中山市肛肠医院有哪些中山市内痔咨询,中山肛肠医院在那,中山大便暗红色是什么原因,中山比较好的便血医院,中山哪个医院治混合痔比较好,中山专科痔疮出血治疗,中山痔疮发痒怎么治疗

SAN DIEGO (CNS) -- A prominent local civil rights leader called on the San Diego County Sheriff's Department Monday to fire a deputy who allegedly shared a "lewd and racist and vile" altered photograph of George Floyd taken from the viral video of the Minnesota man's death in police custody.The doctored image showed a nude male "porn star" kneeling on Floyd in place of Minneapolis police Officer Derek Chauvin, who kept his knee on Floyd's neck for nearly nine minutes as the detainee repeatedly protested that he could not breathe, according to NAACP San Diego Branch President Francine Maxwell. Floyd died on Memorial Day.The words "quit resisting" also were added to the picture, Maxwell asserted in a prepared statement.RELATED: Sheriff's employee removed after reportedly sharing vulgar image"The image was lewd and racist and vile and should disturb anyone with a shred of human decency," Maxwell said. "It is simply unacceptable (behavior for) a law enforcement officer."The deputy, whose name has not been confirmed by the Sheriff's Department, allegedly shared the photo via email, according to Maxwell. On June 18, he was suspended pending the completion of an internal investigation into the matter, said Lt. Ricardo Lopez, media relations director for the regional law enforcement agency."We were so disgusted that an employee may have shared such a vulgar image that within minutes we began to take action," Lopez stated. "Hours after being made aware of this incident, the employee was removed from his official duties and had his peace officer authority removed."In calling for the deputy's ouster, Maxwell also cited his shootings of suspects in 2005 and 2006, describing them as excessive and unjustifiable uses of lethal force. She said the lawman "must go" because "this is far from the first time he has shown himself to be an overtly racist and deplorable human being" and because "this (doctored-photo) incident shows he has clearly not changed his evil, racist and hate-filled ways and (that) he is a danger to all residents of the county."The sheriff's spokesman said the department's leaders "understand the public concern" over the episode and "want to bring the matter to a just conclusion as soon as possible." Lopez said."The Sheriff's Department does not tolerate any ... actions by its employees that are a detriment to our core values," Lopez asserted in a statement issued Monday. 2424

SAN DIEGO (CNS) - A pickup truck struck and gravely injured a 70-year-old man today near Horton Plaza, authorities reported.The pedestrian was crossing G Street in downtown San Diego when the vehicle pulled out of a parking structure east of Third Avenue and hit him shortly after 3 p.m, according to police.Medics took the victim to a hospital for treatment of life-threatening injuries, Officer Dino Delimitros said. 426

SAN DIEGO (CNS) - In a 3-1 vote, the San Diego City Council Environment Committee approved a resolution declaring a climate emergency in the city of San Diego Thursday.The resolution has no council action attached, but voting for it is the first step toward getting more meaningful ordinances in front of the full city council. San Francisco, San Jose and Sacramento have all declared climate emergencies. Councilmember Jennifer Campbell, who chairs the environment committee, said the resolution was a necessary process."By passing this resolution today, we'll be joining more than 1,300 other cities in 25 countries in declaring a climate emergency," she said. "Climate change in San Diego is not a what-if, it's what's now."RELATED: San Diego Mayor Faulconer addresses homeless, housing issues in final State of the CityCampbell said that in the last 100 years, San Diego had witnessed nine inches of sea level rise."It's well past the time to sound the alarm," she said.Councilmember Barbara Bry said that when the council passed the Climate Action Plan in 2015 (a comprehensive plan to reduce emissions and take other climate change steps citywide by 2035), it was setting an example. She hoped by passing the resolution, other cities around the country would follow in San Diego's footsteps.RELATED: Lawmakers consider overhaul to California's bottle and can recycling programCouncilmember Scott Sherman, the lone dissenting vote, didn't get into the politics of the resolution, instead voting no on procedural grounds."I have to ask questions, and one of the questions I always ask is what happens after this is passed?" He said.Jordan Beane, Campbell's communications director and the author of the resolution, said that the committee and city staff would take time to "add teeth" to the resolution before bringing any ordinance before the full council.Sherman said, as a rule, he didn't vote for resolutions as they do not enact change. He also said that he would be "looking forward to" staff adding more substantial items before taking a meaningful vote. 2073

SAN DIEGO (CNS) - An East Village couple was behind bars Wednesday for allegedly subjecting a 3-year old child to torture and sexual abuse over a several-month period while caring for the toddler at their home, San Diego police reported.Officers arrested Marcos Javier Ramirez, 27, and 25-year-old Vennesia Ruiz in the Midway area on Tuesday evening, SDPD public-affairs Lt. Shawn Takeuchi said.Ramirez and Ruiz had been entrusted by an acquaintance to care for the child when the abuse allegedly began last October, Takeuchi said. Three months later, the toddler's mother began to suspect that there was abuse occurring and notified the police, the spokesman said.Ramirez was booked on suspicion of lewd acts with a minor, forcible sex with a foreign object, torture and child cruelty, according to jail records. Ruiz was being held on suspicion of two counts of the latter charge. Both were scheduled for arraignment April 6.Takeuchi, who declined to specify the child's gender, described the suspects as "a couple" but said he did not know if they are husband and wife. He also said he was unsure what circumstances led the toddler's mother to hire them as care providers. 1183

SAN DIEGO (CNS) - A La Jolla restaurant owner raped eight women who he either drugged or knew were too intoxicated to consent to sex, a prosecutor said Tuesday, while a defense attorney argued none of the charged sex acts were forced upon the alleged victims, nor was there any evidence that any of the women were drugged.Jurors on Tuesday began deliberating the fate of Daniel Dorado, who is charged with 35 felonies, including rape of an unconscious person and rape of an intoxicated person. He faces nearly 31 years in prison if convicted of all counts, which are charged for rapes that allegedly occurred in 2009, 2014, 2015, 2017 and 2018.The 61-year-old defendant is the owner of Voce del Mare, an Italian restaurant located on La Jolla Boulevard in the Bird Rock area.Dorado is accused of meeting the victims -- who ranged in age from 22 to 58 -- at local bars and restaurants, sometimes under the guise of a job interview for a position at his restaurant, or through dating websites.RELATED:Restaurant owner charged with rape testifiesTrial begins for La Jolla restaurant owner accused of sexual assaultsHe allegedly offered the women spiked beverages, causing them to fall unconscious and later wake up in the middle of or just after sex acts with the defendant.Dorado was taken into custody in March 2018 on suspicion of assaults on four women. The other alleged victims came forward after learning of his arrest.Defense attorney Eric Youngquist said the prosecution had not proven anything regarding the use of date rape drugs, force or threats on Dorado's behalf, and that each of the encounters with the women were consensual.The attorney said no evidence of date rape drugs turned up in any of the alleged victims' systems and contended their supposed symptoms were more indicative of alcohol consumption.RELATED:8 women accuse Bird Rock restaurant owner of sexual assaultNew charges filed against La Jolla restaurant owner accused of rapeDeputy District Attorney Jessica Coto told jurors that even if they didn't believe the victims were given date rape drugs, evidence from the trial indicated the women drank enough to become noticeably unable to consent -- in some cases vomiting on themselves or rendered unable to stand or walk -- yet Dorado decided to have sex with them anyway."You can't consent to something you don't know is happening to you," Coto said. "You can't make a choice if you are not aware what is happening."Youngquist questioned the motivations of some of the alleged victims, particularly some who were allegedly raped following job interviews at Dorado's restaurant, then proceeded to work for him even after the alleged assaults, but were later fired from their jobs.RELATED: La Jolla restaurant owner accused of sexual assault makes first court appearanceMore women come forward about La Jolla restaurant owner accused of rapeOne of the victims dated Dorado for months following her initial meeting with him, in which she told investigators she had drinks with him, became very intoxicated and collapsed, and later woke up naked in a hotel room, the defense attorney said.Youngquist alleged she was essentially told by police and prosecutors that she was raped, but later testified at trial that she didn't consider herself a victim. Quoting his co-counsel Kim Santini's opening statements, Youngquist contended the charges were the result of "an overzealous district attorney and (a) detective" who planted the notion of drugging into the alleged victims' minds. The attorney emphasized that some of the victims used similar language to describe their symptoms, such as feeling "heavy" or "disassociated."Youngquist also alleged some of the accusers were seeking civil, monetary damages from Dorado, though Coto said only one of the victims ever sued Dorado and has since dropped the lawsuit.RELATED: Woman accuses La Jolla restaurant owner of rape comes forward, talks only to 10NewsCoto questioned what she said were shifting stories on the defendant's behalf between his testimony at trial, conversations with police, and pre- textual phone conversations with some of the victims. At various points, the prosecutor alleged Dorado denied having any sexual contact with the women, then later admitted having consensual sex."If everything was consensual, why deny?" Coto asked the jury. 4336