济南轻度类风湿如何治疗北京类风湿治法,济南强直炎 生小孩,北京强制性脊椎炎跑步,北京上海哪治强直性脊柱炎,山东强直喝酒后复发,济南强直性脊柱炎是不是遗传的,山东类风湿性关节炎是什么原因引起的

Facing backlash, President Donald Trump informally announced outside of the White House on Thursday that his administration would continue funding its share for Special Olympics, mere hours after his Education Secretary Betsy DeVos defended the cuts for a third day in a row. "I've overridden my people, we're funding the Special Olympics," Trump said on Thursday. Trump's proposed budget still needs congressional approval. On Tuesday, DeVos met with lawmakers, and defended the Trump Administration for proposing nearly million in cuts to Special Olympics.DeVos was questioned on the subject by Rep. Mark Pocan, D-Wis., who took issue with DeVos not knowing the number of participants in Special Olympics.“Let me just say that I think Special Olympics is an awesome organization, one that is well supported by the philanthropic sector as well,” DeVos said.According to 2017 figures from Special Olympics, the organization generated nearly 0 million in annual revenue. The majority of its budget comes from donations from individuals and corporations, which totals million a year.DeVos then defended the move as one to save the government money.“We had to make some difficult decisions," she said.A number of prominent celebrities decried DeVos' testimony later on Tuesday."Terrible. We should support athletes with disabilities, not rip away their opportunities," Chelsea Clinton tweeted.On Thursday, before a Senate committee, DeVos once again defended the budget cuts to Special Olympics. "I love Special Olympics myself, I have given a portion of my salary to Special Olympics. I hope all of this debate encourages lots of private contributions to Special Olympics," DeVos said "Let's not use disabled children in a twisted way for your political narrative. That is just disgusting and it's shameful, and I think we should move on from that."While DeVos was delivering testimony, Trump reached the conclusion that the government should provide funding for Special Olympics. "I just told my people, I want to fund the Special Olympics, and I just authorized a funding of the Special Olympics," he said. "I've been to the Special Olympics, I think it's incredible."According to Special Olympics, its mission is "to provide year-round sports training and athletic competition in a variety of Olympic-type sports for children and adults with intellectual disabilities, giving them continuing opportunities to develop physical fitness, demonstrate courage, experience joy and participate in a sharing of gifts, skills and friendship with their families, other Special Olympics athletes and the community." 2628

FRANKLIN, Tenn. — Two boys in Tennessee are getting national attention after their mother shared video of them escaping from their cribs. Ashley Wilson, who runs a lifestyle blog on Facebook, said that she and her husband were asleep one morning when the motion alert went off in her younger son Wilder’s room. 323

For the the second straight year, Liam and Emma are the most popular names for American babies, according to the Social Security Administration.The SSA unveiled the most popular baby names for 2018 in a video on Friday.2018 marked the fifth straight year in which Emma was the most popular name for girl babies in America. It was the the second straight year Liam was the most popular boy name.In fact, the top four boy and girl names went unchanged between 2017 and 2018. Liam, Noah William, James, went unchanged as the top four for boys, while Emma, Olivia, Ava and Isabella held down the fort for girl names.The biggest loser in the top 10 for boys was "Logan," which fell from fifth place to 10th. On the girls' side, Evelyn dropped from eighth to 10th.See the top 10 boy and girl names in the list below:Male name:LiamNoahWilliamJamesOliverBenjaminElijahLucasMasonLoganFemale name:EmmaOliviaAvaIsabellaSophiaCharlotteMiaAmeliaHarperEvelynThe data released is obtained from records on Social Security card applications as of March 2019.To see the most popular names by birth year, or where your name ranks, click here. 1135

For the the second straight year, Liam and Emma are the most popular names for American babies, according to the Social Security Administration.The SSA unveiled the most popular baby names for 2018 in a video on Friday.2018 marked the fifth straight year in which Emma was the most popular name for girl babies in America. It was the the second straight year Liam was the most popular boy name.In fact, the top four boy and girl names went unchanged between 2017 and 2018. Liam, Noah William, James, went unchanged as the top four for boys, while Emma, Olivia, Ava and Isabella held down the fort for girl names.The biggest loser in the top 10 for boys was "Logan," which fell from fifth place to 10th. On the girls' side, Evelyn dropped from eighth to 10th.See the top 10 boy and girl names in the list below:Male name:LiamNoahWilliamJamesOliverBenjaminElijahLucasMasonLoganFemale name:EmmaOliviaAvaIsabellaSophiaCharlotteMiaAmeliaHarperEvelynThe data released is obtained from records on Social Security card applications as of March 2019.To see the most popular names by birth year, or where your name ranks, click here. 1135

Former New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg has decided against running for president in 2020, he announced on Tuesday."As I've thought about a possible presidential campaign, the choice before me has become clear. Should I devote the next two years to talking about my ideas and record, knowing that I might never win the Democratic nomination? Or should I spend the next two years doubling down on the work that I am already leading and funding, and that I know can produce real and beneficial results for the country, right now? I've come to realize that I'm less interested in talking than doing," he wrote in an opinion piece for Bloomberg."And I have concluded that, for now, the best way for me to help our country is by rolling up my sleeves and continuing to get work done."Bloomberg publicly speculated about a 2020 bid for months, traveling the country to meet with voters and determine whether a bid was possible.Bloomberg told reporters during this public speculation that he was seriously considering a bid, to the point that he decided he would self-fund a campaign."In terms of running for office, I ran three times. I used only my own money, so I didn't have to ask anybody what they wanted in return for a contribution," he told CNN in January. "The public liked that every time they elected me. And, if I ran again, I would do the same thing."Bloomberg's wealth could have been considered a knock against the former New York Mayor, however, given that Democrats like Sen. Elizabeth Warren have demanded that candidates swear off super PACs and self funding.A number of Democratic operatives believed that a Bloomberg campaign would be doomed by the mayor's positions on policing, ties to Wall Street and the fact that he spent much of his time in politics as a Republican and independent. But Bloomberg also would have brought considerable strengths to a campaign, including his work on climate change and guns and the fact that he has spent millions on Democratic causes for years.Bloomberg leaned into his moderate persona in the opinion piece, urging Democrats to nominate someone who could beat Trump, not someone from the far left of the party."It's essential that we nominate a Democrat who will be in the strongest position to defeat Donald Trump and bring our country back together," Bloomberg wrote. "We cannot allow the primary process to drag the party to an extreme that would diminish our chances in the general election and translate into 'Four More Years.' "After leaving the mayor's office in 2012, Bloomberg continued to be an influential and recognizable figure on the national and international political stage in part because of his leadership on climate change and gun safety. He elevated his profile even further last year as he toured the country to speak with voters and local leaders.At many stops, he blasted Trump over his immigration, environmental and economic policies. Not only did Bloomberg devote considerable time to his anti-Trump agenda, but the billionaire flexed his financial muscle to see it through. He spent more than 0 million in an effort to wrest control of the Congress from the Republicans.The success of that effort coupled with positive feedback from voters around the country emboldened Bloomberg and his team of advisers, according to a person familiar with the effort.But still, Bloomberg kept his team and the country guessing about whether he would jump into the presidential race, with a steady stream of news stories feeding speculation. Adding to that, Bloomberg made an overtly political stop in New Hampshire in January, taking questions at popular campaign stops throughout the state.In announcing that he isn't running for president on Tuesday, Bloomberg said he would instead be launching a new campaign called "Beyond Carbon," which he described as a "grassroots effort to begin moving America as quickly as possible away from oil and gas and toward a 100 percent clean energy economy.""At the heart of Beyond Carbon is the conviction that, as the science has made clear, every year matters," he wrote. "The idea of a Green New Deal — first suggested by the columnist Tom Friedman more than a decade ago — stands no chance of passage in the Senate over the next two years. But Mother Nature does not wait on our political calendar, and neither can we."What Bloomberg does with his money beyond his series of outside organizations will be a key question for Democrats in 2020, given that his considerable wealth could tip the balance for a number of candidates in a crowded field. 4572