中山无痛便血原因(中山那治疗便血好点) (今日更新中)

The White House communications team is losing a longtime member as Lindsay Walters is set to depart the administration.Walters will leave her post as deputy press secretary in April for a role as vice president of US public affairs at public relations firm Edelman, the White House announced Tuesday alongside a series of glowing on-record statements."There are few talents who also have the savvy, sophistication and street smarts to thrive inside a West Wing as intense as this one. Lindsay Walters is one of them. The President and all of his staff are thankful for her service and we wish her all the best," chief of staff Mick Mulvaney said.Walters joined the administration at its beginning in January 2017. She previously worked on the Republican National Committee's press team as a spokeswoman under then-communications director Sean Spicer.The announcement comes as the White House communications team undergoes a series of changes. Hogan Gidley was recently promoted to principal deputy press secretary with the departure of Raj Shah, who left for the private sector. Two additional deputy press secretaries, Judd Deere and Steven Groves, were added to the team, each with their own assigned areas of focus, a return to its original structure.Press secretary Sarah Sanders will be the only remaining original high-level member of the White House press team after Walters' departure. Sanders and the first lady's communications director, Stephanie Grisham, both began as deputy press secretaries with Walters, but Grisham transitioned to the East Wing early in the administration.Throughout the administration, the communications team has 1661

Three Muslim families were not allowed to board a New York City ferry after they were told they posed a "security issue," according to a discrimination complaint filed with the New York City Commission on Human Rights this week.The complaint was filed by the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) on behalf of the families, which included eight children, against HNY Ferry, LLC; New York City Economic Development Corporation; the City of New York; and two employees referred to as John Doe 1 and Jane Doe 1.The suit seeks disciplinary actions, a formal apology and compensatory damages for "humiliation, embarrassment, and severe emotional distress," claiming that not being allowed to board was based on discrimination and that the security concerns were an "after-the-fact false excuse."A day out and a change of plansSeptember 21 was meant to be a day for three women and their children, ages two months to 14 years old, to enjoy before one of the families went to Pakistan for an extended period of time, the complaint said. Two of the women wore hijabs, according to the complaint.The plan was to visit Governor's Island, but after taking the first ferry from their Brooklyn home to Wall Street they realized that it was getting late and changed their plans to go to Brooklyn's Pier 6 instead, the complaint said. Instead of navigating the line with young children and a double stroller, the women got permission to wait to the side and board last.When their turn came, two ferry employees allegedly told them he had been informed by security not to let them on, the complaint said. But when he and another employee escorted the families to security, the officer "was confused and did not know why Jane and John Doe 1 were blaming security," according to the complaint.The families said the ferry left without them.As they were discussing the situation, another employee of HNY Ferry allegedly raised her voice, telling the families that they weren't allowed on the ferry to Pier 6 because the children were standing on the seats on their last ferry ride. But when they returned to their starting destination, a crew member they had spoken to early in the day said she did not remember the children behaving inappropriately, the complaint said.The families stated they "believe this was an after-the-fact false excuse in an attempt to explain away Respondents' discriminatory conduct and denial of services."CNN has reached out to HNY Ferry for comment, but has not heard back.The ferry is operated by a company called Hornblower, which could not be reached for comment.Both the NYCEDC and the mayor's office said the city would investigate the incident."Discrimination has no place in our city. The City will investigate these allegations, and if they are proven true, take swift and appropriate action to hold those responsible accountable," a spokesperson for NYCEDC said."Discrimination anywhere is an insult to ALL New Yorkers. My team is looking into this. Bigotry has no place in this city. We will confront it and hold those involved accountable," Mayor Bill de Blasio tweeted.Struggling to explain to their childrenThe women and their children were "embarrassed and humiliated," the complaint said, adding that passengers were watching them as they were barred from boarding.Many of the children were crying and confused about why they weren't allowed on the ferry. The parents have struggled to explain to them why they were treated that way, the complaint said."If we look at the totality of the circumstances, the employees went from labeling and telling these families that they were a security issue to telling them the children were standing on the seats in a previous ferry ride." The narrative has changed "to excuse the discriminatory conduct," said Ahmed Mohamed, an attorney for the Council on American-Islamic Relations.After waiting for two hours, the families say they were allowed to board the ferry, but canceled their plans and went back home to Brooklyn.After filing a complaint to NYC Ferry, the families say that NYC Ferry called the incident a "misunderstanding," and offered to reimburse their fare. 4155

Travel to Cuba has become more difficult -- and more confusing -- for US citizens and travelers subject to American jurisdiction.Cruise ships will no longer be allowed to sail to the Caribbean island, according to a Trump administration announcement Tuesday, and the industry is scrambling to understand the full implications of the policy change.Norwegian Cruise Line said in a statement that the company is "closely monitoring these recent developments and any resulting impact to cruise travel to Cuba. We will communicate to our guests and travel partners as additional information becomes available."Royal Caribbean Cruise Lines announced that it is changing itineraries for June 5 and June 6 sailings that were scheduled to go to Cuba. The cruise line also said it is still evaluating the impact of the announcement.Several other cruise companies did not immediately reply to CNN's request for comment.Confusion surrounding the ban is palpable among cruise companies, travel websites and passengers with tickets to Cuba.Erica Silverstein, a senior editor at cruise review site Cruise Critic says the company is "in a holding pattern, waiting on next steps as cruise lines work to decipher what today's announcement means for their specific products."As far as ticketed passengers go, Silverstein says they are fielding questions on what the ban means for people who've paid in full or who are waiting to make final payments on planned trips to Cuba."It's worth noting that cruise lines are able to swap itineraries relatively quickly. We see it often during inclement weather, or in the wake of disruption in particular regions," Silverstein explains. "While nothing is definitive right now, if the lines are mandated to cancel sailings to Cuba, we'll likely see changes in the form of itinerary adjustments."The Trump administration policy change also eliminates group people-to-people travel (educational and cultural exchanges of a non-academic nature) as an approved sub-category of travel for Americans.The Treasury Department in a statement clarified that "certain group people-to-people educational travel that previously was authorized will continue to be authorized where the traveler had already completed at least one travel-related transaction (such as purchasing a flight or reserving accommodation) prior to June 5, 2019."JetBlue, United Airlines and Southwest Airlines have released statements saying they are reviewing the changes and intend to comply with the new rules.Under former President Barack Obama, rules around travel to Cuba were loosened, making it easier for individual Americans to comply with certain approved categories of travel without a formal application and approval process.President Trump tightened those rules in November 2017, only allowing people-to-people travel in groups traveling under the supervision of a US entity."That sub-category of travel has been eliminated, but there is a grandfathering provision that basically allows US travelers that have, for example, booked a flight or booked rooms and were contemplating doing a people-to-people trip, they are allowed to complete it," said Pedro Freyre, a partner and chair of the international practice at national law firm Akerman, which has cruise lines and airlines among its clients."But that doesn't align with shutting down the ability of the cruises to go in," Freyre said.It's that misalignment that has cruise lines scrambling to figure out how the new policies will impact their operations.And it leaves passengers booked on upcoming sailings in limbo. 3578

This is a very rough game. Most people who have not played at this level will never understand what we put our bodies through season after season. We don’t need the sympathy because this is what we signed up for but to “boo” a man that battled for that city is disgraceful.— Richard Sherman (@RSherman_25) August 25, 2019 335

Today is the final day of keynote presentations for E3 2019, the largest gaming expo of the year. Perhaps the most anticipated announcements came from Nintendo, which always closes the show.The biggest Nintendo news of the day: 240

来源：资阳报