中山偶尔便血便血是什么原因中山拉血怎么办啊,中山肛周脓肿治疗,中山大便出鲜红色血怎么办,中山女性肛门出血,中山痣疮医院,中山那家肛肠医院好,中山大便发黑是什么原因

Deval Patrick officially announced a late-entry 2020 presidential campaign on Thursday, thrusting the former Massachusetts governor into an already crowded field of Democratic candidates less than three months before the Iowa caucuses and New Hampshire primary."In a spirit of profound gratitude for all the country has given to me, with a determination to build a better, more sustainable, more inclusive American Dream for the next generation, I am today announcing my candidacy for President of the United States," Patrick said in a video on his official website.The announcement is a stark reversal for Patrick, who decided in December 2018 657

Developing: Lois Augsburger tells me she found a little boy asleep in this box (meant for the neighborhood cats) on the front porch of her Potomac home this morning when she came out to grab the paper. @BPDAlerts are still looking for his parents. @WKBW pic.twitter.com/rzNgjzgHSf— Ali Touhey (@Ali2e) September 16, 2019 332

CNN is hosting the second set of Democratic presidential debates Tuesday and Wednesday, taking place in Detroit.20 Democrats will take the stage over two nights. The first night will, for the first time, offer a match-up between Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren and Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, the two top progressives in the Democratic primary. The second night will offer a rematch of former Vice President Joe Biden and California Sen. Kamala Harris, whose clash over race became the most closely watched moment of the first round of debates.For a large part of the Democratic field outside of the top-tier candidates, the pair of debates will be one of the last chances to make an impression on a national audience. The Democratic National Committee raised the threshold to qualify for the fall debates, meaning many of the candidates run the risk of not making the stage in September and October.Here's how to watch:When are the debates?CNN's Democratic presidential primary debates will be held on Tuesday, July 30, and Wednesday, July 31, starting at 8 p.m. ET and ending around 10:30 p.m. ET.How can I watch them?CNN's Democratic presidential debates will air exclusively on CNN and will stream live in their entirety, without requiring log-in to a cable provider, exclusively to 1304

CINCINNATI, Ohio — Comprehensive multi-platform reporting and collaboration with news outlets are trends among winners of the 2018 Scripps Howard Awards. "Their work embodies the meaning of journalism that brings important truths to light, holds the powerful accountable and changes our world," said a release from the Scripps Howard Foundation. Winners of its 66th awards competed in 15 categories. The Scripps Howard Foundation will present more than 0,000 in prize money to the winning organizations and journalists at its annual awards show on April 18 in Cincinnati. Here are the winners for this year:Breaking News: South Florida Sun Sentinel (Deerfield Beach) for “Parkland: A Breaking News Story that Demanded a Long-Term Commitment” – Coverage of the shooting at Marjorie Stoneman Douglas High School.Judges’ comments: “Breaking news coverage is not often an area where demonstrable impact can be shown, but the Sun Sentinel’s dogged real-time pursuit of every angle of the breaking story and underlying contributors to this tragedy has had a lasting impact on Parkland, on journalism and on the national conversation about guns in America.” Finalists: The Kansas City (Missouri) Star – “Tragedy on Table Rock Lake”; Pittsburgh Post-Gazette – “Tree of Life Shooting” Broadcast – Local Coverage: KNTV (San Jose, California) for “Transgender Kids: A Changing Student Body” – A story exploring the issue of transgender reassignment decisions. Judges’ comments: “The winner in this category, in part, wins for taking on a subject that, 20 years from now we will likely look back on and wonder why it was a subject at all. We were most impressed at the mature, non-sensational way this story treated the subject.” Finalists: KARE (Minneapolis) – “A Pattern of Denial”; KUSA (Denver) – “Lien on Me” Broadcast – National, International Coverage: MSNBC for “Putin’s Covert War” – An investigation into the main players in the 2016 election meddling story. Judges’ comments: “MSNBC reporter Richard Engle goes inside one of the most important and hard-to-crack stories of our time – the spread of Russian influence on international affairs and on U.S. politics. He shows, through audio recordings, for example, how American troops confront Russian-hired mercenaries in Syria, and he tracks down a former KGB spy turned double agent now living in London to learn more about how Russia put out ‘hit contracts’ on opponents.” Finalists: Frontline PBS and ProPublica – “Documenting Hate”; Vice News – “After the Fall” Business/Financial Reporting: International Consortium of Investigative Journalists, NBC News Investigative Unit, Associated Press and more than 50 media partners for “Implant Files” – An investigation into the medical devices and implants industry and its related injuries and deaths. Judges’ comments: “Excellently planned, researched, documented, reported and written with key findings highlighted throughout. The compelling personal stories of patients give life to the numbers.”Finalists: Bloomberg – “Sign Here to Lose Everything”; Reveal from the Center for Investigative Reporting, PRX, Associated Press and PBS NewsHour – “Kept Out” Community Journalism: Knoxville (Tennessee) News Sentinel for “The Devastation of TVA’s Coal Ash Spill” – Coverage of the workers who were sickened cleaning up the country’s worst coal ash spill. Judges’ comments: “Reporter Jamie Satterfield delivers excellent watchdog work that truly holds the powerful accountable. Her investigation is deeply reported and swarms all the important angles. The series of stories were well sourced and contained videos with on-the-record accounts that hit viewers between the eyes. Satterfield’s extraordinary efforts result in change-inducing and life-saving journalism.” Finalists: The Marshall Project and Tennessean (Nashville) – “Tennessee’s ‘Safekeepers’”; The Post and Courier (Charleston, South Carolina) – “Minimally Adequate” Environmental Reporting: National Geographic for “Planet or Plastic?” – Reporting on the alarming volume of plastic in our world. Judges’ comments: “National Geographic’s ‘Planet or Plastic?’ has catapulted the conversation onto a global platform by creating awareness and catalyzing action. Journalism like this shines a light on policy flaws and irresponsible manufacturing and empowers citizens and communities to be proactive about protecting our environment and the people and animals it supports.” Finalists: Center for Public Integrity, The Texas Tribune (Austin), Newsy and Associated Press – “Blowout: Inside America’s Energy Gamble”; Charleston (West Virginia) Gazette-Mail and ProPublica – “The New Power Brokers: West Virginia’s Natural Gas Industry” Distinguished Service to the First Amendment: The Dallas Morning News for “Pain and Profit” – An investigation into the failures in Texas’ privatized Medicaid system. Judges’ comments: "The impact of the investigation is impressive. Sick people are getting the services they are entitled to; the state has spent million on 100 new regulators; the legislature is considering a package of bills expected to lead to a crackdown on companies that deny medically needed services…none of this could have been accomplished without the use of public records requests and resourceful use of duplicate records held by other states when their requests were denied.” Finalists: Atlanta Journal-Constitution and WSB-TV (Atlanta) – “How Atlanta Trampled the Public’s Right to Know”; The Denver Post – “Shrouded Justice” Human Interest Storytelling: The New York Times and ProPublica for “Blood Will Tell” – An investigation of a forensic technique used in the criminal justice system, despite concerns about its reliability. Judges’ comments: “Extraordinary storytelling with careful selection and organization of a massive amount of material. The story somehow manages to present a troubling indictment of blood spatter analysis and its misuse in our courts — and at the same time, to tell the deeply human tragedy of this husband and wife and all those decades the man spent in prison.” Finalists: The New York Times – “Lost in the Storm”; Univision – “America First: The Legacy of an Immigration Raid” Innovation: BBC for “Anatomy of a Killing” – A project that used forensic analysis of viral video footage to prove the occurrence of a series of executions in Cameroon, Africa.Judges’ comments: “This is a story where the innovation was integral to the journalism instead of just enhancing the story. This investigation done from laptops in London taps readily available digital tools to show the potential power of investigative journalism when traditional skills are paired up with modern digital resources. The genesis of this project – a video that went viral – is one that can serve as a replicable model for other newsrooms.” Finalists: The New York Times – “Visual Forensics”; South Florida Sun Sentinel – “Parkland” Investigative Reporting: Reuters for “Myanmar Burning” – Reporting on the expulsion of Rohingya Muslims in Myanmar. Judges’ comments: “Brave, intrepid collection of reporting. Reporters Wa Lone and Kyaw Soe Oo gathered comprehensive evidence from survivors, witnesses and families of the victims to tell the story of atrocities that may otherwise not have been brought to light. The reporters remain imprisoned in Myanmar, but the work they began resonated throughout the world.” Finalists: Star Tribune (Minneapolis) – “Denied Justice”; The Wall Street Journal – “Trump’s Hush Money” Multimedia Journalism: Frontline PBS and The GroundTruth Project for “The Last Generation: An Interactive Film on the Marshall Islands” – A collaborative reporting project on climate change and its effect on the population of the Marshall Islands.Judges’ comments: “Frontline and GroundTruth introduce viewers to this issue through the lens of a generation of children on the Marshall Islands, their lives likely be displaced by rising waters. Using a smartly presented mix of documentary video, explainer text and illustrated graphics to present the science, ‘The Last Generation’ gives a space for these kids to articulate what climate change means for their futures. And as viewers navigate through the story, they might also glimpse their own potential fate." Finalists: The Oregonian/OregonLive.com (Portland) – “Ghosts of Highway 20”; South Florida Sun Sentinel – “Unprepared and Overwhelmed” Opinion: Palestine (Texas) Herald-Press for “What Are They Hiding?” – Commentary that questioned two issues affecting the Palestine community: an athletic commission’s treatment of a football player and the state of Texas’ rush to execute condemned prisoners. Judges’ comments: “In their clarity and detail, the editorials would be worthy of the best efforts of the largest metro newspapers in America. The fact that they were all published by a small Texas paper with less than a 10,000 circulation is an example of journalism that speaks truth to power when doing so could invite truly unpleasant consequences.”Finalists: Bloomberg – Tim O’Brien columns for Bloomberg Opinion; Capital Gazette (Annapolis, Maryland) – “Capital Gazette Shooting and Aftermath” Radio/Podcast: Michigan Radio for “Believed” – A podcast that tells the stories of survivors of abuse by former Olympic gymnastics doctor Larry Nassar. Judges’ comments: “The lifelong costs and consequences of childhood sexual abuse were made vividly, urgently clear in the superb Michigan Radio series ‘Believed.’ Using interrogation tapes, archival audio and in-depth interviews with the victims and their families, the Michigan Radio reporters skillfully led listeners through a staggering loss of innocence.” Finalists: WBEZ-FM (Chicago) and Chicago Tribune – “16 Shots”; WNYC Studios – “Aftereffect” Topic of the Year: Midterm Elections: Vice News for “She’s Running” – A four-part web series on female candidates running for office in the 2018 midterm elections. Judges’ comments: “What Vice News did so impressively in its series “She’s Running” was document just how hard it is to be a young female candidate running for the first time on her own terms – and winning. Each episode was filled with candid moments that revealed what it takes to run for office. We were impressed by Vice’s choice to do this in a non-narrated way, giving the viewer front-row seats to the unfolding drama of this race."Finalists: CBS News: “60 Minutes” – “As Texas Goes”; The Washington Post – “Midterm Election” Visual Journalism: Marcus Yam of the Los Angeles Times for his newspaper photojournalism portfolio. Judges’ comments: “Each submission demonstrated his mastery of key photographic elements such as light, composition and an intimacy that builds a visual narrative that draws the reader in and connects you to the subjects so that one feels their plight and our shared humanity. In this, he fulfilled one of journalism’s highest principles, giving voice to the voiceless.” Finalists: David Goldman photography portfolio for the Associated Press; BBC – “Trail of the Deadly Drug Trade” Journalism Education AwardsThe Scripps Howard Foundation, in partnership with the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, also announced the winners of its two journalism education awards:Teacher of the Year: Jinx Broussard – Manship School of Mass Communication, Louisiana State University (Baton Rouge) Finalists: Kathleen Culver – School of Journalism and Mass Communication, University of Wisconsin-Madison; Meenakshi Gigi Durham – School of Journalism and Mass Communication, University of Iowa (Iowa City)Administrator of the Year: Dean Diane McFarlin – College of Journalism and Communications, University of Florida (Gainesville) Finalist: Director Judy Oskam – School of Journalism and Mass Communication, Texas State University (San Marcos) 11825

Donald Trump signed an executive order Thursday afternoon aimed at improving transparency and promoting free speech on college campuses, part of a largely symbolic gesture to the President's conservative base announced at a conference for conservative activists earlier this month."We're here to take historic action to defend American students and American values. They are under siege," Trump said during a signing event at the East Room of the White House."Every year the federal government provides educational institutions with more than billion dollars in research funding, all of that money is now at stake. That's a lot of money. They're going to have to not like your views a lot, right?" Trump said. "If a college or university does not allow you to speak, we will not give them money."The order, a senior administration official told reporters on a call previewing the signing, is part of the President's vision of "making higher education more transparent and holding institutions more accountable."Cabinet officials, state officials, more than 100 students, as well as conservative policy group leaders and free speech advocates attended the event.Education Secretary Betsy DeVos, who attended the signing, said the executive order "demonstrates this administration's commitment to supporting and empowering students with meaningful resources as they pursue their life-long learning journeys and future careers."Earlier in his presidency, Trump called for bumping up further restrictions on the press by "opening up" libel laws. However, Trump's new executive order is happening against the backdrop of conservative voices highlighting instances of alleged violence directed toward student activists in viral videos on social media.The official speaking to press on Thursday would not comment on recent incidents, saying only that Trump "is fully committed to free speech on college campuses."Aside from certification, the official would not offer key details -- including how the order would be implemented or enforced, as well as how much grant money will be affected or what specific language higher education institutions are being told to agree to. It's largely unclear how the measure will affect college campuses in practice.But the order also aims to provide transparency to students on the financial risk of attending specific colleges and universities, including adding program level earnings, debt and loan default and repayment rates to the federal College Scorecard started under the Obama administration.The President first announced his intention to sign an executive order on the issue at the Conservative Political Action Conference earlier this month -- an annual gathering of conservative activists near Washington."Today, I am proud to announce that I will be very soon signing an executive order requiring colleges and universities to support free speech if they want federal research funds," Trump said then, adding that if schools do not comply, "it will be very costly."Conservative activist and Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk told CNN he will be at the White House for the executive order signing.Turning Point USA works to train conservative students to protest and organize more effectively with conferences across the country.The President's son, Donald Trump Jr., who is close with Kirk, praised him in a Thursday morning tweet."Great work by @TPUSA and @charliekirk11 who have been pushing this since the first time I met him years ago," he wrote.Sarah Ruger, the director of the toleration and free expression division of the Charles Koch Institute, a Libertarian-leaning policy group, said the group is "concerned that wrongly framing censorship as an ideological issue works against efforts to foster open intellectual environments on campus.""For continued progress to be possible, we must have a vanguard to defend speech that's above partisanship," she said.The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE), a group focused on freedom of speech and religion in academia, said in a statement that the executive order "should be uncontroversial.""FIRE will watch closely to see if today's action furthers the meaningful, lasting policy changes that FIRE has secured over two decades — or results in unintended consequences that threaten free expression and academic freedom," the statement said. "We note that the order does not specify how or by what standard federal agencies will ensure compliance, the order's most consequential component. FIRE has long opposed federal agency requirements that conflict with well-settled First Amendment jurisprudence. We will continue to do so." 4663