贵阳治疗下肢静脉血栓科医院贵阳治小腿静脉曲张一般花多少钱,贵州贵阳老烂腿研究院座机多少,贵阳海绵状血管瘤哪家医院,贵阳特异性前列腺肥大专科医院,贵阳睾丸精索静脉曲张哪个医院手术好,贵阳哪个医院小腿静脉曲张微创手术好,贵阳哪有治疗小腿静脉曲张的

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) -- A man was hospitalized Saturday night after being stabbed several times during a confrontation in Mission Beach, police said.The incident happened around 8 p.m. in the 900 block of West Mission Bay, said Ofc. Robert Heims of the San Diego Police Department.Heims said a 26-year-old man approached and exchanged words with a 50-year-old man. The younger man then pulled out a knife and stabbed the victim multiple times."The victim fell to the ground and the suspect fled the scene," Heims said. "The victim was transported to the hospital where his injuries were determined (to be) non-life threatening."The suspect was caught a short time later and arrested. He has been identified as 26-year-old Raul Marcquez.The incident is still under investigation. Anyone with information about the incident is encouraged to call Crime Stoppers at 888-580-8477. 881

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) — A mysterious monolith that appeared in a San Diego parking lot earlier this week is gone, the structure torn down by a group of people in an incident captured on social media Tuesday night. The monolith was in the Scripps Ranch Marketplace parking lot. Similar structures have been popping up all over the country and the world since mid-November. In videos posted to social media, a large group of people can be seen pushing over and then carrying away the shiny, sleek object late Tuesday evening. SDPD told ABC 10News that they did receive a call about the incident but because it's unclear who owns the monolith they weren't able to file a report and there is no ongoing investigation. 718

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) - A San Diego man is accused of having and distributing explicit images of minors.According to a federal complaint that was just unsealed authorities allege Gilad Daniel Reifler knowingly distributed visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct and possessed images of minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct.The federal documents say agents used peer-to-peer file sharing software to connect to his computer in January 2017 and obtain more than four thousand images. Agents say they were able to connect to the computer on two other dates and obtain more sexually explicit files.According to the complaint in June of 2017 agents searched Reifler’s home where they claim he admitted to obtaining and distributing child pornography via the same P2P file-sharing program that they used to obtain the images from a device in his residence.Court documents say, “following the execution of the search warrant I reviewed media seized from Reifler’s residents. The results showed over 170,000 images and over 10,000 videos depicting minors engaging in sexually explicit conduct on media seized.”A man who identified himself has Gilad Reifler told Team 10 investigator Adam Racusin he had no comment about the allegations.10News tried to get a hold of Reifler’s attorney, but as of this writing have not heard back.The FBI tells Team 10 they can’t comment on anything outside of what’s already in the public documents. 1466

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) - A San Diego County woman has filed a lawsuit against a local physician who she says used his own sperm to artificially inseminate her.The discovery occurred decades later after Beverly Willhelm and her husband sought out a fertility specialist in the late 80s.Instead of receiving anonymous sperm, she says the doctor used his own. Willhelm says her son, 23-year-old James Mallus, learned after taking a 23andMe DNA test that his biological dad was the same man that his mother consulted to become pregnant.Willhelm says she's now suing the doctor for fertility fraud in a civil lawsuit.Though Willhelm's attorney said the lawsuit was filed Wednesday, ABC 10News is not naming the doctor because we have not been able to confirm that with the San Diego County Courthouse.According to the lawsuit, the doctor still practices in San Diego County. The lawsuit claims that "the Defendant, without Plaintiff's knowledge or consent, used his own sperm to impregnate her."The suit goes on to say that "based on allegations regarding his mistreatment of numerous patients in 1992-93, Defendant surrendered his California medical license in 1999."The doctor's license was reinstated in 2004. Those allegations are not related to the current lawsuit or other instances of fertility fraud.ABC 10News has reached out to the doctor in the lawsuit, but have not heard back. He is not currently facing any criminal allegations. 1439

SAN DIEGO (KGTV) - A North Park woman is wondering what went wrong after she quickly paid off a fine for a parking ticket, and then got hit with a big late fee.On the second Tuesday in November, Stacy parked her car on Meade Avenue near her home in the morning. When she got off work later that day, she found something unexpected on her windshield."I didn't read the sign correctly. Parked in a spot that said 'No Parking' and got a ticket," said Stacy, who asked 10news not to use her last name.For parking in a street sweeping zone, she received a ticket for .50."Wrote the check the next day and sent it in the mail the following day," said Stacy.Stacy says she included the ticket in her payment and put the citation number on the check."At that point, I thought everything was fine," said Stacy.A few weeks later, she got a notice from the city saying the citation hasn't been paid, and she had a few weeks to pay it. Stacy wrote another check for .50 and sent it in the mail. She stopped payment on her initial check. Fast forward to late December, when she got another notice. Her payment had been received, but she now owed a late fee of ."How I felt was frustration. I felt a lot of frustration, because I felt like I had done what I was supposed to do," said Stacy.Stacy ended up paying the late fee online. She's not alone. After posting details of her ordeal on the Nextdoor app, another driver responded with a similar story. He reported that his check wasn't processed until after the late deadline."My concern is other people aren't able to afford late fee," said Stacy.Stacy won't be mailing any more checks when dealing with the city. "If checks aren't the way to do things, and they can't get to the volume ... we just need to know about it," said Stacy.Stacy says her initial payment didn't get lost in the mail, because the city tried to cash it - weeks after the late deadline.A city spokesperson released the following statement:"Check payments are processed by a third party vendor located in Inglewood, Calif. The average processing time in calendar year 2019 was six days for payments mailed to the vendor. Recently, the vendor encountered delays due to the installation of new remittance processing equipment. The new equipment had connectivity issues which created a backlog of payments. Customers who reached out to the Office of the City Treasurer during the backlog were advised not to stop payment on their checks, the postmark date was considered the legal payment date. When the payments were processed, the postmark date would automatically roll back any late fees if assessed. The Office of the City Treasurer generally advises customers to use the online option as the payments are posted in real-time ... (Stacy) put a stop payment on her original check payment. When stop payments are initiated on checks, it triggers an automatic process that rolls back the original payment. When this occurs, the bank will assess a stop payment fee that is added to the balance due. Late fees were automatically assessed. Her original payment was timely. Subsequently, the late fee and assessment were waived. (Stacy) will receive a refund check for in approximately 30 days." 3235