中山感觉肛门下坠的原因-【中山华都肛肠医院】,gUfTOBOs,中山内痔治疗多少钱,中山肛肠科医院在线,中山大便时带血怎么回事,中山为什么会生痔疮,中山微创痔疮治疗,中山大便出血结块

For Monica Cooper, making it on the outside was tougher than she thought it would be. After spending more than a decade behind bars, Cooper came out of prison ready to rebuild her life. She finished college, earned a bachelor's degree to make herself marketable, and set out to find employment.Monica isn't alone. The National Employment Law Project says an estimated 70 million people, or one in three adults, have a prior arrest or conviction record. And while many exit prison ready to rejoin and contribute to their communities, they're often stopped by one little box. On an initial job application, many employers ask if applicants have been convicted of a felony. This forces many returning from incarceration to check yes, explain their conviction, or leave it blank. Advocates say that pesky box is leaving thousands of qualified workers on the shelf. Since 2004, a growing number of states have taken actions to get that box removed. The latest effort is happening in Maryland.Kimberly Haven says she was haunted knowing she'd have to check "yes" on her application for decades after completing her sentence. She's spent years advocating to get rid of that box, first successfully in Baltimore. The first version of the bill was passed in Baltimore City, and then several other counties adopted their own version. Now a statewide bill has made it to the capitol in Annapolis for consideration.Maryland Delegate Nick Mosby is pushing a statewide bill that would get rid of the box on the initial application. An employer can ask about a criminal history in the first interview but must wait to run a background check until a conditional offer has been made. He says it's just about getting employers to meet these applicants face-to-face.Certain jobs, like ones in law enforcement or one that would require you to work with minors, are excluded from the bill. Those who support it say it reduces recidivism and hits an untapped skilled resource. Put simply, they say it's a smart economic decision.But Cailey Locklair Tolle, who testified against the bill, says employers have a right to know up front whether the potential employee has a criminal history.A 2012 ruling at the Equal Employment Opportunities Commission said employers should only consider convictions directly related to a job and whether the applicant is likely to commit the same crime again. The EEOC made discrimination based on conviction records a violation of federal employment law. Maryland hopes to be the 12th state to pass the law mandating the box removal in both the public and private sectors. A federal bill has also been introduced in Congress. Kimberly says laws like these will make the difference to thousands of returning from incarceration every year. 2792
Five "juvenile suspects" have been arrested after a group of what appear to be teens chased, attacked and robbed a girl in Brooklyn Thursday afternoon, the NYPD said Friday.According to police, the 15-year-old girl was approached by the group of unidentified individuals around 4:10 p.m. on Utica Avenue, by the corner of Sterling Place in Crown Heights.The group started to chase the girl before swarming her, jumping on top of her, and then punching and kicking her multiple times, authorities said.The group then snatched the girl's sneakers, cellphone and debit card before fleeing in several directions, officials said.Police investigating after group of teens chase down and viciously attack 15-year-old girl in Crown Heights, 745

Gordon Ramsay's newest London restaurant has become embroiled in a row over alleged cultural appropriation after an Asian food critic accused the celebrity chef of tokenism.Ramsey's restaurant group is preparing to launch Lucky Cat, which 251
Federal officials are considering requiring that all travelers — including American citizens — be photographed as they enter or leave the country as part of an identification system using facial-recognition technology.The Department of Homeland Security says it expects to publish a proposed rule next July. Officials did not respond to requests for more details.Critics are already raising objections.Sen. Edward Markey, D-Mass., said Tuesday he will introduce legislation to block the plan and prohibit U.S. citizens from being forced to provide facial-recognition information. He said a recent data breach at Customs and Border Protection shows that Homeland Security can’t be trusted with the information.Facial recognition is being tested by several airlines at a number of U.S. airports. American citizens are allowed to opt out of being photographed, although a 2017 audit by a federal watchdog agency found that few U.S. travelers exercised that right — barely more than one per flight.Federal law requires Homeland Security to put into place a system to use biometrics to confirm the identity of international travelers. Government officials have made no secret of their desire to expand the use of biometrics, which they say could identify potential terrorists and prevent fraudulent use of travel documents.Homeland Security announced the possibility of expanding biometrics to U.S. citizens in a recent, brief filing. A spokesman for U.S. Customs and Border Protection, part of Homeland Security, said there would be a chance for the public to comment on any change in regulations.In a November 2018 report, Homeland Security said facial recognition is the best biometric approach at borders because it can be done quickly and “with a high degree of accuracy.” The agency said privacy risks “are mostly mitigated.” Photos used to match Americans to their identities are deleted within 12 hours, according to the report.Jay Stanley, a policy analyst for the American Civil Liberties Union, said the government has told the public and Congress repeatedly that American citizens would be exempt from mandatory biometric screening.“This new notice suggests that the government is reneging on what was already an insufficient promise,” Stanley said in a statement. “Travelers, including U.S. citizens, should not have to submit to invasive biometric scans simply as a condition of exercising their constitutional right to travel.” 2449
Footage captured by a doorbell camera in San Bernardino, California, shows the panic many in the state endured this week due to the threat of wildfires.The footage shows a neighbor pounding on a door, warning people inside about an approaching wildfire on Thursday morning."Henry, get up! Henry, the fire, the hill's on fire!" the neighbor yells.Later, the footage captures the wildfire creeping dangerously close to the house. Embers from the blaze fly into the frame and dance on the porch.The fire destroyed or damaged six homes and two outbuildings.San Bernardino County Fire Chief Don Trapp says about 500 homes have were evacuated since the fire started in the foothills before dawn Thursday, and winds drove it down into the city.The 200-acre blaze is one of two new wildfires burning in the inland region east of Los Angeles.In the nearby city of Jurupa Valley, an early morning blaze has grown to 150 acres. It has destroyed three homes and forced evacuations. 981
来源:资阳报