中山大便习惯改变大便带血中山上厕所出血是什么回事,中山肛肠科特色医院,中山拉稀还带血怎么回事,中山肛瘘手术较好的医院,中山治痔疮的症状,中山大便带血 挂哪个科,中山肛瘘的治疗方法

The Philadelphia Police Department is looking for a man suspected of robbing a Rite Aid on Friday, January 3, citing a "sick child" as his reason for the crime. 172

The parents of a middle school student are suing a Houston-area school district and school officials in federal court for allegedly coloring in his hair design earlier this year with a black permanent marker.According to the lawsuit filed Sunday, officials at the Berry Miller Junior High in Pearland, Texas, claimed the design in the then-seventh grader's haircut violated the Pearland Independent School District's dress code policy.The suit alleges, "They laughed as they took many minutes to color 13-year-old J.T's scalp which took many days of scrubbing to come off."Lawsuit says incident came day after haircutThe lawsuit says Juelz Trice got a fade haircut April 16 and the next day when he was in the cafeteria for breakfast he was told by an assistant principal to go to the office.The civil rights lawsuit names the then-assistant principal Tony Barcelona (since promoted to principal), discipline clerk Helen Day and teacher Jeanette Peterson as defendants as well as the school district.CNN has reached out to the individuals named in the lawsuit and has not immediately heard back.The boy, who is African-American, allegedly was given two options by the two administrators.He could use a black Sharpie to color his scalp, the lawsuit says, or go to in-school suspension. Juelz didn't want a suspension affecting his track team eligibility so he chose the permanent marker option, the lawsuit says.The black Sharpie made the design line in Juelz's hair more prominent, the complaint says.Day took the marker from Juelz and began to blacken Juelz's scalp, the court document says. Peterson -- who, like the administrators, is identified in the court document as white -- came into the office and was asked to use the marker on the boy's scalp and did so, the lawsuit says.Attorney says school district has done nothing but change policyRandall Kallinen, attorney for the student's parents Dante Trice and Angela Washington, said Tuesday that the school never tried to notify the family before coloring their son's scalp.The discipline clerk should have known better how children should be disciplined, he said.The attorney says other than changing the dress code, the school district has done nothing to attempt to rectify the situation.The 2265

The Supreme Court could now decide as early as Wednesday afternoon whether an unnamed foreign-owned company will have to pay daily fines for avoiding a grand jury subpoena related to Robert Mueller's special counsel investigation.The company submitted a reply under seal to the Supreme Court earlier today, following written arguments it and the Justice Department made last week.The filing Wednesday tees up a vote by the full Supreme Court.The company has been trying to avoid a subpoena from a DC-based grand jury, and faced court-imposed fines for every day it did not turn over information.After losing at an appeals court, the company took its challenge to the Supreme Court and asked for a freeze on the mounting penalties.Chief Justice John Roberts allowed it a temporary pause last month, but the full court is now expected to weigh in on whether the freeze should stay in place.A denial from the court would be an apparent win for Mueller's team. Grand jury matters in the federal court system are typically kept secret, unless a witness decides to speak about the subpoenas they receive or their experience testifying.However, the case has still been one of the most secretive in years to progress through the court system.It apparently included two face-offs between special counsel office prosecutors and the unnamed company's private attorneys.After losing at the trial level, the DC Circuit Court closed a floor of the courthouse during appellate arguments to keep the identities of the arguing attorneys completely under wraps.The company has kept nearly all its filings secret -- with the exception of a log of when it submits information to the appeals courts.Though the Supreme Court allows for cases like this to be secret in their early requests, the high court has never heard a known case where all parties and arguments stayed confidential. 1907

The top US diplomat in Ukraine expressed serious misgivings about foreign policy moves being tied to political motives, calling a potential quid pro quo over military assistance to Ukraine "crazy" and suggested he would quit if that assistance was not released, according to 287

The Pentagon's controversial policy banning transgender recruits from joining the military went into effect on Friday.The Pentagon says the new policy does not affect transgender troops currently serving in the armed forces, a contention that's strongly denied by advocates, who point to the potential for discrimination and harassment.The ban blocks individuals who have been diagnosed with a condition known as gender dysphoria from joining. Transgender individuals can serve, but only if they meet the standards of the sex they were assigned at birth.The Pentagon says the policy doesn't block transgender individuals from service, but advocates say it is designed to operate as a comprehensive ban on their presence. Current military leaders have testified to Congress that transgender troops have not affected cohesion, while retired military leaders have decried the policy as misguided and damaging.'Bigoted'"It's a bigoted policy. It has not one shred of evidence behind it," Ray Mabus, a former secretary of the Navy, told CNN. "In fact, all the evidence goes the other way. It goes against the basic American notion that it should be about what you can do and not who you are. ... To do this to patriots who are willing to serve -- not only willing, but eager to serve, who have raised their hands and said send me -- weakens our democracy and seriously weakens our military."Anthony Kurta, a Pentagon official acting for the deputy under secretary of personnel and readiness, told reporters Friday that "the department will continue to treat all individuals with dignity and respect, and every service member is able to express their gender identity. DOD will take no action solely based on gender identity."The policy, signaled when President Donald Trump tweeted a call for a blanket ban in 2017, still faces lower court challenges, but the 1866