中山屁眼处出血中山拉肚子拉好多血,中山大便出血是什么原因但不痛不痒,中山屁眼长了中指大的包的怎么回事,中山上厕所上不出来怎么办,中山外痔治疗的费用是多少,中山痔疮的的医院,中山华都肛泰医院院长

(KGTV) -- A project that would create thousands of homes in San Diego County is heading to the ballot on March 3. If approved, Measure B, also known as Newland Sierra, would affirm the San Diego County Board of Supervisors’ unanimous approval of the changes to the general plan. The project includes 2,135 homes, 60 percent of which would be affordable for working families, according to Kenneth Moore, a spokesperson for the Yes on B campaign. The project would be built just off I-15 next to the cities of Escondido, San Marcos, and Vista. Newland Sierra also preserves more than 60 percent of the property as permanent open space. RELATED: Newland Sierra promises to prioritize first-responders for new homesCurrently, the general plan includes only 99 homes and designates as much as two million square feet of commercial property.If voters do pass Measure B, the permitting process will take 18 to 24 months, according to Moore. It would take another six to seven years to construct the entire project. Moore says construction on the infrastructure could begin as early as late 2021 or 2022. New homes would then start being sold and under construction by 2024. If the measure doesn’t get approved, however, Moore says that’s it for Newland Sierra. “Somebody could then move forward with the development of the current general plan zoning that allows a massive commercial development and estate homes," Moore says. RELATED: Developer pushes to rally support for vote on large North County housing development “Voting Yes on Measure B would create affordably priced homes for working families with open space, parks and trails - a better choice than the current General Plan that permits a two million square foot mega-commercial development, mansions and parking lots,” said Moore. Still, those in opposition say the project would create wildfire dangers, noise pollution, and traffic congestion. Much of the opposition is also being led by the neighboring Golden Door resort. "The developer stands to make more than a billion dollars, and the vast majority of homes will require a six-figure salary to afford," said a spokesperson in a statement to 10News. 2179

SAN DIEGO (KGTV and CNS) — A felony assault charge with a hate crime allegation has been filed against a man who allegedly assaulted a 16-year-old Syrian refugee and used a racial epithet during the attack while the two rode a San Diego trolley.Adrian Vergara, 26, pleaded not guilty to the charge Thursday afternoon.Vergara hid from view Thursday with his head down, at one point standing on the table with his back to the judge. RELATED: Man accused of San Diego trolley hate crime has long rap sheetProsecutors say the victim was on the trolley speaking to his friend in Arabic when Vergara reportedly asked “what trash are you speaking.” When the victim replied that he was speaking Arabic, Vergara reportedly hit the man repeatedly in the face. "The defendant started saying 'F***ing' Arabs, and he began assaulting the teenager while he sat on the trolley," said deputy district attorney Leonard Trinh. Trinh says Vergara hit the boy 5 to 6 times, causing minor injuries to below his eye. RELATED: Man accused of attacking Syrian refugee aboard trolley car arrestedThe victim has not come forward, but released a statement Wednesday through an agency. "My parents brough us to this country so that we may be safe and go to school and have better lives, and this attack brought fear to them," the victim said. "However, I am very happy I reported this crime and that the attacker was found."Vergara is being held without bail because he violated probation for a prior robbery and vehicle theft. He faces up to 11 years in prison if convicted of the assault by force likely to cause great body injury, which carries hate crime escalation. RELATED: Teen attacked on trolley in possible hate crime10News Wednesday learned that Vergara has a history of violence. In 2012, documents say he threatened a man with a club. In 2013, Vergara completed an anger management program. In 2015, a case was dismissed accusing Vergara of attacking another man and in 2016, he was charged with grand theft and burglary for breaking into the Central Library. In late 2016, documents show Vergara violated a restraining order against his ex-girlfriend, kicking her front door, texting her and in a phone call, cursing at her and saying, "if you don't talk to me I'm going to go to your job and cause a scene. I don't care about my life."Documents show he called her 20 times in 30 minutes.Court documents also show a carjacking charge at the beginning of 2017.Later in 2017, Vergara was charged for beating a man at the MTS Imperial Transit Center. The most recent document shows he violated a court order, put in place to prevent domestic violence in January 2019. 2659

(CNN) -- California is the latest state to allow people to take home and eat animals they accidentally hit on the road, including deer, elk, pronghorn antelopes and wild pigs.Senate Bill 395 was among a handful of other bills Gov. Gavin Newsom signed into law last week.The bill, brought forth by Sen. Bob Archuleta, authorizes the state's Fish and Game Commission to develop a pilot program which, through the help of an online portal, would issue free permits to anyone who wants to take the animal they killed on the road home to eat.To get permits, residents would have to record in the portal "the location, type, and description of the animal salvaged, the date and time of salvage, the basic characteristics of the incident and a description of the vehicle involved... and the destination where the carcass will be transported," the legislation says.More than 20,000 deer are hit on California roadways each year, the bill says."This potentially translates into hundreds of thousands of pounds of healthy meat that could be used to feed those in need."The program will not start immediatelyThe commission can only start creating the pilot program -- which would cover limited areas of the state -- once it receives funding from the legislature.The legislation merely gives the commission authority to create the program, and once created, it would cover a maximum of three areas identified as having a high number of vehicle-animal collisions.The commission will have until January 1, 2022 to create the program, if it receives funds.Archuleta says the law would help the California Department of Transportation and the Department of Fish and Wildlife "identify where roadway defenses can be enhanced and where future wildlife highway over-crossings should be located."Once this experimental program concludes, the bill says, officials will report to the commission the number of collisions during a certain time period, barriers to their collection of data and whether it's possible to make the system state-wide, as well as the estimated costs.The information, it says, could help find ways to prevent collisions.This is not a new ideaRoadkill salvage legislation has been passed in more than 20 states across the country, including Florida, Washington state, North Carolina and Pennsylvania.Illinois passed its roadkill salvage law in 2012.Most states, like California's rules, provide provisions on which animals may be taken for personal use and clarify whether a permit is required.Montana's law, for example, allows free salvage permits to be issued only for deer, elk, moose and antelope that were killed by cars.Michigan, which adopted its roadkill legislation in 2014, listed feedback received on the bill, including exposing residents to potential health risks."Drivers and law enforcement officers may not be able to make a determination of whether meat from game killed in a motor vehicle accident is safe for people to handle or eat," a memorandum says. "Furthermore, fresh meat must be properly dressed and stored relatively quickly in order to avoid the growth of potential pathogens."Legislators also warned that poachers may use the new law to unlawfully kill wild animals.Other states that allow the practice include Arizona, New Jersey, South Dakota, Wisconsin, Idaho, Oregon and Vermont.The pros and cons?Some animal rights activists seem to love the idea.PETA says eating roadkill is a "superior option to the neatly shrink-wrapped plastic packages of meat in the supermarket."Eating roadkill, the organization says, is much healthier than packaged meat as those animals most likely haven't consumed antibiotics, hormones and growth stimulants.It's also more humane, PETA said, as the animals who were killed on roads did not have to endure things like getting "castrated, dehorned, or debeaked without anesthesia" and other traumatizing conditions."Perhaps the animals never knew what hit them," the organization said.But other groups have raised concerns.The new legislation may prompt elk and antelope hunters who struggle getting a tag in the state to now kill the animals and report it as roadkill, the California Fish and Game Wardens' Association has previously said, according to CNN affiliate KOVR.Another concern the association raised was the safety of drivers who would stop on roadways and exit their vehicles in order to collect the animals. 4392

SAN MARCOS, Calif. (KGTV) - Upset parents are scrambling after the owner of a beloved preschool and daycare says she will be forced to shut down in a few weeks. ?18-month-old Merrick lights up when he goes to his daycare. More than a year ago, Brie Way enrolled her son at Intelli Children, both a daycare and preschool."It's not just a place. It's a home for kids," said Way.The home for more than 70 kids could soon be closing its doors."I feel sad for the children, parents and staff," said Carol Wilson, owner and director of Intelli Chidren.Ceiling stains in many of the classrooms mark the problem. Wilson says the leaky roof she noticed when she moved in eight years ago turned into big problem with this winter's rains, when several floods for them to cause of several occasions. According to Wilson, walls had to be cut out in most of the classrooms. Wilson says after the landlord declined the necessary repairs, she paid for the repairs so she could stay open. She then stopped paying rent early this year."The business was not viable anymore," said Wilson.She says negotiations stalled when her landlord declined a permanent fix and told her she had to close the school in early August. For Way, a single mom, panic is setting in. Affordable, quality child care is hard to find and she fears she'll be in the same boat she was a year ago."I called from Escondido to Oceanside, and found myself on 30 waiting lists ... It needs to stay open. There aren't a lot of good schools like this in the area. It would devastate the community I believe," said Wilson. The landlord declined comment, contending 'eight months of back rent' are still owed him. Wilson says it's closer to five months and she's willing to pay it if the repairs are done.Wilson says she and her husband are at retirement age and would not be opening the school at a new location. 10news has learned someone has stepped forward and expressed interested in taking over the school. More details could be learned next week. 2012

(AP) -- McDonald's is suing Steve Easterbrook, the CEO it ousted last year over an inappropriate relationship with an employee, alleging he covered up relationships with other employees and destroyed evidence.Easterbrook told the company that there were no other similar instances.McDonald's says in a lawsuit that it has since become aware of sexual relationships between Easterbrook and three other employees prior to his termination.The company also says Easterbrook approved a special stock grant for one of those employees worth hundreds of thousands of dollars.An Associated Press message seeing comment was left with Easterbrook's attorney. 655