中山长期腹泻还便血了中山大便老是出血是什么原因,中山肛门外有小肉,中山微创治疗便血费用,中山小孩拉血是怎么回事,中山那家看混合痔医院好,中山痔疮便血严重怎么办,中山大便干出血

(KGTV) - KGTV and Team10 have launched the Transparency Project to allow the public to view case files from San Diego County over the past 10 years where officer involved shootings and law enforcement misconduct cases were investigated. For many of these cases, the officers were cleared of wrongdoing. Others resulted in officers being reprimanded, fired or even charged criminally --- but all of these cases resulted in community reactions. Transparency Project Database: Search officer-involved shootings, law enforcement misconduct casesThese case files were released after Senate Bill 1421 went into effect on January 1, 2019. It requires California law enforcement agencies to make internal reports for officer-involved shootings and major uses of force, officer dishonesty and confirmed cases of sexual assault available to the public. You can view the cases that have been released by the police agencies here. The project includes a searchable database, where you can find cases by the name of the officer involved, the name of the victim/suspect, the department and much more. Click here to access the database and begin searching. The 10News database contains files released by the following law enforcement agencies in San Diego County:Carlsbad Police DepartmentChula Vista Police DepartmentCoronado Police DepartmentEl Cajon Police DepartmentEscondido Police DepartmentNational City Police DepartmentLa Mesa Police DepartmentOceanside Police DepartmentSan Diego Harbor Police DepartmentSan Diego Police DepartmentSan Diego County Sheriff’s OfficeSan Diego Unified School District Police DepartmentThis project is focusing on documents related to incidents that have occurred between 2009 and 2019. There may be some documents related to earlier cases included based on their content and those parties involved. We will be continuing to upload documents to this database as they are released. All of the information in this database has been gathered from the police reports or investigation files made public by the law enforcement organization. The information has been summarized and entered based on the following:The race or sex of the individual involved was entered as it was reported by the police agency.Some reports did not include information about the race or sex of the law enforcement officer, so this information will appear as “unknown” in the database.The officers involved listed in the database as being involved in the incidents are those listed on the released reports.When classifying “use of force,” we selected all forms of force used as reported in the report or investigative file.The summary of the incident was written by KGTV journalists who reviewed all documents in the case. Not all details are included in the summary.Some of the materials released (including photos, videos, audio files and the reports themselves) can be graphic in nature. We have added notes to files that contain content that may be disturbing or graphic in nature. Please proceed with caution when viewing these materials.If you have any questions about how this database was put together please contact Lynn Walsh at https://www.10news.com/news/transparency-project/transparency-project-questionnaire.Our reporting on these cases and the investigatory process is more complete with your feedback. We encourage you to fill out this form about the Transparency Project if you see any common threads between cases, have more information about a particular case or have questions about how the law enforcement agencies investigate these cases.This project has been supported by the Solutions Journalism Network, a nonprofit organization dedicated to rigorous and compelling reporting about responses to social problems. To learn more about their work and approach to storytelling, click here [solutionsu.solutionsjournalism.org]. 3852

(KGTV) — An inmate convicted of sexually assaulting a minor in San Diego was killed during an attack inside a California corrections facility this week.Officials said on Thursday, 41-year-old Jonathan Watson attacked two inmates with a weapon at California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility, and State Prison in Corcoran. Both inmates suffered head wounds and were taken to a local medical center.One inmate, 48-year-old David Bobb, died from his injuries while being taken to the hospital. Bobb was sentenced in San Diego on Oct. 17, 2015 to life in prison with the possibility of parole for aggravated sexual assault of a child under 14 years old.The other injured inmate is in critical condition at a local hospital.Officials say Watson has been serving a life sentence for first-degree murder and intentionally discharging a firearm causing great bodily injury or death.The prison specializes in substance abuse treatment and houses more than 5,400 inmates. 970

(KGTV) - A Southern California police department's Facebook post is igniting the online debate over panhandling.Ventura Police posted a video on their Facebook page Wednesday discouraging locals not to give to panhandlers and to give to charities instead."Want to help those in need in our community? Please say no to panhandling and yes to charities," Ventura Police's post read. "Giving money to panhandlers often feeds addictions and does not help someone get long-term help."The video features a silent officer holding various signs reading things like "want to help?" and then "please don't give to panhandlers."Comments on the viral video have ranged from supportive to not, some claiming that charities are not enough to solve the issue. Others say the video reinforces negative stereotypes of homeless individuals.The police department said people should instead give to groups that provide meals, medical attention, and avenues that are long-term solutions to homelessness.RELATED: Children spotted alongside man panhandling on La Jolla street cornerThe City of Ventura's website also advocates against panhandling, saying it "may make us feel good for a moment, but cash spent on feeding addictions shortens the life of homeless individuals and supports their ability to live on the street rather than get permanent help." 1355

(KGTV) -- Billions of dollars could be at stake with Proposition 15.If passed, it would tax some commercial properties based on current market value instead of when it was bought. It could potentially bring in anywhere between .5 to .5 billion in new funding to local schools and governments, according to the Legislative Analyst’s Office.Brandon Foster is a small business owner in Oceanside. Even though he rents the space where his two gift shops are located, he is against Prop. 15.“We already have been told by our landlords, if that passes, they will be passing on that cost to us,” Foster said. “The landlords, a lot of them, have vacancies and things like that where they are struggling themselves. I understand why they need to pass that cost onto us.”The ad for No on Prop. 15 highlights a small business owner who said he had to close twice during the pandemic. The ad said Proposition 15 would raise “property taxes and rents on small business and they admit homeowners are next.”The change in property tax assessment would apply only to commercial or industrial properties valued at more than million. It would tax those properties at current market value rather than when it was bought.Residential and agricultural properties are not affected under Prop. 15.“They are very emotional, as ads are supposed to be,” said Lynn Reaser, chief economist at Pt. Loma Nazarene University.The ad has major funding from the California Business Roundtable, California Business Properties Association, and the California Taxpayers Association.“You would see a big effect especially on these older companies, not necessarily the big companies, but all companies that bought their properties some years ago,” Reaser said. “They could face more problems in terms of survival.”The ad lacks detail about time frame for Proposition 15, not making clear that it would take effect in 2022.While the ad said homeowners are next in line for property tax increases, Reaser said “no one knows” if that is actually true.“All the businesses, they’re all going to have to pass on the money, the expense, to somebody,” Foster said. 2131

(KGTV) — Bombshell testimony was dropped on the third day of a Navy SEAL's trial over the fatal stabbing an injured teenage ISIS combatant in Iraq.Navy SEAL Special Operator First Class Corey Scott testified Thursday that he was responsible for the teen's death, not fellow SEAL Chief Edward Gallagher, who is accused of murdering the injured fighter after he was captured.Scott told the court that he held down the teen's breathing tube so that he couldn't breathe after seeing Gallagher stab the combatant. RELATED: Witness: Navy SEAL called dead prisoner an 'ISIS dirt bag'He added “he knew he was going to die” and didn't want the teen to suffer or be tortured, so he held his thumb over the teen's tracheal tube and suffocated him. Scott said his actions took place immediately after Gallagher stabbed the injured teen under the collar bone.During cross-examination, Scott told the court he doesn't want to see Gallagher go to jail or his family endure any further harm from the trial.Scott was deployed with the Navy Chief in 2017.RELATED: Prosecutor: Navy SEAL bragged he 'got' victim with knifeProsecutors say Scott cannot be persecuted for his testimony on the stand, but he can be prosecuted for perjury. A military spokesman told the Associated Press prosecutors will likely continue their case against Gallagher despite Scott's testimony.Scott had met with prosecutors and the defense on multiple occasions prior to his testimony, but Thursday was the first time he revealed his account of the events leading to the ISIS teen's death.Gallagher has been accused in the teen's murder on May 3, 2017, in Mosul, Iraq, and for shooting at Iraqi civilians several times. He has pleaded not guilty to murder, attempted murder, and other charges that carry a potential life in prison sentence. 1805