wooten, the county's public health officer. "Get your flu shot now to avoid getting sick."County health officials and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention strongly advise the annual flu vaccination for everyone 6 months and older, especially in demographics with a heightened risk of serious complications, such as pregnant women, people with chronic medical conditions like lung disease and people age 65 or older.Residents can take precautions against contracting the virus by frequently washing their hands, cleaning commonly touched surfaces and avoiding contact with sick people.The flu vaccine is available at local doctors' offices, retail pharmacies and the county's public health centers. A full list of locations offering flu shots can be found at the county's immunization website, sdiz.org, or by calling 211 for the county's health hotline. 1808

reases is wrong, as these sectors continue to do the right things, while trying to weather the ongoing pandemic and the back and forth of reopenings," Wooten's request states.Deputy Attorney General Jonathan Eisenberg, representing the state, said Wooten's conclusions were based on case numbers that have since increased and cited statements she made during a Nov. 17 San Diego County Board of Supervisors meeting, which drew a different conclusion.During the meeting, Wooten said "the numbers have expanded" since she made her request to the state."We couldn't in good conscience create that same argument since that adjudication submission was sent to the state," Wooten said while answering questions from the Board of Supervisors.Eisenberg called the recent spike in cases "an unprecedented surge" with record numbers being reached at the state, local and national level.Saying the lawsuit was based on outdated figures, Eisenberg cited a study submitted to the court which he said indicated full-service restaurants and gyms are "the top spreader locations" of virus infections.Katz argued that study was done early in the pandemic and without taking the sanitation measures businesses have implemented into account.Katz said restaurants and gyms are being punished despite adhering to the state's guidelines and said the state's reopening plan has applied its restrictions to restaurants and gyms in an arbitrary manner, which he claimed wasn't backed by science.The businesses allege in their complaint that they may be forced to close permanently if indoor operations don't resume, and that outdoor and takeout service will not make up for the economic losses incurred thus far.While Eisenberg acknowledged that businesses are suffering from "great economic hardship," he said "the balance of harms here is overwhelmingly in favor of keeping these restrictions in place."Cowboy Star Restaurant and Butcher Shop sent ABC 10News the following statement after the judge's ruling. 4120

SAN DIEGO (CNS) - A La Jolla restaurant owner raped eight women who he either drugged or knew were too intoxicated to consent to sex, a prosecutor said Tuesday, while a defense attorney argued none of the charged sex acts were forced upon the alleged victims, nor was there any evidence that any of the women were drugged.Jurors on Tuesday began deliberating the fate of Daniel Dorado, who is charged with 35 felonies, including rape of an unconscious person and rape of an intoxicated person. He faces nearly 31 years in prison if convicted of all counts, which are charged for rapes that allegedly occurred in 2009, 2014, 2015, 2017 and 2018.The 61-year-old defendant is the owner of Voce del Mare, an Italian restaurant located on La Jolla Boulevard in the Bird Rock area.Dorado is accused of meeting the victims -- who ranged in age from 22 to 58 -- at local bars and restaurants, sometimes under the guise of a job interview for a position at his restaurant, or through dating websites.RELATED:Restaurant owner charged with rape testifiesTrial begins for La Jolla restaurant owner accused of sexual assaultsHe allegedly offered the women spiked beverages, causing them to fall unconscious and later wake up in the middle of or just after sex acts with the defendant.Dorado was taken into custody in March 2018 on suspicion of assaults on four women. The other alleged victims came forward after learning of his arrest.Defense attorney Eric Youngquist said the prosecution had not proven anything regarding the use of date rape drugs, force or threats on Dorado's behalf, and that each of the encounters with the women were consensual.The attorney said no evidence of date rape drugs turned up in any of the alleged victims' systems and contended their supposed symptoms were more indicative of alcohol consumption.RELATED:8 women accuse Bird Rock restaurant owner of sexual assaultNew charges filed against La Jolla restaurant owner accused of rapeDeputy District Attorney Jessica Coto told jurors that even if they didn't believe the victims were given date rape drugs, evidence from the trial indicated the women drank enough to become noticeably unable to consent -- in some cases vomiting on themselves or rendered unable to stand or walk -- yet Dorado decided to have sex with them anyway."You can't consent to something you don't know is happening to you," Coto said. "You can't make a choice if you are not aware what is happening."Youngquist questioned the motivations of some of the alleged victims, particularly some who were allegedly raped following job interviews at Dorado's restaurant, then proceeded to work for him even after the alleged assaults, but were later fired from their jobs.RELATED: La Jolla restaurant owner accused of sexual assault makes first court appearanceMore women come forward about La Jolla restaurant owner accused of rapeOne of the victims dated Dorado for months following her initial meeting with him, in which she told investigators she had drinks with him, became very intoxicated and collapsed, and later woke up naked in a hotel room, the defense attorney said.Youngquist alleged she was essentially told by police and prosecutors that she was raped, but later testified at trial that she didn't consider herself a victim. Quoting his co-counsel Kim Santini's opening statements, Youngquist contended the charges were the result of "an overzealous district attorney and (a) detective" who planted the notion of drugging into the alleged victims' minds. The attorney emphasized that some of the victims used similar language to describe their symptoms, such as feeling "heavy" or "disassociated."Youngquist also alleged some of the accusers were seeking civil, monetary damages from Dorado, though Coto said only one of the victims ever sued Dorado and has since dropped the lawsuit.RELATED: Woman accuses La Jolla restaurant owner of rape comes forward, talks only to 10NewsCoto questioned what she said were shifting stories on the defendant's behalf between his testimony at trial, conversations with police, and pre- textual phone conversations with some of the victims. At various points, the prosecutor alleged Dorado denied having any sexual contact with the women, then later admitted having consensual sex."If everything was consensual, why deny?" Coto asked the jury. 4336