中山青少年排便时出血-【中山华都肛肠医院】,gUfTOBOs,中山男的大便出血是什么原因,中山拉肚子肛门痛,中山哪里肛瘘手术好,中山切除痔疮多少钱,中山屁股拉粑粑出血怎么回事,中山治痔疮的医院在哪里
中山青少年排便时出血中山女性为什么得痔疮,中山便血几天,中山大便出血是啥病,中山大便肛门疼痛出血是什么原因,中山看肛瘘哪家医院比较好,中山 医院 肛肠科,中山治疗痔疮办法
SAN DIEGO (KGTV) - The Rock Church is making holiday giving even easier, teaming up with Express Feedback for Good to raise money for their Toys for Joy campaign.Under the new program, people can sign up to take on-line surveys. For each one they take, the Church will get towards their holiday fundraiser."This is a life or death situation for some kids and some families," says Pastor Miles McPherson.The Toys for Joy program is now in its 23rd year. Each year the Church helps around 20,000 families with food, clothing, toys, and more for the holidays. McPherson says he hopes the new survey tool will inspire people to do more."The express feedback tool gives people the opportunity to do something to help somebody, but we want them to take the next step, touch a person, smile at a person, hear someone's story," he says.The surveys only take about one minute each, and there's a limit of 100 per person. The Church says they hope to raise 0,000 from the surveys, to help supplement the other donations they get each year.The company, Express Feedback for Good, takes the information from the survey and sells it to businesses to help them serve their customers better."It's a win/win for both parties," says Product Manager Dena Coykendall. "The non-profit can create resources, and business can collect information from a crowd that's more representative."This year, the Rock Church will have four locations for their Toys for Joy campaign on December 14th. To donate, or for more information, click here.To sign up to take the surveys, go here. 1568
SAN DIEGO (KGTV) -- The public will be able to weigh in on the proposed placement of a sexually violent predator (SVP) in north San Diego County.Earlier this month, the state’s Department of State Hospitals (DSH) proposed Joshua Cooley be placed at a property in Pauma Valley.On Oct. 9, at 8:30 a.m., a hearing on Cooley's placement will be available for viewing at https://www.humboldt.courts.ca.gov/.Those interested in submitting a public comment for the hearing can do so between Sept. 15-23. Comments will be sent to the DSH and Humboldt County Superior Court prior to the October hearing.Public comment can be sent via the following methods:Email: sdsafe@sdsheriff.orgPhone: 858-495-3619Mail: SVP Release/SAFE Task Force, 9425 Chesapeake Drive, San Diego, CA 92123More information on sexually violent predators, including legal definitions and requirements for designations can be found at http://www.sdcda.org/preventing/sex-offenders/index.html, and also at the Department of State Hospital’s website, https://www.dsh.ca.gov/.Information on the SAFE Task Force can be obtained at https://www.sdsheriff.net/safe/. 1128
SAN DIEGO (KGTV) -- The San Diego Police Department this October is offering a gun buyback day.Those who sell their guns will be offered either a gift card or a skateboard. Participants will receive 0 for rifles, shotguns and hand guns and 0 for assault weapons, “no questions asked.”There is a limit of two gift cards per vehicle and authorities say all weapons must be operational. The event will be held at the Encanto Southern Baptist Church on Saturday, October 20 from 8 a.m. to noon.RELATED: Immigrants come north, guns go southThe program is being offered to remove unwanted weapons from the community. "Too often, weapons are stolen and end up in the hands of criminals, who use them to commit violent crimes in our neighborhoods,” said San Diego County District Attorney Summer Stephan.RELATED: California bans gun sales to people under 21The department is partnering with the United African American Ministerial Action Council, San Diego Sheriff’s Department, San Diego Training Center and San Diego District Attorney’s Office. 1067
SAN DIEGO (KGTV) - Three Southern Californians, one of which from San Diego, charged Facebook with being complacent in a data breach spanning about 87 million users.In a class action suit filed in San Diego, Jordan O'Hara, of San Diego, Brent Collins, of Newport Beach, Calif., and Olivia Johnston, of Culver City, Calif., the social media company worked with Cambridge Analytica, former White House strategist Steve Bannon, and Cambridge University researcher Aleksandr Kogan.In the lawsuit, the three say Facebook "conspired" to help Cambridge Analytica, Bannon, and Kogan steal personal data in order to manipulate public opinion and U.S. elections. The suit claims Facebook has been aware of this and similar breaches for years.RELATED: Yes, Facebook is scanning your messages"Facebook's failure to adequately protect ... data allowed [the defendants] to engage in an illicit and illegal appropriation of the data, the purpose of which was, at least in part, to disrupt the 2016 American presidential race," the lawsuit claims."The means by which this conspiracy was accomplished reads like an international crime novel, except that it actually happened," the suit adds.The lawsuit requests compensatory and punitive damages in favor of the plaintiffs and proposed class action members, which includes those whose data was accessed by Cambridge Analytica in the U.S.RELATED: Facebook whistleblower says more companies had access to user data"Contrary to Facebook’s assurances that Plaintiffs’ data would be protected, the [defendants], in the course of their unlawful conspiracy, accessed, harvested and sold the data of millions of individuals, including Plaintiffs, for, among other things, use in their efforts to undermine the democratic process during the 2016 U.S. presidential election," the lawsuit states.Encinitas firm Coast Law Group is among three firms representing the plaintiffs.Facebook has said Cambridge Analytica may have accessed data on about 87 million users, most of whom are in the U.S.RELATED: How to find out if you're giving Facebook access to calls, textsThe data was reportedly being collected by a professor for academic purposes, which is in line with Facebook's rules. However, it was later discovered that the information was transferred to third parties, including Cambridge Analytica, which is in violation of Facebook's policies.Cambridge Analytica was hired in summer 2016 as part of the Trump campaign's three-pronged data operation. Bannon served a vice president and secretary of the data firm until he stepped down in August 2016 to run President Trump's campaign. 2657
SAN DIEGO (KGTV) - The Supreme Court ruled Wednesday in favor of providing employers the option to opt out of providing free birth control to their staff, based on religious beliefs.The 7-2 vote was polarizing."It's a huge win for religion," Pastor Andy Ballon said."We are extremely disappointed," Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California’s President/CEO, Jodi Hicks said.Pastor Ballon said the vote is a victory because it allows people of faith the freedom to not do something they don't believe in. "We believe that life starts at conception, so we believe we should have the right to chose to not provide or not pay for these contraceptives."Ballon said women have options to access birth control outside their healthcare plan provided through work.One of those options is Planned Parenthood."We know what [the vote] means. It will have a devastating effect on women trying to plan how they want to live their lives quite frankly," Hicks said.She explained those plans could involve pursuing higher education or a career.Hicks said 5.5 million women in California could have to pay if their employers opt out. Hicks said that leaves minorities much more vulnerable, saying many can't afford birth control."We are planning on campaigning to encourage those companies still cover access to birth control for women," she said.Pastor Ballon said it's not a fight against women. "Women play an important role in my life and it's not about taking anybody's rights. It's about protecting the life in the belly of the woman."He said he has great respect for women.Hicks responded, "your religious choices can't impede on someone else's decisions to be healthy."The ruling rolls back 'Obamacare', but could be reversed in a future administration. 1753