中山大便出血应该看什么科室(中山便中带血怎么回事) (今日更新中)

Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders said Monday he was open to backing a major proposed reform to the makeup of the Supreme Court.The Vermont independent, following the lead of some progressive legal scholars, floated a plan that would effectively end lifetime, uninterrupted appointments for Supreme Court justices."What may make sense is, if not term limits, then rotating judges to the appeals court as well," Sanders said at the We the People Summit in Washington. "Letting them get out of the Supreme Court and bringing in new blood."Sanders stopped short of backing calls to add justices to the court, a strategy gaining steam with a new generation of left-wing activists, who are putting pressure on the Democratic candidates to address their concerns over the current conservative influence on the court with more ambitious plans."My worry is that the next time the Republicans are in power they will do the same thing," Sanders said of the court-packing option. "So I think that is not the ultimate solution."Progressive legal scholars and activist groups have paid increasing mind to the courts in the aftermath of 2016, when Senate Republicans blocked former President Barack Obama's Supreme Court pick, Merrick Garland, denying him even a public hearing ahead of the election. Since then, President Donald Trump has appointed two justices, both confirmed nearly along party lines after the GOP did away with the filibuster for Supreme Court nominees."It's not just about expansion, it's about depoliticizing the Supreme Court," Sen. Elizabeth Warren told 1597

CAPE CORAL, Fla. — A veteran in Cape Coral, Florida, says the result of a class-action lawsuit that was supposed to help him fix toxic Chinese drywall in his home will now 184

Climate change is putting shellfish at risk as increases in carbon emissions and agricultural runoff are altering ocean ecosystems.Now oyster farmers are adapting before going extinct.“It’s not that they grow more slowly, it’s that they’re less likely to grow at all,” said Todd Van Herpe of Humboldt County Oyster Co.Van Herpe has been farming northern California’s Humboldt Bay for years. Now his livelihood is at risk after scientists say a change in ocean acidification is making it more difficult for oysters to form their shells and ultimately survive.“They’re like anything else; there’s strong one and a weaker one,” Van Herpe said of young oysters. To help protect his product, Van Herpe is getting seed grown in hatcheries. And in this multimillion-dollar industry, any increase in cost is ultimately passed on to you. “We’re going to have to charge our customers more,” Van Herpe said. At Humboldt Bay Provisions, workers are opening up about the change in the industry. “I’ve noticed it’s getting harder and harder to find the freshest oysters,” said one employee.Now this North Coast oyster restaurant is working with more oyster farmers to get this area’s most iconic seafood.“It’s really a source of pride for the people of Eureka and the people of Humboldt County that we have this right in our backyard,” the worker said. Back on the bay, ocean experts are tracking the change in weather conditions. Dr. Joe Tyburczy of California Sea Grant Extension says oysters are suffering because of an increase in carbon emissions and agricultural runoff, which could mean an end to this industry. “If we’re thinking about mass extinctions and radical changes in marine ecosystems this could drive fisheries collapses,” he said.To help keep more oysters alive oyster alive, oyster farmers like Hog Island Oyster Company is now farming oysters in controlled environments.“We’re doing a lot of research here with eel grass and how eel grass can help with manage the acidity of the water through photosynthesis and respiration and taking some of that carbon dioxide out of the air,” Hog Island Oyster Company scientist Juan Avellaneda, PhD said.Making genetic gains could help this seafood and this industry survive. 2232

Facebook on Thursday began taking down ads for the reelection campaign of President Donald Trump that direct people to a survey labeled a “census,” hours after House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said people would confuse it with the once-a-decade head count.Facebook said in a statement that it was enforcing its policies to prevent confusion over the 2020 census, which begins next week for most people.“There are policies in place to prevent confusion around the official U.S. Census and this is an example of those being enforced,” the Facebook statement said.Earlier in the day, Pelosi had called the survey sponsored by the Trump reelection campaign, “an absolute lie.”“A lie that is consistent with the misrepresentation policy of Facebook,” Pelosi said. “But now they’re messing with who we are as Americans. I know the profit motive is their business model, but it should not come at the cost of counting who is in our country.”The ad says, “President Trump needs you to take the Official 2020 Congressional District Census today.” Clicking on a red button saying “Take the Survey” leads to a website with questions asking visitors about party affiliation, whether they intend to support Trump and which media organizations they get their information, among other questions.Similar mailings have been distributed around the U.S.On Thursday, four Democratic House members — Reps. Carolyn Maloney of New York, Jamie Raskin of Maryland, Gerry Connolly of Virginia, and Katie Porter of California — demanded in a letter that the Republican National Committee stop any mailings or online ads that resemble Census Bureau documents.In a statement, the Republican National Committee said it would add language to future mailings, making it clear what it is.“This is a standard direct mail piece that has been utilized for decades. These mailers are fully compliant with the law, clearly marked as a fundraising solicitation from the Republican National Committee, and in no way resemble the official government census,” the RNC statement said.Census Bureau officials have been on high alert for online misinformation aimed at confusing people about who is eligible to fill out the form or how to properly file it, along with imitation websites posing as the official census site.The bureau has spent the last year forging relationships with the major tech platforms -- Facebook, Twitter and Google — to put out accurate information about how the census works and yank misinformation about the form from their sites.In January, Facebook began banning ads that discourage people from participating in the census or portray it as “useless.” The ban applies to ads on both Facebook and Instagram, which Facebook owns. The platform also announced that misleading posts about the census would be subject to removal. Typically, the platform does not remove false or misleading content from its site, unless it gives wrong information about voting.The Trump campaign on Tuesday began running different versions of the census ad on Facebook across the country from Trump and Vice President Mike Pence’s official Facebook page. The campaign purchased thousands of the online ads that were viewed thousands of times before Facebook began removing them Thursday. Former Census Bureau director John Thompson said the Trump campaign has put a new spin on an old campaign strategy: For years, Republicans have sent fundraising mailers that mimic the census.Although it’s hard to tell if those tactics have had any impact on the response rate to the census, Thompson said “the less confusion, the better” when it comes to the once-every-decade survey.Trump’s ads and the Republican mailers could dupe some people into thinking they’ve already filled out the official census form, and if there’s any consequence at all, it could be that the move backfires on Trump’s own supporters, Thompson said.“I don’t know that they would want to have confusion,” said Thompson, who served in the Obama administration. “It could have a reverse impact on the Trump administration, (it) could create an under-representation of their constituents in the census.”Meanwhile, in the U.S Senate, Democratic senators told U.S. Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross, whose department oversees the U.S. Census Bureau, they felt misled by his testimony almost two years ago on the origins of a failed citizenship question. Ross was testifying Thursday before the Senate Committee on Appropriations.The U.S. Supreme Court blocked the Trump administration last summer from adding a citizenship question to the 2020 questionnaire. The administration had said the question was being added to aid the Justice Department in enforcing a law that protects minority voters’ access to the ballot box. But the high court said the administration’s justification for the question “seems to have been contrived.”Opponents argued it would have intimidated immigrants, Hispanics and others from participating in the once-a-decade head count that determines how .5 trillion in federal spending is allocated and how many congressional seats each state gets.“Your statements were totally false,” Democratic U.S. Sen. Patrick Leahy of Vermont told Ross during the hearing. “There is now an avalanche of evidence showing you repeatedly pressured both the Justice Department and the Census Bureau for nearly a year to support adding the question.”Ross denied misleading the senators.“”My statements were correct then. They were true then. They are correct now. They are true now,” Ross said.Leahy responded, “The evidence we’ve seen shows they were not true.”This is the first census in which the Census Bureau is encouraging most people to answer the questionnaire online, although people can still answer the questions by telephone or by mailing in a paper form. Residents can start answering the form next Thursday.Separately, a federal judge in Maryland on Thursday denied a request for a preliminary injunction in a lawsuit the NAACP had filed against the Census Bureau, claiming its preparations for the 2020 census were ina

Defense Secretary James Mattis resigned Thursday, a day after President Donald Trump's plans to withdraw troops from Syria became public."Because you have the right to have a Secretary of Defense whose views are better aligned with yours on these and other subjects, I believe it is right for me to step down from my position," Mattis wrote in his letter."One core belief I have always held is that our strength as a nation is inextricably linked to the strength of our unique and comprehensive system of alliances and partnerships. While the US remains the indispensable nation in the free world, we cannot protect our interests or serve that role effectively without maintaining strong alliances and showing respect to those allies," he added.Trump first announced Mattis' departure in a tweet."General Jim Mattis will be retiring, with distinction, at the end of February, after having served my Administration as Secretary of Defense for the past two years," Trump tweeted.Trump touted the "tremendous progress" that has been made during Mattis' tenure at the helm of the Defense Department and thanked Mattis for his service.Trump said a successor "will be named shortly."Mattis and the President's other top national security advisers opposed Trump's decision to withdraw from Syria.Mattis’ resignation letter makes it clear. “My views on treating allies with respect and also being clear eyed about both malign actors and strategic competitors are strongly held and informed by over four decades of immersion in these issues.” 1546

来源：资阳报